Mountain chickadees return to their post-natal dispersal settlements following long-term captivity

in Behaviour
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

There is little work investigating the relationship between environmental changes and associated hippocampal effects on animal homing. We took advantage of previous studies in which wild, non-migratory mountain chickadees spent six months in captivity prior to being released. Over the following three years, 45.8% of the birds were resighted, and in all cases birds were identified less than 300 m from their initial capture locations at their respective elevation, despite previous studies documenting ca 30% captivity-related reduction of the hippocampus. Reproductive success of birds that spent six months in captivity did not differ from control birds that did not experience captivity. Our findings suggest that chickadees are highly site faithful and can return to their original capture location after spending time in captivity. Our results also have important implications for animal welfare practices as birds held in captivity bred successfully and may not need to be sacrificed following captivity.

Mountain chickadees return to their post-natal dispersal settlements following long-term captivity

in Behaviour

Sections

References

BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). _lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. — R package version 1.1-8 available online at http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4.

BenvenutiS.IoaleP. (1980). Homing experiments with birds displaced from their wintering ground. — J. Ornithol. 121: 281-286.

BingmanV.P.MenchJ.A. (1990). Homing behavior of hippocampus and parahippocampus lesioned pigeons following short-distance releases. — Behav. Brain Res. 40: 227-238.

BingmanV.P.YatesG. (1992). Hippocampal lesions impair navigational learning in experienced homing pigeons. — Behav. Neurosci. 106: 229-232.

BranchC.L.KozlovskyD.Y.PravosudovV.V. (2015a). Elevation related differences in female mate preferences in mountain chickadees) are smart chickadees choosier?Anim. Behav. 99: 89-94.

BranchC.L.KozlovskyD.Y.PravosudovV.V. (2015b). Elevation related variation in aggressive response to mirror image in mountain chickadees. — Behaviour 152: 667-676.

BranchC.L.PravosudovV.V. (2015). Mountain chickadees from different elevations sing different dialects) acoustic adaptation, temporal drift, or signal of local adaptation?Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 2: 150019.

BrookeM. de L. (1979). Differences in the quality of territories held by wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe). — J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 21-32.

BulmerM.G. (1973). Inbreeding in the great tit. — Heredity 30: 313-325.

CatchpoleC.K. (1972). A comparative study of territory in the reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and sedge warbler (A. schoenobaenus). — J. Zool. Lond. 166: 213-231.

CrostonR.BranchC.I.KozlowskyD.Y.DukasR.PravosudovV.V. (2015). Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits. — Behav. Ecol. 26: 1447-1459.

DaviesN.B.KrebsJ.R.WestS.A. (2012). An introduction to behavioural ecology. — Wiley-BlackwellOxford.

DayL.B.GuerraM.SchlingerB.A.RothsteinS.I. (2008). Sex differences in the effects of captivity on hippocampus size in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater obscurus). — Behav. Neurosci. 122: 527-534.

DhondtA.A.HubleJ. (1968). Fledging date and sex in relation to dispersal in young tits. — Bird Stud. 15: 127-134.

EkmanJ. (1989). Ecology of non-breeding social systems of parus. — Wilson Bull. 101: 263-288.

FreasC.A.LaDageL.D.RothT.C.IIPravosudovV.V. (2012). Elevation-related differences in memory and the hippocampus in mountain chickadees, Poecile gambeli. — Anim. Behav. 84: 121-127.

FreasC.A.BingmanK.LaDageL.D.PravosudovV.V. (2013). Untangling elevation related differences in the hippocampus in food caching mountain chickadees: the effect of a uniform captive environment. — Brain Behav. Evol. 82: 199-209.

GagliardoA.IoaleP.BingmanV.P. (1999). Homing in pigeons: the role of the hippocampal formation in the representation of landmarks used for navigation. — J. Neurosci. 19: 311-315.

Google Earth V 7.1.5.1557 (2015). Sagehen Experimental Forest California. 39°25′54.08″N 120°14′29.45″W Eye alt 8.64 km. — DigitalGlobe 2016 available online at http://www.earth.google.com (accessed 1 March 2016).

GreenwoodP.J.HarveyP.H.PerinsC.M. (1979). The role of dispersal in the great tit (Parus major): the causes consequences and heritability of natal dispersal. — J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 123-142.

GreenwoodP.J.HarveyP.H. (1982). The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 1-21.

HamptonR.R.ShettleworthS.J. (1996). Hippocampal lesions impair memory for location but not color in passerine birds. — Behav. Neurosci. 110: 831-835.

HarrapS.QuinnD. (1995). Chickadees nuthatches and treecreepers. — Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ.

HarveyP.H.GreenwoodP.J.PerinsC.M. (1979). Breeding area fidelity of the great tit (Parus major). — J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 305-313.

Herculano-HouzelS. (2011). Brains matter, bodies maybe not: the case for examining neuron numbers irrespective of body size. — Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1225: 191-199.

HindeR.A. (1956). The biological significance of the territories of birds. — Ibis 98: 340-369.

HooverJ.P. (2003). Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the prothonotary warbler. — Ecology 84: 416-430.

KeiserJ.T.ZiegenfusC.W.S.CristolD.A. (2005). Homing success of migrant versus nonmigrant dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). — Auk 122: 608-617.

