Variation in echolocation calls of Hipposideros amiger during habituation to a novel, captive environment

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Animals alter their behaviour during habituation to novel environments. Echolocating bats exhibit remarkable flexibility in their acoustic signals to sense diverse microhabitats. Previous studies have described intra-individual variation in echolocation calls of bats in different environments, but few studies have systematically quantified these changes in detail. We investigated variation in echolocation call structure of the great leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros armiger during habituation to a novel, captive environment. Echolocation calls of free-ranging bats were recorded in the natural habitat and in captivity over a three-week period. We found that bats exhibited significant changes in some call parameters following introduction to the novel captive environment, and some parameters changed continuously over time. We observed plasticity in peak frequency, pulse duration and pulse rate during the captive period. This suggests that variation in echolocation calls of bats in response to a novel captive environment is a progressive process, during which bats adjust echolocation call structure to habituate gradually to their surroundings.

Variation in echolocation calls of Hipposideros amiger during habituation to a novel, captive environment

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AldridgeH.D.J.N.ObristM.MerriamH.G.FentonM.B. (1990). Roosting, vocalizations, and foraging by the African bat, Nycteris thebaica. — J. Mammal. 71: 242-246.

BarclayR.M.R.FentonM.B.ThomasD.W. (1979). Social behavior of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus. II. Vocal communication. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6: 137-146.

BarlowK.E.JonesG. (1997). Function of pipistrelle social calls: field data and a playback experiment. — Anim. Behav. 53: 991-999.

BehrendO.SchullerG. (2004). New aspects of Doppler-shift compensation in the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus rouxi. — In: Echolocation in bats and dolphins ( ThomasJ.A.MossC.F.VaterM. eds). University of Chicago PressChicago, IL p.  17-21.

BoughmanJ.W.WilkinsonG.S. (1998). Greater spear-nosed bats discriminate group mates by vocalizations. — Anim. Behav. 55: 1717-1732.

BrodersH.G.FindlayC.S.ZhengL. (2004). Effects of clutter on echolocation call structure of Myotis septentrionalis and M. lucifugus. — J. Mammal. 85: 273-281.

BrummH. (2004). The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. — J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 434-440.

CainP.GerinW.MollerP. (1994). Short-range navigation of the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii L. (Mormyridae, Teleostei), in novel and familiar environments. — Ethology 96: 33-45.

ChenS.F.JonesG.RossiterS.J. (2009). Determinants of echolocation call frequency variation in the Formosan lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus monoceros). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 276: 3901-3909.

GillamE.H.McCrackenG.F. (2007). Variability in the echolocation of Tadarida brasiliensis: effects of geography and local acoustic environment. — Anim. Behav. 74: 277-286.

GriffinD.R. (1958). Listening in the dark. — Yale University PressNew Haven, CT.

GriffinD.R.WebsterF.A.MichaelC.R. (1960). The echolocation of flying insects by bats. — Anim. Behav. 8: 141-154.

GuillénS.A.JusteB.IbáñezC. (2000). Variation in the frequency of the echolocation calls of Hipposideros ruber in the Gulf of Guinea: an exploration of the adaptive meaning of the constant frequency value in rhinolophoid CF bats. — J. Evol. Biol. 13: 70-80.

HiryuS.KatsuraK.NagatoT.YamazakiH.LinL.K.WatanabeY.RiquimarouxH. (2006). Intra-individual variation in the vocalized frequency of the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros terasensis, influenced by conspecific colony members. — J. Comp. Physiol. A 192: 807-815.

HollandR.A.WatersD.A. (2007). The effect of familiarity on echolocation in the megachiropteran bat Rousettus aegyptiacus. — Behaviour 114: 1053-1064.

HoustonR.D.BoonmanA.M.JonesG. (2004). Do echolocation signal parameters restrict bats’ choice of prey? — In: Echolocation in bats and dolphins ( ThomasJ.A.MossC.F.VaterM. eds). University of Chicago PressChicago, IL p.  339-345.

HuffmanR.F.HensonO.W. (1993). Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. I. Concomitant shifts in biosonar emission frequency. — J. Comp. Physiol. A 171: 725-734.

