In some social groups, non-breeding subordinates regulate their growth, relative to the size of their immediate dominants in ways that reduce conflict over dominance rank. We predicted that such strategic growth adjustment should also occur in breeding pairs, if this is beneficial for the more subordinate individual within a pair. Using the cichlid fish, Julidochromis transcriptus, held in a laboratory, we examined whether strategic growth regulation occurs in monogamous pairs. In female-largest pairs, smaller males grew slower than their partner when the initial size ratio of pairs (large/small) was small, but faster when the ratio was large, and the number of pairs with an intermediate size ratio increased over time. However, in male-largest pairs, smaller females had a low growth rate and the size ratio of these pairs increased over time. The most important factors for predicting the growth rate of fish were the initial size ratio of pairs for smaller males in female-largest pairs and the initial body size for larger individuals in both pair types, but no such predictors were found for smaller females in male-largest pairs. Neither feeding rate nor attacking rate of the two individuals in a pair predicted the growth rate of smaller fish in a pair. These results suggest that smaller males strategically adjust their own growth, relative to the size of their partner in female-largest pairs, wherein the growth of larger females unrestrained by social relationship with their partner can increase female fecundity, being beneficial for both sexes. The adaptive significance of a low growth rate of smaller females in male-largest pairs is also discussed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. — IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 19: 716-723.
Allen, G.R. (1972). The anemonefishes: their classification and biology, 2nd edn. — T.F.H., Neptune City, NJ.
Amat, J.A., Visser, G.H., Pérez-Hurtado, A. & Arroyo, G.M. (2000). Brood desertion by female shorebirds: a test of the differential parental capacity hypothesis on Kentish plovers. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 267: 2171-2176.
Andersson, M. (1994a). Sexual size dimorphism. — In: Sexual selection (Andersson, M., ed.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 247-293.
Andersson, M. (1994b). Alternative mating tactics. — In: Sexual selection (Andersson, M., ed.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 379-395.
Awata, S. & Kohda, M. (2004). Parental roles and the amount of care in a bi-parental substrate brooding cichlid: the effect of size differences within pairs. — Behaviour 141: 1135-1149.
Awata, S., Munehara, H. & Kohda, M. (2005). Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58: 506-516.
Awata, S., Takeuchi, H. & Kohda, M. (2006). The effect of body size on mating system and parental roles in a biparental cichlid fish (Julidochromis transcriptus): a preliminary laboratory experiment. — J. Ethol. 24: 125-132.
Awata, S., Takeyama, T., Makino, Y., Kitamura, Y. & Kohda, M. (2008). Cooperatively breeding cichlid fish adjust their testis size but not sperm traits in relation to sperm competition risk. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1701-1710.
Booth, D.J. (1995). Juvenile groups in a coral-reef damselfish: density-dependent effects on individual fitness and population demography. — Ecology 76: 91-106.
Brown, M.E. (1946). The growth of brown trout (Salmo trutta Linn.); factors influencing the growth of trout fry. — J. Exp. Biol. 22: 118-129.
Buston, P.M. (2003). Size and growth modification in clownfish. — Nature 424: 145-146.
Buston, P.M. & Cant, M.A. (2006). A new perspective on size hierarchies in nature: patterns, causes, and consequences. — Oecologia 149: 362-372.
Coates, D. (1980). Prey-size intake in humbug damselfish, Dascyllus aruanus (Pisces, Pomacentridae) living within social groups. — J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 335-340.
Culbert, B.M., Gilmour, K.M. & Balshine, S. (2018). Stress axis regulation during social ascension in a group-living cichlid fish. — Horm. Behav. 103: 121-128.
Culbert, B.M., Balshine, S. & Gilmour, K.M. (2019). Physiological regulation of growth during social ascension in a group-living fish. — Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 92: 211-222.
Dugatkin, A.L. & FitzGerald, J.G. (1997). Sexual selection. — In: Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes (Godin, J.G.J., ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p. 265-291.
Everhart, W.H., Eipper, A.W. & Youngs, W.D. (1975). Principles of fishery science. — Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Filby, A.L., Paull, G.C., Bartlett, E.J., Van Look, K.J.W. & Tyler, C.R. (2010). Physiological and health consequences of social status in zebrafish (Danio rerio). — Pysiol. Behav. 101: 576-587.
Fitzpatrick, J.L., Desjardins, J.K., Milligan, N., Stiver, K.A., Montgomerie, R. & Balshine, S. (2008). Female-mediated causes and consequences of status change in a social fish. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 275: 929-936.
Forrester, G.E. (1991). Social rank, individual size, and group composition as determinants of food consumption by humbug damselfish, Dascyllus aruanus. — Anim. Behav. 42: 701-711.
Fox, H.E., White, S.A., Kao, M.H.F. & Fernald, R.D. (1997). Stress and dominance in a social fish. — J. Neurosci. 17: 6463-6469.
Gotelli, N.J. & Graves, G.R. (1996). Null models in ecology. — Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Hamilton, I.M. & Heg, D. (2008). Sex differences in the effect of social status on the growth of subordinates in a co-operatively breeding cichlid. — J. Fish Biol. 72: 1079-1088.
Hamilton, I.M. & Benincasa, M.D. (2022). Emergence of size-structured dominance hierarchies through size-dependent feedback. — Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 377: 20200449.
Hattori, A. (1991). Socially controlled growth and size-dependent sex change in the anemonefish Amphiprion frenatus in Okinawa, Japan. — Jpn. J. Ichthyol. 38: 165-177.
Heg, D. (2010). Status-dependent and strategic growth adjustments in female cooperative cichlids. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 1309-1316.
Heg, D., Bender, N. & Hamilton, I. (2004). Strategic growth decisions in helper cichlids. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 271(Suppl.): S505-S508.
Hellmann, J.K., Ligocki, I.Y., O’Connor, C.M., Reddon, A.R., Farmer, T.M., Marsh-Rollo, S.E., Balshine, S. & Hamilton, I.M. (2016). The influence of status and the social environment on energy stores in a social fish. — J. Fish Biol. 88: 1321-1334.
Hofmann, H.A. & Fernald, R.D. (2000). Social status controls somatostatin neuron size and growth. — J. Neurosci. 20: 4740-4744.
Huchard, E., English, S., Bell, M.B.V., Thavarajah, N. & Clutton-Brock, T. (2016). Competitive growth in a cooperative mammal. — Nature 533: 532-534.
Johnstone, R.A. (2006). Models of reproductive skew: a review and synthesis. — Ethology 106: 5-26.
Keenleyside, M.H.A. (1983). Mate desertion in relation to adult sex ratio in the biparental cichlid fish Herotilapia multispinosa. — Anim. Behav. 31: 683-688.
Koebele, B.P. (1985). Growth and the size hierarchy effect: an experimental assessment of three proposed mechanisms; activity differences, disproportional food acquisition, physiological stress. — Environ. Biol. Fish. 12: 181-188.
Konings, A. (1998). Tanganyika cichlids in their natural habitat. — Cichlid, El Paso, TX.
Kuwamura, T. (1997). The evolution of parental care and mating systems among Tanganyikan cichlids. — In: Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika (Kawanabe, H., Hori, M. & Nagoshi, M., eds). Kyoto University Press, Kyoto, p. 57-86.
LeCren, E.D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). — J. Anim. Ecol. 20: 201-219.
Magnusson, J.J. (1962). An analysis of aggressive behavior, growth, and competition for food and space in medaka (Oryzias latipes (Pisces, Cyprinodontidae)). — Can. J. Zool. 40: 313-363.
Matsumoto, K., Okamoto, Y., Tsurumi, Y. & Kohda, M. (2020). Context-dependent agonistic response to neighbors along territory boundaries in a cichlid fish. — Behaviour 157: 559-573.
Menningen, J.A., Magnan, J., Touma, K., Best, C., Culbert, B.M., Bernier, N.J. & Gilmour, K.M. (2022). Social status-dependent regulation and function of the somatotropic axis in juvenile rainbow trout. — Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 554: 111709.
Metcalfe, N.B. (1986). Intraspecific variation in competitive ability and food intake in salmonids: consequences for energy budgets and growth rates. — J. Fish. Biol. 28: 525-529.
Munday, P.L., Cardoni, A.M. & Syms, C. (2006). Cooperative growth regulation in coral-dwelling fishes. — Biol. Lett. 2: 355-358.
Ochi, H. (1986). Growth of the anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii in temperate waters, with special reference to the influence of settling time on the growth of 0-year olds. — Mar. Biol. 92: 223-229.
Sloman, K.A., Metcalfe, N.B., Taylor, A.C. & Gilmour, K.M. (2001). Plasma cortisol concentrations before and after social stress in rainbow trout and brown trout. — Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 74: 383-389.
Taborsky, M. (1984). Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. — Anim. Behav. 32: 1236-1252.
Trainor, B.C. & Hofmann, H.A. (2007). Somatostatin and somatostatin receptor gene expression in dominant and subordinate males of an African cichlid fish. — Behav. Brain Res. 179: 314-320.
Vera Cruz, E.M. & Brown, C.L. (2007). The influence of social status on the rate of growth, eye color pattern and insulin-like growth factor-I gene expression in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. — Horm. Behav. 51: 611-619.
Wisenden, B.D. (1994). Factors affecting mate desertion by males in free-ranging convict cichlids (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum). — Behav. Ecol. 5: 439-447.
Wong, M.Y.L., Buston, P.M., Munday, P.L. & Jones, G.P. (2007). The threat of punishment enforces peaceful cooperation and stabilizes queues in a coral-reef fish. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 274: 1093-1099.
Wong, M.Y.L., Munday, P.L., Buston, P.M. & Jones, G.P. (2008). Fasting or feasting in a fish social hierarchy. — Current. Biol. 18: R372-R373.
Wootton, R.J. (1998). Ecology of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. — Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 814 | 610 | 134 |
Full Text Views | 112 | 12 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 198 | 23 | 4 |
In some social groups, non-breeding subordinates regulate their growth, relative to the size of their immediate dominants in ways that reduce conflict over dominance rank. We predicted that such strategic growth adjustment should also occur in breeding pairs, if this is beneficial for the more subordinate individual within a pair. Using the cichlid fish, Julidochromis transcriptus, held in a laboratory, we examined whether strategic growth regulation occurs in monogamous pairs. In female-largest pairs, smaller males grew slower than their partner when the initial size ratio of pairs (large/small) was small, but faster when the ratio was large, and the number of pairs with an intermediate size ratio increased over time. However, in male-largest pairs, smaller females had a low growth rate and the size ratio of these pairs increased over time. The most important factors for predicting the growth rate of fish were the initial size ratio of pairs for smaller males in female-largest pairs and the initial body size for larger individuals in both pair types, but no such predictors were found for smaller females in male-largest pairs. Neither feeding rate nor attacking rate of the two individuals in a pair predicted the growth rate of smaller fish in a pair. These results suggest that smaller males strategically adjust their own growth, relative to the size of their partner in female-largest pairs, wherein the growth of larger females unrestrained by social relationship with their partner can increase female fecundity, being beneficial for both sexes. The adaptive significance of a low growth rate of smaller females in male-largest pairs is also discussed.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 814 | 610 | 134 |
Full Text Views | 112 | 12 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 198 | 23 | 4 |