The development of mobile phones has largely increased human interactions. Whilst the use of these devices for communication has received significant attention, there has been little analysis of more passive interactions. Through census data on casual social groups, this work suggests a clear pattern of mobile phones being carried in people’s hands, without the person using it (that is, not looking at it). Moreover, this study suggests that when individuals join members of the opposite sex there is a clear tendency to stop holding mobile phones whilst walking. Although it is not clear why people hold their phones whilst walking in such large proportions (38% of solitary women, and 31% of solitary men), we highlight several possible explanation for holding the device, including the need to advertise status and affluence, to maintain immediate connection with friends and family, and to mitigate feelings related to anxiety and security.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. — American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA.
Anderson, M. (2015). Racial and ethnic differences in how people use mobile technology. — Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.
Anderson, M. & Perrin, A. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults. — Pew Research Centre, Washington, DC.
Angel, S. et al. (2018). NYU Urban Expansion Program, Atlas of Urban Expansion. — Available online at http://www.atlasofurbanexpansion.org/cities/view/Paris (accessed 7 March 2018).
Apple (2017). http://www.apple.com/shop/buy-iphone/iphone-x (accessed 11 October 2017).
Bidart, C. & Lavenu, D. (2005). Evolutions of personal networks and life events. — Soc. Net. 27: 359-376.
Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M. & Rochat, L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. — Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 22: 1195-1210.
Blumenstock, J. & Eagle, N. (2010). Mobile divides: gender, socioeconomic status, and mobile phone use in Rwanda. — In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, London. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, p. 6.
BOA, Bank of America (2015). Trends in consumer mobility report. — Available online at http://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/files/doc_library/additional/2015_BAC_Trends_in_Consumer_Mobility_Report.pdf.
Budmar, P. (2012). Why Japanese smartphones never went global — PC World, available online atr https://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/430254/why_japanese_smartphones_never_went_global/.
Chen, B., Liu, F., Ding, S., Ying, X., Wang, L. & Wen, Y. (2017). Gender differences in factors associated with smartphone addiction: a cross-sectional study among medical college students. — BMC Psychiatr. 17: 341.
De-Sola Gutierrez, J., Rodriguez de Fonseca, F. & Rubio, G. (2016). Cell-phone addiction: a review. — Front. Psychiatr. 7: 175.
Donner, J. (2008). Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: a review of the literature. — The Information Society 24: 140-159.
Dunbar, R.I.M. (2016). Sexual segregation in human conversations. — Behaviour 153: 1-14.
Dunbar, R.I.M. (2017). Breaking bread: the functions of social eating. — Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 3: 198.
Ericsson (2017). Mobility Report. — Telefonaktiebolaget L. M. Ericsson, Stockholm.
Farley, T. (2005). Mobile telephone history. — Telektronikk 3/4: 22.
Forgays, D.K., Hyman, I. & Schreiber, J. (2014). Texting everywhere for everything: gender and age differences in cell phone etiquette and use. — Comput. Hum. Behav. 31: 314-321.
Frias-Martinez, V. & Virseda, J. (2012). On the relationship between socio-economic factors and cell phone usage. — In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on information and communication technologies and development. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, p. 76-84.
High-Touch Com. Inc. (2013). Response-time protocols in the internet age. — Survey Results.
Hughes, D.J., Rowe, M., Batey, M. & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. — Comput. Hum. Behav. 28: 561-569.
Jackson, L.A., Zhao, Y., Kolenic III, A., Fitzgerald, H.E., Harold, R. & Von Eye, A. (2008). Race, gender, and information technology use: the new digital divide. — Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11: 437-442.
Junco, R., Merson, D. & Salter, D.W. (2010). The effect of gender, ethnicity, and income on college students’ use of communication technologies. — Cyberpsychol. Behav. 13: 619-627.
Karasik, L.B., Adolph, K.E., Tamis-LeMonda, C.S. & Zuckerman, A.L. (2012). Carry on: spontaneous object carrying in 13-month-old crawling and walking infants. — Dev. Psychol. 48: 389-397.
Kneidinger-Müller, B. (2017). Mobile communication as invader in face-to-face interactions: an analysis of predictors for parallel communication habits. — Comput. Hum. Behav. 73: 328-335.
Kuss, D.J. & Griffiths, M.D. (2012). Internet gaming addiction: a systematic review of empirical research. — Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 10: 278-296.
Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens, smartphones and texting. — Pew Internet Am. Life Proj. 21: 1-34.
Leung, L. (2007). Leisure, boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, addiction symptoms and patterns of cell phone use. — In: Mediated interpersonal communication (Konijn, E.A., Tanis, M.A., Utz, S. & Linden, A., eds). Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, p. 359-381.
