Boldness reflects consistent individual differences in risk-taking behavior across various contexts. However, evaluating this basic assumption has largely been neglected in birds. In a captive monk parakeet population (Myiopsitta monachus; ), we undertook an analysis of 7 measures across 3 commonly used boldness assays (i.e., novel object, emergence, and predator-exposure tests). Using principal component analysis, we derived 3 components (PCs). PC-2 loaded strongly with measures from emergence and predator-exposure tests; we interpreted it as the closest approximation of boldness. PC-1 and PC-3 described different aspects of feeding such as foraging activity and rate, respectively. Finally, we assessed the predictive power of each measure that loaded significantly on the boldness axis. We found that no single metric explained even %55 of the variation in PC-2, nor could more than %50 individuals at the extremes of the spectrum be predicted. Our results demonstrate the utility of an inclusive approach in personality research.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Andersson A., Laikre L., Bergvall U.A. (2014). Two shades of boldness: novel object and anti-predator behavior reflect different personality dimensions in domestic rabbits. — J. Ethol. 32: 1-14.
Arnold K.E., Ramsay S.L., Donaldson C., Adam A. (2007). Parental prey selection affects risk-taking behaviour and spatial learning in avian offspring. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 274: 2563-2569.
Avery M., Tillman E., Keacher K., Arnett J., Lundy K. (2012). Biology of invasive monk parakeets in South Florida. — Wilson J. Ornithol. 124: 581-588.
Barnett C.A., Thompson C.F., Sakaluk S.K. (2012). Aggressiveness, boldness and parental food provisioning in male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). — Ethology 118: 984-993.
Beckmann C., Biro P.A. (2013). On the validity of a single (boldness) assay in personality research. — Ethology 119: 937-947.
Bell A. (2012). Randomized or fixed order for studies of behavioral syndromes? — Behav. Ecol. 24: 16-20.
Bell A.M. (2005). Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). — J. Evol. Biol. 18: 464-473.
Biro P., Dingemanse N. (2009). Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 66-67.
Biro P.A., Stamps J.A. (2010). Do consistent individual differences in metabolic rate promote consistent individual differences in behavior? — Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 653-659.
Boissy A. (1995). Fear and fearfulness in animals. — Q. Rev. Biol. 70: 165-191.
Boogert N., Reader S.M., Laland K.N. (2006). The relation between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. — Anim. Behav. 72: 1229-1239.
Brown C., Braithwaite V.A. (2005). Effects of predation pressure on the cognitive ability of the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi. — Behav. Ecol. 16: 482-487.
Bucher E.H., Martin L.F., Martella M.B., Navarro J.L. (1990). Social behaviour and population dynamics of the Monk Parakeet. — Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 20: 681-689.
Budaev S.V. (2010). Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: caveats and guidelines. — Ethology 116: 472-480.
Burger J., Gochfeld M. (2005). Nesting behavior and nest site selection in monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) in the Pantanal of Brazil. — Acta Ethologica 8: 23-34.
Campler M., Jöngren M., Jensen P. (2009). Fearfulness in red junglefowl and domesticated white Leghorn chickens. — Behav. Process. 81: 39-43.
Campo J.L., Dávila S.G., Gil M.G., Torres O., Moreno J.S. (2015). Fear and stress measurements in pure and hybrid red-legged partridges. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 166: 123-130.
Carere C., Maestripieri D. (eds) (2013). Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Carter A.J., Feeney W.E., Marshall H.H., Cowlishaw G., Heinsohn R. (2012a). Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? — Biol. Rev. 88: 465-475.
Carter A.J., Heinsohn R., Goldizen A.W., Biro P.A. (2012b). Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards. — Anim. Behav. 83: 1051-1058.
Carter A.J., Marshall H.H., Heinsohn R., Cowlishaw G. (2012c). Evaluating animal personalities: do observer assessments and experimental tests measure the same thing? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66: 153-160.
Carter A.J., Marshall H.H., Heinsohn R., Cowlishaw G. (2012d). How not to measure boldness: novel object and antipredator responses are not the same in wild baboons. — Anim. Behav. 84: 603-609.
Coleman K., Wilson D.S. (1998). Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context-specific. — Anim. Behav. 56: 927-936.
Collar N.J. (1997). Family Psittacidae (parrots). — In: Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 4 ( del Hoyo J., Elliott A., Sargatal J., Cabot J., eds). Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, p. 280-477.
Cote J., Fogarty S., Weinersmith K., Brodin T., Sih A. (2010). Personality trait and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 277: 1571-1579.
Dall S.R.X., Griffith S.C. (2014). An empiricist guide to animal personality variation in ecology and evolution. — Behav. Evol. Ecol. 2: 3.
Dammhahn M., Almeling L. (2012). Is risk taking during foraging a personality trait? A field test for cross-context consistency in boldness. — Anim. Behav. 84: 1131-1139.
David M., Auclair Y., Cézilly F. (2011). Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. — Anim. Behav. 81: 219-224.
Dingemanse N.J., Kazem A.J.N., Réale D., Wright J. (2010). Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 81-89.
Dzieweczynski T.L., Crovo J.A. (2011). Shyness and boldness differences across contexts in juvenile three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus from an anadromous population. — J. Fish Biol. 79: 776-788.
Feenders G., Klaus K., Bateson M. (2011). Fear and exploration in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): a comparison of hand-reared and wild-caught birds. — PLoS ONE 6: e19074.
Finkler H., Terkel J. (2015). The relationship between individual behavioural styles, dominance rank and cortisol levels of cats living in urban social groups. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 173: 22-28.
Forss S.I.F., Schuppli C., Haiden D., Zweifel N., Van Schaik C.P. (2015). Contrasting responses to novelty by wild and captive orangutans. — Am. J. Primatol. 77: 1109-1121.
Fox R.A., Ladage L.D., Roth T.C., Pravosudov V.V. (2009). Behavioural profile predicts dominance status in mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli. — Anim. Behav. 77: 1441-1448.
Garamszegi L.Z., Rosivall B., Rettenbacher S., Marko G., Zsebok S., Szollosi E., Eens M., Potti J., Torok J. (2012). Corticosterone, avoidance of novelty, risk-taking and aggression in a wild bird: no evidence for pleiotropic effects. — Ethology 118: 621-635.
Greenberg R. (1984). Neophobia in the foraging-site selection of a neotropical migrant bird: an experimental study. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 3778-3780.
Greenberg R. (1989). Neophobia, aversion to open space, and ecological plasticity in song and swamp sparrows. — Can. J. Zool. 67: 1194-1199.
Greenberg R., Mettke-Hofmann C. (2001). Ecological aspects of neophobia and neophilia in birds. — Curr. Ornithol. 16: 119-178.
Herborn K.A., Macleod R., Miles W.T.S., Schofield A.N.B., Alexander L., Arnold K.E. (2010). Personality in captivity reflects personality in the wild. — Anim. Behav. 79: 835-843.
Highcock L., Carter A.J. (2014). Intraindividual variability of boldness is repeatable across contexts in a wild lizard. — PLoS ONE 9: e95179.
Hobson E.A., Avery M.L., Wright T.F. (2014). The socioecology of Monk Parakeets: insights into parrot social complexity. — Auk. 131: 756-775.
Hollander F.A., van Overveld T., Tokka I., Matthysen E. (2008). Personality and nest defence in the great tit (Parus major). — Ethology 114: 405-412.
Hyman J., Myers R., Krippel J. (2013). Personality influences alarm calling behaviour in song sparrows. — Behaviour 150: 1147-1164.
Ingley S.J., Rehm J., Johnson J.B. (2014). Size doesn’t matter, sex does: a test for boldness in sister species of Brachyrhaphis fishes. — Ecol. Evol. 4: 4361-4369.
