Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
The ways that forest edges may affect animal vocalization behaviour are poorly understood. We investigated the effects of various types of edge habitat on the loud calls (howls) of a folivorous-frugivorous primate species, Alouatta palliata, with reference to the ecological resource defence hypothesis, which predicts that males howl to defend vegetation resources. We tested this hypothesis across four forest zones — interior, riparian, anthropogenic, and combined forest edges — in a riparian forest fragment in Costa Rica. We predicted vegetation and howling would differ between forest zones, with riparian and interior zones showing the highest values and anthropogenic edge the lowest. Our results indicated that vegetation was richer and howling longer in riparian and interior zones compared to combined and anthropogenic edges, supporting the resource defence hypothesis and providing some of the first evidence in animal communication scholarship for differences in behavioural edge effects between natural riparian and anthropogenic edges.
Las formas en que los bordes del bosque pueden afectar el comportamiento vocal de los animales son poco conocidas. Investigamos los efectos de varios tipos de hábitat de borde en los gritos (aullidos) de una especie de primate folívoro-frugívora, Alouatta palliata, con referencia a la hipótesis de la defensa de los recursos ecológicos, la cual predice que los machos aúllan para defender los recursos vegetales. Probamos esta hipótesis en cuatro zonas forestales: interior, ribereña, antropogénica y una combinación de bordes de bosque, en un fragmento de bosque ribereño en Costa Rica. Predijimos que la vegetación y el aullido diferirían entre las zonas forestales, con zonas ribereñas e interiores mostrando los valores más altos y el borde antropogénico los más bajos. Nuestros resultados indicaron que la vegetación era más rica y el aullido prolongado en las zonas ribereñas e interiores en comparación con los bordes combinados y antropogénicos, respaldando la hipótesis de defensa de los recursos y proporcionando algunas de las primeras pruebas en la investigación de la comunicación animal para diferencias en el comportamiento relacionadas con los efectos de bordeentre los bordes naturales ribereños y los antropogénicos.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. — Behaviour 49: 227-265.
Altmann, S. (1959). Field observations on a howling monkey society. — J. Mammal. 40: 317-330.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V. & Mandujano, S. (2006). Forest fragmentation modifies habitat quality for Alouatta palliata. — Int. J. Primatol. 27: 1079-1096.
Baldwin, J. & Baldwin, J. (1976). Vocalizations of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Southwestern Panama. — Folia Primatol. 26: 81-108.
Bolt, L. (2013a). The function of howling in the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta). — Int. J. Primatol. 34: 157-169.
Bolt, L. (2013b). The relationship between dominance and vocal communication in the male ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta). — PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Bolt, L. (2016). Alarm calling upon predator detection. — In: Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (Shackelford, T. & Weekes-Shackelford, V., eds). Springer, New York, NY. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1513-1.
Bolt, L., Schreier, A., Voss, K., Sheehan, E., Barrickman, N., Pryor, N. & Barton, M. (2018). Influence of anthropogenic edge effects on primate populations and their habitat in a fragmented rainforest in Costa Rica. — Primates 59: 301-311.
Bolt, L., Schreier, A., Russell, D., Jacobson, Z., Merrigan-Johnson, C., Barton, M. & Coggeshall, E. (2019). Howling on the edge: mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) howling behaviour and anthropogenic edge effects in a fragmented tropical rainforest in Costa Rica. — Ethology 125: 593-602.
Bradbury, J. & Vehrencamp, S. (1998). Principles of animal communication. — Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Brandt, L. & Singleton, M. (2018). Record of Baird’s Tapir Tapirus bardii at the La Suerte Biological Field Station in the Caribbean Lowlands of Costa Rica. — PeerJ Prepr. 6: e27128v1.
Cadenasso, M., Pickett, S., Weathers, K. & Jones, C. (2003). A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries. — BioScience 53: 750-758.
Carpenter, C. (1934). A field study of the behavior and social relations of howling monkeys Alouatta palliata. — Comp. Psychol. Monogr. 10: 1-168.
Chapman, C. (1988). Patterns of foraging and range use by three species of Neotropical primates. — Primates 29: 177-194.
Chiarello, A. (1995). Role of loud calls in brown howlers, Alouatta fusca. — Am. J. Primatol. 36: 213-222.
Chivers, D. (1969). On the daily behaviour and spacing of howling monkey groups. — Folia Primatol. 10: 48-102.
Crockett, C. & Eisenberg, J. (1987). Howlers: variations in group size and demography. — In: Primate societies (Smuts, B., Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R., Wrangham, R. & Struhsaker, T., eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 54-68.
da Cunha, R., de Oliveira, D., Holzmann, I. & Kitchen, D. (2015). Production of loud and quiet calls in howler monkeys. — In: Howler monkeys. Developments in primatology: progress and prospects (Kowalewski, M., Garber, P., Cortés-Ortiz, L., Urbani, B. & Youlatos, D., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 337-368.
de Vore, I. (1979). A comparison of the ecology and behavior of monkeys and apes. — In: Primate ecology: problem oriented field studies (Sussman, R., ed.). Wiley, New York, NY, p. 343-361.
