Chemical cues influence retreat-site selection by flat rock spiders

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Many animals use chemical cues to detect conspecifics and predators. On sandstone outcrops, flat rock spiders Morebilus plagusius and Polyrachis ants use sun-exposed rocks as nest sites, and defend rocks from intruders. We investigated whether chemical cues influenced retreat-site selection by spiders. In the field, spiders showed significant avoidance of rocks used by ants. In laboratory trials, we gave spiders the choice between conspecific-scented and unscented refuges, and ant-scented and unscented refuges. In conspecific scent trials, spiders showed no avoidance of spider scented refuges during the night, but significantly more spiders chose unscented refuges as their diurnal retreat-site. In ant scent trials, spiders made more visits to unscented refuges than ant-scented refuges during the night, and significantly more spiders chose unscented refuges as their diurnal retreat site. Our results demonstrate that spiders can detect chemical cues from ants and conspecifics, and that such cues influence retreat-site selection.

Chemical cues influence retreat-site selection by flat rock spiders

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AllanR.A.ElgarM.A.CaponR.J. (1996). Exploitation of an ant chemical alarm signal by the zodariid spider Habronestes bradleyi Walckenaer. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 263: 69-73.

AndersenA.N. (1991). The ants of southern Australia: a guide to the Bassian fauna. — CSIROMelbourne, VIC.

AngelonK.A.PetrankaJ.W. (2002). Chemicals of predatory mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) influence selection of oviposition site by Culex mosquitoes. — J. Chem. Ecol. 28: 797-806.

BarnesM.C.PersonsM.H.RypstraA.L. (2002). The effect of predator chemical cue age on chemically-mediated antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). — J. Insect Behav. 15: 269-281.

BrennanB. (2002). Habitat use by the flat rock spider Hemicloea major: roles of food and temperature. — The University of Sydney Sydney NSW.

ChiversD.P.MirzaR.S.BryerP.J.KieseckerJ.M. (2001). Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information. — Can. J. Zool. 79: 867-873.

CristT.O.WiensJ.A. (1996). The distribution of ant colonies in a semiarid landscape: implications for community and ecosystem processes. — Oikos 76: 301-311.

CroakB.M.PikeD.A.WebbJ.K.ShineR. (2010). Using artificial rocks to restore nonrenewable shelter sites in human-degraded systems: colonization by fauna. — Restor. Ecol. 18: 428-438.

CushingP.E. (1997). Myrmecomorphy and myrmecophily in spiders: a review. — Florida Entomol. 80: 165-193.

CushingP.E. (2012). Spider–ant associations: an updated review of myrmecomorphy, myrmecophily, and myrmecophagy in spiders. — Psyche: 151989.

DickeM.GrostalP. (2001). Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 1-23.

DugatkinL.A. (1997). Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. — Behav. Ecol. 8: 583-587.

FoelixR. (2011). Biology of spiders. — Oxford University PressNew York, NY.

FoelixR.F. (1970). Chemosensitive hairs in spiders. — J. Morphol. 132: 313-333.

FuellingO.HalleS. (2004). Breeding suppression in free-ranging grey-sided voles under the influence of predator odour. — Oecologia 138: 151-159.

GoldsbroughC.HochuliD.ShineR. (2003). Invertebrate biodiversity under hot rocks: habitat use by the fauna of sandstone outcrops in the Sydney region. — Biol. Conserv. 109: 85-93.

HölldoblerB.WilsonE.O. (1990). The ants. — The Belknap Press of Harvard University PressCambridge, MA.

JohnsonA.RevisO.JohnsonJ.C. (2011). Chemical prey cues influence the urban microhabitat preferences of western black widow spiders, Latrodectus hesperus. — J. Arachnol. 39: 449-453.

KaravanichC.AtemaJ. (1998). Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. — Anim. Behav. 56: 1553-1560.

KatsL.B.DillL.M. (1998). The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. — Ecoscience 5: 361-394.

KoskelaE.YlonenH. (1995). Suppressed breeding in the field vole (Microtus agrestis): an adaptation to cyclically fluctuating predation risk. — Behav. Ecol. 6: 311-315.

