Save

Coyotes living near cities are bolder: implications for dog evolution and human-wildlife conflict

In: Behaviour
Authors:
James Brooks Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8203, Japan

Search for other papers by James Brooks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roland Kays Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA

Search for other papers by Roland Kays in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Brian Hare Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA

Search for other papers by Brian Hare in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

How animal populations adapt to human modified landscapes is central to understanding modern behavioural evolution and improving wildlife management. Coyotes (Canis latrans) have adapted to human activities and thrive in both rural and urban areas. Bolder coyotes showing reduced fear of humans and their artefacts may have an advantage in urban environments. We analysed the reactions of 636 coyotes to novel human artefacts (camera traps) at 575 sites across the state of North Carolina. Likelihood of a coyote approaching the camera increased with human housing density suggesting that urban coyotes are experiencing selection for boldness and becoming more attracted to human artefacts. This has implications for both human-wildlife conflict and theories of dog domestication. We also note physical traits in coyotes that could be the result of domestication-related selection pressures, or dog hybridization.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3729 674 49
Full Text Views 602 142 16
PDF Views & Downloads 866 207 22