Delgado, R. (2006). Sexual selection in the loud calls of male primates: signal content and function. — Int. J. Primatol. 27: 5-25.
di Fiore, A., Link, A. & Campbell, C. (2011). The atelines: behavioral and sociological diversity in a New World monkey radiation. — In: Primates in perspective (Campbell, C., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K., Panger, M. & Bearder, S., eds). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p. 155-188.
Estrada, A. (1984). Resource use by howler monkeys in the rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. — Int. J. Primatol. 5: 105-131.
Estrada, A., Garber, P., Rylands, A., Roos, C., Fernandez-Duque, E., Di Fiore, A., Nekaris, K.A.-I., Nijman, V., Heymann, E.W., Lambert, J.E., Rovero, F., Barelli, C., Setchell, J.M., Gillespie, T.R., Mittermeier, R.A., Verde Arregoitia, L., de Guinea, M., Gouveia, S., Dobrovolski, R., Shanee, S., Shanee, N., Boyle, S.A., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K.C., Amato, K.R., Meyer, A.L.S., Wich, S., Sussman, R.W., Pan, R., Kone, I. & Li, B. (2017). Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. — Sci. Adv. 3: e1600946.
Fashing, P. (2001). Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas (Colobus guereza): evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 219-230.
Garber, P., Molina, A. & Molina, R. (2010). Putting the community back in community ecology and education: the role of field schools and private reserves in the ethical training of primatologists. — Am. J. Primatol. 72: 785-793.
Grebner, D., Bettinger, P. & Siry, J. (2013). Introduction to forestry and natural resources. — Academic Press, New York, NY.
Haddad, N., Brudwig, L., Clobert, J., Davies, K., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. & Townshend, J. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. — Sci. Adv. 1: e1500052.
Harper, K. & Macdonald, S. (2001). Structure and composition of riparian boreal forest: new methods for analyzing edge influence. — Ecology 82: 649-659.
Harper, K., Macdonald, S., Burton, P., Chen, J., Brosofske, K., Saunders, S., Euskirchen, E., Roberts, D., Jaiteh, M. & Esseen, P.-A. (2005). Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. — Conservation Biology. 19: 768-782. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x.
Harris, L. (1988). Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. — Conserv. Biol. 2: 330-332.
Hopkins, M. (2013). Relative dominance and resource availability mediate mantled howler (Alouatta palliata) spatial responses to neighbors’ loud calls. — Int. J. Primatol. 34: 1032-1054.
Kitchen, D., da Cunha, R., Holzmann, I. & de Oliveira, D. (2015). Function of loud calls in howler monkeys. — In: Howler monkeys. Developments in primatology: progress and prospects (Kowalewski, M., Garber, P., Cortés-Ortiz, L., Urbani, B. & Youlatos, D., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 369-399.
Laurance, W. (1991). Edge effects in tropical forest fragments: application of a model for the design of nature reserves. — Biol. Conserv. 57: 205-219.
Laurance, W., Goosem, M. & Laurance, S. (2009). Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 659-669.
Lees, A. & Peres, C. (2008). Conservation value of remnant riparian forest corridors of varying quality for Amazonian birds and mammals. — Conserv. Biol. 22: 439-449.
Lovejoy, T., Bierregaard, R., Rylands, A., Malcolm, J., Quintela, C., Harper, L., Brown, K., Powell, A., Powell, G., Schubart, H. & Hays, M. (1986). Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. — In: Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity (Soule, M., ed.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, p. 257-285.
Mace, G. & Balmford, A. (2000). Patterns and processes in contemporary mammalian extinction. — In: Future priorities for the conservation of mammalian diversity (Entwhistle, A. & Dunstone, N., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 27-52.
Magura, T. (2002). Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. — For. Ecol. Manage. 157: 23-37.
Mbora, D. & Meikle, D. (2004). Forest fragmentation and the distribution, abundance and conservation of the Tana River red colobus (Procolobus rufomitratus). — Biol. Conserv. 118: 67-77.
Milton, K. (1980). The foraging strategy of howler monkeys: a study in primates economics. — Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
Mitani, J. & Rodman, P. (1979). Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 241-251.
Molina, R. (2015). A brief history of the Molina family, and the birth of the Maderas Rainforest Conservancy at the La Suerte and Ometepe Field Stations — a narrative. — In: Central American biodiversity: conservation, ecology and a sustainable future (Huettman, F., ed.). Springer Science + Business Media, New York, NY, p. 199-214.
