Information depends on context: behavioural response to chemical signals depends on sex and size in crayfish contests

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Securing information about oneself or an opponent can be crucial to update the likelihood of winning a contest and the relative costs of continuing or escalating. This information can subsequently reduce costly errors. However, information encoded in signals exchanged by opponents can differ based on context. We sought to unravel these differences by pairing male and female crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) under varying sex and size conditions. A pre-optimized technique was used to visualize a well-studied contest signal in crayfish (i.e., urine). Behavioural responses were quantified prior to and after the release of that signal. There was a characteristic de-escalation of behavioural intensity after an opponent released urine. However, behavioural changes after the release event were dependent on the sex and the relative size of the opponents. Urine also significantly altered both sender and receiver behaviour, but lack of behavioural differences suggests urine plays a role in both opponent and auto-communication.

Information depends on context: behavioural response to chemical signals depends on sex and size in crayfish contests

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AggioJ.DerbyC.D. (2011). Chemical communication in lobsters. — In: Chemical communication in crustaceans ( BreithauptT.ThielM. eds). SpringerNew York, NY p.  239-256.

ArnottG.ElwoodR.W. (2008). Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. — Anim. Behav. 76: 529-542.

ArnottG.ElwoodR.W. (2009). Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. — Anim. Behav. 77: 991-1004.

BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. — J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1-48.

BatistaG.ZubizarretaL.PerroneR.SilvaA. (2012). Non-sex-biased dominance in a sexually monomorphic electric fish: fight structure and submissive electric signalling. — Ethology 118: 398-410.

BelangerR.M.MooreP.A. (2006). The use of the major chelae by reproductive male crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) for discrimination of female odours. — Behaviour 143: 713-731.

BergmanD.A.MooreP.A. (2003). Field observation of intraspecific agonistic behaviour of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. — Biol. Bull. 205: 26-35.

BergmanD.A.MooreP.A. (2005a). The role of chemical signals in the social behaviour of crayfish. — Chem. Senses 30: i305-i306.

BergmanD.A.MooreP.A. (2005b). Prolonged exposure to social odours alters subsequent social interactions in crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). — Anim. Behav. 70: 311-318.

BergmanD.A.KozlowskiC.P.McIntyreJ.C.HuberR.DawsA.G.MooreP.A. (2003). Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. — Behaviour 140: 805-825.

BergmanD.A.MartinA.L.IIIMooreP.A. (2005). Control of information flow through the influence of mechanical and chemical signals during agonistic encounters by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. — Anim. Behav. 70: 485-496.

BerryF.C.BreithauptT. (2010). To signal or not to signal? Chemical communication by urine-borne signals mirrors sexual conflict in crayfish. — BMC Biol. 8: 25.

BovbjergR.V. (1953). Dominance order in the crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen). — Phys. Zool. 26: 173-178.

BradburyJ.W.VehrencampS.L. (eds) (1998). Principles of animal communication. — Sinauer AssociatesSunderland, MA.

BreithauptT.EgerP. (2002). Urine makes the difference: chemical communication in fighting crayfish made visible. — J. Exp. Biol. 205: 1221-1231.

BreithauptT. (2011). Chemical communication in crayfish. — In: Chemical communication in crustaceans ( BreithauptT.ThielM. eds). SpringerNew York, NY p.  257-276.

BruskiC.A.DunhamD.W. (1987). The importance of vision in agonistic communication of the crayfish Orconectes rusticus I: an analysis of bout dynamics. — Behaviour 103: 83-107.

BuckupL.DutraB.K.RibarckiF.P.FernandesF.A.NoroC.K.OliveiraG.T.VinagreA.S. (2008). Seasonal variations in the biochemical composition of the crayfish Parastacus defossus (Crustacea, Decapoda) in its natural environment. — Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A 149: 59-67.

BushmannP.J.AtemaJ. (1996). Nephropore rosette glands of the lobster Homarus americanus: possible sources of urine pheromones. — J. Crust. Biol. 16: 221-231.

