During agonistic interactions, decisions about contest persistence can be informed by assessment of one’s own energy or time expenditure (self-assessment), one’s own expenditure combined with opponent inflicted costs (cumulative assessment), or through information exchange with an opponent (mutual assessment). Females and males can be expected to exhibit different strategies for contest resolution due to contrasting energetic requirements and resource valuation. We examined the assessment strategies crayfish employ during same-sex and mixed-sex fights. Two individuals interacted for 15 min, and fight duration and times spent at various intensity levels were quantified. Results indicated that both sexes employ a self-assessment strategy during same-sex fights. Evidence for assessment during mixed-sex fights was notably weaker, suggesting the resolution of mixed-sex fights involves different behavioural elements and/or sources of information. In species where mixed-sex fights are common year-round, the lack of common rules can lead to greater energy expenditure for both sexes.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Acquistapace P., Aquiloni L., Hazlett B.A., Gherardi F. (2002). Mulitmodal communication in crayfish: sex recognition during mate search by male Austropotamobius pallipes. — Can. J. Zool. 80: 2041-2045.
Arnott G., Elwood R.W. (2009a). Gender differences in aggressive behaviour in convict cichlids. — Anim. Behav. 78: 1221-1227.
Arnott G., Elwood R.W. (2009b). Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. — Anim. Behav. 77: 991-1004.
Batista G., Zubizarreta L., Perrone R., Silva A. (2012). Non-sex-biased dominance in a sexually monomorphic electric fish: fight structure and submissive electric signalling. — Ethology 118: 398-410.
Beck C.A., Bowen W.D., Iverson S.J. (2003). Sex differences in the seasonal patterns of energy storage and expenditure in a phocid seal. — J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 280-291.
Bergman D.A., Kozlowski C.P., McIntyre J.C., Huber R., Daws A.G., Moore P.A. (2003). Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. — Behaviour 140: 805-825.
Bergman D.A., Martin A.L. III, Moore P.A. (2005). Control of information flow through the influence of mechanical and chemical signals during agonistic encounters by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. — Anim. Behav. 70: 485-496.
Bergman D.A., Moore P.A. (2003). Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. — Biol. Bull. 205: 26-35.
Bergman D.A., Moore P.A. (2005). Prolonged exposure to social odours alters subsequent social interactions in crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). — Anim. Behav. 70: 311-318.
Berry F.C., Breighaupt T. (2010). To signal or not to signal? Chemical communication by urine-borne signals mirrors sexual conflict in crayfish. — BMC Biol. 8: 1-11.
Bishop D.T., Cannings C., Smith J.M. (1978). The war of attrition with random rewards. — J. Theor. Biol. 74: 377-388.
Bovbjerg R. (1953). Dominance order in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Hagen). — Physiol. Zool. 26: 173-178.
Breithaupt T. (2001). Fan organs of crayfish enhance chemical information flow. — Biol. Bull. 200: 150-154.
Breithaupt T., Eger P. (2002). Urine makes the difference: chemical commmunication in fighting crayfish made visible. — J. Exp. Biol. 205: 1221-1231.
Briffa M. (2008). Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size? — Anim. Behav. 75: 1053-1062.
Briffa M., Dallaway D. (2007). Inter-sexual contests in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus: females fight harder but males win more encounters. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1781-1787.
Briffa M., Elwood R. (2005). Rapid change in energy status in fighting animals: causes and effects of strategic decisions. — Anim. Behav. 70: 119-124.
Briffa M., Elwood R. (2009). Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assesment in animal contests. — Anim. Behav. 77: 759-762.
Briffa M., Sneddon L.U. (2007). Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. — Funct. Ecol. 21: 627-637.
Briffa M., Williams R. (2008). Use of chemical cues during shell fights in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. — Behaviour 143: 1281-1290.
Bruski C.A., Dunham D.W. (1987). The importance of vision in agonistic communication of the crayfish Orconectes rusticus. — Behaviour 103: 83-107.
Bywater C.L., Angilletta M.J., Wilson R.S. (2008). Weapon size is a reliable indicator of strength and social dominance in female slender crayfish (Cherax dispar). — Funct. Ecol. 22: 311-316.
Callaghan D.T., Weisbord C.D., Dew W.A., Pyle G.G. (2012). The role of various sensory inputs in establishing social hierarchies in crayfish. — Behaviour 149: 1443-1458.
Candolin U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. — Biol. Rev. 78: 575-595.
Clutton-Brock T. (2007). Sexual selection in males and females. — Science 318: 1882-1885.
Cocanour B., Allen K. (1967). Short communication on the breeding cycles of a sand dollar and a sea urchin. — Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 20: 327-331.
Darwin C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. — John Murray, London.
