Giraffe nursing behaviour reflects environmental conditions

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Nursing behaviour is one component of mammalian life history strategy that demonstrates context-dependent flexibility within species. Wild giraffes live in groups and feed themselves over large area. In the zoo, giraffes are kept in enclosures with abundant food resources. We aimed to analyse whether the nursing behaviour of giraffes differs between the zoo and nature reserve and discuss which factor (food intake, presence of predators, population density) can explain the difference. We observed seven and four female–calf pairs in the Bandia reserve, Senegal, and in Prague Zoo, Czech Republic, respectively. Nursing bouts were less frequent and longer and calves were less successful in nursing solicitations in the reserve, as females there seemed to be more selective for nursing times and locations, likely due to presence of predators and differences in food intake. Allonursing occurred more frequently in the zoo which can be attributed to higher population density in captive conditions.

Giraffe nursing behaviour reflects environmental conditions

in Behaviour

Sections

References

Al-OgoumrabeN. (2002). Les aires protégées au Sénégal: étude du cas de la Réserve de faune de Bandia: adaptation des animaux sauvages introduits et aspect socio-économique. — These UCAD EISMV Dakar 7: 193.

AntonínováM.NežerkováP.VinckeX.Al-OgoumrabeN. (2004). Herd structure of the giant eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in the Bandia Reserve, Senegal. — Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 37: 1-5.

BartošL.ŠilerJ.IllmannG. (2001). Adoption, allonursing and allosucking in farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus). — Anim. Sci. 72: 483-492.

BaxterE.PlowmanA. (2001). The effect of increasing dietary fibre on feeding, rumination and oral stereotypies in captive giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis). — Anim. Welf. 10: 281-290.

BercovitchF.B.BerryP.S.M. (2010). Reproductive life history of Thornicroft’s giraffe in Zambia. — Afr. J. Ecol. 48: 535-538.

BrandlováK.BartošL.HaberováT. (2013). Camel calves as opportunistic milk thefts? The first description of allosuckling in domestic bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus). — PLoS One 8: e53052.

BungoT.ShimojoM.NakanoY.OkanoK.MasudaY.GotoI. (1998). Relationship between nursing and suckling behaviour in Tokara native goats. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 59: 357-362.

BunnellF.GillinghamM. (1985). Foraging behavior: dynamics of dining out. — In: Bioenerg. wild herbiv. CRC PressBoca Rat. p.  53-75.

CameronE.Z.du ToitJ.T. (2005). Social influences on vigilance behaviour in giraffes, Giraffa camelopardalis. — Anim. Behav. 69: 1337-1344.

Clutton-BrockT.H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. — Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ.

CowlishawG.LawesM.J.LightbodyM.MartinA.PettiforR.RowcliffeJ.M. (2004). A simple rule for the costs of vigilance: empirical evidence from a social forager. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 271: 27-33.

DrábkováJ.BartošováJ.BartošL.KotrbaR.PluháčekJ.ŠvecováL.DušekA.KottT. (2008). Sucking and allosucking duration in farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus). — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 113: 215-223.

EAZA Giraffe EEPs (2006). EAZA husbandry and management guidelines for Giraffa camelopardalis. — Burgers ZooArnhem.

EstesR. (1991). The behavior guide to African mammals: including hoofed mammals carnivores primates. A Wake Forest Studium book.

FosterJ.DaggA. (1972). Notes on the biology of the giraffe. — Afr. J. Ecol. 10: 1-16.

GlonekováM.BrandlováK.PluháčekJ. (2016). Stealing milk by young and reciprocal mothers: high incidence of allonursing in giraffes, Giraffa camelopardalis. — Anim. Behav. 113: 113-123.

GreeneT.V.ManneS.P.ReiterL.M. (2006). Developing models for mother–infant behaviour in black rhinoceros and reticulated giraffe Diceros bicornis michaeli and Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata at Brookfield Zoo, Illinois. — Int. Zoo Yb. 40: 372-378.

HamelS.CôtéS.D. (2008). Trade-offs in activity budget in an alpine ungulate: contrasting lactating and nonlactating females. — Anim. Behav. 75: 217-227.

HanwellA.PeakerM. (1977). Physiological effects of lactation on the mother. — Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 41: 297-312.

HejcmanováP.HejcmanM.CamaraA.A.AntonínováM. (2010). Exclusion of livestock grazing and wood collection in dryland savannah: an effect on long-term vegetation succession. — Afr. J. Ecol. 48: 408-417.

HejcmanováP.VymyslickáP.KoláčkováK.AntonínováM.HavlíkováB.StejskalováM.PolichtR.HejcmanM. (2011). Suckling behavior of eland antelopes (Taurotragus spp.) under semi-captive and farm conditions. — J. Ethol. 29: 161-168.

HorováE.BrandlováK.GlonekováM. (2015). The first description of dominance hierarchy in captive giraffe: not loose and egalitarian, but clear and linear. — PLoS One 10: e0124570.

HorwichR.H.KitchenC.WangelM.RutheR. (1983). Behavioral development in okapis and giraffes. — Zoo Biol. 2: 105-125.

HunterL.T.B.SkinnerJ.D. (1998). Vigilance behaviour in African ungulates: the role of predation pressure. — Behaviour 135: 195-211.

