Reconciliation in human adults: a video-assisted naturalistic observational study of post conflict conciliatory behaviour in interpersonal aggression
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by R. Philpot in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by L.S. Liebst in
Current site
Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), De Boelelaan 1077, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by M. Rosenkrantz Lindegaard in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by P. Verbeek in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by M. Levine in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Reconciliation is an aspect of conflict resolution, with similar behavioural patterns documented in non-human primates, human children, and human adults of non-Western, non-industrialized cultures. Reconciliation amongst adults of industrialized societies has rarely been studied. We observed naturally occurring conflicts between adults, captured by public security cameras in England. Reconciliation was found in one-quarter of all conflicts and was more prevalent in milder conflicts. Reconciliation typically occurred spontaneously between opponents — and was found within friendship groups and across stranger groups. Reconciliation between opponents also appeared to be stimulated by peers, law enforcement, or shared objects. In some instances, reconciliation extended beyond the initial conflict dyad toward victimized third-party peacemakers. These findings add to growing cross-cultural and cross-species evidence demonstrating the presence and function of post-conflict reconciliation. We extend the repertoire of reconciliatory behaviour and introduce five common features of reconciliation that are central to the study of adult peacemaking.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Arnold, K. & Aureli, F. (2007). Postconflict reconciliation. — In: Primates in perspective (Campbell, C.J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K.C., Panger, M. & Bearder, S.K., eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 592-608.
-
Aureli, F. & de Waal, F.B.M. (2000). Natural conflict resolution. — University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
-
Aureli, F., Cords, M. & Van Schaik, C.P. (2002). Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. — Anim. Behav. 64: 325-343.
-
Benenson, J.F. & Wrangham, R.W. (2016). Cross-cultural sex differences in post-conflict affiliation following sports matches. — Curr. Biol. 26: 2208-2212.
-
Black, D. (1993). The social structure of right and wrong. — Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
-
Bloch, C., Liebst, L.S., Poder, P., Christiansen, J.M. & Heinskou, M.B. (2018). Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations. — Curr. Sociol. 66: 1049-1069.
-
Bramsen, I. (2018). How violence happens (or not): situational conditions of violence and nonviolence in Bahrain, Tunisia, and Syria. — Psych. Viol. 8: 305-315.
-
Brown, D. (1991). Human universals. — McGraw Hill, New York, MY.
-
Burrows, E.G. (1963). Flower in my ear: arts and ethos of Ifaluk Atoll. — University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
-
Butovskaya, M.L. & Kozintsev, A. (1999). Aggression, friendship, and reconciliation in Russian primary schoolchildren. — Aggr. Behav. 25: 125-139.
-
Butovskaya, M.L., Verbeek, P., Ljungberg, T. & Lunardini, A. (2000). A multicultural view of peacemaking among young children. — In: Natural conflict resolution (Aureli, F. & de Waal, F.B.M., eds). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p. 243-258.
-
Butovskaya, M.L., Boyko, E.Y., Selverova, N.B. & Ermakova, I.V. (2005). The hormonal basis of reconciliation in humans. — Phys. Anthropol. 24: 333-337.
-
Cafazzo, S., Marshall-Pescini, S., Lazzaroni, M., Virányi, Z. & Range, F. (2018). The effect of domestication on post-conflict management: wolves reconcile while dogs avoid each other. — Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 5: 1-18.
-
Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. — Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
-
Cools, A.K., Van Hout, A.J.-M. & Nelissen, M.H. (2008). Canine reconciliation and third-party-initiated postconflict affiliation: do peacemaking social mechanisms in dogs rival those of higher primates? — Ethology 114: 53-63.
-
Cordoni, G. & Norscia, I. (2014). Peace-making in marsupials: the first study in the red-necked wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus). — PLoS ONE 9: e86859.
-
Cords, M. & Killen, M. (1998). Conflict resolution in human and nonhuman primates. — In: Piaget, evolution and development (Langer, J. & Killen, M., eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, p. 193-218.
-
Dael, N., Mortillaro, M. & Scherer, K.R. (2012). Emotion expression in body action and posture. — Emotion 12: 1085.1101.
-
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. — John Murray, London.
-
De Waal, F.B.M. (1989). Peacemaking among primates. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
De Waal, F.B.M. (1993). Reconciliation among primates: a review of empirical evidence and unresolved issues. — In: Primate social conflict (Mason, W.A. & Mendoza, S.P., eds). University of New York Press, New York, NY, p. 111-144.
-
De Waal, F.B.M. (2000). Primates — a natural heritage of conflict resolution. — Science 289: 586-590.
