Protective Strategies and the Prestige of the “Academic”

A Religious Studies and Practice Theory Redescription of Evangelical Inerrantist Scholarship

in Biblical Interpretation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This article examines how Evangelical Christian inerrantist scholars theorize their biblical scholarship and its relation to the broader academy, highlighting (1) their self-representation as true academics, and (2) the ways they modulate historical methods to prefer interpretive options that keep the Bible inerrant. Using these characteristics of inerrantist theorizing, the article redescribes their scholarship in terms of the religious studies rubrics of “protective strategies” and “privileging” insider claims. It then exploits this redescription to explore various characteristics of inerrantist religiosity from a Practice Theory vantage point, noting especially inerrantist religiosity’s highly intellectualized nature as well as features of its fields of discourse production and consumption, and their participants, that differentiate them from broader academic fields focused on the Bible. Overall the article thus provides a detailed positive account of inerrantist scholarship and introduces scholars to the utility of this data set for studying contemporary religiosity and religious “protectionism.”

Protective Strategies and the Prestige of the “Academic”

A Religious Studies and Practice Theory Redescription of Evangelical Inerrantist Scholarship

in Biblical Interpretation



AllertC.2007Grand Rapids, MIBaker AcademicA High View of Scripture? The Authority of the Bible and the Formation of the New Testament Canon

ArcherG. L.Alleged Errors and Discrepancies in the Original Manuscripts of the Bible,198019805784Geisler

ArcherG. L.2001Grand Rapids, MIZondervanNew International Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties

AverbeckR. E.Pentateuchal Criticism and the Priestly Torah20122012151179Hoffmeier and Magary

BaggerM.1999New YorkCambridge University PressReligious Experience Justification and History

BarrettJ. L.Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraints and the Study of Religion199911325339MTSR

BarrettJ. L.KeilF. C.Anthropomorphism and God Concepts: Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity19963219247Cognitive Psychology

BarrickW. D.Exegetical Fallacies: Common Interpretive Mistakes Every Student Must Avoid2008191527TMSJ

BealeG. K.Myth, History, and Inspiration: A Review Article of Inspiration and Incarnation by Peter Enns200649287312JETS

BealeG. K.A Surrejoinder to Peter Enns,2007a321425Them

BealeG. K.A Surrejoinder to Peter Enns’s Response to G.K. Beale’s JETS Review Article of His Book, Inspiration and Incarnation2007b111636SBJT

BealeG. K.2008Wheaton, ILCrosswayThe Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism: Responding to New Challenges to Biblical Authority

BealeG. K.The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism2009online interview at The Reformed Forum posted January 30 2009: (accessed 1/21/2013)

BealeG. K.Can the Bible Be Completely Inspired by God and Yet Still Contain Errors? A Response to Some Recent ‘Evangelical’ Proposals201173122WTJ

BlockD. I.Recovering the Voice of Moses: The Genesis of Deuteronomy,200144385408JETS

BlombergC.A Constructive Traditional Response to New Testament Criticism20122012345365Hoffmeier and Magary

BockD. L.Precision and Accuracy: Making Distinctions in the Cultural Context that Give us Pause in Pitting the Gospels against Each Other20122012367381Hoffmeier and Magary

BourdieuP.1977New YorkCambridge University PressOutline of a Theory of Practice (trans. R. Nice

BourdieuP.1990Stanford, CAStanford University PressIn Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology (trans. M. Adamson

BourdieuP.1993New YorkColumbia University PressThe Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature

BourdieuP.1998Stanford, CAStanford University PressPractical Reason: On the Theory of Action

BoyerP.SlingerlandE.CollardM.From Studious Irrelevancy to Consilient Knowledge: Modes of Scholarship and Cultural Anthropology2012113129New YorkOxford University PressCreating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities

BurkD. R.Is Inerrancy Sufficient? A Plea to Biblical Scholars Concerning the Authority and Sufficiency of Scripture2007507691SwJT

BushL. R.Understanding Biblical Inerrancy2007502055SwJT

BushS. S.Are Religious Experiences Too Private to Study201292199223JR

CarsonD. A.Three Books on the Bible: A Critical Review198326337367JETS

CarsonD. A.Recent Developments in the Doctrine of Scripture19861986548Carson and Woodbridge

