Red squirrel territorial vocalizations deter intrusions by conspecific rivals

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

In many species, territory advertisement is thought to be one of the primary functions of acoustic communication. North American red squirrels are a territorial species in which ‘rattles’ have long been thought to be the principal signal communicating territory ownership. These vocalizations have been assumed to deter intruders, thus reducing energetic costs and the risk of injury associated with direct aggressive interactions. However, this hypothesis has not been directly tested. Here we used a speaker occupation experiment to test whether red squirrel rattles function to deter conspecific rivals. We studied 29 male squirrels and removed each individual from his territory twice in a paired design. During the experimental treatment, we simulated the owner’s presence after its removal by broadcasting the owner’s rattle from a loudspeaker at the centre of the territory once every 7 min. During the control treatment, the territory was left in silence following the temporary removal of the owner. We found that the presence of a speaker replacement reduced the probability of intrusion by 34% and increased the latency to first intrusion by 7%, providing support for the hypothesis that rattles play an active role in reducing intrusion risk. However, intrusions were not completely averted by the speaker replacement, indicating that for some individuals vocalizations alone are not a sufficient deterrent without other cues of the territory owner.

Red squirrel territorial vocalizations deter intrusions by conspecific rivals

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AndersonP.K. & BarclayR.M.R. (1995). Acoustic signals of solitary dugongs: physical characteristics and behavioral correlates. — J. Mammal. 76: 1226-1237.

BarlowK.E. & JonesG. (1997). Function of pipistrelle social calls: field data and a playback experiment. — Anim. Behav. 53: 991-999.

BassA.H. & McKibbenJ.R. (2003). Neural mechanisms and behaviors for acoustic communication in teleost fish. — Progr. Neurobiol. 69: 1-26.

BastosR.P.AlcantaraM.B. & MoraisA.R. (2011). Vocal behaviour and conspecific call response in Scinax centralis. — Herpetol. J. 21: 43-50.

BerteauxD. & BoutinS. (2000). Breeding dispersal in female North American red squirrels. — Ecology 81: 1311-1326.

BradburyJ.W. & VehrencampS.L. (2011). Principles of animal communication2nd edn.Sinauer AssociatesSunderland, MA.

BrummH.RobertsonK.A. & NemethE. (2011). Singing direction as a tool to investigate the function of birdsong: an experiment on sedge warblers. — Anim. Behav. 81: 653-659.

CainK.E. & LangmoreN.E. (2015). Female and male song rates across breeding stage: testing for sexual and nonsexual functions of female song. — Anim. Behav. 109: 65-71.

CatchpoleC.K. (1973). The functions of advertising song in the sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) and the reed warbler (A. scirpaceus). — Behaviour 46: 300-319.

CatchpoleC.K. (1982). The evolution of bird sounds in relation to mating and spacing behavior. — In: Acoustic communication in birds (KroodsmaD.E. & MillerE.H. eds). Academic PressLondon p. 297-319.

CatchpoleC.K. (1983). Variation in the song of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defence. — Anim. Behav. 31: 1217-1225.

CatchpoleC.K. & SlaterP.J.B. (2008). Bird song: biological themes and variations2nd edn.Cambridge University PressCambridge.

ContiC.FonsecaP.J.PicciulinM. & AmorimM.C.P. (2015). How effective are acoustic signals in territorial defence in the Lusitanian toadfish?J. Exp. Biol. 218: 893-898.

CoxD.R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. — J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 34: 187-220.

CoxD.R. & OakesD. (1984). Analysis of survival data. — Chapman & HallLondon.

DantzerB.BoutinS.HumphriesM.M. & McAdamA.G. (2012). Behavioral responses of territorial red squirrels to natural and experimental variation in population density. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66: 865-878.

DantzerB.NewmanA.E.M.BoonstraR.PalmeR.BoutinS.HumphriesM.M. & McAdamA.G. (2013). Density triggers maternal hormones that increase adaptive offspring growth in a wild mammal. — Science 340: 1215-1217.