Leung, L. & Wei, R. (2000). More than just talk on the move: uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. — 1&MC Q. 7: 2.
Levitin, D.J. (2015). Why the modern world is bad for your brain. — The Guardian, 18 January.
Lockard, J.S. & Adams, R.M. (1980). Courtship behaviors in public: different age/sex roles. — Ethol. Sociobiol. 1: 245-253.
Lycett, J. & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2000). Mobile phones as lekking devices among human males. — Hum. Nat. 11: 93-104.
Martin, A.R., da Silva, V.M.F. & Rothery, P. (2008). Object carrying as socio-sexual display in an aquatic mammal. — Biol. Lett. 4: 243-245.
Mazaheri, M.A. & Najarkolaei, F.R. (2014). Cell phone and Internet addiction among Students in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Iran). — J. Health Policy Sust. Health 1: 101-105.
McDonald, D.B. (2007). Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 10910-10914.
Ng, B.D. & Wiemer-Hastings, P. (2005). Addiction to the Internet and online gaming. — Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8: 110-113.
Ogletree, S.M., Fancher, J. & Gill, S. (2014). Gender and texting: masculinity, femininity, and gender role ideology. — Comput. Hum. Behav. 37: 49-55.
Pain, R., Grundy, S., Gill, S., Towner, E., Sparks, G. & Hughes, K. (2005). So long as I take my mobile. — Mobile Phones, Urban Life and Geographies of Young People’s Safety 29: 814-830.
Pedrero Perez, E.J., Rodriguez Monje, M.T. & Ruiz Sanchez De Leon, J.M. (2012). Mobile phone abuse or addiction. A review of the literature. — Adicciones 24: 139-152.
Phillips, A.G., Cox, V.C., Kakolewski, J.W. & Valenstein, E.S. (1969). Object-carrying by rats: an approach to the behavior produced by brain stimulation. — Science 166: 903-905.
Rhodes, M.G. (2009). Age estimation of faces: a review. — Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 23: 1-12.
Roberts, J., Yaya, L. & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. — J. Behav. Addict. 3: 254-265.
Sahin, S., Ozdemir, K., Unsal, A. & Temiz, N. (2013). Evaluation of mobile phone addiction level and sleep quality in university students. — Pak. J. Med. Sci. 29: 913-918.
Shin, L.Y. (2014). A comparative study of mobile Internet usage between the US and Korea. — J. Eur. Psychol. Stud. 5: 46-55.
Smith, S.V. (2009). Materializing resistant identities among the medieval peasantry an examination of dress accessories from English rural settlement sites. — J. Material Cult. 14(3): 309-332.
Tavakolizadeh, J., Atarodi, A., Ahmadpour, S. & Pourgheisar, A. (2014). The prevalence of excessive mobile phone use and its relation with mental health status and demographic factors among the students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2011–2012. — Razavi Int. J. Med. 2: e15527.
Walsh, S., White, K. & Young, R. (2010). Needing to connect: the effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. — Aust. J. Psychol. 62: 194-203.
Walsh, S., White, K. & Young, R. (2011). Keeping in constant touch: the predictors of young australians’ mobile phone involvement. — Comput. Hum. Behav. 27: 333-342.
Wesolowski, A., Eagle, N., Noor, A.M., Snow, R.W. & Buckee, C.O. (2012). Heterogeneous mobile phone ownership and usage patterns in Kenya. — PLoS One 7: e35319.
Wohn, D.Y. & Birnholtz, J. (2015). From ambient to adaptation: interpersonal attention management among young adults. — In: Proceedings of the mobile HCI’15, Copenhagen.
Zhou, J., Rau, P.L.P. & Salvendy, G. (2014). Older adults’ use of smart phones: an investigation of the factors influencing the acceptance of new functions. — Behav. Inf. Technol. 33: 552-560.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1287 | 182 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 311 | 15 | 8 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 75 | 18 | 0 |
The development of mobile phones has largely increased human interactions. Whilst the use of these devices for communication has received significant attention, there has been little analysis of more passive interactions. Through census data on casual social groups, this work suggests a clear pattern of mobile phones being carried in people’s hands, without the person using it (that is, not looking at it). Moreover, this study suggests that when individuals join members of the opposite sex there is a clear tendency to stop holding mobile phones whilst walking. Although it is not clear why people hold their phones whilst walking in such large proportions (38% of solitary women, and 31% of solitary men), we highlight several possible explanation for holding the device, including the need to advertise status and affluence, to maintain immediate connection with friends and family, and to mitigate feelings related to anxiety and security.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1287 | 182 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 311 | 15 | 8 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 75 | 18 | 0 |