Effects of social experience on pair bonding in a monogamous fish (Amatitlania nigrofasciata)

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

For species in which individuals spend at least some time in groups, dominance relationships and various social cues are often important for mate assessment and choice. For pair bonding species, social experiences may affect reproductive decisions in both sexes. We tested whether prior experience in a mixed-sex group and having a higher dominance status coincides with faster pair formation or spawning in a monogamous fish. Individuals having prior experience in mixed-sex groups paired with a novel fish more frequently than fish from same-sex groups. Fish in mixed-sex groups performed more bites and lateral displays. Although spawning occurred infrequently across pairs, dominant fish from mixed-sex groups spawned more than dominant fish from same-sex groups. Otherwise, there were no clear behavioural relationships between treatment group and subsequent pair formation or spawning, nor were behaviours of the paired fishes related to their prior treatment group. We do not know how mixed-sex social experience may have affected the physiology of those individuals, although our results support a reproductive priming effect.

Effects of social experience on pair bonding in a monogamous fish (Amatitlania nigrofasciata)

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AlmeidaO.GozdowskaM.KulczykowskaE.OliveiraR.F. (2012). Brain levels of arginine-vasotocin and isotocin in dominant and subordinate males of a cichlid fish. — Horm. Behav. 61: 212-217.

AlonsoF.CanepaM.MoreiraR.G.PandolfiM. (2011). Social and reproductive physiology and behavior of the Neotropical cichlid fish Cichlasoma dimerus under laboratory conditions. — Neotrop. Ichthyol. 9: 559-570.

AlonsoF.HonjiR.M.MoreiraR.G.PandolfiM. (2012). Dominance hierarchies and social status ascent opportunity: anticipatory behavioral and physiological adjustments in a Neotropical cichlid fish. — Physiol. Behav. 106: 612-618.

AmorimM.C.P.AlmadaV.C. (2005). The outcome of male-male encounters affects subsequent sound production during courtship in the cichlid fish Oreochromis mossambicus. — Anim. Behav. 69: 595-601.

AndersonC.JonesR.MoscickiM.ClotfelterE.EarleyR.L. (2016). Seeing orange: breeding convict cichlids exhibit heightened aggression against more colorful intruders. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70: 647-657.

BackstromT.WinbergS. (2009). Arginine-vasotocin influence on aggressive behavior and dominance in rainbow trout. — Physiol. Behav. 96: 470-475.

BallG.F.BentleyG.E. (2000). Neuroendocrine mechanisms mediating the photoperiodic and social regulation of seasonal reproduction in birds. — In: Reproduction in context ( WallenK.SchneiderJ. eds). MIT PressCambridge, MA p.  129-158.

BarlowG.W. (1998). Sexual-selection models for exaggerated traits are useful but constraining. — Am. Zool. 38: 59-69.

BerglundA.RosenqvistG. (2001). Male pipefish prefer ornamented females. — Anim. Behav. 61: 345-350.

BielskyI.F.YoungL.J. (2004). Oxytocin, vasopressin, and social recognition in mammals. — Peptides 9: 1565-1574.

BierbachD.SchulteM.HerrmannN.ToblerM.StadlerS.JungC.KunkelB.RieschR.KlausS.ZiegeM.IndyJ.Arias-RodriguezL.PlathM. (2011). Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects. — BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 190-200.

BlümV.FielderK. (1965). Hormonal control of reproductive behavior in some cichlid fish. — Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 5: 186-196.

CameronJ. (1997). Stress and behaviorally induced reproductive dysfunction in primates. — Semin. Reprod Endocrinol. 15: 37-45.

CarneiroL.A.OliveiraR.F.CanarioA.V.M.GroberM.S. (2003). The effect of arginine vasotocin on courtship behavior in a blenniid fish with alternative reproductive tactics. — Fish Physiol. Biochem. 28: 241-243.

ChaseI.D.ToveyC.MurchP. (2003). Two’s company, three’s a crowd: differences in dominance relationships in isolated versus socially embedded pairs of fish. — Behaviour 140: 1193-1217.

ChaseM.NurN.GeupelG. (2005). Effects of weather and population density on reproductive success and population dynamics in a song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population: a long-term study. — Auk 122: 572-592.

ChenT.BeekmanM.WardA.J.W. (2011). The role of female dominance hierarchies in the mating behavior of the mosquitofish. — Biol. Letters 7: 343-345.