KalkoE.K.V.SchnitzlerH.U. (1993). Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 415-428.

LiuY.FengJ.MetznerW. (2013). Different auditory feedback control for echolocation and communication in horseshoe bats. — PloS One 8: e62710.

MastersW.M.JacobsS.C.SimmonsJ.A. (1991). The structure of echolocation sounds used by the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus: some consequences for echo processing. — J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 1402-1413.

ObristM.K. (1995). Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat and conspecifics on sonar signal design. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 207-219.

ParsonsS. (1998). The effect of recording situation on the echolocation calls of the New Zealand lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata Gray). — New. Zeal. J. Zool. 25: 147-156.

PfalzerG.KuschJ. (2003). Structure and variability of bat social calls: implications for specificity and individual recognition. — J. Zool. 261: 21-33.

SchullerG.PollakG. (1979). Disproportionate frequency representation in the inferior colliculus of Doppler-compensating greater horseshoe bats: evidence for an acoustic fovea. — J. Comp. Physiol. A 132: 47-54.

SiemersB.M.KalkoE.K.V.SchnitzlerH.U. (2001). Echolocation behavior and signal plasticity in the Neotropical bat Myotis nigricans (Schinz, 1821) (Vespertilionidae): a convergent case with European species of Pipistrellus?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 317-328.

SlabbekoornH.SmithT.B. (2002). Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. — Evolution 56: 1849-1858.

SurlykkeA.MillerL.A.MøhlB.AndersenB.B.Christensen-DalsgaardJ.JørgensenM.B. (1993). Echolocation in two very small bats from Thailand: Craseonycteris thonglongyai and Myotis siligorensis. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 1-12.

TakahashiE.HyomotoK.RiquimarouxH.WatanabeY.OhtaT.HiryuS. (2014). Adaptive changes in echolocation sounds by Pipistrellus abramus in response to artificial jamming sounds. — J. Exp. Biol. 217: 2885-2891.

TidemannC.R.PriddelD.M.NelsonJ.E.PettigrewJ.D. (1985). Foraging behaviour of the Australian ghost bat, Macroderma gigas (Microchiroptera: Megadermatidae). — Aust. J. Zool. 33: 705-713.

TrappeM.SchnitzlerH.U. (1982). Doppler-shift compensation in insect-catching horseshoe bats. — Naturwissenschaften 69: 193-194.

VaughanT.A. (1976). Nocturnal behavior of the African false vampire bat (Cardioderma cor). — J. Mammal. 57: 227-249.

VaughanT.A.VaughanR.P. (1986). Seasonality and the behavior of the African yellow-winged bat. — J. Mammal. 67: 91-102.

WilczynskiW.RyanM.J. (1999). Geographic variation in animal communication systems. — In: Geographic variation in behavior ( FosterS.A.EndlerJ.A. eds). Oxford University PressNew York, NY p.  234-261.

WongJ.G.WatersD.A. (2001). The synchronisation of signal emission with wingbeat during the approach phase in soprano pipistrelles. — J. Exp. Biol. 204: 575-583.

WundM.A. (2005). Learning and the development of habitat-specific bat echolocation. — Anim. Behav. 70: 441-450.

WundM.A. (2006). Variation in the echolocation calls of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in response to different habitats. — Am. Midl. Nat. 156: 99-108.

ZbindenK. (1989). Field observations on the flexibility of the acoustic behavior of the European bat Nyctalus noctula. — Rev. Sui. Zool. 96: 335-343.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Spectrum and spectrogram of an echolocation call recorded from the great leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros armiger, flying in the indoor environment. Spectrum and spectrogram were calculated using a 1024-point FFT with 16 bits per sample and a Hamming window. Calls were digitized with an effective sampling rate of 250 kHz.

  • View in gallery

    Mean ± SE for (a) peak frequency, (b) pulse duration and (c) pulse rate of echolocation calls recorded during bats living in the enclosed environment across trials (N=8). The asterisk represents the significant differences between the first day level and the others.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 9
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0