Protective Strategies and the Prestige of the “Academic”


A Religious Studies and Practice Theory Redescription of Evangelical Inerrantist Scholarship


in Biblical Interpretation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article examines how Evangelical Christian inerrantist scholars theorize their biblical scholarship and its relation to the broader academy, highlighting (1) their self-representation as true academics, and (2) the ways they modulate historical methods to prefer interpretive options that keep the Bible inerrant. Using these characteristics of inerrantist theorizing, the article redescribes their scholarship in terms of the religious studies rubrics of “protective strategies” and “privileging” insider claims. It then exploits this redescription to explore various characteristics of inerrantist religiosity from a Practice Theory vantage point, noting especially inerrantist religiosity’s highly intellectualized nature as well as features of its fields of discourse production and consumption, and their participants, that differentiate them from broader academic fields focused on the Bible. Overall the article thus provides a detailed positive account of inerrantist scholarship and introduces scholars to the utility of this data set for studying contemporary religiosity and religious “protectionism.”


Protective Strategies and the Prestige of the “Academic”


A Religious Studies and Practice Theory Redescription of Evangelical Inerrantist Scholarship


in Biblical Interpretation

Sections

References

  • AllertC.2007Grand Rapids, MIBaker AcademicA High View of Scripture? The Authority of the Bible and the Formation of the New Testament Canon

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ArcherG. L.Alleged Errors and Discrepancies in the Original Manuscripts of the Bible,198019805784Geisler

  • ArcherG. L.2001Grand Rapids, MIZondervanNew International Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties

  • AverbeckR. E.Pentateuchal Criticism and the Priestly Torah20122012151179Hoffmeier and Magary

  • BaggerM.1999New YorkCambridge University PressReligious Experience Justification and History

  • BarrettJ. L.Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraints and the Study of Religion199911325339MTSR

  • BarrettJ. L.KeilF. C.Anthropomorphism and God Concepts: Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity19963219247Cognitive Psychology

  • BarrickW. D.Exegetical Fallacies: Common Interpretive Mistakes Every Student Must Avoid2008191527TMSJ

  • BealeG. K.Myth, History, and Inspiration: A Review Article of Inspiration and Incarnation by Peter Enns200649287312JETS

  • BealeG. K.A Surrejoinder to Peter Enns,2007a321425Them

  • BealeG. K.A Surrejoinder to Peter Enns’s Response to G.K. Beale’s JETS Review Article of His Book, Inspiration and Incarnation2007b111636SBJT

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BealeG. K.2008Wheaton, ILCrosswayThe Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism: Responding to New Challenges to Biblical Authority

  • BealeG. K.The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism2009online interview at The Reformed Forum posted January 30 2009: http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc54/ (accessed 1/21/2013)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BealeG. K.Can the Bible Be Completely Inspired by God and Yet Still Contain Errors? A Response to Some Recent ‘Evangelical’ Proposals201173122WTJ

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BlockD. I.Recovering the Voice of Moses: The Genesis of Deuteronomy,200144385408JETS

  • BlombergC.A Constructive Traditional Response to New Testament Criticism20122012345365Hoffmeier and Magary

  • BockD. L.Precision and Accuracy: Making Distinctions in the Cultural Context that Give us Pause in Pitting the Gospels against Each Other20122012367381Hoffmeier and Magary

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BourdieuP.1977New YorkCambridge University PressOutline of a Theory of Practice (trans. R. Nice

  • BourdieuP.1990Stanford, CAStanford University PressIn Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology (trans. M. Adamson

  • BourdieuP.1993New YorkColumbia University PressThe Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature

  • BourdieuP.1998Stanford, CAStanford University PressPractical Reason: On the Theory of Action

  • BoyerP.SlingerlandE.CollardM.From Studious Irrelevancy to Consilient Knowledge: Modes of Scholarship and Cultural Anthropology2012113129New YorkOxford University PressCreating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BurkD. R.Is Inerrancy Sufficient? A Plea to Biblical Scholars Concerning the Authority and Sufficiency of Scripture2007507691SwJT

  • BushL. R.Understanding Biblical Inerrancy2007502055SwJT

  • BushS. S.Are Religious Experiences Too Private to Study201292199223JR

  • CarsonD. A.Three Books on the Bible: A Critical Review198326337367JETS

  • CarsonD. A.Recent Developments in the Doctrine of Scripture19861986548Carson and Woodbridge

