Cvetkovich, An Archive of Feelings, p. 12, her emphasis.

Cvetkovich, An Archive of Feelings, p. 12, her emphasis.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), p. 14.

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), p. 14.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), pp. 12, 11.

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), pp. 12, 11.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), p. 14. For Warner, counterpublics are “defined by their tension with a larger public…. Discussion within such a public is understood to contravene the rules obtaining in the world at large, being structured by alternative dispositions or protocols, making different assumptions about what can be said or what goes without saying” (ibid., p. 56). A counterpublic “maintains at some level, conscious or not, an awareness of its subordinate status…. This subordinate status does not simply reflect identities formed elsewhere; participation in such a public is one of the ways by which its members identities are formed and transformed” (ibid., pp. 56–57).

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), p. 14. For Warner, counterpublics are “defined by their tension with a larger public…. Discussion within such a public is understood to contravene the rules obtaining in the world at large, being structured by alternative dispositions or protocols, making different assumptions about what can be said or what goes without saying” (ibid., p. 56). A counterpublic “maintains at some level, conscious or not, an awareness of its subordinate status…. This subordinate status does not simply reflect identities formed elsewhere; participation in such a public is one of the ways by which its members identities are formed and transformed” (ibid., pp. 56–57).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), p. 16. Warner describes how publics are “essentially intertextual, frameworks for understanding texts against an organized background of the circulation of other texts, all interwoven not just by citational references but by the incorporation of a reflexive circulatory field in the mode of address and consumption” (ibid., p. 14).

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), p. 16. Warner describes how publics are “essentially intertextual, frameworks for understanding texts against an organized background of the circulation of other texts, all interwoven not just by citational references but by the incorporation of a reflexive circulatory field in the mode of address and consumption” (ibid., p. 14).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), 15.

Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone Books, 2005), 15.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lauren Berlant, “Intuitionists: History and the Affective Event,” American Literary History 20.4 (2008), pp. 845–60 (845).

Lauren Berlant, “Intuitionists: History and the Affective Event,” American Literary History 20.4 (2008), pp. 845–60 (845).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cvetkovich, An Archive of Feelings, p. 15.

Cvetkovich, An Archive of Feelings, p. 15.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Thurman, “Novel Men,” p. 223.

Thurman, “Novel Men,” p. 223.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Berlant, “Intuitionists,” p. 846.

Berlant, “Intuitionists,” p. 846.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Taussig et al., The Thunder, pp. 29–30. Compare Bentley Layton’s reading of Thunder as primarily presenting paradoxes in “The Riddle of Thunder (NHC VI, 2): The Function of the Paradox in a Gnostic Text from Nag Hammadi,” in Charles W. Hedrick and Robert Hodgson, Jr. (eds.), Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, and Early Christianity (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1986), pp. 37–54.

Taussig et al., The Thunder, pp. 29–30. Compare Bentley Layton’s reading of Thunder as primarily presenting paradoxes in “The Riddle of Thunder (NHC VI, 2): The Function of the Paradox in a Gnostic Text from Nag Hammadi,” in Charles W. Hedrick and Robert Hodgson, Jr. (eds.), Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, and Early Christianity (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1986), pp. 37–54.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Taussig et al., The Thunder, p. 31.

Taussig et al., The Thunder, p. 31. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Taussig et al., The Thunder, pp. 62–63.

Taussig et al., The Thunder, pp. 62–63.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation