Self-handicapping during play fighting in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

in Behaviour
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Play may serve several potential functions, including learning to overcome unexpected circumstances. Self-handicapping, during which individuals do not utilize their full strength, is proposed to provide training for the unexpected. If self-handicapping occurs, then play fight intensity should decrease as partner age discrepancy increases. By playing with reduced intensity, the older partner self-handicaps, exposing itself to situations that it does not fully control. Self-handicapping was investigated in a captive group of brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) by recording the duration and sequence of play during focal samples. All instances of play fighting were scored from video for intensity. As the age difference between the partners increased, the intensity of play bouts decreased. Since partners with larger age disparities played less intensely, results provided quantitative evidence for self-handicapping, although additional factors may affect play intensity. We suggest that self-handicapping encourages play and provides support for the training for the unexpected hypothesis.

Self-handicapping during play fighting in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

in Behaviour

Sections

References

  • AltmannJ. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. — Behaviour 49: 227-265.

  • AntonacciD.NorsciaI.PalagiE. (2010). Stranger to familiar: wild strepsirhines manage xenophobia by playing. — PLoS ONE 5: 9.

  • BaldwinJ.D. (1969). The ontogeny of social behavior of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) in a seminatural environment. — Folia Primatol. 11: 35-79.

  • BauerE.B.SmutsB.B. (2007). Cooperation and competition during dyadic play in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. — Anim. Behav. 73: 489-499.

  • BekoffM. (1977). Social communication in canids — evidence for evolution of a sterotyped mammalian display. — Science 197: 1097-1099.

  • BekoffM. (2001). Social play behaviour — cooperation, fairness, trust, and the evolution of morality. — J. Consciousness Stud. 8: 81-90.

  • BekoffM. (2004). Wild justice and fair play: cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals. — Biol. Philos. 19: 489-520.

  • BekoffM.BeyersJ.A. (1981). A critical reanalysis of the ontogeny and phylogeny of mammalian social and locomotor play: an ethological hornet’s nest. — In: Behavioral development: the Bielefeld interdisciplinary project ( ImmelmannK.BarlowG.W.PetrinovichL.MainM. eds). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  296-337.

  • BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate — a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. — J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B: Stat. Methodol. 57: 289-300.

  • BibenM. (1986). Individual-related and sex-related strategies of wrestling play in captive squirrel monkeys. — Ethology 71: 229-241.

  • BibenM. (1989). Effects of social environment on play in squirrel monkeys: resolving harlequin’s dilemma. — Ethology 81: 72-82.

  • BlankD.YangW.K. (2012). Play behaviour in goitered gazelle, Gazella subgutturosa (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) in Kazakhstan. — Folia Zool. 61: 161-171.

  • BrownS.J. (1988). Play behaviour in lowland gorillas: age differences, sex differences, and possible function. — Primates 29: 219-228.

  • BurghardtG. (2005). The genesis of animal play: testing the limits. — MIT PressCambridge, MA.

  • ByersJ.A.WalkerC. (1995). Refining the motor training hypothesis for the evolution of play. — Am. Nat. 146: 25-40.

  • CaroT.M. (1995). Short-term costs and correlates of play in cheetahs. — Anim. Behav. 49: 333-345.

  • CianiF.Dall’OlioS.StanyonR.PalagiE. (2012). Social tolerance and adult play in macauqe societies. A comparison with different human cultures. — Anim. Behav. 84: 1313-1322.

  • CordoniG.PalagiE. (2011). Ontogenetic trajectories of chimpanzee social play: similarities with humans. — PLoS ONE 6: 10.

  • CroftD.B.SnaithF. (1991). Boxing in red kangaroos, Macropos rufus: aggression or play?Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 4: 221-236.

  • de OliveiraS.G.AlfaroJ.W.L.VeigaL.M. (2014). Activity budget, diet, and habitat use in the critically endangered ka’apori capuchin monkey (Cebus kaapori) in Pará State, Brazil: a preliminary comparison to other capuchin monkeys. — Am. J. Primatol. 76: 919-931.

  • DreaC.M.HawkJ.E.GlickmanS.E. (1996). Aggression decreases as play emerges in infant spotted hyaenas: preparation for joining the clan. — Anim. Behav. 51: 1323-1336.

  • EsslerJ.L.CafazzoS.Marshall-PesciniS.ViranyiZ.KotrschalK.RangeF. (2016). Play behavior in wolves: using the ‘50:50’ rule to test for egalitarian play styles. — PLoS ONE 11: 19.

  • FagenR. (1981). Animal play behavior. — Oxford University PressNew York, NY.

  • FagenR.FagenJ. (2009). Play behaviour and multi-year juvenile survival in free-ranging brown bears, Ursus arctos. — Evol. Ecol. Res. 11: 1053-1067.

  • FlackJ.C.JeannotteL.A.de WaalF.B.M. (2004). Play signaling and the perception of social rules by juvenile chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). — J. Comp. Psychol. 118: 149-159.

  • FragaszyD.M.VisalberghiE.FediganL.M. (2004). The complete capuchin: the biology of the genus Cebus. — Cambridge University PressCambridge.

  • GoodallJ. (1968). The behaviour of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve. — Anim. Behav. Monogr. 1: 161-311.

  • GovindarajuluP.HunteW.VermeerL.A.HorrocksJ.A. (1993). The ontogeny of social play in a feral troop of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): the function of early play. — Int. J. Primatol. 14: 701-719.

  • GrahamK.L.BurghardtG.M. (2010). Current perspectives on the biological study of play: signs of progress. — Q. Rev. Biol. 85: 393-418.

  • HausfaterG. (1976). Predatory behavior of yellow baboons. — Behaviour 56: 44-68.

  • HayakiH. (1985). Social play of juvenile and adolescent chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. — Primates 26: 343-360.

  • KoyamaN. (1985). Playmate relationships among individuals of the Japanese monkey troop in Arashiyama, Japan. — Primates 26: 390-406.

  • LairdN.M.WareJ.H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. — Biometrics 38: 963-974.

  • LeRescheL.A. (1976). Dyadic play in hamadryas baboons. — Behaviour 57: 190-205.

  • MartinP. (1984). The time and energy costs of play-behavior in the cat. — J. Comp. Ethol. 64: 298-312.

  • National Research Council (2011). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals8th edn.. — National Academy PressWashington, DC.

  • NishidaT.InabaA. (2009). Pirouettes: the rotational play of wild chimpanzees. — Primates 50: 333-341.

  • NorsciaI.PalagiE. (2011). When play is a family business: adult play, hierarchy, and possible stress reduction in common marmosets. — Primates 52: 101-104.

  • OwensN.W. (1975). A comparison of aggressive play and aggression in free-living baboons, Papio anubis. — Anim. Behav. 23: 757-765.

  • PalagiE. (2009). Adult play fighting and potential role of tail signals in ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta). — J. Comp. Psychol. 123: 1-9.

  • PalagiE.BurghardtG.M.SmutsB.CordoniG.Dall’OlioS.FoutsH.N.Řeháková-PetruM.SiviyS.M.PellisS.M. (2016). Rough-and-tumble play as a window on animal communication. — Biol. Rev. 91: 311-327.

  • PalagiE.PaoliT. (2007). Play in adult bonobos (Pan paniscus): modality and potential meaning. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 134: 219-225.

  • PalagiE.PaoliT.TarliS.B. (2006). Short-term benefits of play behavior and conflict prevention in Pan paniscus. — Int. J. Primatol. 27: 1257-1270.

  • PauknerA.SuomiS.J. (2008). Sex differences in play behavior in juvenile tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). — Primates 49: 288-291.

  • PellisS.M.IwaniukA.N. (1999). The problem of adult play fighting: a comparative analysis of play and courtship in primates. — Ethology 105: 783-806.

  • PereiraM.E.PreisserM.C. (1998). Do strong primate players ‘self-handicap’ during competitive social play?Folia Primatol. 69: 177-180.

  • PetruM.SpinkaM.CharvatovaV.LhotaS. (2009). Revisiting play elements and self-handicapping in play: a comparative ethogram of five Old World monkey species. — J. Comp. Psychol. 123: 250-263.

  • PetruM.SpinkaM.LhotaS.SipekP. (2008). Head rotations in the play of Hanuman langurs (Semnopithecus entellus): description and analysis of function. — J. Comp. Psychol. 122: 9-18.

  • R Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingViennaavailable online at https://www.R-project.org/.

  • SchallerG.B. (1972). The serengeti lion. — University of Chicago PressChicago, IL.

  • ShimadaM. (2006). Social object play among young Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) in Arashiyama, Japan. — Primates 47: 342-349.

  • SmithE.O. (1978). A historical view on the study of play statement of the problem. — In: Social play in primates ( SmithE.O. ed.). Academic PressNew York, NY p.  1-32.

  • SommerV.Medoza-GranadosD. (1995). Play as an indicator of habitat quality: a field study of langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus). — Ethology 99: 177-192.

  • SpinkaM.NewberryR.C.BekoffM. (2001). Mammalian play: training for the unexpected. — Q. Rev. Biol. 76: 141-168.

  • StoneA.I. (2008). Seasonal effects on play behavior in immature Saimiri sciureus in eastern Amazonia. — Int. J. Primatol. 29: 195-205.

  • TannerJ.E.ByrneR.W. (2010). Triadic and collaborative play by gorillas in social games with objects. — Anim. Cogn. 13: 591-607.

  • TáranoZ.LópezM.C. (2015). Behavioural repertoires and time budgets of semi-free-ranging and captive groups of wedge-capped capuchin monkeys, Cebus olivaceus, in zoo exhibits in Venezuela. — Folia Primatol. 86: 203-222.

  • VisalberghiE.GuidiC. (1998). Play behaviour in young tufted capuchin monkeys. — Folia Primatol. 69: 419-422.

  • WatsonD.M.CroftD.B. (1993). Playfighting in captive red-necked wallabies, Macropus rufogriseus banksianus. — Behaviour 126: 219-245.

  • WatsonD.M.CroftD.B. (1996). Age-related differences in playfighting strategies of captive male red-necked wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus banksianus). — Ethology 102: 336-346.

  • WeigelR.M. (1979). The facial expressions of the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). — Behaviour 68: 250-276.

  • WelkerW.I. (1956). Effects of age and experience on play and exploration of young chimpanzees. — J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 49: 223-226.

  • WemmerC.FlemingM.J. (1974). Ontogeny of playful contact in a social mongoose, meerkat Suricata suricatta. — Amer. Zool. 14: 415-426.

  • ZuckerE.L.ClarkeM.R. (1992). Developmental and comparative aspects of social play of mantled howling monkeys in Costa Rica. — Behaviour 123: 144-171.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Interaction plot of mean play rate broken down by type of play across the different ages for all subjects. Locomotor Play (Loc), Object Play (Obj), and Social Play (Soc) are indicated. The y-axis is scaled in minutes of play per hour of observation.

  • View in gallery

    (Left) Number of bouts between individuals of different age disparity (measured in full scale age categories; Table 2). 1950 total bouts were observed. (Centre) Number of total dyads with each age disparity. This was calculated by counting how many of all of the possible dyads had each level of age disparity at some point during the study. Note that some dyads are counted twice if the age category difference between the two actors changed over the course of the study. (Right) Relative preference for play partners calculated as the number of observed play bouts divided by the number of expected play bouts for a given age category discrepancy. The expected number of play bouts assuming that the monkeys were choosing play partnerships randomly by multiplying the proportion of play partnerships of a particular age discrepancy by 1950, the total number of play bouts observed. A preference value greater than 1 indicates that more play bouts were observed than expected by the number of play partners available, and a preference value less than 1 indicates that there were fewer play bouts than expected.

  • View in gallery

    Intensity of play fighting bouts (N=1950) as a function of the age disparity between partners (in full scale age categories; Table 2). The radius of the circles is scaled to the number of bouts at the specific age difference/intensity score combination. The linear trendline shows the adjusted-slope and y-intercept from the model (Table 5).

  • View in gallery

    Distribution of intensity scores for bouts with matched partners (left column) and mismatched partners (right column). The upper row shows data for Smithson (Nmatched = 141, Nmismatched = 95). The lower row shows data for Nye (Nmatched = 121, Nmismatched = 81).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 70 70 8
Full Text Views 237 237 57
PDF Downloads 12 12 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0