Cleveland-RobertsA.ItzkowitzM. (2009). The role of sex ratios and resource availability on the pre-mating behavior of a monogamous fish. — Behav. Process. 80: 46-50.

ColeK.StaceyN.E. (1984). Prostaglandin induction of spawning behavior in Cichlasoma bimaculatum (Pices Cichlidae). — Horm. Behav. 18: 235-248.

CreelS. (2001). Social dominance and stress hormones. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 491-497.

CrewsD.SilverR. (1985). Reproductive physiology and behavioral interactions in non-mammalian vertebrates. — In: Reproduction handbook of behavioral neurobiologyVol. 7 ( AdlerN.T.PfaffD.W.GoyR.W. eds). Plenum PressNew York, NY p.  101-182.

CruzA.OliveiraR. (2015). Audience effects and aggressive priming in agonistic behaviour of male zebrafish, Danio rerio. — Anim. Behav. 107: 269-276.

DonaldsonZ.R.YoungL.J. (2008). Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. — Science 322: 900-904.

DrickamerL.C. (1995). Rates of urine excretion by house mouse (Mus domesticus): differences by age, sex, social status, and reproductive condition. — J. Chem. Ecol. 21: 1481-1493.

DuftyA.M.Jr.WingfieldJ.C. (1986). Influence of social cues on the reproductive endocrinology of male brown headed cowbirds: field and laboratory studies. — Horm. Behav. 20: 222-234.

EarleyR.L.EdwardsJ.T.AseemO.FeltonK.BlumerL.S.KaromM.GroberM. (2006). Social interactions tune aggression and stress responsiveness in a territorial cichlid fish (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus). — Physiol. Behav. 88: 353-363.

EdelineE.HaugenT.WeltzeinF.ClaessenD.WinfieldI.StensethN.VøllestadL. (2010). Body downsizing caused by non-consumptive social stress severely depresses population growth rate. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 277: 843-851.

FawcettT.W.JohnstoneR.A. (2003). Mate choice in the face of costly competition. — Behav. Ecol. 14: 771-779.

FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. — SageLondon.

FoxH.E.WhiteS.A.KaoM.H.FernaldR.D. (1997). Stress and dominance in a social fish. — J. Neurosci. 17: 6463-6469.

FrancisD.D.YoungL.J.MeaneyM.J.InselT.R. (2002). Naturally occurring differences in maternal care are associated with the expression of oxytocin and vasopressin (V1a) receptors: gender differences. — J. Neuroendocrinol. 14: 349-353.

GodwinJ.ThompsonR. (2012). Nonapeptides and social behavior in fishes. — Horm. Behav. 61: 230-238.

GoodsonJ.L. (1998a). Territorial aggression and dawn song are modulated by septal vasotocin and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in male field sparrows (Spizella pusilla). — Horm. Behav. 34: 67-77.

GoodsonJ.L. (1998b). Vasotocin and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide modulate aggression in a territorial songbird, the violet-eared waxbill (Estrildidae: Uraeginthus granatina). — Gen. Comp. Endocr. 111: 233-244.

GoodsonJ.L.Adkins-ReganE. (1999). Effect of intraseptal vasotocin and vasoactiveintestinal polypeptide infusions on courtship song and aggression in the male zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). — J. Neuroendocrinol 11: 19-25.

GoodsonJ.L. (2013). Deconstructing sociality, social evolution and relevant nonapeptide functions. — Psychoneuroendocrinology 38: 465-478.

GoymannW.WingfieldJ.C. (2004). Allostatic load, social status and stress hormones: the costs of social status matter. — Anim. Behav. 67: 591-602.

GreenbergN.CrewsD. (1990). Endocrine and behavioral responses to aggression and social dominance in the green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis. — Gen. Comp. Endocr. 77: 246-255.

GreenwoodA.K.WarkA.R.FernaldR.D.HofmannH.A. (2008). Expression of arginine vasotocin in distinct preoptic regions is associated with dominant and subordinate behaviour in an African cichlid fish. — Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 275: 2393-2402.

GroberM.S.GeorgeA.WatkinsK.CarneiroL.OliveiraR.F. (2002). Forebrain AVT and courtship in a fish with male alternative reproductive tactics. — Brain Res. Bull. 57: 423-425.

HardyM.P.SottasC.M.GeR.McKittrickC.R.TamashiroK.L.McEwenB.S.HaiderS.G.MarkhamC.M.BlanchardR.J.BlanchardD.C.SakaiR.R. (2002). Trends of reproductive hormones in male rats during psychosocial stress: role of glucocorticoid metabolism in behavioral dominance. — Biol. Reprod. 67: 1750-1755.