IlliusA.FitzgibbonC. (1994). Costs of vigilance in foraging ungulates. — Anim. Behav. 47: 481-484.

IlliusA.W.TolkampB.J.YearsleyJ. (2002). The evolution of the control of food intake. — Proc. Nutr. Soc. 61: 465-472.

KitchenC. (1977). The development and nursing behavior of the okapi. — Brookfield Bison June/July: C5-C8.

KomersP.E. (1997). Behavioural plasticity in variable environments. — Can. J. Zool. 75: 161-169.

LangmanV.A. (1977). Cow–calf relationships in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa). — Z. Tierpsychol. 43: 264-286.

LawessonJ. (1995). Studies of woody flora and vegetation in Senegal. — Council for Nordic Publications in BotanyCopenhagen.

LentP.C. (1974). Mother–infant relationships in ungulates. 1. — In: The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to managment. IUCN publications new series No. 24 ( GeistV.WaltherF. eds). IUCNMorges p.  14-55.

LimaS.L.DillL.M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. — Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.

MalyjurkovaL.HejzlarovaM.VymyslickaP.J.BrandlovaK. (2014). Social preferences of translocated giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa) in Senegal: evidence for friendship among females?Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 47: 5-13.

NakamichiM.MurataC.EtoR.TakagiN.YamadaK. (2015). Daytime mother–calf relationships in reticulated giraffes (Giraffa cameloparadalis reticulate) at the Kyoto City Zoo. — Zoo Biol. 34: 110-117.

NežerkováP.VernerP.H.AntonínováM. (2004). The conservation programme of the western giant eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal–Czech Aid Development Project. — Gazella 31: 87-182.

PackerC.LewisS.PuseyA. (1992). A comparative analysis of non-offspring nursing. — Anim. Behav. 43: 265-281.

ParkerK.L.WhiteR.G.GillinghamM.P.HollemanD.F. (1990). Comparison of energy metabolism in relation to daily activity and milk consumption by caribou and muskox neonates. — Can. J. Zool. 68: 106-114.

PellewR.A. (1984a). Food consumption and energy budgets of giraffe. — J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 141-159.

PellewR.A. (1984b). The feeding ecology of a selective browser, the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi). — J. Zool. 202: 57-81.

PluháčekJ.BartošL.BartošováJ.KotrbaR. (2010). Feeding behaviour affects nursing behaviour in captive plains zebra (Equus burchellii). — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 128: 97-102.

PrattD.M.AndersonV.H. (1979). Giraffe cow–calf relationships and social development of the calf in the Serengeti. — Z. Tierpsychol. 51: 233-251.

RachlowJ.BowyerR. (1998). Habitat selection by Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli): maternal trade-offs. — J. Zool. 245: 457-465.

RallsK.KranzK.LundriganB. (1986). Mother–young relationships in captive ungulates: variability and clustering. — Anim. Behav. 34: 134-145.

RallsK.LundriganB.KranzK. (1987). Mother–young relationships in captive ungulates: behavioral changes over time. — Ethology 75: 1-14.

RéaleD.BoussesP.ChapuisJ.L. (1999). Nursing behaviour and mother–lamb relationships in mouflon under fluctuating population densities. — Behav. Proc. 47: 81-94.

RosenblattJ.MayerA.SiegelH. (1985). Maternal behavior among nonprimate mammals. — In: Handbook of behavioral neurobiologyVol. 7 ( AdlerN.PfaffD.GoyR.W. eds). Plenum PressNew York, NY p.  229-298.

RuckstuhlK.Festa-BianchetM. (1998). Do reproductive status and lamb gender affect the foraging behavior of bighorn ewes?Ethology 104: 941-954.

ShipleyL.GrossJ.SpalingerD. (1994). The scaling of intake rate in mammalian herbivores. — Am. Nat. 143: 1055-1082.

ŠpinkaM.IllmannG. (1992). Suckling behaviour of young dairy calves with their own and alien mothers. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33: 165-173.

TherrienJ.F.CôtéS.D.Festa-BianchetM.OuelletJ.P. (2008). Maternal care in white-tailed deer: trade-off between maintenance and reproduction under food restriction. — Anim. Behav. 75: 235-243.

ToïgoC. (1999). Vigilance behavior in lactating female Alpine ibex. — Can. J. Zool. 77: 1060-1063.

VeaseyJ.S.WaranN.K.YoungR.J. (1996). On comparing the behaviour of zoo housed animals with wild conspecifics as a welfare indicator. — Anim. Welf. 5: 13-24.

WhiteF. (1983). The vegetation of Africa a descriptive memoir to accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of Africa (3 plates Northwestern Africa Northeastern Africa and Southern Africa 1:5000000). — UnescoParis.

ZapataB.GaeteG.CorreaL. (2009). A case of allosuckling in wild guanacos (Lama guanicoe). — J. Ethol. 27: 295-297.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    The schema of nursing positions (1, antiparallel position; 2, perpendicular position; 3, parallel position). Direction of the arrow indicates the head of animal.

  • View in gallery

    The difference in nursing duration between two different environments.

  • View in gallery

    The difference in suckling success proportion of the calves between two different environments.

  • View in gallery

    The difference in suckling position of the calf between the two environments.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 31 31 18
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0