  • CarsonD. A.Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: The Possibility of Systematic Theology199219926595Carson and Woodbridge

  • CarsonD. A.Three More Books on the Bible: A Critical Review200627162TJ

  • CarsonD. A.WoodbridgeJ. D.1986Grand Rapids, MIZondervanHermeneutics Authority and Canon

  • CarsonD. A.WoodbridgeJ. D.1992Grand Rapids, MIBakerScripture and Truth [original 1984]

  • CookW. R.Biblical Inerrancy and Intellectual Honesty1968125157175BibSac

  • ConnH. M.1988Grand Rapids, MIBakerInerrancy and Hermeneutic: A Tradition A Challenge A Debate

  • CopanP.Is Yahweh a Moral Monster?: The New Atheists and Old Testament Ethics200810737Philosophia Christi

  • CraigW. L.Slaughter of the Canaanitesn.d.online post at Reasonable Faith (accessed 1/26/2013)

  • DillardR. B.Harmonization: A Help and a Hindrance19881988151164Conn

  • FackreG.Evangelical Hermeneutics: Commonality and Diversity198943117129Int

  • FarnellF. D.Philosophical and Theological Bent of Historical Criticism1998199885131Thomas and Farnell

  • FeinbergJ. S.Truth, Meaning and Inerrancy in Contemporary Evangelical Thought1983261730JETS

  • FergusonS. B.How Does the Bible Look at Itself?198819884766Conn

  • FrameJ.2010Philipsburg, NJP&R PressThe Doctrine of the Word of God

  • GaffinR. B.Review of Dewey M. Beegle, The Inspiration of Scripture196426230238WTJ

  • GaffinR. B.2006Waynesboro, GAPaternosterBy Faith Not By Sight: Paul and the Order of Salvation

  • GarnerD. B.GarnerD. B.2012129161Phillipsburg, NJP&RDid God Really Say?: Affirming the Truthfulness and Trustworthiness of Scripture

  • GeislerN. L.The Concept of Truth in the Inerrancy Debate1980137327339BibSac

  • GeislerN. L.Methodological Unorthodoxy1983268794JETS

  • GeislerN. L.1980Grand Rapids, MIZondervanInerrancy

  • GeislerN. L.1981Grand Rapids: MIZondervanBiblical Errancy: An Analysis of its Philosophical Roots

  • GeislerN. L.RoachW. C.2011Grand Rapids, MIBaker BooksDefending Inerrancy: Affirming the Accuracy of Scripture for a New Generation

  • GrudemW.Scripture’s Self-Attestation and the Problem of Formulating a Doctrine of Scripture199219921959Carson and Woodbridge

  • GrudemW.Do We Act as if We Really Believe that ‘The Bible Alone, and the Bible in its Entirety, is the Word of God Written’?200043526JETS

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GundryR. H.1982Grand Rapids, MIEerdmansMatthew: A Commentary on His Literary and Theological Art

  • HahnS.ScottD.For the Sake of Our Salvation: The Truth and Humility of God’s Word20106Letter and Spirit

  • HartD. G.LivingstoneD.N.HartD.G.NollM.A.Evangelicals, Biblical Scholarship, and the Politics of the Modern American Academy1999306326New YorkOxford University PressEvangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HatchN. O.NollM. A.1982New YorkOxford University PressThe Bible in America: Essays in Cultural History

  • HelmP.Faith, Evidence, and the Scriptures19921992303320Carson and Woodbridge

  • HenryC. F. H.1979Waco, TXWordGod Revelation and Authority: Volume IV God Who Speaks and Shows

  • HoffmeierJ. K.MagaryD. R.2012Wheaton, ILCrosswayDo Historical Matters Matter to Faith? A Critical Appraisal of Modern and Postmodern Approaches to Scripture

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JohnsonA. F.The Historical-Critical Method: Egyptian Gold or Pagan Precipice?198326315JETS

  • JohnsonH. W.The ‘Analogy of Faith’ and Exegetical Methodology: A Preliminary Discussion on Relationships1988316980JETS

  • KaiserW. C.Legitimate Hermeneutics19801980117150Geisler

  • KofoedJ. B.The Old Testament as Cultural Memory20122012303323Hoffmeier and Magary