BushmannP.J.AtemaJ. (1997). Shelter sharing and chemical courtship signals in the lobster Homarus americanus. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 647-654.

CallaghanD.T.WeisbordC.D.DewW.A.PyleG.G. (2012). The role of various sensory inputs in establishing social hierarchies in crayfish. — Behaviour 149: 1443-1458.

ChenP.Z.CarrascoL.R.NgK.L. (2014). Post-contest stridulation used exclusively as a victory display in mangrove crabs. — Ethology 120: 532-539.

ClevelandD.W.LavalliK.L. (2010). Factors influencing the establishment of dominance hierarchies of the grey triggerfish Balistes capriscus. — Curr. Zool. 56: 18-35.

DallS.R.X.GiraldeauL.A.OlssonO.McNamaraJ.M.StephensD.W. (2005). Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 187-193.

DavisK.M.HuberR. (2007). Activity patterns, behavioural repertoires, and agonistic interactions of crayfish: a non-manipulative field study. — Behaviour 144: 229-247.

DawsA.G.GrillsJ.KonzenK.MooreP.A. (2002). Previous experiences alter the outcome of aggressive interactions between males in the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. — Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 35: 139-148.

DraudM.Macías-OrdóñezR.VergaJ.ItzkowitzM. (2004). Female and male Texas cichlids (Herichthys cyanoguttatum) do not fight by the same rules. — Behav. Ecol. 15: 102-108.

DusenberryD.B. (1992). Sensory ecology: how organisms acquire and respond to information. — W.H. FreemanNew York, NY.

DussatourA.LattyT.BeekamnM.SimpsonS.J. (2010). Amoeboid organism solves complex nutritional challenges. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 4607-4611.

EdwardsD.H.KravitzE.A. (1997). Serotonin, social status and aggression. — Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7: 812-819.

EggeA.R.BrandtY.SwallowJ.G. (2011). Sequential analysis of aggressive interactions in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 369-379.

EliasD.O.BoteroC.A.AndradeM.C.B.MasonA.C.KasumovicM.M. (2010). High resource valuation fuels “desperado” fighting tactics in female jumping spiders. — Behav. Ecol. 21: 868-875.

ElwoodR.W.ArnottG. (2012). Understanding how animals fight with Lloyd Morgan’s canon. — Anim. Behav. 84: 1095-1102.

EnquistM.LeimarO.LjungbergY.M.SegerdahlN. (1990). A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala. — Anim. Behav. 40: 1-14.

FawcettT.W.JohnstoneR.A. (2010). Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B.: Biol. Sci. 277: 1427-1434.

FawcettT.W.MowlesS.L. (2013). Assessments of fighting ability need not be cognitively complex. — Anim. Behav. 86: e1-e7.

FeroK.MooreP.A. (2008). Social spacing of crayfish in natural habitats: what role does dominance play?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1119-1125.

FeroK.C.MooreP.A. (2014). Shelter availability influences social behaviour and habitat choice in crayfish, Orconectes virilis. — Behaviour 151: 103-123.

GarciaM.PaivaL.LennoxM.SivaramanB.WongS.C.EarleyR.L. (2012). Assessment strategies and the effects of fighting experience on future contest performance in the green anole (Anolis carolinensis). — Ethology 118: 821-834.

GherardiF. (2002). Behaviour. — In: Biology of freshwater crayfish ( HoldichD.M. ed.). Blackwell ScienceOxford p.  192-224.

HayM.E. (2009). Marine chemical ecology: chemical signals and cues structure marine populations, communities, and ecosystems. — Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1: 193-212.

HsuY.LeeS.P.ChenM.H.YangS.Y.ChengK.C. (2008). Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. — Anim. Behav. 75: 1641-1649.

HuberR.DelagoA. (1998). Serotonin alters decisions to withdraw in fighting crayfish, Astacus astacus: the motivational concept revisited. — J. Comp. Physiol. A. 182: 573-583.

HuberR.OrzeszynaM.PokornyN.KravitzE.A. (1997). Biogenic amines and aggression: experimental approaches in crustaceans. — Brain Behav. Evol. 50: 60-68.

