Artificial Visible Implant Elastomer (VIE) tags of different colour and symmetry do not influence mate choice in a cichlid

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Experimental individuals are frequently marked with coloured tags for individual identification. Except for birds, the consequences of such artificial tagging on mate choice have been rarely investigated even though individuals often prefer naturally brightly coloured or symmetrically ornamented mates. We tested whether differently coloured Visible Implant Elastomer (VIE) tags influence female mate choice in rainbow kribs, Pelvicachromis pulcher. Females were allowed to simultaneously choose between a control and a VIE-marked male. The VIE-marked male carried two tags of the same colour (red, blue, green or white) set symmetrically or asymmetrically. Females did not show a preference for or avoidance of males carrying any of the colours compared to control males, no matter if the tags had been set symmetrically or asymmetrically. Although we found no discrimination for or against colour-tags, we highlight the importance of considering potential influences of colour-marks on mate choice in behavioural and evolutionary studies.

Artificial Visible Implant Elastomer (VIE) tags of different colour and symmetry do not influence mate choice in a cichlid

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AnderssonM. (1994). Sexual selection. — Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ.

BaileyL.L. (2004). Evaluating elastomer marking and photo identification methods for terrestrial salamanders: marking effects and observer bias. — Herpetol. Rev. 35: 38-41.

BaileyR.E.IrvineJ.R.DalzielF.C.NelsonT.C. (1998). Evaluations of visible implant fluorescent tags for marking coho salmon smolts. — N. Am. J. Fish. Managem. 18: 191-196.

BaldaufS.A.KullmannH.ThünkenT.WinterS.BakkerT.C. (2009). Computer animation as a tool to study preferences in the cichlid Pelvicachromis taeniatus. — J. Fish Biol. 75: 738-746.

BertucciF.BeauchaudM.AttiaJ.MathevonN. (2010). Sounds modulate males’ aggressiveness in a cichlid fish. — Ethology 116: 1179-1188.

BouskaW.W.PaukertC.P. (2010). Effects of visible implant elastomer mark colour on the predation of red shiners by largemouth bass. — Fish. Managem. Ecol. 17: 294-296.

BrewerR.S.NorcrossB.L. (2012). Long-term retention of internal elastomer tags in a wild population of north Pacific giant octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini). — Fish. Res. 134-136: 17-20.

BrookesM.PomiankowskiA. (1994). Symmetry is in the eye of the beholder. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 201-202.

BruyndoncxL.KnaepkensG.MeeusW.BervoetsL.EensM. (2002). The evaluation of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags and visible implant elastomer (VIE) marks as new marking techniques for the bullhead. — J. Fish Biol. 60: 260-262.

BurleyN. (1986). Comparison of the band-color preferences of two species of estrildid finches. — Anim. Behav. 34: 1732-1741.

BurleyN. (1988). Wild zebra finches have band-colour preferences. — Anim. Behav. 36: 1235-1237.

BurleyN.KrantzbergG.RadmanP. (1982). Influence of colour-banding on the conspecific preferences of zebra finches. — Anim. Behav. 30: 444-455.

ButtK.R.LoweC.N. (2007). A viable technique for tagging earthworms using visible implant elastomer. — Appl. Soil Ecol. 35: 454-457.

CasaliniM.ReichardM.SmithC. (2010). The effect of crowding and density on male mating behaviour in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). — Behaviour 147: 1035-1050.

ChapinK.J. (2011). Suitability of a subcuticular permanent marking technique for scorpions. — J. Arachnol. 39: 194-196.

ColléterM.BrownC. (2011). Personality traits predict hierarchy rank in male rainbowfish social groups. — Anim. Behav. 81: 1231-1237.

CrawleyM.J. (2007). The R book. — WileyChichester.

CroftD.P.KrauseJ.JamesR. (2004). Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 271: S516-S519.

Dechaume-MoncharmontF.-X.CornuauJ.H.KeddarI.IhleM.MotreuilS.CézillyF. (2011). Rapid assessment of female preference for male size predicts subsequent choice of spawning partner in a socially monogamous cichlid fish. — Compt. Rend. Biol. 334: 906-910.

EndlerJ.A. (1990). On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41: 315-352.