-
De Waal, F.B.M. & Aureli, F. (1999). Conflict resolution and distress alleviation in monkeys and apes. — In: The integrative neurobiology of affiliation (Carter, S.C., Lederhendler, I.I. & Kirkpatrick, B., eds). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 317-328.
-
De Waal, F.B.M. & van Roosmalen, A. (1979). Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 55-66.
-
De Waal, F.B.M. & Yoshihara, D. (1983). Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. — Behaviour 85: 224-241.
-
Denzin, N.K. (2017). Sociological methods: a sourcebook. — Routledge, Abingdon.
-
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. — Aldine de Gruyter, Chicago, IL.
-
Ejbye-Ernst, P., Lindegaard, M.R. & Bernasco, W. (2020). A CCTV-based analysis of target selection by guardians intervening in interpersonal conflicts. — Eur. J. Criminol. DOI:10.1177/1477370820960338.
-
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W.V. (1975). Unmasking the face. — Prentice-Hall, Hoboken, NJ.
-
Elias, N. (1979). The civilizing process, Vol. 1. — Blackwell, Oxford.
-
Ellickson, R.C. (1994). Order without law. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Emerson, R.M. (2015). Everyday troubles: the micro-politics of interpersonal conflict. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
-
Flack, J.C., Girvan, M., De Waal, F.B.M. & Krakauer, D.C. (2006). Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. — Nature 439: 426-429.
-
Fraser, O.N. & Bugnyar, T. (2011). Ravens reconcile after aggressive conflicts with valuable partners. — PLoS ONE 6: e18118.
-
Fraser, O.N., Stahl, D. & Aureli, F. (2010). The function and determinants of reconciliation in Pan troglodytes. — Int. J. Primatol. 31: 39-57.
-
Fry, D.P. (2000). Conflict management in cross-cultural perspective. — In: Natural conflict resolution (Aureli, F. & de Waal, F.B.M., eds). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p. 334-351.
-
Fry, D.P. (2012). Anthropological examples of peacemaking: practice and theory. — In: Peacemaking: from practice to theory, Vol. II (Nan, S.A., Mampilly, Z.C. & Bartoli, A., eds). Praeger Security International, Westport, CT, p. 550-562.
-
Fujisawa, K.K., Kutsukake, N. & Hasegawa, T. (2005). Reconciliation pattern after aggression among Japanese preschool children. — Aggr. Behav. 31: 138-152.
-
Ge, W., Collins, R.T. & Ruback, R.B. (2012). Vision-based analysis of small groups in pedestrian crowds. — IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34: 1003-1016.
-
Gibson, J.L. (2006). The contributions of truth to reconciliation: lessons from South Africa. — J. Conf. Res. 50: 409-432.
-
Gilmore, R.O. & Adolph, K.E. (2017). Video can make behavioural science more reproducible. — Nature Hum. Behav. 1: 0128.
-
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: microstudies of public order. — Basic Books, New York, NY.
-
Gold, G.J. & Davis, J.R. (2005). Psychological determinants of forgiveness: an evolutionary perspective. — Humb. J. Soc. Relat. 29: 111-134.
-
Hartup, W.W. & Laursen, B. (1993). Conflict and context in peer relations. — In: Children on playgrounds: research perspectives and applications (Hart, C.H., ed.). State University of New York Press, Stony Brook, NY, p. 44-84.
-
Heinskou, M.B. & Liebst, L.S. (2017). Gadevold: en sociologisk kortlægning af vold I byen. — Djøf Forlag, Copenhagen.
-
Hofer, H. & East, M.L. (2000). Conflict management in female-dominated spotted hyenas. — In: Natural conflict resolution (Aureli, F. & de Waal, F.B.M., eds). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p. 232-234.
-
Jones, L.K., Jennings, B.M., Higgins, M.K. & De Waal, F.B.M. (2018). Ethological observations of social behavior in the operating room. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115: 7575-7580.
-
King, G., Keohane, R.O. & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations. — Hum. Commun. Res. 30: 411-433.
-
Laursen, B. & Hartup, W.W. (1989). The dynamics of preschool children’s conflicts. — Merr. Palm. Q. 35: 281-297.
-
Levine, M., Taylor, P.J. & Best, R. (2011). Third parties, violence, and conflict resolution: the role of group size and collective action in the microregulation of violence. — Psychol. Sci. 22: 406-412.
-
Levine, M., Philpot, R. & Kovalenko, A.G. (2020). Rethinking the bystander effect in violence reduction training programs. — Soc. Iss. Polic. Rev. 14: 273-296.
