Save

Males signal their breeding burrow characteristics to females in the fiddler crab Austruca perplexa

In: Behaviour
Authors:
Fahmida Wazed TinaFaculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, Tha Ngio, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80280, Thailand

Search for other papers by Fahmida Wazed Tina in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9040-8947
and
Daisuke MuramatsuCenter for Natural Environment Education, Nara University of Education, Takabatake-cho, Nara, 630-8528, Japan
Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, 2-24 Sekiden, Tanaka, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8203, Japan

Search for other papers by Daisuke Muramatsu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8767-1488
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

Females often choose mates based on their courtship signals. Males may signal their heritable genetic quality, defended resources, or parental care efforts; however, the reasons why females choose males based on their signals are often not clear. Here, we show that, in the fiddler crab Austruca perplexa, male signals (major-claw waving rates) were correlated with important characteristics of their defended resources (width and depth of breeding burrows). By using the male signals, females may be able to roughly predict the burrow quality and decide whether to enter and check the burrow characteristics. The signals are predicted to be honest because the female’s final decision is based on burrow quality. Since females can reject males if their burrow quality is insufficient for breeding, the courtship efforts of deceptive males will be dismissed. The honesty of the signals is beneficial for both sexes and thus easily evolved in their signalling system.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 339 340 8
Full Text Views 25 25 1
PDF Views & Downloads 63 63 2