DardenS.K. & DabelsteenT. (2008). Acoustic territorial signalling in a small, socially monogamous canid. — Anim. Behav. 75: 905-912.

DigweedS.M.RendallD. & ImbeauT. (2012). Who’s your neighbor? Acoustic cues to individual identity in red squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus rattle calls. — Curr. Zool. 58: 758-764.

DonaldJ. & BoutinS. (2011). Intraspecific cache pilferage by larder-hoarding red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). — J. Mammal. 92: 1013-1020.

FallsJ.B. (1988). Does song deter territorial intrusion in white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis)?Can. J. Zool. 66: 206-211.

GorrellJ.McAdamA.ColtmanD.HumphriesM. & BoutinS. (2010). Adopting kin enhances inclusive fitness in asocial red squirrels. — Nature Commun. 1: 22.

GrinnellJ. & McCombK. (2001). Roaring and social communication in African lions: the limitations imposed by listeners. — Anim. Behav. 62: 93-98.

GrinnellJ.PackerC. & PuseyA.E. (1995). Cooperation in male lions: kinship, reciprocity or mutualism?Anim. Behav. 49: 95-105.

HarringtonF.H. & MechD.L. (1979). Wolf howling and its role in territory maintenance. — Behaviour 68: 207-249.

HayesS.A.KumarA.CostaD.P.MellingerD.K.HarveyJ.T.SouthallB.L. & Le BoeufB.J. (2004). Evaluating the function of the male harbour seal, Phoca vitulina, roar through playback experiments. — Anim. Behav. 67: 1133-1139.

HuangP.SievingK.E. & St. MaryC.M. (2012). Heterospecific information about predation risk influences exploratory behavior. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 463-472.

KramerH.G. & LemonR.E. (1983). Dynamics of territorial singing between neighboring song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). — Behaviour 85: 198-223.

KrebsC.J.BoutinS.A. & BoonstraR. (2001). Ecosystem dynamics of the boreal forest: the Kluane project. — Oxford University PressNew York, NY.

KrebsJ.R. (1977). Song and territory in the great tit Parus major. — In: Evolutionary ecology (StonehouseB. & PerrinsC. eds). University Park PressBaltimore, MD p. 47-62.

KrebsJ.AshcroftR. & WebberM. (1978). Song repertoires and territory defence in the great tit. — Nature 271: 539-542.

LairH. (1990). The calls of the red squirrel: a contextual analysis of function. — Behaviour 115: 254-281.

McAdamA.BoutinS.SykesA.K. & HumphriesM.M. (2007). Life histories of female red squirrels and their contributions to population growth and lifetime fitness. — Ecoscience 14: 362-369.

McDonaldM.V. (1989). Function of song in Scott’s seaside sparrow, Ammodramus maritimus peninsulae. — Anim. Behav. 38: 468-485.

MoraisA.R.SiqueiraM.N. & BastosR.P. (2015). How do males of Hypsiboas goianus (Hylidae: Anura) respond to conspecific acoustic stimuli?Zoologia (Curitiba) 32: 431-437.

MortonE.S. (1977). On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. — Am. Nat. 111: 855-869.

MyrbergA.A. (1997). Sound reduction by a coral reef fish (Pomacentrus partitus): evidence for a vocal, territorial “keep-out” signal. — Bull. Mar. Sci. 60: 1017-1025.

NowickiS.HughesM. & SearcyW. (1998). The territory defense function of song in song sparrows: a test with the speaker occupation design. — Behaviour 135: 615-628.

OdomK.J. & MennillD.J. (2010). Vocal duets in a nonpasserine: an examination of territory defence and neighbour-stranger discrimination in a neighbourhood of barred owls. — Behaviour 147: 619-639.

PeekF.W. (1972). An experimental study of the territorial function of vocal and visual display in the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). — Anim. Behav. 20: 112-118.

PenterianiV. (2002). Variation in the function of eagle owl vocal behaviour: territorial defence and intra-pair communication?Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14: 275-281.

PereiraR.RismondoS.CaianoM.PedrosoS.S.FonsecaP.J. & AmorimM.C.P. (2013). The role of agonistic sounds in male nest defence in the painted goby Pomatoschistus pictus. — Ethology 120: 53-63.

PriceK.BoutinS. & YdenbergR. (1990). Intensity of territorial defense in red squirrels: an experimental test of the asymmetric war of attrition. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 217-222.

R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingViennaavailable online at https://www.R-project.org/.

RebyD.CargneluttiB. & HewisonA.J.M. (1999). Contexts and possible functions of barking in roe deer. — Anim. Behav. 57: 1121-1128.

SeyfarthR. & CheneyD. (1990). The assessment by vervet monkeys of their own and another species’ alarm calls. — Anim. Behav. 40: 754-764.

SharpeD.J. & GoldingayR.L. (2009). Vocal behaviour of the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis). — Aust. J. Zool. 57: 55-64.

ShonfieldJ.TaylorR.BoutinS.HumphriesM. & McAdamA. (2012). Territorial defence behaviour in red squirrels is influenced by local density. — Behaviour 149: 369-390.

ShonfieldJ.GorrellJ.C.ColtmanD.W.BoutinS.HumphriesM.M.WilsonD.R. & McAdamA.G. (2017). Using playback of territorial calls to investigate mechanisms of kin discrimination in red squirrels. — Behav. Ecol. 28: 382-390.

SmithC.C. (1968). The adaptive nature of social organization in the genus of three squirrels Tamiasciurus. — Ecol. Monogr. 38: 31-64.

SmithC.C. (1978). Structure and function of the vocalizations of tree squirrels (Tamiasciurus). — J. Mammal. 59: 793-808.

SmithD.G. (1979). Male singing ability and territory integrity in red-winged blackbirds (Ageliaus phoeniceus). — Behaviour 68: 193-206.

SoardC.M. & RitchisonG. (2009). ‘Chick-a-dee’ calls of Carolina chickadees convey information about degree of threat posed by avian predators. — Anim. Behav. 78: 1447-1453.

TempletonC.N.GreeneE. & DavisK. (2005). Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. — Science 308: 1934-1937.

TherneauT.M. (2015). Mixed effects Cox models (R package version 2.2-5). — Available online at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxme.

WaserP.M. (1975). Experimental playbacks show vocal mediation of intergroup avoidance in a forest monkey. — Nature 255: 56-58.

WeedenJ.S. & FallsJ.B. (1959). Differential responses of male ovenbirds to recorded songs of neighboring and more distant individuals. — Auk 76: 343-351.

WellsK.D. (1977). The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. — Anim. Behav. 25: 666-693.

WestcottD. (1992). Inter-and intra-sexual selection: the role of song in a lek mating system. — Anim. Behav. 44: 695-703.

WilsonE.O. (1975). Sociobiology: the new synthesis. — Harvard University PressCambridge, MA.

WilsonD.R.GobleA.R.BoutinS.HumphriesM.M.ColtmanD.W.GorrellJ.C.ShonfieldJ. & McAdamA.G. (2015). Red squirrels use territorial vocalizations for kin discrimination. — Anim. Behav. 107: 79-85.

YasukawaK. (1981). Song and territory defense in the red-winged blackbird. — Auk 98: 185-187.

YasukawaK. (1990). Does the “teer” vocalization deter prospecting female red-winged blackbirds?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 421-426.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Latency to intrusion following the temporary removal of a territory owner during trials with (N=15) and without (N=25) a speaker replacement. Centre lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles. Percentages above each boxplot indicate the percentage of trials in which an intrusion occurred.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 17 17 17
Full Text Views 9 9 8
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0