-
Liebst, L.S., Heinskou, M.B. & Ejbye-Ernst, P. (2018). On the actual risk of bystander intervention: a statistical study based on naturally occurring violent emergencies. — J. Res. Crim. Delin. 55: 27-50.
-
Liebst, L.S., Ejbye-Ernst, P., Philpot, R., Heinskou, M.B., Demant, J., Dausel, K.L. & Lindegaard, M.R. (2019a). Intervention or involvement: a video observational analysis of bouncers in aggressive encounters. — Dev. Behav. 41: 1383-1392.
-
Liebst, L.S., Philpot, R., Bernasco, W., Dausel, K.L., Ejbye-Ernst, P., Nicolaisen, M.H. & Lindegaard, M.R. (2019b). Social relations and presence of others predict bystander intervention: evidence from violent incidents captured on CCTV. — Aggr. Behav. 45: 598-609.
-
Liebst, L.S., Philpot, R., Levine, M. & Lindegaard, M.R. (2020). Cross-national CCTV footage shows low victimization risk for bystander interveners in public conflicts. — Psych. Viol. 11: 11-18.
-
Liebst, L.S., Baggesen, L., Dausel, K.L., Pallante, V. & Lindegaard, M.R. (2021). Human observers are accurate in judging personal relationships in real-life settings: a methodological tool for human observational research. — OSF, preprint.
-
Lindegaard, M.R. & Bernasco, W. (2018). Lessons learned from crime caught on camera. — J. Res. Crim. Delinq. 55: 155-186.
-
Lindegaard, M.R., Liebst, L.S., Bernasco, W., Heinskou, M.B., Philpot, R., Levine, M. & Verbeek, P. (2017). Consolation in the aftermath of robberies resembles post-aggression consolation in chimpanzees. — PLoS ONE 12: 0177725.
-
Ljungberg, T., Westlund, K. & Forsberg, A.J.L. (1999). Conflict resolution in 5-year-old boys: does postconflict affiliative behaviour have a reconciliatory role? — Anim. Behav. 58: 1007-1016.
-
Lofland, L.H. (2017). The public realm: exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. — Routledge, Abingdon.
-
Lorenz, K.Z. (1973). The fashionable fallacy of dispensing with description. — Naturwissenschaften 60: 1-9.
-
Luckenbill, D.F. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction. — Soc. Probl. 25: 176-186.
-
Martens, J.P., Tracy, J.L. & Shariff, A.F. (2012). Status signals: adaptive benefits of displaying and observing the nonverbal expressions of pride and shame. — Cogn. Emotion 26: 390-406.
-
Martin, J.L. (2017). Thinking through methods: a social science primer. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
-
Maxwell, J.A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. — Qual. Inq. 16: 475-482.
-
Morrison, C., Lee, J.P., Gruenewald, P.J. & Mair, C. (2016). The reliability of naturalistic observations of social, physical and economic environments of bars. — Addict. Res. Theor. 24: 330-340.
-
Nassauer, A. (2016). From peaceful marches to violent clashes: a micro-situational analysis. — Soc. Move Stud. 15: 515-530.
-
Nassauer, A. & Legewie, N.M. (2018). Video data analysis: a methodological frame for a novel research trend. — Sociol. Methods Res. 50: 135-174.
-
Nippert-Eng, C. (2015). Watching closely: a guide to ethnographic observation. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Nowak, M.A. & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. — Nature 437: 1291-1298.
-
Palagi, E. & Norscia, I. (2011). Scratching around stress: hierarchy and reconciliation make the difference in wild brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus). — Stress 14: 93-97.
-
Philpot, R. (2017). Beyond the dyad: the role of groups and third-parties in the trajectory of violence. — PhD thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter.
-
Philpot, R. & Levine, M. (2022). Evacuation behavior in a subway train emergency: a video-based analysis. — Environ. Behav. 54: 383-411.
-
Philpot, R., Liebst, L.S., Møller, K.K., Lindegaard, M.R. & Levine, M. (2019). Capturing violence in the night-time economy: a review of established and emerging methodologies. — Aggr. Viol. Behav. 46: 56-65.
-
Philpot, R., Liebst, L.S., Levine, M., Bernasco, W. & Lindegaard, M.R. (2020). Would I be helped? Cross-national CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. — Am. Psychol. 75: 66-75.
-
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: the decline of violence in history and its causes. — Penguin, London.
-
Planty, M. (2002). Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993-99. — US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
-
Reiss Jr, A.J. (1992). The trained incapacities of sociologists. — In: Sociology and its publics: the forms and fates of disciplinary organization (Halliday, T.C. & Janowitz, M., eds). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 297-315.