FiskeP.AmundsenT. (1997). Female bluethroats prefer males with symmetric colour bands. — Anim. Behav. 54: 81-87.

FrommenJ.G.HanakS.SchmidlC.A.ThünkenT. (2015). Visible implant elastomer tagging influences social preferences of zebrafish (Danio rerio). — Behaviour 152: 1765-1777.

FürtbauerI.KingA.J.HeistermannM. (2015). Visible implant elastomer (VIE) tagging and simulated predation risk elicit similar physiological stress responses in three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. — J. Fish Biol. 86: 1644-1649.

GodinD.M.CarrW.H.HaginoG.SeguraF.SweeneyJ.N.BlankenshipL. (1996). Evaluation of a fluorescent elastomer internal tag in juvenile and adult shrimp Penaeus vannamei. — Aquaculture 139: 243-248.

GodinJ.-G.J.DugatkinL.A. (1996). Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 10262-10267.

GodinJ.-G.J.McDonoughH.E. (2003). Predator preference for brightly colored males in the guppy: a viability cost for a sexually selected trait. — Behav. Ecol. 14: 194-200.

GoforthW.R.BaskettT.S. (1965). Effects of experimental color marking on pairing of captive murning doves. — J. Wildl. Managem. 29: 543-553.

HaganJ.M.ReedM.J. (1988). Red color bands reduce fledging success in red-cockaded woodpeckers. — Auk 105: 498-503.

HansenL.T.T.AmundsenT.ForsgrenE. (1999). Symmetry: attractive not only to females. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 266: 1235-1240.

JennionsM.D. (1998). The effect of leg band symmetry on female–male association in zebra finches. — Anim. Behav. 55: 61-67.

KingA.J.FürtbauerI.MamuneasD.JamesC.ManicaA. (2014). Sex-differences and temporal consistency in stickleback fish boldness. — PLoS ONE 8: e81116.

LittleA.C.JonesB.C.DeBruineL.M.FeinbergD.R. (2008). Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality. — Behav. Ecol. 19: 902-908.

MartinC.H. (2013). Strong assortative mating by diet, color, size, and morphology but limited progress toward sympatric speciation in a classic example: Cameroon crater lake cichlids. — Evolution 67: 2114-2123.

MartinE.TaborskyM. (1997). Alternative male mating tactics in a cichlid, Pelvicachromis pulcher: a comparison of reproductive effort and success. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 311-319.

MartinezA.S.ByrneM.ColemanR.A. (2013). Unique tagging of small echinoderms: a case study using the cushion star Parvulastra exigua. — Methods Ecol. Evol. 4: 993-1000.

MeloT.d.S.de Carvalho-SouzaG.F.Lima PeresM.C.Browne RibeiroH.C.DiasM.A. (2013). The utilization of visible implant fluorescent elastomers in spiders (Araneae: Theraphosidae). — Rev. Iberica Aracnol. 23: 99-101.

MilinskiM.BakkerT.C.M. (1990). Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. — Nature 344: 330-333.

MoffattC. (2013). Using visible implant elastomer to tag insects across life stages: a preliminary investigation with blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae). — Can. Entomol. 145: 466-470.

MøllerA.P.ThornhillR. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. — Am. Nat. 151: 174-192.

OlsenE.M.VøllestadL.A. (2001). An evaluation of visible implant elastomer for marking age-0 brown trout. — N. Am. J. Fish. Managem. 21: 967-970.

ParsonsP.A. (1990). Fluctuating aysmmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. — Biol. Rev. 65: 131-145.

ParsonsP.A. (1992). Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. — Heredity 68: 361-364.

PenneyK.M.GianopulosK.D.McCoyE.D.MushinskyH.R. (2001). The visible implant elastomer marking technique in use for small reptiles. — Herpetol. Rev. 32: 236-241.

R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna available online at http://www.R-project.org/.

ReevesK.S.BuckmeierD.L. (2009). Mortality, predation, and tag visibility of fish marked with visible implant elastomer tags. — N. Am. J. Fish. Managem. 29: 323-329.

RobertsJ.H.AngermeierP.L. (2004). A comparison of injectable fluorescent marks in two genera of darters: effects on survival and retention rates. — N. Am. J. Fish. Managem. 24: 1017-1024.

