The function of putative appeasement behaviour for access to food in African painted dogs
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Kanako Ake in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Nobuyuki Kutsukake in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In some group-living species that share food, interindividual disagreement on access to food is mediated by several types of negotiation, ranging from appeasing the current owner to reduce aggression and gain access to the food, to harassment where non-owners assert their presence and apply insistent pressure until owners give up their food. In some species, non-owners employ specific behaviours used in other social contexts during negotiation, which makes it challenging to discern their precise functions. The core prediction of the harassment hypothesis is that intense pressure by beggars makes owners abandon their food and leads to food monopolisation, which is not predicted by the appeasement hypothesis. In the African painted dog (Lycaon pictus), non-owners assume a low posture and produce high-pitched vocalisations — a suite of behaviours considered appeasement in non-feeding contexts. This study examined whether these behaviours, referred to collectively as putative appeasement behaviour (PAB), serve as appeasement in the context of feeding or whether they may also, or only, be used for harassment. To this end, we used behavioural experiments in captive parent–offspring or full sibling pairs. Individuals showed more frequent PAB when offered food that could not be easily shared (one vs. two bones). As aggression also only occurred under that condition, PAB seems to have a function in appeasement. However, we observed a positive effect of PAB on food monopolisation by PAB actors but not on co-feeding. Persistent PAB led to monopolisation, indicating that these behaviours serve as a form of harassment in feeding. We did not observe reciprocity between paired individuals, another possible form of food monopolisation besides appeasement and harassment. In conclusion, PAB in the African painted dog functions as both appeasement and harassment, and this highly tolerant species employs negotiation strategies in feeding.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ake, K. & Kutsukake, N. (2023). Contagious yawning in African painted dogs. — Anim. Cogn. 26: 1191-1198.
-
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. — Behaviour 49: 227-267.
-
Anderson, J.R. (2007). Animal behaviour: tolerant primates cooperate best. — Curr. Biol. 17: 242-244.
-
Aureli, F. & de Waal, F.B.M. (2000). Natural conflict resolution. — University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
-
Aureli, F., Cords, M. & van Schaik, C.P. (2002). Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: A predictive framework. — Anim. Behav. 64: 325-343.
-
Bates, D. (2015). Package ‘lme4’. — Convergence 12: 2.
-
Bergmüller, R., Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. (2005). Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 272: 325-331.
-
Bowden-Parry, M., Postma, E. & Boogert, N.J. (2020). Effects of food type and abundance on begging and sharing in Asian small-clawed otters (Aonyx cinereus). — PeerJ 8: e10369.
-
Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. (2011). Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. — Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
-
Brotherton, P.N.M., Clutton-Brock, T.H., O’Riain, M.J., Gaynor, D., Sharpe, L., Kansky, R. & McIlrath, G.M. (2001). Offspring food allocation by parents and helpers in a cooperative mammal. — Behav. Ecol. 12: 590-599.
-
Bucci, M.E., Nicholson, K.L. & Krausman, P.R. (2022). Lycaon pictus (Carnivora: Canidae). — Mammal. Species 54: 220-240.
-
Burkart, J.M., Fehr, E., Efferson, C. & van Schaik, C.P. (2007). Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19762-19766.
-
Burkart, J.M., Allon, O., Amici, F., Fichtel, C., Finkenwirth, C., Heschl, A., Huber, J., Isler, K., Kosonen, Z.K., Martins, E., Meulman, E.J., Richiger, R., Rueth, K., Spillmann, B., Wiesendanger, S. & van Schaik, C.P. (2014). The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. — Nature Commun. 5: 4747.
-
Carbone, C., Frame, L., Frame, G., Malcolm, J., Fanshawe, J., FitzGibbon, C., Schaller, G., Gordon, I.J., Rowcliffe, J.M. & Du Toit, J.T. (2005). Feeding success of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in the Serengeti: the effects of group size and kleptoparasitism. — J. Zool. 266: 153-161.
-
Carter, G.G. & Wilkinson, G.S. (2015). Social benefits of non-kin food sharing by female vampire bats. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 282: 20152524.
-
Chancellor, R.L. & Isbell, L.A. (2008). Punishment and competition over food in captive rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta. — Anim. Behav. 75: 1939-1947.
-
Courchamp, F. & Macdonald, D.W. (2001). Crucial importance of pack size in the African wild dog Lycaon pictus. — Anim. Conserv. 4: 169-174.