Jolles J.W., Ostojić L., Clayton N.S. (2013). Dominance, pair bonds and boldness determine social-foraging tactics in rooks, Corvus frugilegus. — Anim. Behav. 85: 1261-1269.
Jones K., Godin J. (2010). Are fast explorers slow reactors? Linking personality type and anti-predator behaviour. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 277: 625-632.
Kaiser H.F. (1959). Computer program for varimax rotation in factor analysis. — Educ. Psychol. Meas. 19: 413-420.
Kaiser H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. — Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20: 141-151.
Kie J.G. (1999). Optimal foraging and risk of predation: effects on behavior and social structure in ungulates. — J. Mammal. 80: 1114-1129.
Killen S.S., Marras S., Ryan M.R., Domenici P., McKenzie D.J. (2011). A relationship between metabolic rate and risk-taking behaviour is revealed during hypoxia in juvenile European sea bass. — Funct. Ecol. 26: 134-143.
Kurvers R.H.J.M., Nolet B.A., Prins H.H.T., Ydenberg R.C., van Oers K. (2012a). Boldness affects foraging decisions in barnacle geese: an experimental approach. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 1155-1161.
Kurvers R.H.J.M., van Santen de Hoog S., van Wieren S.E., Ydenberg R.C., Prins H.H.T. (2012b). No evidence for negative frequency-dependent feeding performance in relation to personality. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 51-57.
Lê S., Josse J., Husson F. (2008). FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. — J. Stat. Softw. 25: 1-18.
Maindonald J., Braun W.J. (eds) (2010). Data analysis and graphics using R: an example-based approach, 3rd edn. — Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Martella M.B., Bucher E.H. (1990). Vocalizations of the monk parakeet. — Bird Behav. 8: 101-110.
Martin L.B., Fitzgerald L. (2005). A taste for novelty in invading house sparrows, Passer domesticus. — Behav. Ecol. 16: 702-707.
Miller K.A., Garner J.P., Mench J.A. (2006). Is fearfulness a trait that can be measured with behavioural tests? A validation of four fear tests for Japanese quail. — Anim. Behav. 71: 1323-1334.
Minderman J., Reid J.M., Evans P.G.H., Whittingham M.J. (2009). Personality traits in wild starlings: exploration behavior and environmental sensitivity. — Behav. Ecol. 20: 830-837.
Moscicki M.K., Hurd P.L. (2015). Sex, boldness and stress experience affect convict cichlid, Amatitlania nigrofasciata, open field behaviour. — Anim. Behav. 107: 105-114.
Noer C.L., Needham E.K., Wiese A.-S., Balsby T.J.S., Dabelsteen T. (2015). Context matters: multiple novelty tests reveal different aspects of shyness–boldness in farmed American mink (Neovison vison). — PLoS ONE 10: e0130474.
R Core Team (2014). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available online at http://cran.r-project.org.
Real L., Caraco T. (1986). Risk and foraging in stochastic environments. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17: 371-390.
Reale D., Reader S., Sol D., McDougall P., Dingemanse N. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. — Biol. Rev. 82: 291-318.
Revelle W. (2015). psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. — R package version 1.5.4. Available online at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html.
Rockwell C., Gabriel P.O., Black J.M. (2012). Bolder, older, and selective: factors of individual-specific foraging behaviors in Steller’s jays. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 676-683.
Russello M., Avery M., Wright T. (2008). Genetic evidence links invasive monk parakeet populations in the United States to the international pet trade. — BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 217.
Scheid C., Noë R. (2010). The performance of rooks in a cooperative task depends on their temperament. — Anim. Cogn. 13: 545-553.
Schuett W., Dall S.R.X. (2009). Sex differences, social context and personality in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. — Anim. Behav. 77: 1041-1050.
Schuett W., Laaksonen J., Laaksonen T. (2012). Prospecting at conspecific nests and exploration in a novel environment are associated with reproductive success in the jackdaw. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66: 1341-1350.
Seaman B., Briffa M. (2015). Parasites and personality in periwinkles (Littorina littorea): infection status is associated with mean-level boldness but not repeatability. — Behav. Process. 115: 132-134.
Short K., Petren K. (2008). Boldness underlies foraging success of invasive Lepidodactylus lugubris geckos in the human landscape. — Anim. Behav. 76: 429-437.
Sloan Wilson D., Clark A.B., Coleman K., Dearstyne T. (1994). Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 442-446.
Small T.W., Schoech S.J. (2015). Sex differences in the long-term repeatability of the acute stress response in long-lived, free-living Florida scrub-jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens). — J. Comp. Physiol. B 185: 119-133.
South J., Pruett-Jones S. (2000). Patterns of flock size, diet, and vigilance of naturalized Monk Parakeets in Hyde Park, Chicago. — Condor 102: 848-854.
Stevens J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. — Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Stowe M., Bugnyar T., Heinrich B., Kotrschal K. (2006a). Effects of group size on approach to novel objects in raven (Corvus corax). — Ethology 112: 1079-1088.
Stowe M., Bugnyar T., Loretto M.C., Schloegl C., Range F., Kotrschal K. (2006b). Novel object exploration in ravens (Corvus corax): effects of social relationships. — Behav. Process. 73: 68-75.
Tillman E.A., Genchi A.C., Lindsay J.R., Newman J.R., Avery M.L. (2004). Evaluation of trapping to reduce monk parakeet populations at electric utility facilities. — Vertebr. Pest Conf. 21: 126-129.
van den Brink V., Henry I., Wakamatsu K., Roulin A. (2012). Melanin-based coloration in juvenile kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) covaries with anti-predatory personality traits. — Ethology 118: 673-682.
Vazire S., Gosling S.D., Dickey A.S., Schapiro S.J. (2007). Measuring personality in nonhuman animals. — In: Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. p. 190-206.
Verbeek M.E.M., Drent P.J., Wiepkema P.R. (1994). Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour of male great tits. — Anim. Behav. 48: 1113-1121.
Webster S.J., Lefebvre L. (2001). Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. — Anim. Behav. 62: 23-32.
Wilson A.D.M., Godin J.G.J. (2009). Boldness and behavioral syndromes in the bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. — Behav. Ecol. 20: 231-237.
Wilson A.D.M., Stevens E.D. (2005). Consistency in context-specific measures of shyness and boldness in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. — Ethology 111: 849-862.
Wilson A.D.M., Whattam E.M., Bennett R., Visanuvimol L., Lauzon C., Bertram S.M. (2010). Behavioral correlations across activity, mating, exploration, aggression and antipredator contexts in the European house cricket, Acheta domesticus. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 703-715.
Wilson A.D.M., Binder T.R., McGrath K.P., Cooke S.J., Godin J.G.J. (2011). Capture technique and fish personality: angling targets timid bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68: 749-757.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 696 | 125 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 29 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 49 | 10 |
Boldness reflects consistent individual differences in risk-taking behavior across various contexts. However, evaluating this basic assumption has largely been neglected in birds. In a captive monk parakeet population (Myiopsitta monachus; ), we undertook an analysis of 7 measures across 3 commonly used boldness assays (i.e., novel object, emergence, and predator-exposure tests). Using principal component analysis, we derived 3 components (PCs). PC-2 loaded strongly with measures from emergence and predator-exposure tests; we interpreted it as the closest approximation of boldness. PC-1 and PC-3 described different aspects of feeding such as foraging activity and rate, respectively. Finally, we assessed the predictive power of each measure that loaded significantly on the boldness axis. We found that no single metric explained even %55 of the variation in PC-2, nor could more than %50 individuals at the extremes of the spectrum be predicted. Our results demonstrate the utility of an inclusive approach in personality research.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 696 | 125 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 29 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 49 | 10 |