SalzburgerW.NiederstätterH.BrandstätterA.BergerB.ParsonW.SnoeksJ.SturmbauerC. (2006). Colour-assortative mating among populations of Tropheus moorii, a cichlid fish from Lake Tanganyika, East Africa. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 273: 257-266.

SapsfordS.J.AlfordR.A.SchwarzkopfL. (2015). Visible implant elastomer as a viable marking technique for common mistfrogs (Litoria rheocola). — Herpetologica 71: 96-101.

SchluppI.MarlerC.RyanM.J. (1994). Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. — Science 263: 373-374.

SchluppI.RyanM.J. (1997). Male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males. — Behav. Ecol. 8: 104-107.

SchlüterA.ParzefallJ.SchluppI. (1998). Female preference for symmetrical vertical bars in male sailfin mollies. — Anim. Behav. 56: 147-153.

SchuettW.DallS.R.X. (2010). Appearance, “state”, and behavior in male zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. — J. Ethol. 28: 273-286.

SeehausenO.van AlphenJ.J.M. (1998). The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 1-8.

SeguinA.ForstmeierW. (2012). No band color effects on male courtship rate or body mass in the zebra finch: four experiments and a meta-analysis. — PLoS ONE 7: e37785.

SelzO.M.PierottiM.E.R.MaanM.E.SchmidC.SeehausenO. (2014). Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species. — Behav. Ecol. 25: 612-626.

SimmonsL.W.RhodesG.PetersM.KoehlerN. (2004). Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability? — Behav. Ecol. 15: 864-871.

SimonJ.DörnerH. (2011). Growth, mortality and tag retention of small Anguilla anguilla marked with visible implant elastomer tags and coded wire tags under laboratory conditions. — J. Appl. Ichthyol. 27: 94-99.

SirkiäP.M.LaaksonenT. (2009). Distinguishing between male and territory quality: females choose multiple traits in the pied flycatcher. — Anim. Behav. 78: 1051-1060.

SoulaM.NavarroA.HildebrandtS.ZamoranoM.RooJ.Hernández-CruzC.M.AfonsoJ.M. (2012). Evaluation of VIE (visible implant elastomer) and PIT (passive integrated transponder) physical tagging systems for the identification of red porgy fingerlings (Pagrus pagrus). — Aquacult. Int. 20: 571-583.

SwaddleJ.P.CuthillI.C. (1994a). Female zebra finches prefer males with symmetrical chest plumage. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 258: 267-271.

SwaddleJ.P.CuthillI.C. (1994b). Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches. — Nature 367: 165-166.

ThünkenT.BakkerT.C.M.BaldaufS.A.KullmannH. (2007). Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. — Curr. Biol. 17: 225-229.

WoodsC.M.C.Martin-SmithK.M. (2004). Visible implant fluorescent elastomer tagging of the big-bellied seahorse, Hippocampus abdominalis. — Fish. Res. 66: 363-371.

ZhouM.FullerR.C. (2016). Intrasexual competition underlies sexual selection on male breeding coloration in the orangethroat darter, Etheostoma spectabile. — Ecol. Evol. 6: 3513-3522.

ZukM.KolluruG.R. (1998). Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. — Q. Rev. Biol. 73: 415-438.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    (a) A typical male from our captive Pelvicachromis pulcher population, carrying a green VIE-tag (arrow). Positions of VIE-tags (black dots) in (b) symmetrical and (c) asymmetrical treatments. A fish received two tags of the same colour (red, blue, green or white) at either of the two shown combinations of positions of the symmetrical and asymmetrical treatment, respectively. (b), (c) Schematic view of fish from above.

  • View in gallery

    The mean ± SE time females spent with a control and VIE-marked male during mate choice trials. Mean ± SE based on raw data. N=121 trials.

  • View in gallery

    The mean ± SE time a female spent with a control and VIE-marked male during mate choice trials. Marked males carried two blue (a, b), green (c, d), red (e, f) or white (g, h) VIE marks in an asymmetrical (a, c, e, g) or symmetrical (b, d, f, h) manner. Mean ± SE based on raw data.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 23 23 14
Full Text Views 88 84 46
PDF Downloads 7 6 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0