JohnsonM.E.AtemaJ. (2005). The olfactory pathway for individual recognition in the American lobster Homarus americanus. — J. Exp. Biol. 208: 2865-2872.

KaravanichC.AtemaJ. (1998). Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. — Anim. Behav. 56: 1553-1560.

KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP.B.ChristensenR.H.B. (2016). lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. — R Package version 2.0-33 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna. Available online at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.

MartinA.L.IIIMooreP.A. (2007). Field observations of agonism in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: shelter use in a natural environment. — Ethology 113: 1192-1201.

MartinA.L.IIIMooreP.A. (2010). The influence of reproductive state on the agonistic interactions between male and female crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). — Behaviour 147: 1309-1325.

MartínJ.MoreiraP.L.LópezP. (2007). Status-signalling chemical badges in male Iberian rock lizards. — Funct. Ecol. 21: 568-576.

MatherM.E.SteinR.A. (1993). Direct and indirect effects of fish predation on the replacement of a native crayfish by an invading congener. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 1279-1288.

McLayC.L.van den BrinkA.M. (2016). Crayfish growth and reproduction. — In: Biology and ecology of crayfish ( LongshawM.StebbingP. eds). CRC PressBoca Raton, FL p.  62-116.

Mesterton-GibbonsM.HeapS.M. (2014). Variation between self- and mutual assessment in animal contests. — Am. Nat. 183: 199-213.

MooreP.A.BergmanD.A. (2005). The smell of success and failure: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic chemical signals on the social behaviour of crayfish. — Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 650-657.

MooreP.A. (2007). Agonistic behaviour in freshwater crayfish: the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on aggressive encounters and dominance. — In: Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms ( DuffyJ.E.ThielM. eds). Oxford University PressOxford p.  90-114.

MowlesS.L.BriffaM. (2012). Forewarned is forearmed: early signals of RHP predict opponent fatigue in hermit crab shell fights. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 1324-1329.

NystromP. (2002). Ecology. — In: Biology of freshwater crayfish ( HoldichD.M. ed.). Blackwell ScienceOxford p.  192-224.

OtteD. (1974). Effects and functions in the evolution of signalling systems. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 5: 385-417.

ParkerG.A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. — J. Theor. Biol. 47: 223-243.

PaveyC.R.FielderD.R. (1996). The influence of size differential on agonistic behaviour in the freshwater crayfish, Cherax cuspidatus (Decapoda: Parastacidae). — J. Zool. 238: 445-457.

PercivalD.T.MooreP.A. (2010). Shelter size influences self-assessment of size in crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: consequences for agonistic fights. — Behaviour 147: 103-119.

PerryW.L.LodgeD.M.LambertiG.A. (1997). Impact of crayfish predation on exotic zebra mussels and native invertebrates in a lake-outlet stream. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 120-125.

R Core Development Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/.

ScheelD.Godfrey-SmithP.LawrenceM. (2016). Signal use by octopuses in agonistic interactions. — Curr. Biol. 26: 1-6.

SchirfV.R.TurnerP.SelbyL.HannapelC.De La CruzP.DehnP.F. (1987). Nutritional status and energy metabolism of crayfish (Procambarus clarkii, Girard) muscle and hepatopancreas. — Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 3: 383-386.

SeebacherF.WilsonR.S. (2007). Individual recognition in crayfish (Cherax dispar): the roles of strength and experience in deciding aggressive encounters. — Biol. Lett. 3: 471-474.

ShabaniS.KamioM.DerbyC.D. (2009). Spiny lobsters use urine-borne olfactory signalling and physical aggressive behaviours to influence social status and conspecifics. — J. Exp. Biol. 212: 2464-2474.

SimonJ.L.MooreP.A. (2007). Male-female communication in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus: the use of urinary signals in reproductive and non-reproductive pairings. — Ethology 133: 740-754.