Munoz, D., Estrada, A., Naranjo, E. & Ochoa, S. (2006). Foraging ecology of howler monkeys in a cacao (Theobroma cacao) plantation in Comalcalco, Mexico. — Am. J. Primatol. 68: 127-142.
Murcia, C. (1995). Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 58-62.
Naguib, M. & Wiley, R. (2001). Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanism and adaptations for long-range communication. — Anim. Behav. 62: 825-837.
Payne, N. & Bryant, F. (1998). Wildlife habitat management of forest lands, rangelands, and farmlands. — Krieger, Malabar, FL.
Pohlman, C., Turton, S. & Goosem, M. (2009). Temporal variation in microclimatic edge effects near powerlines, highways and streams in Australian tropical rainforest. — Agric. Forest Meteorol. 149: 84-95.
Prestwich, K. (1994). The energetic of acoustic signaling in anurans and insects. — Am. Zool. 34: 625-643.
Pruetz, J. & Leasor, H. (2002). Densities of primate species in forest fragments at La Suerte Biological Field Station, Costa Rica. — Neotrop. Primates 10: 4-9.
Ramos, F. & Santos, F. (2006). Floral visitors and pollination of Psychotria tenuinervis (Rubiaceae): distance from the anthropogenic and natural edges of the Atlantic forest fragment. — Biotropica 38: 383-389.
Richardson, J. & Danehy, R. (2007). A synthesis of the ecology of headwater streams and their riparian zones in temperate forests. — Forest Sci. 53: 131-147.
Ross, C. & Srivastava, A. (1994). Factors influencing the population density of the Hanuman langur (Prebytis entellus) in Sariska Tiger Reserve. — Primates 35: 361-367.
Roume, A., Deconchat, M., Raison, L., Balent, G. & Ouin, A. (2011). Edge effects on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at the woodlot-field interface are short-range and asymmetrical. — Agric. Forest Entomol. 35: 395-403.
Russell, D. (2018). The influence of edge effects on mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) food resource use and availability in a fragmented forest. — M.Sc. Thesis, American University, Washington, DC.
Schwitzer, C., Glatt, L., Nekaris, K. & Ganzhorn, J. (2011). Responses of animals to habitat alteration: an overview focusing on primates. — Endang. Species Res. 14: 31-38.
Sekulic, R. (1982). The function of howling in red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus). — Behaviour 81: 38-54.
Skrinyer, A. (2016). Living on the edge: an assessment of habitat disturbance and primate use on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. — M.A. Thesis, Kent State University, Kent, OH.
Stone, M., Catterall, C. & Stork, N. (2018). Edge effects and beta diversity in ground and canopy beetle communities of fragmented subtropical forest. — PLoS ONE 13: e0193369.
Swanson, F., Gregory, S., Sedell, J. & Campbell, A. (1982). Land-water interactions: the riparian zone. — In: Analysis of coniferous forest ecosystems in the Western United States (Edmonds, R., ed.). Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsburg, PA, p. 267-291.
Van Belle, S., Estrada, A. & Garber, P. (2013). Spatial and diurnal distribution of loud calling in black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). — Int. J. Primatol. 34: 1209-1224.
Van Schaik, C., Assink, P. & Salafsky, N. (1992). Territorial behavior in southeast Asian langurs: resource defense or mate defense? — Am. J. Primatol. 26: 233-242.
Waser, P. & Brown, C. (1986). Habitat acoustics and primate communication. — Am. J. Primatol. 10: 135-154.
Wich, S. & Nunn, C. (2002). Do male “long-distance calls” function in mate defense? A comparative study of long-distance calls in primates. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 474-484.
Wich, S., Assink, P., Becher, F. & Sterck, E. (2002). Playbacks of long-distance calls to wild Thomas langurs (Primates; Presbytis thomasi): the effect of location. — Behaviour 139: 65-78.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. — J. Theor. Biol. 53: 204-214.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1523 | 294 | 48 |
Full Text Views | 155 | 43 | 6 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 203 | 86 | 5 |
The ways that forest edges may affect animal vocalization behaviour are poorly understood. We investigated the effects of various types of edge habitat on the loud calls (howls) of a folivorous-frugivorous primate species, Alouatta palliata, with reference to the ecological resource defence hypothesis, which predicts that males howl to defend vegetation resources. We tested this hypothesis across four forest zones — interior, riparian, anthropogenic, and combined forest edges — in a riparian forest fragment in Costa Rica. We predicted vegetation and howling would differ between forest zones, with riparian and interior zones showing the highest values and anthropogenic edge the lowest. Our results indicated that vegetation was richer and howling longer in riparian and interior zones compared to combined and anthropogenic edges, supporting the resource defence hypothesis and providing some of the first evidence in animal communication scholarship for differences in behavioural edge effects between natural riparian and anthropogenic edges.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1523 | 294 | 48 |
Full Text Views | 155 | 43 | 6 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 203 | 86 | 5 |