The sensory ecology of prey detection in the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis)
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by S. Renda in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by A. le Roux in
Current site
Google Scholar
In the absence of direct sunlight, nocturnal animals face sensory challenges different to those affecting their diurnal counterparts whilst foraging. Anecdotal observations have led to the general prediction that the auditory sensory mode is the most prominent for the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), a nocturnal, insectivorous canid. The present study aimed to clarify the relative importance of different sensory modes to foraging bat-eared foxes by conducting sensory trials with individuals belonging to a habituated population in the Kuruman River Reserve in South Africa. Foxes were tested in repeated trials controlling for particular sensory stimuli using live or pre-killed prey. Auditory cues proved significant () predictors of fox foraging success with olfactory and visual cues indicated as being of secondary importance. This study thus provides empirical confirmation for anecdotal reports that the bat-eared fox is predominantly reliant on auditory cues to determine hunting success.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Anjum F., Turni H., Mulder P.G., van der Burg J., Brecht M. (2006). Tactile guidance of prey capture in Etruscan shrews. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 16544-16549.
-
Barton R.A., Purvis A., Harvey P.H. (1995). Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 348: 381-392.
-
Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models Using lme4. — J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1-48.
-
Bender D.J., Bayne E.M., Brigham R.M. (1996). Lunar condition influences coyote (Canis latrans) howling. — Am. Midl. Nat. 136: 413-417.
-
Bicca-Marques J.C., Garber P.A. (2004). Use of spatial, visual, and olfactory information during foraging in wild nocturnal and diurnal anthropoids: a field experiment comparing Aotus, Callicebus, and Saguinus. — Am. J. Primatol. 62: 171-187.
-
Červený J., Begall S., Koubek P., Novakova P., Burda H. (2011). Directional preference may enhance hunting accuracy in foraging foxes. — Biol. Lett. 7: 355-357.
-
Clark H.O. (2005). Otocyon megalotis. — Mamm. Species 766: 1-5.
-
Clarke J.A. (1983). Moonlight’s influence on predator/prey interactions between short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) and deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 205-209.
-
Cunningham S.J., Castro I., Potter M.A. (2009). The relative importance of olfaction and remote touch in prey detection by north island brown kiwis. — Anim. Behav. 78: 899-905.
-
Da Costa R.S., Bicca-Marques J.C. (2014). Owl monkeys (Aotus nigriceps and A. infulatus) follow routes instead of food-related cues during foraging in captivity. — PLoS ONE 9: e115188.
-
Dominy N.J., Lucas P.W., Osorio D., Yamashita N. (2001). The sensory ecology of primate food perception. — Evol. Anthropol. 10: 171-186.
-
Eilam D. (2005). Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense — implications for the control of defensive behavior. — Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29: 1181-1191.
-
Fraser N.H.C., Metcalfe N.B. (1997). The costs of becoming nocturnal: feeding efficiency in relation to light intensity in juvenile Atlantic salmon. — Funct. Ecol. 11: 385-391.
-
Gadbois S., Reeve C. (2014). Canine olfaction: scent, sign, and situation. — In: Domestic dog cognition and behavior ( Horowitz A., ed.). Springer, Berlin, p. 3-29.
-
Garber P.A., Hannon B. (1993). Modeling monkeys: a comparison of computer-generated and naturally occurring foraging patterns in two species of Neotropical primates. — Int. J. Primatol. 14: 827-852.
-
Goerlitz H.R., Greif S., Siemers B.M. (2008). Cues for acoustic detection of prey: insect rustling sounds and the influence of walking substrate. — J. Exp. Biol. 211: 2799-2806.
-
Goerlitz H.R., Siemers B.M. (2007). Sensory ecology of prey rustling sounds: acoustical features and their classification by wild grey mouse lemurs. — Funct. Ecol. 21: 143-153.
-
Grant P.B.C., Samways M.J. (2015). Acoustic prey and a listening predator: interaction between calling katydids and the bat-eared fox. — Bioacoustics 24: 49-61.
-
Holderied M., Korine C., Moritz T. (2011). Hemprich’s long-eared bat (Otonycteris hemprichii) as a predator of scorpions: whispering echolocation, passive gleaning and prey selection. — J. Comp. Physiol. A. 197: 425-433.
-
Isley T.E., Gysel L.W. (1975). Sound-source localization by the red fox. — J. Mammal. 56: 397-404.
-
Jones G., Webb P.I., Sedgeley J.A., O’Donnell C.F.J. (2003). Mysterious Mystacina: how the New Zealand short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) locates insect prey. — J. Exp. Biol. 206: 4209-4216.
-
Jones G. (2013). Sensory biology: listening in the dark for echoes from silent and stationary prey. — Curr. Biol. 23: R249-R251.
-
Klinka D.R., Reimchen T.E. (2002). Nocturnal and diurnal foraging behaviour of brown bears (Ursus arctos) on a salmon stream in coastal British Columbia. — Can. J. Zool. 80: 1317-1322.