KozlovskyD.Y.BranchC.L.FreasC.A.PravosudovV.V. (2014). Elevation related differences in novel environment exploration and social dominance in food caching mountain chickadees. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 1871-1881.

KozlovskyD.Y.BranchC.L.PravosudovV.V. (2015a). Problem-solving ability and response to novelty in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli) from different elevations. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69: 635-643.

KozlovskyD.Y.BranchC.L.PravosudovV.V. (2015b). Elevation-related differences in parental risk-taking behavior are associated with cognitive variation in mountain chickadees. — Ethology 1(20): 1-12.

KristinA.HoiH.ValeraF.HoiC. (2007). Philopatry, dispersal patterns and nest-site reuse in lesser grey shrikes (Lanius minor). — Biodiv. Conserv. 16: 987-995.

KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP.B.ChristensenR.H.B. (2015). lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. — R package version 2.0-25 available online at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.

LaDageL.D.RothT.C.IIFoxR.A.PravosudovV.V. (2009). Effects of captivity and memory-based experiences on the hippocampus in mountain chickadees. — Behav. Neurosci. 123: 284-291.

LaDageL.D.RothT.C.IIFoxR.A.PravosudovV.V. (2010). Ecologically relevant memory use modulates hippocampal neurogenesis. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 277: 1071-1079.

McCallumD.A.GrundelR.DahlstenD.L. (1999). Mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli) The birds of North America online (A. Poole ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology Ithaca NY. — Retrieved from the birds of North America online available onine at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.innopac.library.unr.edu/bna/species/453.

Mettke-HofmannC.GwinnerE. (2003). Long-term memory for a life on the move. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5863-5866.

NewtonI.MarquissM. (1982). Fidelity to breeding area and mate in the sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus. — J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 327-341.

PatonP.W.C.EdwardsT.C.Jr. (1996). Factors affecting interannual movements of snowy plovers. — Auk 113: 534-543.

PravosudovV.V.KitayskyA.S.OmanskaA. (2006). The relationship between migratory behaviour, memory and the hippocampus: an intraspecific comparison. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 273: 2641-2649.

PravosudovV.V.RothT.C.II (2013). Cognitive ecology of food hoarding: the evolution of spatial memory and the hippocampus. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44: 173-193.

R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/.

RalphC.J.MewaldtL.R. (1976). Homing success in wintering sparrows. — Auk 93: 1-14.

RothT.C.LaDageL.D.FreasC.PravosudovV.V. (2012). Variation in memory and the hippocampus across populations from different climates: a common garden approach. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 279: 402-410.

Schmidt-KoenigK.SchlichteH.J. (1972). Homing in pigeons with impaired vision. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 2446-2447.

SchubertK.A.MennillD.J.RamsayS.M.OtterK.A.RatcliffeL.M.KrausC. (2008). Between-year survival and rank transitions in male black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) a multistate modeling approach. — Auk 125: 629-636.

SchwagmeyerP.L. (1994). Competitive mate searching in thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Mammalia, Sciuridae): potential roles of spatial memory. — Ethology 98: 265-276.

SedgwickJ.A. (2004). Site fidelity, territory fidelity, and natal philopatry in willow flycatchers (Empidonax traillii). — Auk 121: 1103-1121.

SherryD.F. (2006). Neuroecology. — Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57: 167-197.

SmuldersT.V.CastoJ.M.NolanV.Jr.KettersonE.D.De VoogdT.J. (2000). Effects of captivity and testosterone on the volumes of four brain regions in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). — J. Neurobiol. 43: 244-253.

SniegowskiP.D.KettersonE.D.NolanV.Jr. (1988). Can experience alter the avian annual cycle? Results of migration experiments with indigo buntings. — Ethology 79: 333-341.

SpritzerM.D.MeikleD.B.SolomonN.G. (2004). The relationship between dominance rank and spatial ability among male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). — J. Comp. Psychol. 118: 332-339.

WallraffH.G. (2005). Avian navigation: pigeon homing as a paradigm. — SpringerBerlin.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Map of Sagehen Experimental Forest study sites created using Google Earth V 7.1.5. Black markers represent high elevation feeder sites and white markers represent low elevation feeder sites where birds were trapped for both studies reported in this article. L, low-elevation sites; H, high-elevation sites. Markers labelled “Release Site” indicate where all birds were released in a single year after being in captivity for 6 months. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1568539x.

  • View in gallery

    Map of Sagehen Experimental Forest study sites created using Google Earth V 7.1.5. (a) Low elevation sites and (b) high elevation sites showing where the 12 birds from 2014 were originally trapped (e.g., 1T) and where they were resighted (e.g., 1R). Yellow pin drops indicate (a) original tapping location (T) and resighting location (R) for birds 1–7 and (b) original tapping location (T) and resighting location (R) for birds 1–5. All other birds depicted were from 2013 and, therefore, only have resighting locations (R). All birds listed on these maps were resighted at feeders, except (a) 8R, 9R and 13R, and (b) 7R and 8R, which were resighted at nestboxes. Arrows connect each bird’s original capture location and their resighting location. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1568539x.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 28 28 11
Full Text Views 127 127 56
PDF Downloads 3 3 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0