Digby L.J., Kahlenberg S.M. (2002). Female dominance in blue-eyed black lemurs (Eulemur macaco flavifrons). — Primates 43: 191-199.
Draud M., Macias-Ordonez R., Verga J., Itzkowitz M. (2004). Female and male Texas cichlids (Herichthys cyanoguttatum) do not fight by the same rules. — Behav. Ecol. 15: 102-108.
Earley R.L., Hsu Y. (2013). Contest behaviour in fishes. — In: Animal contests ( Hardy I.C.W., Briffa M., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 199-227.
Elias D.O., Botero C.A., Andrade M.C.B., Mason A.C., Kasumovic M.M. (2010). High resource valuation fuels “desperado” fighting tactics in female jumping spiders. — Behav. Ecol. 21: 868-875.
Enquist M., Leimar O. (1983). Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. — J. Theor. Biol. 102: 387-410.
Enquist M., Leimar O., Ljungberg T., Mallner Y., Segerdahl N. (1990). A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala. — Anim. Behav. 40: 1-14.
Faber D.B., Baylis J.R. (1993). Effects of body size on agonistic encounters between male jumping spiders. — Anim. Behav. 45: 289-299.
Fairbairn D.J. (1997). Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 659-687.
Fero K., Moore P.A. (2007). Social spacing of crayfish in natural habitats: what role does dominance play? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1119-1125.
Figler M.H., Blank G.S., Peeke H.V.S. (2001). Maternal territoriality as an offspring defense strategy in Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii, Girard). — Aggr. Behav. 27: 391-403.
Figler M.H., Twum M., Finkelstein J.E., Peeke H.V.S. (1995). Maternal aggression in Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii, Girard): the relation between reproductive status and outcome of aggressive encounters with male and female conspecifics. — Behaviour 132: 107-125.
Fingerman M. (1995). Endocrine mechanisms in crayfish, with emphasis on reproduction and neurotransmitter regulation of hormone release. — Am. Zool. 35: 68-78.
Garcia M., Paiva L., Lennox M., Sivaraman B., Wong S.C., Earley R.L. (2012). Assessment strategies and the effects of fighting experience on future contest performance in the green anole (Anolis carolinensis). — Ethology 118: 821-834.
Gherardi F. (2002). Behaviour. — In: Biology of freshwater crayfish ( Holdich D.M., ed.). Blackwell, Oxford, p. 258-290.
Goubault M., Cortesero A.M., Poinsot D., Wajnberg E., Boivin G. (2007a). Does host value influence female aggressiveness, contest outcome and fitness gain in parasitoids? — Ethology 113: 334-343.
Goubault M., Scott D., Hardy I.C.W. (2007b). The importance of offspring value: maternal defence in parasitoid contests. — Anim. Behav. 74: 437-446.
Hardy I.C.W., Briffa M. (2013). Animal contests. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hazlett B., Rubenstein D., Rittschof D. (1975). Starvation, energy reserves, and aggression in the crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen, 1870) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). — Crustaceana 28: 11-16.
Hazlett B.A. (1985). Chemical detection of sex and condition in the crayfish Orconectes virilis. — J. Chem. Ecol. 11: 181-189.
Holdich D. (2002). Biology of freshwater crayfish. — Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Hsu Y., Lee S., Chen M.H., Yang S.Y., Cheng K. (2008). Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. — Anim. Behav. 75: 1641-1649.
Huntingford F.A., Turner A.K. (1987). Animal conflict. — Springer, New York, NY.
Hurd P.L. (2006). Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling. — J. Theor. Biol. 241: 639-648.
Jennings D.J., Gammell M.P., Payne R.J.H., Hayden T.J. (2005). An investigation of assessment games during fallow deer fights. — Ethology 111: 511-525.
Karavanich C., Atema J. (1998). Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. — Anim. Behav. 56: 1553-1560.
López P., Martín J. (2001). Pheromonal recognition of females takes precedence over the chromatic cue in male Iberian wall lizards. — Ethology 107: 901-912.
Martin A.L. III, Moore P.A. (2010). The influence of reproductive state on the agonistic interactions between male and female crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). — Behaviour 147: 1309-1325.
McComb K., Packer C., Pusey A. (1994). Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. — Anim. Behav. 47: 379-387.
Mesterton-Gibbons M., Heap S.M. (2014). Variation between self- and mutual assessment in animal contests. — Am. Nat. 183: 199-213.
Milner R.N.C., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. (2011). Know thine enemy’s neighbor: neighbor size affects floaters’ choice of whom to fight. — Behav. Ecol. 22: 947-950.