CarsonD. A.Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: The Possibility of Systematic Theology199219926595Carson and Woodbridge

CarsonD. A.Three More Books on the Bible: A Critical Review200627162TJ

CarsonD. A.WoodbridgeJ. D.1986Grand Rapids, MIZondervanHermeneutics Authority and Canon

CarsonD. A.WoodbridgeJ. D.1992Grand Rapids, MIBakerScripture and Truth [original 1984]

CookW. R.Biblical Inerrancy and Intellectual Honesty1968125157175BibSac

ConnH. M.1988Grand Rapids, MIBakerInerrancy and Hermeneutic: A Tradition A Challenge A Debate

CopanP.Is Yahweh a Moral Monster?: The New Atheists and Old Testament Ethics200810737Philosophia Christi

CraigW. L.Slaughter of the post at Reasonable Faith (accessed 1/26/2013)

DillardR. B.Harmonization: A Help and a Hindrance19881988151164Conn

FackreG.Evangelical Hermeneutics: Commonality and Diversity198943117129Int

FarnellF. D.Philosophical and Theological Bent of Historical Criticism1998199885131Thomas and Farnell

FeinbergJ. S.Truth, Meaning and Inerrancy in Contemporary Evangelical Thought1983261730JETS

FergusonS. B.How Does the Bible Look at Itself?198819884766Conn

FrameJ.2010Philipsburg, NJP&R PressThe Doctrine of the Word of God

GaffinR. B.Review of Dewey M. Beegle, The Inspiration of Scripture196426230238WTJ

GaffinR. B.2006Waynesboro, GAPaternosterBy Faith Not By Sight: Paul and the Order of Salvation

GarnerD. B.GarnerD. B.2012129161Phillipsburg, NJP&RDid God Really Say?: Affirming the Truthfulness and Trustworthiness of Scripture

GeislerN. L.The Concept of Truth in the Inerrancy Debate1980137327339BibSac

GeislerN. L.Methodological Unorthodoxy1983268794JETS

GeislerN. L.1980Grand Rapids, MIZondervanInerrancy

GeislerN. L.1981Grand Rapids: MIZondervanBiblical Errancy: An Analysis of its Philosophical Roots

GeislerN. L.RoachW. C.2011Grand Rapids, MIBaker BooksDefending Inerrancy: Affirming the Accuracy of Scripture for a New Generation

GrudemW.Scripture’s Self-Attestation and the Problem of Formulating a Doctrine of Scripture199219921959Carson and Woodbridge

GrudemW.Do We Act as if We Really Believe that ‘The Bible Alone, and the Bible in its Entirety, is the Word of God Written’?200043526JETS

GundryR. H.1982Grand Rapids, MIEerdmansMatthew: A Commentary on His Literary and Theological Art

HahnS.ScottD.For the Sake of Our Salvation: The Truth and Humility of God’s Word20106Letter and Spirit

HartD. G.LivingstoneD.N.HartD.G.NollM.A.Evangelicals, Biblical Scholarship, and the Politics of the Modern American Academy1999306326New YorkOxford University PressEvangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective

HatchN. O.NollM. A.1982New YorkOxford University PressThe Bible in America: Essays in Cultural History

HelmP.Faith, Evidence, and the Scriptures19921992303320Carson and Woodbridge

HenryC. F. H.1979Waco, TXWordGod Revelation and Authority: Volume IV God Who Speaks and Shows

HoffmeierJ. K.MagaryD. R.2012Wheaton, ILCrosswayDo Historical Matters Matter to Faith? A Critical Appraisal of Modern and Postmodern Approaches to Scripture

JohnsonA. F.The Historical-Critical Method: Egyptian Gold or Pagan Precipice?198326315JETS

JohnsonH. W.The ‘Analogy of Faith’ and Exegetical Methodology: A Preliminary Discussion on Relationships1988316980JETS

KaiserW. C.Legitimate Hermeneutics19801980117150Geisler

KofoedJ. B.The Old Testament as Cultural Memory20122012303323Hoffmeier and Magary