-
Courchamp, F., Rasmussen, G.S.A. & Macdonald, D.W. (2002). Small pack size imposes a trade-off between hunting and pup-guarding in the painted hunting dog Lycaon pictus. — Behav. Ecol. 13: 20-27.
-
Creel, S. (2001). Social dominance and stress hormones. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 491-497.
-
Creel, S. & Creel, N.M. (1995). Communal hunting and pack size in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. — Anim. Behav. 50: 1325-1339.
-
Creel, S. & Creel, N.M. (2002). The African wild dog: Behaviour, ecology, and conservation. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Creel, S. & Creel, N.M. (2015). Opposing effects of group size on reproduction and survival in African wild dogs. — Behav. Ecol. 26: 1414-1422.
-
Crofoot, M.C., Rubenstein, D.I., Maiya, A.S. & Berger-Wolf, T.Y. (2011). Aggression, grooming and group-level cooperation in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus): insights from social networks. — Am. J. Primatol. 73: 821-833.
-
Crossey, B., Chimimba, C., du Plessis, C., Ganswindt, A. & Hall, G. (2021). African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) show differences in diet composition across landscape types in Kruger National Park, South Africa. — J. Mammal. 102: 1211-1221.
-
Dale, R., Range, F., Stott, L., Kotrschal, K. & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2017). The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71: 107.
-
de Kort, S.R., Emery, N.J. & Clayton, N.S. (2003). Food offering in jackdaws (Corvus monedula). — Naturwissenschaften 90: 238-240.
-
de Oliveira Terceiro, F.E., Arruda, M.d.F., van Schaik, C.P., Araújo, A. & Burkart, J.M. (2021). Higher social tolerance in wild versus captive common marmosets: the role of interdependence. — Sci. Rep. 11: 825.
-
de Villiers, M.S., Richardson, P.R.K. & van Jaarsveld, A.S. (2003). Patterns of coalition formation and spatial association in a social carnivore, the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). — J. Zool. 260: 377-389.
-
de Waal, F.B.M. (1992). Appeasement, celebration, and food sharing in the two Pan species. — In: Topics in Primatology. Volume 1: Human Origins (Nishida, T., McGrew, W.C., Marler, P., Pickford, M.P. & de Waal, F.B.M., eds). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, p. 37-51.
-
Estes, R.D. & Goddard, J. (1967). Prey selection and hunting behaviour of the African wild dog. — J. Wildl. Manage. 31: 52-70.
-
Fanshawe, J.H. & Fitzgibbon, C.D. (1993). Factors influencing the hunting success of an African wild dog pack. — Anim. Behav. 45: 479-490.
-
Frame, L.H., Malcolm, J.R., Frame, G.W. & van Lawick, H. (1979). Social organization of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) on the Serengeti Plains, Tanzania 1967–1978. — Z. Tierpsychol. 50: 225-249.
-
Friard, O. & Gamba, M. (2016). BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. — Methods Ecol. Evol. 7: 1325-1330.
-
Gilby, I.C. (2006). Meat sharing among the Gombe chimpanzees: harassment and reciprocal exchange. — Anim. Behav. 71: 953-963.
-
Graf, J.A., Gusset, M., Reid, C., Janse van Rensburg, S., Slotow, R. & Somers, M.J. (2006). Evolutionary ecology meets wildlife management: artificial group augmentation in the re-introduction of endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). — Anim. Conserv. 9: 398-403.
-
Gusset, M. & Macdonald, D.W. (2010). Group size effects in cooperatively breeding African wild dogs. — Animal Behav. 79: 425-428.
-
Gusset, M., Slotow, R. & Somers, M.J. (2006). Divided we fail: the importance of social integration for the re-introduction of endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). — J. Zool. 270: 502-511.
-
Hamilton, W.D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. — J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1-16.
-
Hamilton, W.D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behaviour II. — J. Theor. Biol. 7: 17-52.
-
Hayward, M.W., O’Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2006). Prey preferences of the African wild dog Lycaon pictus (Canidae: Carnivora): ecological requirements for conservation. — J. Mammal. 87: 1122-1131.
-
Heesen, M., Rogahn, S., Macdonald, S., Ostner, J. & Schülke, O. (2014). Predictors of food-related aggression in wild Assamese macaques and the role of conflict avoidance. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 1829-1841.
-
Hubel, T.Y., Myatt, J.P., Jordan, N.R., Dewhirst, O.P., McNutt, J.W. & Wilson, A.M. (2016). Energy cost and return for hunting in African wild dogs and cheetahs. — Nature Commun. 7: 11034.
-
Jaeggi, A.V. & Gurven, M. (2013). Reciprocity explains food sharing in humans and other primates independent of kin selection and tolerated scrounging: a phylogenetic meta-analysis. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 280: 20131615.
-
Jaeggi, A.V., Stevens, J.M.G. & van Schaik, C.P. (2010). Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 143: 41-51.
-
Jakobsson, S., Brick, O. & Kullberg, C. (1995). Escalated fighting behaviour incurs increased predation risk. — Anim. Behav. 49: 235-239.
-
Jordan, N.R., Golabek, K.A., Behr, D.M., Walker, R.H., Plimpton, L., Lostrom, S., Claase, M., van der Weyde, L.K. & McNutt, J.W. (2022). Priority of access to food and its influence on social dynamics of an endangered carnivore. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 76: 13.
-
Jordan, N.R., Golabek, K.A., Marneweck, C.J., Marneweck, D.G., Mbizah, M.M., Ngatia, D., Rabaiotti, D., Tshimologo, B. & Watermeyer, J. (2023). Hunting behaviour and social ecology of African wild dogs. — In: Social strategies of carnivorous mammalian predators (Srinivasan, M. & Würsig, B., eds). Springer, Cham, p. 177-227.
-
King, A.J., Clark, F.E. & Cowlishaw, G. (2011). The dining etiquette of desert baboons: the roles of social bonds, kinship, and dominance in co-feeding networks. — Am. J. Primatol. 73: 768-774.
-
Kutsukake, N. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. (2006). Aggression and submission reflect reproductive conflict between females in cooperatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 541-548.
-
Lindsey, P.A., du Toit, J.T. & Mills, M.G.L. (2003). Area and prey requirements of African wild dogs under varying habitat conditions: implications for reintroductions. — Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 34: 77-86.
-
MacDonald, D.W. (1983). The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. — Nature 301: 379-384.
-
Mathy, J.W. & Isbell, L.A. (2001). The relative importance of size of food and interfood distance in eliciting aggression in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). — Folia Primatol. 72: 268-277.
-
McNutt, J.W. (1996). Adoption in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. — J. Zool. 240: 163-173.
-
Nolte, S., Sterck, E.H.M. & van Leeuwen, E.J.C. (2023). Does tolerance allow bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task? A conceptual replication of Hare et al., 2007. — Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 10: 220194.
-
Palagi, E., Celeghin, A., Tamietto, M., Winkielman, P. & Norscia, I. (2020). The neuroethology of spontaneous mimicry and emotional contagion in human and non-human animals. — Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 111: 149-165.
-
R Core Team (2021). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, available online at https://www.R-project.org/.
-
Rafacz, M.L. & Santymire, R.M. (2014). Using odor cues to elicit a behavioural and hormonal response in zoo-housed African wild dogs. — Zoo Biol. 33: 144-149.
-
Range, F., Ritter, C. & Virányi, Z. (2015). Testing the myth: tolerant dogs and aggressive wolves. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 282: 20150220.
-
Reddon, A.R., Ruberto, T. & Reader, S.M. (2021). Submission signals in animal groups. — Behaviour 159: 1-20.
-
Robbins, R.L. (2000). Vocal communication in free-ranging African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). — Behaviour 137: 1271-1298.
-
Romero, T., Castellanos, M.A. & de Waal, F.B.M. (2011). Post-conflict affiliation by chimpanzees with aggressors: other-oriented versus selfish political strategy. — PLoS ONE 6: e22173.
-
Rütten, S. & Fleissner, G. (2004). On the function of the greeting ceremony in social canids — exemplified by African wild dogs Lycaon pictus. — IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland.
-
Silk, J.B., Brosnan, S.F., Henrich, J., Lambeth, S.P. & Shapiro, S. (2013). Chimpanzees share food for many reasons: the role of kinship, reciprocity, social bonds and harassment on food transfers. — Anim. Behav. 85: 941-947.
-
Sillero-Zubiri, C. & Macdonald, D.W. (1998). Scent-marking and territorial behaviour of Ethiopian wolves Canis simensis. — J. Zool. 245: 351-361.
