Shelter preference in the Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish)

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

For many animals, shelters are valuable source to hide from predators. To know acquisition of adequate shelter is important to understand social interactions of animals. Preferences for types of shelter used by the Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) were analysed behaviourally. Individual crayfish were presented with a choice between two PVC pipes with four different internal diameters (XL, L, M and S). The time spent in each shelter and the number of times crayfish entered each shelter were measured. Preference ranks of crayfish were XL = L = or > M > S. Our experiments strongly suggested that crayfish chose shelters based first on the diameter of the entrance, and then based on the length of the shelter. Crayfish recognised adequate shelters by visual cues under light conditions and utilised tactile cues from their antennae under dark conditions.

Sections

References

AlberstadtP.J.SteeleC.W.SkinnerC. (1995). Cover-seeking behavior in juvenile and adult crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: effects of darkness and thigmotactic cues. — J. Crustacean Biol. 15: 537-544.

AngelJ.E. (2000). Effects of shell fit on the biology of the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus (Say). — J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 243: 169-184.

AntonelliJ.SteeleC.W.SkinnerC. (1999). Cover-seeking behavior and shelter use by juvenile and adult crayfish, Procambarus clarkii: potential importance in species invasion. — J. Crustacean Biol. 19: 293-300.

ArakiM.HasegawaT.KomatsudaS.NagayamaT. (2013). Social status-dependent modulation of LG-flip habituation in the crayfish. — J. Exp. Biol. 216: 681-686.

BalasundaramC.JeyachitraP.BalamuruganP. (2004). Shelter preference in Macrobrachium spp. with reference to aquaculture. — Acta Ethol. 7: 95-101.

BraddockJ.C. (1949). The effect of prior residence upon the dominance in the fish Platypoecilus maculatus. — Physiol. Zool. 22: 161-169.

De MellonF.Jr. (2000). Convergence of multimodal sensory input onto higher level neurons of the crayfish olfactory pathway. — J. Neurophysiol. 84: 3043-3055.

EgglestonD.B.LipciusR.N. (1992). Shelter selection by spiny lobster under variable predation risk, social conditions, and shelter size. — Ecology 73: 992-1011.

EgglestonD.B.LipciusR.N.MillerD.L.Coba-CetinaL. (1990). Shelter scaling regulates survival of juvenile Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus. — Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 62: 79-88.

Farca LunaA.J.Hurtado-ZavalaJ.I.ReischigT.HeinrichR. (2009). Circadian regulation of agonistic behavior in groups of parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Procambarus sp.J. Biol. Rhythm 24: 64-72.

FaulkesZ. (2016). Marble crayfish as a new model organism and a new threat to native crayfish conservation. — In: Freshwater crayfish: a global overview ( KawaiT.FaulkesZ.ScholtzG., eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p.  31-53.

FeroK.C.MooreP.A. (2014). Shelter availability influences social behavior and habitat choice in crayfish, Orconectes virilis. — Behaviour 151: 103-123.

FielderD.R. (1965). A dominance order for shelter in the spiny lobster Jasus lalandei (H. Hilne-Edwards). — Behaviour 24: 236-245.

FiglerM.H.ChevertonH.M.BlankG.S. (1999). Shelter competition in juvenile red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii): the influences of sex differences, relative size, and prior residence. — Aquaculture 178: 63-75.

FiglerM.H.BlankG.S.PeekeH.V.S. (2005). Shelter competition between resident male red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard) and conspecific intruders varying by sex and reproductive status. — Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 38: 237-248.

FujimotoS.HirataB.NagayamaT. (2011). Dominance hierarchy-dependent behavioural plasticity of crayfish avoidance reactions. — J. Exp. Biol. 214: 2718-2723.

JonesC.M.RuscoeI.M. (2001). Assessment of five shelter types in the production of redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus (Decapoda: Parastacidae) under earthen pond conditions. — J. World Aquacult. Soc. 32: 41-52.

KennedyD.BrunoM.S. (1961). The spectral sensitivity of crayfish and lobster vision. — J. Gen. Physiol. 44: 1089-1102.

KochL.M.PatulloB.W.MacmillanD.L. (2006). Exploring with damaged antennae: do crayfish compensate for injuries?J. Exp. Biol. 209: 3226-3233.

MariappanP.BalasundaramC. (2003). Sheltering behaviour of Macrobrachium nobilii (Henderson and Matthai, 1910). — Acta Ethol. 5: 89-94.

MartinP.KohlmannK.ScholtzG. (2007). The parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) produces genetically uniform offspring. — Naturwissenschaften 94: 843-846.

MartinA.L.IIIMooreP.A. (2008). The influence of dominance on shelter preference and eviction rates in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. — Ethology 114: 351-360.

McMahonA.PatulloB.W.MacmillanD.L. (2005). Exploration in a T-maze by the crayfish Cherax destructor suggests bilateral comparison of antennal tactile information. — Biol. Bull. 208: 183-188.

MizunoT.TsujiH. (1974). Harbouring behaviour of three species of cockroaches, Periplaneta americana, P. japonica, and Blattella germanica. — Jpn. J. Sanit. Zool. 24: 237-240.

MomoharaY.KanaiA.NagayamaT. (2013). Aminergic control of social status in crayfish agonistic encounters. — PLoS One 8: e74489.