HofmannH.A.BensonM.E.FernaldR.D. (1999). Social status regulates growth rate: consequences for life-history strategies. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 14171-14176.

HofmannH.A.FernaldR.D. (2000). Social status controls somatostatin neuron size and growth. — J. Neurosci. 20: 4740-4744.

HuntingfordF.TurnerA.K. (1987). Animal conflict. — Chapman & HallLondon.

InselT.R. (2010). The challenge of translation in social neuroscience: a review of oxytocin, vasopressin, and affiliative behavior. — Neuron 65: 768-779.

InselT.R.HulihanT.J. (1995). A gender-specific mechanism for pair bonding — oxytocin and partner preference formation in monogamous voles. — Behav. Neurosci. 109: 782-789.

ItzkowitzM.DraudM. (1992). Conspecific intruders influence pair bond formation in a monogamous fish. — Behav. Process. 28: 59-64.

KobayashiM.StaceyN. (1993). Prostaglandin-induced female spawning behavior in goldfish (Carassius auratus) appears independent of ovarian influence. — Horm. Behav. 27: 38-55.

KrebsJ.R.DaviesN.B. (1993). Introduction to behavioural ecology3rd edn.Blackwell ScienceMalden.

KulczykowskaA.SokolowskaE.KulczykowskaE. (2012). Variation in brain arginine vasotocin (AVT) and isotocin (IT) levels with reproductive stage and social status in males of three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). — Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 175: 290-296.

LaMannaJ.R.EasonP.K. (2010). Effects of fighting on pairing and reproductive success. — Behaviour 148: 89-102.

LemaS.C.NevittG.A. (2004). Exogenous vasotocin alters aggression during agonistic exchanges in male Amargosa river pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae). — Horm. Behav. 46: 628-637.

LileyN.R. (1972). The effects of estrogens and other steroids on the sexual behavior of the female guppy Poecilia reticulata. — Gen. Comp. Endocr. Supp. 3: 542-552.

LileyN.R. (1982). Chemical communication in fish. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 22-35.

LileyN.R.StaceyN.E. (1983). Hormones, pheromones, and reproductive behavior in fish. — In: Fish physiologyVol. 9B ( HoarW.S.RandallD.J.DonaldsonE.M. eds). Academic PressNew York, NY p.  1-49.

LimM.YoungL.J. (2004). Vasopressin-dependent neural circuits underlying pair bond formation in the monogamous prairie vole. — Neuroscience 125: 35-45.

LimM.WangZ.OlazabalD.RenX.TerwilligerE.F.YoungL.J. (2004). Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene. — Nature 429: 754-757.

LumleyT.DiehrP.EmersonS.ChenL. (2002). The importance of normality assumption in large public health data sets. — Annu. Rev. Publ. Health 23: 151-169.

MackerethR.W.KeenleysideM.H.A. (1993). Breeding territoriality and pair formation in the convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum; Pisces, Cichlidae). — Can. J. Zool. 71: 960-967.

McGheeK.E.TravisJ. (2010). Repeatable behavioural type and stable dominance rank in the bluefin killifish. — Anim. Behav. 79: 497-507.

MilevaV.R.FitzpatrickJ.L.Marsh-RolloS.GilmourK.M.WoodC.M.BalshineS. (2009). The stress response of the highly social African cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. — Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 82: 720-729.

MoltzL.RommlerA.PostK.SchwartzU.HammersteinJ. (1980). Medium dose cyproterone acetate (CPA): effects on hormone secretion and on spermatogenesis in men. — Contraception 21: 393-413.

MooreA.OlsenK.H.LowerN.KindahlH. (2002). The role of F-series prostaglandins as reproductive priming pheromones in the brown trout. — J. Fish Biol. 60: 613-624.

MooreI.T.GreeneM.LernerD.AsherC.KrohmerR.HessD.WhittierJ.MasonR.T. (2005). Physiological evidence for reproductive suppression in the introduced population of brown tree snakes (Boiga irregularis) in Guam. — Biol. Conserv. 121: 91-98.

MunakataA.KobayashiM. (2010). Endocrine control of sexual behavior in teleost fish. — Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 165: 456-468.

NuttallD.B.KeenleysideM.H.A. (1993). Mate choice by the male convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum; Pices, Cichlidae). — Ethology 95: 247-256.