Odell E., Raguso R.A., Jones K.N. (1999). Bumblebee foraging responses to variation in floral scent and color in snapdragons (Antirrhinum: Scrophulariaceae). — Am. Mid. Nat. 142: 257-265.
Otronen M. (1988). Intra- and intersexual interactions at breeding burrows in the horned beetle, Coprophanaeus ensifer. — Anim. Behav. 36: 741-748.
Parker G. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. — J. Theor. Biol. 47: 223-243.
Pavey C.R., Fielder D.R. (1996). The influence of size differntial on agonistic behaviour in the freshwater crayfish, Cherax cuspidatus (Decapoda: Parastacidae). — J. Zool. 238: 445-457.
Payne R.J.H. (1998). Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. — Anim. Behav. 56: 651-662.
Pratt A.E., McLain D.K., Lathrop G.R. (2003). The assessment game in sand fiddler crab contests for breeding burrows. — Anim. Behav. 65: 945-955.
Prenter J., Elwood R.W., Taylor P.W. (2006). Self-assessment by males during energetically costly contests over precopula females in amphipods. — Anim. Behav. 72: 861-868.
Rillich J., Schildberger K., Stevenson P.A. (2007). Assessment strategy of fighting crickets revealed by manipulating information exchange. — Anim. Behav. 74: 823-836.
Rubenstein D.I., Hazlett B.A. (1973). Examination of the agonistic behaviour of the crayfish Orconectes virilis by character analysis. — Behaviour 50: 193-216.
Schneider R.A.Z., Huber R., Moore P.A. (2001). Individual and status recognition in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: the effects of urine release on fight dynamics. — Behaviour 138: 137-153.
Seebacher F., Ward A.J.W., Wilson R.S. (2013). Increased aggression during pregnancy comes at a higher metabolic cost. — J. Exp. Biol. 216: 771-776.
Shine R. (1989). Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. — Q. Rev. Biol. 64: 419-460.
Simon J.L., Moore P.A. (2007). Male–female communication in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus: the use of urinary signals in reproductive and non-reproductive pairings. — Ethology 113: 740-754.
Smith J.M. (1974). The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. — J. Theor. Biol. 47: 209-221.
Smith J.M., Parker G.A. (1976). The logic of aysmmetric contests. — Anim. Behav. 24: 159-175.
Sterck E.H.M., Watts D.P., van Schaik C.P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 291-309.
Stuart-Fox D. (2006). Testing game theory models: fighting ability and decision rules in chameleon contests. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 273: 1555-1561.
Suter R.B. (1985). Intersexual competition for food in the bowl and doily spider, Frontinella pyramitela (Araneae, Linyphiidae). — J. Arachnol. 13: 61-70.
Taylor P.W., Elwood R.W. (2003). The mismeasure of animal contests. — Anim. Behav. 65: 1195-1202.
Thiel M. (2000). Extended parental care behavior in crustaceans — a comparative overview. — In: The biodiversity crisis and Crustacea, Crustacean Issues 12 ( von Vaupel Klein J.C., ed.). A.A. Balkema, Brookfield, VT, p. 211-226.
Tibbets E.A. (2008). Resource value and the context dependence of receiver behaviour. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 275: 2201-2206.
Tokarz R.R. (1985). Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged agonistic encounters between male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). — Anim. Behav. 33: 746-753.
Trivers R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. — In: Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 ( Campbell B.G., ed.). Aldine, Chicago, IL, p. 136-179.
Vincent S.E., Herrel A., Irschick D.J. (2004). Sexual dimorphism in head shape and diet in the cottonmouth snake (Agkistrodon piscivorus). — J. Zool. Lond. 264: 53-59.
Wilson E. (1975). Sociobiology, the new synthesis. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wilson J.D. (1992). Correlates of agonistic display by great tits Parus major. — Behaviour 121: 168-214.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 639 | 69 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 12 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 47 | 16 | 0 |
During agonistic interactions, decisions about contest persistence can be informed by assessment of one’s own energy or time expenditure (self-assessment), one’s own expenditure combined with opponent inflicted costs (cumulative assessment), or through information exchange with an opponent (mutual assessment). Females and males can be expected to exhibit different strategies for contest resolution due to contrasting energetic requirements and resource valuation. We examined the assessment strategies crayfish employ during same-sex and mixed-sex fights. Two individuals interacted for 15 min, and fight duration and times spent at various intensity levels were quantified. Results indicated that both sexes employ a self-assessment strategy during same-sex fights. Evidence for assessment during mixed-sex fights was notably weaker, suggesting the resolution of mixed-sex fights involves different behavioural elements and/or sources of information. In species where mixed-sex fights are common year-round, the lack of common rules can lead to greater energy expenditure for both sexes.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 639 | 69 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 12 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 47 | 16 | 0 |