MomoharaY.YoshidaM.NagayamaT. (2015). Serotonergic modulation of social status-dependent behavioural plasticity of the crayfish avoidance reaction. — J. Comp. Physiol. A 201: 1063-1074.

NagayamaT.ArakiM. (2015). Habituation of LG-mediated tailflip in the crayfish. — Invert. Neurosci. 15: 2.

NagayamaT.NambaH.AonumaH. (1994). Morphological and physiological bases of crayfish local circuit neurones. — Histol. Histopathol. 9: 791-805.

NakataK.HamanoT.HayashiK.-I.KawaiT.GoshimaS. (2001). Artificial burrow preference by the Japanese crayfish Cambaroides japonicus. — Fisheries Sci. 67: 449-455.

RantaE.LindstromK. (1993). Body size and shelter possession in mature signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus. — Ann. Zool. Fenn. 30: 125-132.

SandemanD.C.VarjuD. (1988). A behavioural study of tactile localization in the crayfish Cherax destructor. — J. Comp. Neurol. 163: 525-536.

SatoG.NagayamaT. (2012). Development of agonistic encounters in dominance hierarchy formation of juvenile crayfish. — J. Exp. Biol. 215: 1210-1217.

ScholtzG.BrabandA.TolleyL.ReimannA.MittmannB.LukhaupC.SteuerwaldF.VogtG. (2003). Parthenogenesis in an outsider crayfish. — Nature 421: 806.

SteeleC.SkinnerC.AlberstadtP.AntonelliJ. (1997). Importance of adequate shelters for crayfishes maintained in aquaria. — Aquarium Sci. Conserv. 1: 189-192.

UenoR.NagayamaT. (2012). Interlocking of chelae is a key factor for dominance hierarchy formation in crayfish. — J. Exp. Biol. 215: 2841-2848.

VogtG.FalckenhaynC.SchrimpfA.SchmidK.HannaK.PanteleitJ.HelmM.SchulzR.LykoF. (2015). The marbled crayfish as a paradigm for saltational speciation by autopolyploidy and parthenogenesis in animals. — Biol. Open 4: 1583-1594.

WatanabeS.MomoharaY.MinamiH.NagayamaT. (2016). Two types of orienting behaviour during agonistic encounters in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Decapoda: Cambaridae). — J. Crustacean Biol. 36: 147-153.

WineJ.J. (1984). The structural basis of an innate behavioural pattern. — J. Exp. Biol. 112: 283-319.

Figures

  • Activity pattern of the marbled crayfish. Time spent outside the shelter is plotted for each hour from 9:00 to 21:00 h. Crayfish were placed in the experimental container at 9:00 h (N=10).

    View in gallery
  • Shelter preferences of crayfish of 4.0–4.5 cm in length. (i) Time spent in the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h; (ii) the number of times the crayfish entered the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h (N=6). (a) Each crayfish was offered a choice between two XL pipes. (b) Each crayfish was offered a choice between XL and L pipes (N=10). (c) Each crayfish was offered a choice between XL and M pipes (N=10). (d) Each crayfish was offered a choice between XL and S pipes (N=6). No crayfish chose the S pipe during this experiment. p<0.05 and ∗∗∗p<0.001.

    View in gallery
  • (a) Each crayfish was offered a choice between L and M pipes. (b) A choice between L and S pipes. (c) A choice between M and S pipes. (d) Each crayfish was offered only an S pipe. (i) The time spent inside the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h and (ii) the number of times crayfish that entered the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h (N=10 in (a), 8 in (b and c) and 6 (d)). p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01 and ∗∗∗p<0.001.

    View in gallery
  • The number of times the crayfish entered the O pipe plotted against that for the L pipe shown in Figure 2b (N=10).

    View in gallery
  • Shelter preferences in crayfish offered two pipes of different lengths. (i) The time spent inside the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h and (ii) the number of times crayfish entered the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h. (a) Each crayfish was offered a choice between two XL pipes of 2 cm and 4 cm in length. (b) A choice between an XL pipe of 2 cm in length and an L pipe of 4 cm in length. (c) A choice between an XL pipe of 2 cm in length and an M pipe of 4 cm in length. (d) A choice between an XL pipe of 2 cm in length and an S pipe of 4 cm in length (N=8). p<0.05, ∗∗p<0.01 and ∗∗∗p<0.001.

    View in gallery
  • Shelter preferences in crayfish of 2 cm in length. (i) The time spent inside the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h and (ii) the number of times crayfish entered the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h (N=8).

    View in gallery
  • Shelter preferences in crayfish with and without antennae. (i) The time spent inside the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h and (ii) is shown the number of times crayfish entered the pipe from 13:00 to 18:00 h. (a) Crayfish of 4.0–4.5 cm in length were offered a choice between an XL or M pipe in a dark room with a red LED light. (b) After removal of their antennae, the same crayfish were offered a choice between an XL or M pipe in a dark room with a red LED light, 4 days after the first tests. (c) The same crayfish without antennae were offered a choice between an XL pipe or M pipe under light conditions, 4 days after the second test (N=5). p<0.05 and ∗∗∗p<0.001.

    View in gallery

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 26 26 8
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0