SmithM.R.DunhamD.W. (1990). Chela posture and vision: compensation for sensory deficit in the crayfish Orconectes propinquus (Girard) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). — Crustaceana 59: 309-313.

StebbingP.D.BentleyM.G.WatsonG.J. (2003). Mating behaviour and evidence for a female released courtship pheromone in the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus. — J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 465-475.

SteinR.A. (1976). Sexual dimorphism in crayfish chelae: functional significance linked to reproductive activities. — Can. J. Zool. 54: 220-227.

TaylorP.W.ElwoodR.W. (2003). The mismeasure of animal contests. — Anim. Behav. 65: 1195-1202.

TorreblancaA.del RamoJ.Diaz-MayansJ. (1992). Changes in biochemical compostion of gills, hepatopancreas and muscle of the red crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard) after sublethal exposure to mercury. — Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 102: 247-252.

TriversR.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. — In: Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 ( CampbellB. ed.). Aldine-AthertonChicago, IL p.  136-179.

Van HarreveldA. (1936). Physiological saline for crayfish. — Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 34: 428.

VogtG. (2002). Functional anatomy. — In: Biology of freshwater crayfish ( HoldichD.M. ed.). Blackwell ScienceOxford p.  53-151.

WoffordS.J.EarleyR.L.MooreP.A. (2015). Evidence for assessment disappears in mixed-sex contests of the crayfish, Orconectes virilis. — Behaviour 152: 995-1018.

WymanM.T.MooringM.S.McCowanB.PenedoM.C.T.RebyD.HartL.A. (2012). Acoustic cues to size and quality in the vocalizations of male North American bison, Bison bison. — Anim. Behav. 84: 1381-1391.

ZeilJ.HemmiJ.M. (2006). The visual ecology of fiddler crabs. — J. Comp. Physiol. A. 192: 1-25.

Zulandt-SchneiderR.A.HuberR.MooreP.A. (2001). Individual and status recognition in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: the effects of urine release on fight dynamics. — Behaviour 138: 137-153.

ZuurA.F.IenoE.N.WalkerN.J.SavelievA.A.SmithG.M. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. — SpringerNew York, NY.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Schematic of fight arena set up. The drawing on the left shows the view into the test arena from the side-view camera. The drawing on the right shows the set up from the side, rotated 90 degrees. Black lights were placed around the top of the structure to illuminate fluorescein release. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1568539x.

  • View in gallery

    Behavioural changes pre and post urine release. Release plots demonstrate qualitative changes in behavioural intensity over time in relation to a urine release event. 2A shows changes in behaviour at each second averaged across all release events (N=78). 2B shows differences in behavioural changes between different sex conditions (male–male (N=21), female–female (N=24), male–female (N=33)). 2C shows differences in behavioural changes between size matched (N=42) and size different (N=36) conditions. The red dashed line at time point 0 denotes the release event on all graphs.

  • View in gallery

    Fixed Effects Interactive Effects on Non-escalated Contact Phase. Bar plot exhibits significant interactive effect of all three fixed variables on non-escalated contact phase (χ2=5.82, df = 2, p=0.05). Female same sex contests showed little to no change in non-escalated contact behaviours post-release, regardless of size treatment. Males showed a trend towards increased proportion of non-escalated contact behaviours post-release for both size matched and size different contests. Changes for these behaviours post-release in mixed sex contests were dependent on the size treatment.

  • View in gallery

    R code used for data analysis. Linear mixed models (LMM) followed by analysis of deviance tables using Type II Wald Chi Square tests were used to determine the main effects of opponent sex and size on behaviour pre- and post-urine release in the lme4 package (Bates et al., 2015). Models were constructed using sex treatment (male only, female only, or mixed sex dyads), size treatment (size matched or size different dyads) and time (pre- or post-release) as fixed effects and trial number and release number as nested random effects. Differences of least squares means (‘difflsmeans’) from the lmerTest package (Kuznetsova et al., 2016) in R was used as a post hoc test to discern significant differences within significant main effects detected by the ANOVAs.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 4
Full Text Views 64 64 40
PDF Downloads 15 15 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0