O’BrienE.L.DawsonR.D. (2011). Plumage color and food availability affect male reproductive success in a socially monogamous bird. — Behav. Ecol. 22: 66-72.

O’ConnellL.A.MatthewsB.HofmannH.A. (2012). Isotocin regulates paternal care in a monogamous cichlid fish. — Horm. Behav. 61: 725-733.

OldfieldR.HofmannH.A. (2011). Neuropeptide regulation of social behavior in a monogamous cichlid fish. — Physiol. Behav. 102: 296-303.

OliveiraR.F.AlmadaV.CanarioA. (1996). Social modulation of sex steroid concentrations in the urine of male cichlid fish Oreochromis mossambicus. — Horm. Behav. 30: 2-12.

OliveiraR.F.McGregorP.LatruffeC. (1998). Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. — Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 265: 1045-1049.

PeetersC.MonninT.MalosseC. (1999). Cuticular hydrocarbons correlated with reproductive status in a queenless ant. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 266: 1323-1327.

PitkowL.J.SharerC.A.RenX.InselT.R.TerwilligerE.F.YoungL.J. (2001). Facilitation of affiliation and pair bond formation by vasopressin receptor gene transfer into the ventral forebrain of a monogamous vole. — J. Neurosci. 21: 7392-7396.

RipleyJ.L.ForanC. (2010). Quantification of whole brain arginine vasotocin for two Syngnathus pipefishes: elevated concentrations correlated with paternal brooding. — Fish Physiol. Biochem. 36: 867-874.

RobertsA.J.UetzG.W. (2005). Information content of female chemical signals in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata: male discrimination of reproductive state and receptivity. — Anim. Behav. 70: 217-223.

RosA.F.BruintejesR.SantosR.CanarioA.OliveiraR.F. (2004). The role of androgens in the trade-off between territorial and parental behavior in the Azorean rock-pool blenny, Parablennius parvicornis. — Horm. Behav. 46: 491-497.

RosA.F.FrancoA.M.GroothuisT.G. (2009). Experience modulates both aromatase activity and the sensitivity of agonistic behaviour to testosterone in black-headed gulls. — Physiol. Behav. 97: 30-35.

RuggeriB.ThoroughgoodC.A. (1985). Prostaglandins in aquatic fauna: a comprehensive review. — Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 23: 301-306.

SakataJ.T.GuptaA.ChuangS.CrewsD. (2002). Social experience affects territorial and reproductive behaviors in male leopard geckos, Eublepharis macularuis. — Anim. Behav. 63: 487-493.

SalekS.J.SullivanC.V.GodwinJ. (2002). Arginine vasotocin effects on courtship behavior in male white perch (Morone americana). — Behav. Brain Res. 133: 177-183.

SantangeloN.BassA. (2006). New insight into neuropeptide modulation of aggression: field studies of arginine vasotocin in a territorial tropical damselfish. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 273: 3085-3092.

SapolskyR.M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. — Science 308: 648-652.

SemsarK.KandelF.L.M.GodwinJ. (2001). Manipulations of the AVT system shift social status and related courtship and aggressive behavior in the bluehead wrasse. — Horm. Behav. 40: 21-31.

SessaA.K.HarrisR.HofmannH.A. (2013). Sex steroid hormones modulate responses to social challenges and opportunity in males of the monogamous convict cichlid, Amatitlania nigrofasciata. — Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 189: 59-65.

StaceyN.E. (1976). Effects of indomethacin and prostaglandins on spawning behavior of female goldfish. — Prostaglandins 12: 113-126.

StaceyN.E. (1981). Hormonal regulation of female reproductive behavior in fish. — Am. Zool. 21: 305-316.

UngD.AmyM.LeboucherG. (2011). Heaven it’s my wife! Male canaries conceal extra-pair courtships but increase aggression when their mate watches. — PLoS One 6: 1-6.

VerbeekM.GoedeP.DrentP.WiepkemaP. (1999). Individual behavioural characteristics and dominance in aviary groups of great tits. — Behaviour 136: 23-48.

WardG.FitzgeraldG. (1987). Male aggression and female mate choice in threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. — J. Fish Biol. 30: 679-690.

WeberP.G.WeberS.P. (1967). The effect of female color, size, dominance and early experience upon mate selection in male convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum Guenther (Pisces, Cichlidae). — Behaviour 56: 116-135.