-
Klinka D.R., Reimchen T.E. (2009). Darkness, twilight, and daylight foraging success of bears (Ursus americanus) on salmon in coastal British Columbia. — J. Mammal. 90: 144-149.
-
Korine C., Kalko E.K.V. (2005). Fruit detection and discrimination by small fruit-eating bats (Phyllostomidae): echolocation call design and olfaction. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 12-23.
-
Kuntzsch V., Nel J.A.J. (1992). Diet of bat-eared foxes Otocyon megalotis in the Karoo. — Koedoe. 35: 37-48.
-
Lenth R.V. (2016). Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. — J. Stat. Softw. 69: 1-33.
-
Malcolm J.R. (1986). Socio-ecology of bat-eared foxes (Otocyon megalotis). — J. Zool. 208: 457-469.
-
Malkemper E.P., Topinka V., Burda H. (2015). A behavioral audiogram of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). — Hear. Res. 320: 30-37.
-
Martin G.R. (2012). Through birds’ eyes: insights into avian sensory ecology. — J. Ornithol. 153: 23-48.
-
Nekaris K.A.I. (2005). Foraging behaviour of the slender loris (Loris lydekkerianus lydekkerianus): implications for theories of primate origins. — J. Hum. Evol. 49: 289-300.
-
Nel J.A.J. (1990). Foraging and feeding by bat-eared foxes; Otocyon megalotis; in the southwestern Kalahari. — Koedoe. 33: 9-16.
-
Österholm H. (1964). The significance of distance receptors in the feeding behaviour of the fox, Vulpes vulpes L. — Acta. Zool. Fenn. 106: 3-31.
-
Piep M., Radespiel U., Zimmermann E., Schmidt S., Siemers B.M. (2008). The sensory basis of prey detection in captive-born grey mouse lemurs, Microcebus murinus. — Anim. Behav. 75: 871-878.
-
Raghuram H., Thangadurai C., Gopukumar N., Nathar K., Sripathi K. (2009). The role of olfaction and vision in the foraging behaviour of an echolocating megachiropteran fruit bat, Rousettus leschenaulti (Pteropodidae). — Mamm. Biol. 74: 9-14.
-
Ramsier M.A., Dominy N.J. (2012). Receiver bias and the acoustic ecology of aye-ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis). — Commun. Integr. Biol. 5: 637-640.
-
Regular P.M., Hedd A., Montevecchi W.A. (2011). Fishing in the dark: a pursuit-diving seabird modifies foraging behaviour in response to nocturnal light levels. — PLoS ONE 6: e26763.
-
Rushmore J., Leonhardt S.D., Drea C.M. (2012). Sight or scent: lemur sensory reliance in detecting food quality varies with feeding ecology. — PLoS ONE 7: e41558.
-
Schaub A., Ostwald J., Siemers B.M. (2009). Foraging bats avoid noise. — J. Exp. Biol. 212: 3036.
-
Siemers B.M., Goerlitz H.R., Robsomanitrandrasana E., Piep M., Ramanamanjato J.B., Rakotondravony D., Ramilijaona O., Ganzhorn J.U. (2007). Sensory basis of food detection in wild Microcebus murinus. — Int. J. Primatol. 28: 291-304.
-
Siemers B.M., Swift S.M. (2006). Differences in sensory ecology contribute to resource partitioning in the bats Myotis bechsteinii and Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 373-380.
-
Stuart C.T., Stuart T., Pereboom V. (2003). Diet of the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), based on scat analysis, on the Western-Escarpment, South Africa. — Canid News 6. Available online at http://www.canids.org/canidnews/6/Bat-eared_fox_diet_in_South_Africa.pdf.
-
Szetei V., Miklósi A., Topál J., Csányi V. (2003). When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 83: 141-152.
-
Wells M.C., Lehner P.N. (1978). The relative importance of the distance senses in coyote predatory behaviour. — Anim. Behav. 26: 251-258.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1194 | 154 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 347 | 20 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 143 | 35 | 2 |
The sensory ecology of prey detection in the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis)
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by S. Renda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. le Roux in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In the absence of direct sunlight, nocturnal animals face sensory challenges different to those affecting their diurnal counterparts whilst foraging. Anecdotal observations have led to the general prediction that the auditory sensory mode is the most prominent for the bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), a nocturnal, insectivorous canid. The present study aimed to clarify the relative importance of different sensory modes to foraging bat-eared foxes by conducting sensory trials with individuals belonging to a habituated population in the Kuruman River Reserve in South Africa. Foxes were tested in repeated trials controlling for particular sensory stimuli using live or pre-killed prey. Auditory cues proved significant () predictors of fox foraging success with olfactory and visual cues indicated as being of secondary importance. This study thus provides empirical confirmation for anecdotal reports that the bat-eared fox is predominantly reliant on auditory cues to determine hunting success.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1194 | 154 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 347 | 20 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 143 | 35 | 2 |