LincolnB.How to Read a Religious Text2012515Demons Priests and Scholars: Critical Explorations in the History of Religions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)

LindsellH.1976Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Battle for the Bible

LindsellH.1979Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Bible in the Balance

LongV. P.The Art of Biblical History19961996281429Silva

LongmanT.Literary Approaches to Biblical Interpretation1996199691192Silva

MarsdenG. M.Everyone One’s Own Interpreter? The Bible, Science, and Authority in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America1982198279100Hatch and Noll

MarsdenG. M.1995Grand Rapids, MIEerdmansReforming Fundamentalism: Fuller Seminary and the New Evangelicalism [original 1987]

MartinC.HughesAaron W. On ‘Belief’: A Story of Protectionism2013103106LeidenBrillTheory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty Five Years On

MartinC.McCutcheonR2012DurhamEquinoxReligious Experience: A Reader

McCallT. H.Religious Epistemology, Theological Interpretation of Scripture, and Critical Biblical Scholarship: A Theologian’s Reflections201220123354Hoffmeier and Magary

McCutcheonR.1997New YorkOxford University PressManufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia

McCutcheonR.2001AlbanyState University of New York PressCritics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion

MerrillE. H.Deuteronomy and de Wette: A Fresh Look at a Fallacious Premise201212542JESOT

MohlerA.The Inerrancy of Scripture: The Fifty Years’ War…and Counting2010online post at (accessed 8/4/2013)

MorelandJ. P.The Rationality of Belief in Inerrancy198677586TJ

NicholsS. J.BrandtE. T.2009Wheaton, ILCrosswayAncient Word Changing Worlds: The Doctrine of Scripture in a Modern Age

NollM.2001Malden, MAWiley-BlackwellAmerican Evangelical Christianity: An Introduction

NollM.2004VancouverRegent College PublishingBetween Faith and Criticism: Evangelicals Scholarship and the Bible in North America 2nd edn

OswaltJ.2009Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Bible Among the Myths: Unique Revelation or Just Ancient Literature?

Packer J. I.Upholding the Unity of Scripture Today198225409414JETS

Packer J. I.Infallible Scripture and the Role of Hermeneutics19921992321356Carson and Woodbridge

PattersonP.The Issue is Truth2007505774SwJT

PayneJ. B.Higher Criticism and Biblical Inerrancy,1980198085116Geisler

PoythressV. S.Divine Meaning of Scripture198648241279WTJ

PoythressV. S.Science and Hermeneutics: Implications of Scientific Method for Biblical Interpretation19961996431531Silva

PoythressV. S.2012aWheaton, ILCrosswayInerrancy and the Gospels: A God-Centered Approach to the Challenges of Harmonization

PoythressV. S.2012bWheaton, ILCrosswayInerrancy and Worldview: Answering Modern Challenges to the Bible

ProudfootW.1985BerkeleyUniversity of California PressReligious Experience

RouseJ.TurnerS.RisjordM.Practice Theory2007639681AmsterdamElsevierPhilosophy of Anthropology and Sociology

SchatzkiT. R.1996New YorkCambridge University PressSocial Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social

SchatzkiT. R.2002University Park, PAPennsylvania State University PressThe Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change

SchilbrackK.Religions: Are There Any?20107811121138JAAR

SchilbrackK.The Social Construction of ‘Religion’ and Its Limits: A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgerald20122497117MTSR

SchilbrackK.What Isn’t Religion?201393291318JR

SchultzR.BacoteV.MiguélezL.OkholmD. How Many Isaiahs Were There and What Does it Matter?: Prophetic Inspiration in Recent Evangelical Scholarship2004150170Downers Grove, ILInterVarsityEvangelicals and Scripture: Tradition Authority and Hermeneutics

Scott J. W.The Inspiration and Interpretation of God’s Word, with Special Reference to Peter Enns, Part I: Inspiration and its Implications2009a71129183WTJ

Scott J. W.The Inspiration and Interpretation of God’s Word, with Special Reference to Peter Enns, Part II: The Interpretation of Representative Passages2009b71247279WTJ

Sexton J. S.How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate2009342649Them

SharfR. H.TaylorM.C.199894116ChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressCritical Terms for Religious Studies

SilvaM.The Place of Historical Reconstruction in New Testament Criticism19861986109133Carson and Woodbridge

SilvaM.Old Princeton, Westminster and Inerrancy198819886780Conn

SilvaM.KaiserW.C.SilvaM.The Case for Calvinistic Hermeneutics1994251269Grand Rapids, MIZondervanAn Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics: The Search for Meaning

SilvaM1996Grand Rapids, MIZondervanFoundations of Contemporary Interpretation: Six Volumes in One

SlingerlandE.Who’s Afraid of Reductionism? The Study of Religion in the Age of Cognitive Science200876375411JAAR

SloneD. J.2004New YorkOxford University PressTheological Incorrectness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t

SproulR. C.NicoleR.MichaelsJ.R.Biblical Interpretation and the Analogy of Faith1980119135Grand Rapids, MIBakerInerrancy and Common Sense

StowersS.The Concepts of ‘Religion’, ‘Political Religion’ and the Study of Nazism200742924JCH

StowersS.BraunW.McCutcheonR.T.The Ontology of Religion2008434449Oakville, CTEquinox PublishingIntroducing Religion: Essays in Honor or Jonathan Z. Smith

StowersS.KnustJ.W.VárhelyiZ.The Religion of Plant and Animal Offerings Versus the Religion of Meanings, Essences, and Textual Mysteries20113556New YorkOxford University PressAncient Mediterranean Sacrifice

SwartzD.1997ChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressCulture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu

ThomasR. L.Impact of Historical Criticism on Hermeneutics19981998317337Thomas and Farnell

ThomasR. L.2002Grand Rapids, MIKregelEvangelical Hermeneutics: The New Versus the Old

ThomasR. L.FarnellF. D.1998Grand Rapids, MIKregelThe Jesus Crisis: The Inroads of Historical Criticism into Evangelical Scholarship

ThompsonM. D.The Divine Investment in Truth: Toward a Theological Account of Inerrancy201220127197Hoffmeier and Magary

TiptonL. G.The Presence of Divine Persons: Extending the Incarnational Analogy to Impeccability and Inerrancy20106196201The Confessional Presbyterian

UllucciD.2012New YorkOxford University PressThe Christian Rejection of Animal Sacrifice

Van TilC.1967Ripon, CAden DulkThe Protestant Doctrine of Scripture

WaltonJ. H.Inspired Subjectivity and Hermeneutical Objectivity2002136577TMSJ

WeberT. P.The Two-Edged Sword: The Fundamentalist Use of the Bible19821982101120Hatch and Noll

YamauchiE. M.Sociology, Scripture and the Supernatural198427169192JETS

YeoJ. J.2010Lanham, MDUniversity Press of AmericaPlundering the Egyptians: The Old Testament and Historical Criticism at Westminster Theological Seminary (1929–1998)

YoungE. J.TenneyM.C.Are the Scriptures Inerrant?1968103119Grand Rapids, MIZondervanThe Bible: The Living Word of Revelation


 See for instance Henry 1979: 166–67176 187 201–207; Feinberg 1983: 19 23 27–28; Ferguson 1988: 60 63–64; Grudem 1992: 32–33 51–53. See also CSBI Article XIII and Exposition: Infallibility Inerrancy and Interpretation.


 See also Henry 1979: 173–74185 190–91 401; Payne 1980: 89–90; Oswalt 2009: 16–17.


 See for example Payne 1980: 90–93; Sproul 1980: 127. The CSBI articulates the underlying principle concisely: “We affirm that canonical Scripture should always be interpreted on the basis that it is infallible and inerrant” (Exposition: Infallibility Inerrancy and Interpretation). See also Richard Schultz’s comments: “One of the primary threats today to a traditional understanding of biblical inspiration and inerrancy is the unrestricted employment of historical-critical tools by evangelical biblical scholars” (Schultz 2004: 150).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 8
Full Text Views 14 14 9
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 2 2 0