  • LincolnB.How to Read a Religious Text2012515Demons Priests and Scholars: Critical Explorations in the History of Religions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LindsellH.1976Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Battle for the Bible

  • LindsellH.1979Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Bible in the Balance

  • LongV. P.The Art of Biblical History19961996281429Silva

  • LongmanT.Literary Approaches to Biblical Interpretation1996199691192Silva

  • MarsdenG. M.Everyone One’s Own Interpreter? The Bible, Science, and Authority in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America1982198279100Hatch and Noll

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarsdenG. M.1995Grand Rapids, MIEerdmansReforming Fundamentalism: Fuller Seminary and the New Evangelicalism [original 1987]

  • MartinC.HughesAaron W. On ‘Belief’: A Story of Protectionism2013103106LeidenBrillTheory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty Five Years On

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MartinC.McCutcheonR2012DurhamEquinoxReligious Experience: A Reader

  • McCallT. H.Religious Epistemology, Theological Interpretation of Scripture, and Critical Biblical Scholarship: A Theologian’s Reflections201220123354Hoffmeier and Magary

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCutcheonR.1997New YorkOxford University PressManufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCutcheonR.2001AlbanyState University of New York PressCritics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion

  • MerrillE. H.Deuteronomy and de Wette: A Fresh Look at a Fallacious Premise201212542JESOT

  • MohlerA.The Inerrancy of Scripture: The Fifty Years’ War…and Counting2010online post at AlbertMohler.com (accessed 8/4/2013)

  • MorelandJ. P.The Rationality of Belief in Inerrancy198677586TJ

  • NicholsS. J.BrandtE. T.2009Wheaton, ILCrosswayAncient Word Changing Worlds: The Doctrine of Scripture in a Modern Age

  • NollM.2001Malden, MAWiley-BlackwellAmerican Evangelical Christianity: An Introduction

  • NollM.2004VancouverRegent College PublishingBetween Faith and Criticism: Evangelicals Scholarship and the Bible in North America 2nd edn

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OswaltJ.2009Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Bible Among the Myths: Unique Revelation or Just Ancient Literature?

  • Packer J. I.Upholding the Unity of Scripture Today198225409414JETS

  • Packer J. I.Infallible Scripture and the Role of Hermeneutics19921992321356Carson and Woodbridge

  • PattersonP.The Issue is Truth2007505774SwJT

  • PayneJ. B.Higher Criticism and Biblical Inerrancy,1980198085116Geisler

  • PoythressV. S.Divine Meaning of Scripture198648241279WTJ

  • PoythressV. S.Science and Hermeneutics: Implications of Scientific Method for Biblical Interpretation19961996431531Silva

  • PoythressV. S.2012aWheaton, ILCrosswayInerrancy and the Gospels: A God-Centered Approach to the Challenges of Harmonization

  • PoythressV. S.2012bWheaton, ILCrosswayInerrancy and Worldview: Answering Modern Challenges to the Bible

  • ProudfootW.1985BerkeleyUniversity of California PressReligious Experience

  • RouseJ.TurnerS.RisjordM.Practice Theory2007639681AmsterdamElsevierPhilosophy of Anthropology and Sociology

  • SchatzkiT. R.1996New YorkCambridge University PressSocial Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social

  • SchatzkiT. R.2002University Park, PAPennsylvania State University PressThe Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchilbrackK.Religions: Are There Any?20107811121138JAAR

  • SchilbrackK.The Social Construction of ‘Religion’ and Its Limits: A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgerald20122497117MTSR

  • SchilbrackK.What Isn’t Religion?201393291318JR

  • SchultzR.BacoteV.MiguélezL.OkholmD. How Many Isaiahs Were There and What Does it Matter?: Prophetic Inspiration in Recent Evangelical Scholarship2004150170Downers Grove, ILInterVarsityEvangelicals and Scripture: Tradition Authority and Hermeneutics

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott J. W.The Inspiration and Interpretation of God’s Word, with Special Reference to Peter Enns, Part I: Inspiration and its Implications2009a71129183WTJ

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott J. W.The Inspiration and Interpretation of God’s Word, with Special Reference to Peter Enns, Part II: The Interpretation of Representative Passages2009b71247279WTJ

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sexton J. S.How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate2009342649Them

  • SharfR. H.TaylorM.C.199894116ChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressCritical Terms for Religious Studies

  • SilvaM.The Place of Historical Reconstruction in New Testament Criticism19861986109133Carson and Woodbridge

  • SilvaM.Old Princeton, Westminster and Inerrancy198819886780Conn

  • SilvaM.KaiserW.C.SilvaM.The Case for Calvinistic Hermeneutics1994251269Grand Rapids, MIZondervanAn Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics: The Search for Meaning

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SilvaM1996Grand Rapids, MIZondervanFoundations of Contemporary Interpretation: Six Volumes in One

  • SlingerlandE.Who’s Afraid of Reductionism? The Study of Religion in the Age of Cognitive Science200876375411JAAR

  • SloneD. J.2004New YorkOxford University PressTheological Incorrectness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t

  • SproulR. C.NicoleR.MichaelsJ.R.Biblical Interpretation and the Analogy of Faith1980119135Grand Rapids, MIBakerInerrancy and Common Sense

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StowersS.The Concepts of ‘Religion’, ‘Political Religion’ and the Study of Nazism200742924JCH

  • StowersS.BraunW.McCutcheonR.T.The Ontology of Religion2008434449Oakville, CTEquinox PublishingIntroducing Religion: Essays in Honor or Jonathan Z. Smith

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StowersS.KnustJ.W.VárhelyiZ.The Religion of Plant and Animal Offerings Versus the Religion of Meanings, Essences, and Textual Mysteries20113556New YorkOxford University PressAncient Mediterranean Sacrifice

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SwartzD.1997ChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressCulture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu

  • ThomasR. L.Impact of Historical Criticism on Hermeneutics19981998317337Thomas and Farnell

  • ThomasR. L.2002Grand Rapids, MIKregelEvangelical Hermeneutics: The New Versus the Old

  • ThomasR. L.FarnellF. D.1998Grand Rapids, MIKregelThe Jesus Crisis: The Inroads of Historical Criticism into Evangelical Scholarship

  • ThompsonM. D.The Divine Investment in Truth: Toward a Theological Account of Inerrancy201220127197Hoffmeier and Magary

  • TiptonL. G.The Presence of Divine Persons: Extending the Incarnational Analogy to Impeccability and Inerrancy20106196201The Confessional Presbyterian

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UllucciD.2012New YorkOxford University PressThe Christian Rejection of Animal Sacrifice

  • Van TilC.1967Ripon, CAden DulkThe Protestant Doctrine of Scripture

  • WaltonJ. H.Inspired Subjectivity and Hermeneutical Objectivity2002136577TMSJ

  • WeberT. P.The Two-Edged Sword: The Fundamentalist Use of the Bible19821982101120Hatch and Noll

  • YamauchiE. M.Sociology, Scripture and the Supernatural198427169192JETS

  • YeoJ. J.2010Lanham, MDUniversity Press of AmericaPlundering the Egyptians: The Old Testament and Historical Criticism at Westminster Theological Seminary (1929–1998)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YoungE. J.TenneyM.C.Are the Scriptures Inerrant?1968103119Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Bible: The Living Word of Revelation

  • 6

     See for instance Henry 1979: 166–67176 187 201–207; Feinberg 1983: 19 23 27–28; Ferguson 1988: 60 63–64; Grudem 1992: 32–33 51–53. See also CSBI Article XIII and Exposition: Infallibility Inerrancy and Interpretation.

  • 18

     See also Henry 1979: 173–74185 190–91 401; Payne 1980: 89–90; Oswalt 2009: 16–17.

  • 22

     See for example Payne 1980: 90–93; Sproul 1980: 127. The CSBI articulates the underlying principle concisely: “We affirm that canonical Scripture should always be interpreted on the basis that it is infallible and inerrant” (Exposition: Infallibility Inerrancy and Interpretation). See also Richard Schultz’s comments: “One of the primary threats today to a traditional understanding of biblical inspiration and inerrancy is the unrestricted employment of historical-critical tools by evangelical biblical scholars” (Schultz 2004: 150).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 128 121 13
Full Text Views 202 202 1
PDF Downloads 14 14 0
EPUB Downloads 2 2 0