LimaS.L.DillL.M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. — Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.

MacMahonJ.A.MullJ.F.CristT.O. (2000). Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): their community and ecosystem influences. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 265-291.

MullerK.L.StampsJ.A.KrishnanV.V.WillitsN.H. (1997). The effects of conspecific attraction and habitat quality on habitat selection in territorial birds. — Am. Nat. 150: 650-661.

NelsonX.J.JacksonR.R. (2004). Predation by ants on jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) in the Philippines. — N. Zeal. J. Zool. 31: 45-56.

NelsonX.J.JacksonR.R. (2011). Flexibility in the foraging strategies of spiders. — In: Spider behaviour. Flexibility and versatility ( HerbersteinM.E. ed.). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  45-72.

NelsonX.J.JacksonR.R. (2014). Timid spider uses odor and visual cues to actively select protected nesting sites near ants. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 773-780.

PenfoldS. (2015). Habitat use and competitive interactions of species in rock outcrop environments. — University of Technology Sydney Sydney NSW.

PersonsM.H.RypstraA.L. (2000). Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). — Ethology 106: 27-35.

PersonsM.H.RypstraA.L. (2001). Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. — J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 2493-2504.

PersonsM.H.WalkerS.E.RypstraA.L. (2002). Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). — Behav. Ecol. 13: 386-392.

PikeD.A.WebbJ.K.ShineR. (2012). Hot mothers, cool eggs: nest-site selection by egg-guarding spiders accommodates conflicting thermal optima. — Funct. Ecol. 26: 469-475.

PlatnickN.I. (2002). A revision of the Australasian ground spiders of the families Ammoxenidae, Cithaeronidae, Gallieniellidae, and Trochanteriidae (Araneae: Gnaphosoidea). — Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 27: 1-243.

PringleR.M.WebbJ.K.ShineR. (2003). Canopy structure, microclimate, and habitat selection by a nocturnal snake, Hoplocephalus bungaroides. — Ecology 84: 2668-2679.

SchulteL.M.YeagerJ.SchulteR.VeithM.WernerP.BeckL.A.LöttersS. (2011). The smell of success: choice of larval rearing sites by means of chemical cues in a Peruvian poison frog. — Anim. Behav. 81: 1147-1154.

ScottM.L.WhitingM.J.WebbJ.K.ShineR. (2013). Chemosensory discrimination of social cues mediates space use in snakes, Cryptophis nigrescens (Elapidae). — Anim. Behav. 85: 1493-1500.

SmallwoodJ. (1982). Nest relocations in ants. — Insect. Soc. 29: 138-147.

StampsJ.A. (1988). Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. — Am. Nat. 131: 329-347.

TrabalonM. (2013). Chemical communication and contact cuticular compounds in spiders. — In: Spider ecophysiology ( NentwigW. ed.). SpringerBerlin p.  125-140.

UhlG. (2013). Spider olfaction: attracting, detecting, luring and avoiding. — In: Spider ecophysiology ( NentwigW. ed.). SpringerBerlin p.  141-156.

van den BergF.T. (2015). Ecology of thermally extreme environments: ontogenetic ecophysiology of flat rock spiders Morebilus plagusius. — PhD thesis The University of Sydney Sydney NSW.

van den BergF.T.ThompsonM.B.HochuliD.F. (2015). When hot rocks get hotter: behavior and acclimatization mitigate exposure to extreme temperatures in a spider. — Ecosphere 6: 88.

WebbJ.K.ShineR. (2000). Paving the way for habitat restoration: can artificial rocks restore degraded habitats of endangered reptiles? — Biol. Conserv. 92: 93-99.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Photograph of an adult female flat rock spider used in laboratory experiments. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1568539x.

  • View in gallery

    The mean number of visits made by flat rock spiders to ant scented and unscented refuges during the nocturnal trials. Error bars denote standard errors. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests showed that individual spiders made significantly more visits to unscented refuges than ant-scented refuges.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 8
Full Text Views 9 9 9
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0