-
Spiering, P.A., Somers, M.J., Maldonado, J.E., Wildt, D.E. & Gunther, M.S. (2010). Reproductive sharing and proximate factors mediating cooperative breeding in the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 583-592.
-
Stevens, J.R. (2004). The selfish nature of generosity: harassment and food sharing in primates. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 271: 451-456.
-
Stevens, J.R. & Stephens, D.W. (2002). Food sharing: a model of manipulation by harassment. — Behav. Ecol. 13: 393-400.
-
Teunissen, N., Kingma, S.A., Hall, M.L., Aranzamendi, N.H., Komdeur, J. & Peters, A. (2018). More than kin: subordinates foster strong bonds with relatives and potential mates in a social bird. — Behav. Ecol. 29: 1316-1324.
-
Trivers, R.L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. — Q. Rev. Biol. 46: 35-57.
-
van den Berghe, F., Paris, M.C.J., Sarnyai, Z., Millar, R., Ganswindt, A., Cozzi, A., Pageat, P. & Paris, D.B.B.P. (2019). Dog Appeasing Pheromone prevents the testosterone surge, and may reduce contact-dominance and active-submission behaviours after interventions in captive African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). — PLoS One 14: e0212551.
-
von Bayern, A.M.P., de Kort, S.R., Clayton, N.S. & Emery, N.J. (2007). The role of food- and object-sharing in the development of social bonds in juvenile jackdaws (Corvus monedula). — Behaviour 144: 711-733.
-
Walters, K.A.F., King, C., Scolaro, C.L.C. & Shyan-Norwalt, M.R. (2020). Reconciliation in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): evidence for the uncertainty reduction hypothesis. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 226: 104987.
-
Webster, M.M. & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? — Nature 582: 337-340.
-
Wilkinson, A., Sebanz, N., Mandl, I. & Huber, L. (2011). No evidence of contagious yawning in the red-footed tortoise Geochelone carbonaria. — Curr. Zool. 57: 477-484.
-
Woodroffe, R., McNutt, J.W. & Mills, M.G.L. (2004). African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). — In: Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs — status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN, Gland, p. 174-183.
-
Woodroffe, R. & Sillero-Zubiri, C. (2020). Lycaon pictus (amended version of 2012 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020. IUCN, Gland, e.T12436A166502262.
-
Wroe, S., McHenry, C. & Thomason, J. (2005). Bite club: comparative bite force in big biting mammals and the prediction of predatory behaviour in fossil taxa. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 272: 619-625.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 238 | 238 | 51 |
| Full Text Views | 27 | 27 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 58 | 58 | 5 |
The function of putative appeasement behaviour for access to food in African painted dogs
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Kanako Ake in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nobuyuki Kutsukake in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In some group-living species that share food, interindividual disagreement on access to food is mediated by several types of negotiation, ranging from appeasing the current owner to reduce aggression and gain access to the food, to harassment where non-owners assert their presence and apply insistent pressure until owners give up their food. In some species, non-owners employ specific behaviours used in other social contexts during negotiation, which makes it challenging to discern their precise functions. The core prediction of the harassment hypothesis is that intense pressure by beggars makes owners abandon their food and leads to food monopolisation, which is not predicted by the appeasement hypothesis. In the African painted dog (Lycaon pictus), non-owners assume a low posture and produce high-pitched vocalisations — a suite of behaviours considered appeasement in non-feeding contexts. This study examined whether these behaviours, referred to collectively as putative appeasement behaviour (PAB), serve as appeasement in the context of feeding or whether they may also, or only, be used for harassment. To this end, we used behavioural experiments in captive parent–offspring or full sibling pairs. Individuals showed more frequent PAB when offered food that could not be easily shared (one vs. two bones). As aggression also only occurred under that condition, PAB seems to have a function in appeasement. However, we observed a positive effect of PAB on food monopolisation by PAB actors but not on co-feeding. Persistent PAB led to monopolisation, indicating that these behaviours serve as a form of harassment in feeding. We did not observe reciprocity between paired individuals, another possible form of food monopolisation besides appeasement and harassment. In conclusion, PAB in the African painted dog functions as both appeasement and harassment, and this highly tolerant species employs negotiation strategies in feeding.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 238 | 238 | 51 |
| Full Text Views | 27 | 27 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 58 | 58 | 5 |