WiebeK.L.GerstmarH. (2010). Influence of spring temperatures and individual traits on reproductive timing and success in a migratory woodpecker. — Auk 127: 917-925.

WilliamsJ.CataniaK.C.CarterC.S. (1992). Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): the role of social and sexual experience. — Horm. Behav 26: 339-349.

WilliamsJ.InselT.HarbaughC.CarterC.S. (1994). Oxytocin administered centrally facilitates formation of partner preference in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). — J. Neuroendocrinol. 6: 247-250.

WinslowJ.T.InselT.R. (2004). Neuroendocrine basis of social recognition. — Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14: 248-253.

WinslowJ.T.HastingsN.CarterC.S.HarbaughC.R.InselT.R. (1993). A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles. — Nature 365: 545-548.

WisendenB.D. (1993). Female convict cichlids can adjust gonadal investment in current reproduction in response to relative risk of brood predation. — Can. J. Zool. 71: 252-256.

WisendenB.D. (1995). Reproductive behavior of free-ranging convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. — Environ. Biol. Fish. 43: 121-134.

WisendenB.SnekserJ.StumboA.LeeseJ. (2008). Parental defence of an empty nest after catastrophic brood loss. — Anim. Behav. 76: 2059-2067.

WyattT.D. (2003). Pheromones and animal behaviour. — Cambridge University PressCambridge.

YoungL.J.NilsenR.WaymireK.G.MacGregorG.R.InselT.R. (1999). Increased affiliative response to vasopressin in mice expressing the V1a receptor from a monogamous vole. — Nature 400: 766-768.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Experimental design used to create the three treatment social groups. Arrows indicate which individuals were removed and paired with a novel fish after 48 h of group treatment.

  • View in gallery

    Behaviours within social treatment groups. Individuals received a mixed sex (black lines), or same sex (males: light gray lines; females: dark grey lines) social treatment over three days. (a) No groups differed on day 1, but MS fish bit more than the other groups on days 2 and 3. (b) Chases were least frequent on day 1, and SSM individuals chased more overall than MS but not SSF individuals. (c) No groups differed on day 1, but more lateral displays occurred in the MS group than the SSF group on days 2 and 3. (d) Fewer frontal displays were observed in the SSF group compared to the MS, but not the SSM group. Data points show means ± SE.

  • View in gallery

    Sex differences in behaviour within the mixed-sex social treatment. The third day of MS group observations were used to assess patterns according to the sex of the individual performing the behaviour and the sex of the individual that the behaviour was targeted towards (M, male; F, female). Labels underneath each bar represent the sex of the fish performing the behaviour followed by the sex of the target individual (e.g., M–F indicates male performed behaviour towards a female target). (a) More intra-sexual chases occurred than inter-sexual chases. (b) More bites occurred between males than in any other group. (c) Lateral displays did not differ based on the sex of the performer or target individual. Bars show means ± SE. Those with unshared letters are significantly different from one another.

  • View in gallery

    Behaviours within assigned pairs. The behaviours of both the treatment fish ((a)–(d)) and novel partner ((e)–(h)) were examined for each pair in order to see how the treated fish’ dominance status and prior social treatment affected each partner (MSM, mixed-sex males; MSF, mixed-sex females; SSM, same-sex males; SSF, same-sex females). (a) Dominance status and prior social treatment had no effect on the amount treatment fish chased their novel partners, (e) or on how much novel partners chased their treated partner. (b) Males from the SSM group bit their partners more than females from the MSF or SSF groups, but (f) novel fish showed no difference in biting behaviour. (c) Frontal displays towards novel partners, and (g) treated partners did not differ. (d) Lateral displays towards novel partners, and (h) treated partners did not differ. Data points show means ± SE.

  • View in gallery

    Pair bonding and reproduction within assigned pairs. Pairs were assessed for pair bond formation and reproduction in order to see if prior social treatment or dominance status of the treatment fish would facilitate or accelerate these behaviors. (a) Pairs were given 48 hr before being assessed for pair bond formation while in the presence of an intruder. A total of 56 out of 80 pairs formed pair bonds. Individuals from the mixed sex group formed pair bonds more often than those from a single sex social treatment. (b) Pairs were given 5 days to reproduce. A total of 17 out of 80 pairs laid eggs. Dominant fish from the mixed sex group reproduced more than those from the single sex group.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 26 26 8
Full Text Views 61 61 38
PDF Downloads 8 8 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0