J. Elliot, “The Evil Eye and the Sermon on the Mount: Contours of a Pervasive Belief in Social Scientific Perspective,” BibInt 2 (1994), pp. 51–84 (51); idem., “The Evil Eye in the First Testament,” p. 148. See also J. Roberts, “Belief in the Evil Eye in World Perspective,” in C. Maloney (ed.), The Evil Eye (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972), pp. 223–78; M. Malul, Knowledge, Control, and Sex: Studies in Biblical Thought, Culture, and Worldview (Tel Aviv: Archaeological Center Publications, 2002), pp. 209, 286–87, 351; N. Wazana, “A Case of the Evil Eye: Qohelet 4:4–8,” JBL 126 (2007), pp. 685–702; Z. Kotzé, “קרץ עין as Conceptual Metaphor for the Evil Eye in Ps 35, 19,” in P. Van Hecke and A. Labahn (eds.), Metaphors in the Psalms (Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters, 2010), pp. 135–39; and F. Viljoen, “A Contextualised Reading of Matthew 6:22–23: ‘Your Eye is the Lamp of Your Body,’” HTS Teologiese Studies 65 (2009), Art. #152; available online at http://www.hts.org.za.

J. Elliot, “The Evil Eye and the Sermon on the Mount: Contours of a Pervasive Belief in Social Scientific Perspective,” BibInt 2 (1994), pp. 51–84 (51); idem., “The Evil Eye in the First Testament,” p. 148. See also J. Roberts, “Belief in the Evil Eye in World Perspective,” in C. Maloney (ed.), The Evil Eye (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972), pp. 223–78; M. Malul, Knowledge, Control, and Sex: Studies in Biblical Thought, Culture, and Worldview (Tel Aviv: Archaeological Center Publications, 2002), pp. 209, 286–87, 351; N. Wazana, “A Case of the Evil Eye: Qohelet 4:4–8,” JBL 126 (2007), pp. 685–702; Z. Kotzé, “קרץ עין as Conceptual Metaphor for the Evil Eye in Ps 35, 19,” in P. Van Hecke and A. Labahn (eds.), Metaphors in the Psalms (Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters, 2010), pp. 135–39; and F. Viljoen, “A Contextualised Reading of Matthew 6:22–23: ‘Your Eye is the Lamp of Your Body,’” HTS Teologiese Studies 65 (2009), Art. #152; available online at http://www.hts.org.za. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

M.-L. Thomsen, “The Evil Eye in Mesopotamia,” JNES 51 (1992), pp. 19–32 (28); Y. Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture: Sensory Perception in the Hebrew Bible (New York: T & T Clark International, 2011), pp. 152–53. See also R. Ulmer, The Evil Eye in the Bible and Rabbinic Literature (Hoboken, N.J.: KTAV Publishing House, Inc., 1994), pp. 1–4, and the many modern English editions of Deuteronomy and Proverbs that translate these phrases with terms that reflect the inner character of the individual. The NRSV, for instance, translates רעע עין as “view with hostility” (Deut. 15:9) or “begrudge food” (Deut. 28:54, 56) and רע עין as “stingy” (Prov. 23:6) or “miser” (Prov. 28:22).

M.-L. Thomsen, “The Evil Eye in Mesopotamia,” JNES 51 (1992), pp. 19–32 (28); Y. Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture: Sensory Perception in the Hebrew Bible (New York: T & T Clark International, 2011), pp. 152–53. See also R. Ulmer, The Evil Eye in the Bible and Rabbinic Literature (Hoboken, N.J.: KTAV Publishing House, Inc., 1994), pp. 1–4, and the many modern English editions of Deuteronomy and Proverbs that translate these phrases with terms that reflect the inner character of the individual. The NRSV, for instance, translates רעע עין as “view with hostility” (Deut. 15:9) or “begrudge food” (Deut. 28:54, 56) and רע עין as “stingy” (Prov. 23:6) or “miser” (Prov. 28:22).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Elliot, “The Evil Eye and the Sermon on the Mount,” p. 54; D. Allison, “The Eye is the Lamp of the Body (Matthew 6:22–23 = Luke 11.34–36),” NTS 33 (1987), pp. 61–83.

Elliot, “The Evil Eye and the Sermon on the Mount,” p. 54; D. Allison, “The Eye is the Lamp of the Body (Matthew 6:22–23 = Luke 11.34–36),” NTS 33 (1987), pp. 61–83.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, “Vision Metaphors for the Intellect: Are They Really Cross-Ling­uistic?” Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 30 (2008), pp. 15–33 (20).

I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, “Vision Metaphors for the Intellect: Are They Really Cross-Ling­uistic?” Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 30 (2008), pp. 15–33 (20).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, “Vision Metaphors for the Intellect,” pp. 26–30.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, “Vision Metaphors for the Intellect,” pp. 26–30.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, “Vision Metaphors for the Intellect,” p. 20.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, “Vision Metaphors for the Intellect,” p. 20.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

H. Jonas, “The Nobility of Sight: A Study in the Phenomenology of the Senses,” in The Phe­-nomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology (New York: Harper & Row, 1966), p. 146.

H. Jonas, “The Nobility of Sight: A Study in the Phenomenology of the Senses,” in The Phe­-nomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology (New York: Harper & Row, 1966), p. 146.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

E. Sweetser, From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Se­-mantic Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 44.

E. Sweetser, From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Se­-mantic Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 44.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, pp. 150–51.

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, pp. 150–51.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, p. 153.

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, p. 153.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kotzé, “קרץ עין as Conceptual Metaphor for the Evil Eye,” p. 137.

Kotzé, “קרץ עין as Conceptual Metaphor for the Evil Eye,” p. 137.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

M. Fox, Proverbs 10–31: A New Introduction and Commentary (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), p. 517.

M. Fox, Proverbs 10–31: A New Introduction and Commentary (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), p. 517.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, pp. 163–64.

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, pp. 163–64.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, p. 125. As Avrahami argues, the use of רֵיחַ here plays upon the dual connotation of the noun (“breath” and “scent”) and suggests a “correlation not just between breathing and smelling, but between exhalation and spreading a smell.”

Avrahami, The Senses of Scripture, p. 125. As Avrahami argues, the use of רֵיחַ here plays upon the dual connotation of the noun (“breath” and “scent”) and suggests a “correlation not just between breathing and smelling, but between exhalation and spreading a smell.”)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

J. Grady, “Primary Metaphors as Inputs to Conceptual Integration,” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (2005), pp. 1595–1614 (1600).

J. Grady, “Primary Metaphors as Inputs to Conceptual Integration,” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (2005), pp. 1595–1614 (1600).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Sheets-Johnstone, The Primacy of Movement, pp. 135–38.

Sheets-Johnstone, The Primacy of Movement, pp. 135–38.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Sheets-Johnstone, The Primacy of Movement, pp. 143.

Sheets-Johnstone, The Primacy of Movement, pp. 143. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation