Reduced cannibalism during male pregnancy

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Cannibalism provides energetic benefits but is also potentially costly, especially when directed towards kin. Since fitness costs increase with time and energy invested in offspring, cannibalism should be infrequent when parental investment is high. Thus, filial cannibalism in male syngnathids, a group known for the occurrence of male pregnancy, should be rare. Using the pipefish (Syngnathus abaster) we aimed to investigate whether cannibalism does occur in both sexes and how it is affected by reproductive and nutritional states. Although rare, we witnessed cannibalism both in the wild and in the laboratory. Unlike non-pregnant males and females, pregnant and post-partum males largely refrained from cannibalising juveniles. Reproducing males decreased their feeding activity, thus rendering cannibalism, towards kin or non-kin, less likely to occur. However, if not continuously fed, all pipefish adopted a cannibal strategy, revealing that sex and life history stages influenced the ratio between the benefits and costs of cannibalism.

Reduced cannibalism during male pregnancy

in Behaviour



BerglundA.RosenqvistG.SvenssonI. (1986). Reversed sex roles and parental energy investment in zygotes of two pipefish (Syngnathidae) species. — Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 29: 209-215.

BlumerL.S. (1979). Male parental care in the bony fishes. — Q. Rev. Biol. 54: 149-161.

BlumerL.S. (1982). A bibliography and categorization of bony fishes exhibiting parental care. — Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 75: 1-22.

BrownD.B. (1972). A comparative life history study of four species of pipefishes (family Syngnathidae). — PhD thesis University of Florida Gainesville FL.

CarcupinoM. (2002). Functional significance of the male brood pouch in the reproductive strategies of pipefishes and seahorses: a morphological and ultrastructural comparative study on three anatomically different pouches. — J. Fish. Biol. 61: 1465-1480.

CunhaM.BerglundA.MonteiroN.M. (2014). The intrinsically dynamic nature of mating patterns and sexual selection. — Environ. Biol. Fish. 98: 1047-1058.

DiekmannO.E.GouveiaL.SerrãoE.A.Van De ViletM.S. (2009). Highly polymorphic microsatellite markers for the black striped pipefish, Syngnathus abaster. — Mol. Ecol. Res. 9: 1460-1466.

Eibl-EibelsfeltI. (1961). The fighting behavior of animals. — Sci. Am. 205: 112-123.

ElgarM.A.CrespiB.J. (1992). Ecology and evolution of cannibalism. — In: Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa ( ElgarM.A.CrespiB.J. eds). Oxford University PressOxford p.  1-12.

ElwoodR.W. (1994). Temporal-based kinship recognition: a switch in time saves mine. — Behav. Process. 33: 15-24.

FitzGeraldG.J. (1992). Filial cannibalism in fishes: why do parents eat their offspring?Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 7-10.

FoxL.R. (1975). Cannibalism in natural populations. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6: 87-106.

HarshmanL.G.ZeraA.J. (2007). The cost of reproduction: the devil in the details. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 80-86.

KvarnemoC.SvenssonO.L.A.ForsgrenE. (1998). Parental behaviour in relation to food availability in the common goby. — Anim. Behav. 56: 1285-1290.

LourdaisO.BrischouxF.ShineR.BonnetX. (2005). Adaptive maternal cannibalism in snakes (Epicrates cenchria maurus, Boidae). — Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 767-774.

MalavasiS.RiccatoF.GeorgalasV.FranzoiP.TorricelliP. (2009). Occurrence and intensity of intercohort cannibalism of post-hatching stages in the broad-nosed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle. — J. Appl. Ichthyol. 25: 479-480.

ManicaA. (2002). Filial cannibalism in teleost fish. — Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 77: 261-277.

MayntzD.ToftS. (2006). Nutritional value of cannibalism and the role of starvation and nutrient imbalance for cannibalistic tendencies in a generalist predator. — J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 288-297.

MehlisM.BakkerT.C.M.FrommenJ.G. (2009). Nutritional benefits of filial cannibalism in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). — Naturwissenschaften 96: 399-403.

MehlisM.BakkerT.C.M.EngqvistL.FrommenJ.G. (2010). To eat or not to eat: egg-based assessment of paternity triggers fine-tuned decisions about filial cannibalism. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 277: 2627-2635.

MonteiroN.AlmadaV.VieiraM. (2005). Implications of different brood pouch structures in syngnathid reproduction. — J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 85: 1235-1241.

PaczoltK.A.JonesA.G. (2010). Post-copulatory sexual selection and sexual conflict in the evolution of male pregnancy. — Nature 464: 401-404.

ParsonsW.ZhongW.RudolfV.H.W. (2013). Mating status and kin recognition influence the strength of cannibalism. — Anim. Behav. 85: 365-369.

PartridgeC.ShardoJ.BoettcherA. (2007). Osmoregulatory role of the brood pouch in the euryhaline Gulf pipefish, Syngnathus scovelli. — Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A: Comp. Physiol. 147: 556-561.

PeakallR.SmouseP.E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research — an update. — Bioinformatics 28: 2537-2539.

PennD.J.FrommenJ.G. (2010). Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory. — In: Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms ( KappelerP. ed.). SpringerBerlin p.  55-85.

PfennigD.W. (1997). Kinship and cannibalism: understanding why animals avoid preying on relatives offers insights into the evolution of social behavior. — BioScience 47: 667-675.

PolisG.A. (1981). The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 225-251.

RipleyJ.L. (2006). Differential parental nutrient allocation in two congeneric pipefish species (Syngnathidae: Syngnathus spp.). — J. Exp. Biol. 209: 1112-1121.

RipleyJ.L.ForanC.M. (2008). Direct evidence for embryonic uptake of paternally-derived nutrients in two pipefishes (Syngnathidae: Syngnathus spp.). — J. Comp. Physiol. B 179: 325-333.

RipleyJ.L. (2009). Osmoregulatory role of the paternal brood pouch for two Syngnathus species. — Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A: Comp. Physiol. 154: 98-104.

RudolfV.H.W.KamoM.BootsM. (2010). Cannibals in space: the coevolution of cannibalism and dispersal in spatially structured populations. — Am. Nat. 175: 513-524.

SagebakkenG.AhnesjoI.MobleyK.B.GoncalvesI.B.KvarnemoC. (2009). Brooding fathers, not siblings, take up nutrients from embryos. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 277: 971-977.

ScobellS.K.MacKenzieD.S. (2011). Reproductive endocrinology of Syngnathidae. — J. Fish. Biol. 78: 1662-1680.

SekinoM.KakehiS. (2012). PARFEX v1.0: an EXCEL™-based software package for parentage allocation. — Conserv. Gen. Resourc. 4: 275-278.

SilvaK.MonteiroN.AlmadaV.VieiraM. (2006). Early life history of Syngnathus abaster. — J. Fish. Biol. 68: 80-86.

SimpsonS.J.SwordG.A.LorchP.D.CouzinI.D. (2006). Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 4152-4156.

SmithC.ReayP. (1991). Cannibalism in teleost fish. — Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1: 41-64.

TeixeiraR.L.MusickJ.A. (1995). Trophic ecology of two congeneric pipefishes (Syngnathidae) of the lower York River, Virginia. — Environ. Biol. Fish. 43: 295-309.

VinyolesD.CôtéI.M.De SostoaA. (1999). Egg cannibalism in river blennies: the role of natural prey availability. — J. Fish. Biol. 55: 1223-1232.

WilsonA.B.VincentA.C.J.AhnesjoI.MeyerA. (2001). Male pregnancy in seahorses and pipefishes (family Syngnathidae): rapid diversification of paternal brood pouch morphology inferred from a molecular phylogeny. — J. Hered. 92: 159-166.


  • View in gallery

    Average number of Artemia nauplii consumed within 2 min according to sex and male mating status in S. abaster (PM, pregnant males; PPM, post-pregnant males; NPM, non-pregnant males; F, females). Error bars depict standard errors and an asterisk indicates groups that are similar.

  • View in gallery

    Cannibalism according to sex and male mating status in S. abaster (PM, pregnant males; PPM, post-partum males; NPM, non-pregnant males; F, females). Error bars depict standard errors and an asterisk indicates groups that are similar.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 23 23 7
Full Text Views 85 85 54
PDF Downloads 6 6 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0