-
Richer, J.M. (2017). Direct observation: impediments and approaches. — Hum. Ethol. Bull. 32: 6-14.
-
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing media message: using quantitative content analysis in research. — Routledge, Abingdon.
-
Roseth, C.J. (2018). Children’s peacekeeping and peacemaking. — In: Peace ethology: behavioral processes and systems of peace (Verbeek, P. & Peters, B., eds). Wiley, Chichester, p. 113-132.
-
Rossner, M. (2011). Emotions and interaction ritual: a micro analysis of restorative justice. — Br. J. Crim. 51: 95-119.
-
Sackin, S. & Thelen, E. (1984). An ethological study of peaceful associative outcomes to conflict in preschool children. — Child. Dev. 55: 1098-1102.
-
Schmitt, A. (1995). Reconciliation among kindergarden children. an ethological and psychological study. — PhD thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna.
-
Sherman, L.W. & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice: the evidence. — The Smith Institute, London.
-
Shnabel, N. (2018). Addressing the psychological needs of conflicting parties as a key to promoting reconciliation: the perspective of the Needs-based Model. — J. Self Regul. 4: 75-87.
-
Silk, J.B. (2002). The form and function of reconciliation in primates. — Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 31: 21-44.
-
Suvilehto, J.T., Glerean, E., Dunbar, R.I.M., Hari, R. & Nummenmaa, L. (2015). Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 13811-13816.
-
Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea culpa: a sociology of apology and reconciliation. — Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
-
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. — Z. Tierpsychol. 20: 410-433.
-
Trivers, R.L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. — Q. Rev. Biol. 46: 35-57.
-
Valach, L., Von Cranach, M. & Kalbermatten, U. (1988). Social meaning in the observation of goal directed action. — Semiotica 71: 243-260.
-
Verbeek, P. (2008). Peace ethology. — Behaviour 145: 1497-1524.
-
Verbeek, P. (2009). Book review: the need to observe forgiveness. — Evol. Psychol. 7: 142-145.
-
Verbeek, P. (2018). Natural peace. — In: Peace ethology: behavioral processes and systems of peace (Verbeek, P. & Peters, B., eds). Wiley, Chichester, p. 287-320.
-
Verbeek, P. & de Waal, F.B.M. (2001). Peacemaking among preschool children. peace and conflict. — J. Peace Psychol. 7: 5-28.
-
Verbeek, P. & Peters, B.A. (2018). Peace ethology: behavioral processes and systems of peace. — Wiley, Chichester.
-
Verbeek, P., Hartup, W.W. & Collins, W.A. (2000). Conflict management in children and adolescents. — In: Natural conflict resolution (Aureli, F. & de Waal, F.B.M., eds). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p. 34-53.
-
Webb, C.E., Franks, B., Romero, T., Higgins, E.T. & De Waal, F.B.M. (2014). Individual differences in chimpanzee reconciliation relate to social switching behaviour. — Anim. Behav. 90: 57-63.
-
Wrangham, R. (2008). The International Primatological Society as a coalition: primatologists and the future of primates. — Int. J. Primatol. 29: 3-11.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 652 | 141 | 21 |
| Full Text Views | 86 | 19 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 150 | 30 | 6 |
Reconciliation in human adults: a video-assisted naturalistic observational study of post conflict conciliatory behaviour in interpersonal aggression
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by R. Philpot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L.S. Liebst in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), De Boelelaan 1077, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by M. Rosenkrantz Lindegaard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P. Verbeek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Levine in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Reconciliation is an aspect of conflict resolution, with similar behavioural patterns documented in non-human primates, human children, and human adults of non-Western, non-industrialized cultures. Reconciliation amongst adults of industrialized societies has rarely been studied. We observed naturally occurring conflicts between adults, captured by public security cameras in England. Reconciliation was found in one-quarter of all conflicts and was more prevalent in milder conflicts. Reconciliation typically occurred spontaneously between opponents — and was found within friendship groups and across stranger groups. Reconciliation between opponents also appeared to be stimulated by peers, law enforcement, or shared objects. In some instances, reconciliation extended beyond the initial conflict dyad toward victimized third-party peacemakers. These findings add to growing cross-cultural and cross-species evidence demonstrating the presence and function of post-conflict reconciliation. We extend the repertoire of reconciliatory behaviour and introduce five common features of reconciliation that are central to the study of adult peacemaking.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 652 | 141 | 21 |
| Full Text Views | 86 | 19 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 150 | 30 | 6 |