One of the most troubling aspects of the Gospel of John is its tendency to create rigid dualisms between insiders and outsiders. This article uses the technique of deconstruction to undermine John’s characterization of the ultimate outsider: Judas. John inadvertently gives the reader the freedom to identify the anonymous figure of the other disciple who lets Peter into the high priest’s courtyard as Judas. Such identification leads to a deconstructive reading of the Gospel of John in which dualism collapses. With its ambiguities and aporias, the Gospel of John allows for the redemption of Judas when read deconstructively. The instability John’s dualism calls into question the validity of any strict binary that labels people as insiders or outsiders.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abbott E. 1914 Cambridge Cambridge University Press The Fourfold Gospel. Section II: The Beginning
Anderson Emily R. Telling Stories: Unreliable Discourse, Fight Club, and the Cinematic Narrator 2010 40 80 107 Journal of Narrative Theory
Barker James W. 2015 Minneapolis Fortress John’s Use of Matthew
Bauer Walter, Arndt William F., Gingrich F. Wilbur & Danker Frederick W. 1979 Chicago University of Chicago Press, 2nd edn A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature
Beck D.R. The Narrative Function of Anonymity in Fourth Gospel Characterization 1993 63 143 158 Semeia
Bennema Cornelis 2009 Milton Keynes Paternoster Encountering Jesus: Character Studies in the Gospel of John
Booth Wayne C. 1961 Chicago University of Chicago Press The Rhetoric of Fiction
Brant Jo-Ann A. 2011 Grand Rapids Baker Academic John
Brodie Thomas 1997 New York Oxford University Press The Gospel According to John: A Literary and Theological Commentary
Brown Raymond 1970 New Haven Yale University Press The Gospel According to John XIII–XXI
Bultmann Rudolf 1971 Philadelphia Westminster The Gospel of John: A Commentary
Burnett Fred W. Characterization and Reader Construction of Characters in the Gospels 1993 63 3 78 Semeia
Carson D.A. 1991 Grand Rapids Eerdmans The Gospel According to John
Charlesworth James H. 1995 Valley Forge Trinity International The Beloved Disciple: Whose Witness Validates the Gospel of John?
Conway Colleen M. Speaking through Ambiguity: Minor Characters in the Fourth Gospel 2002 10 324 341 BibInt
Counet Patrick Chaelion Judas, the Disciple Who Was Known to the High Priest: A Deconstruction of the Betrayal Based on John 18:15 2011 67.1 HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Culpepper R. Alan 2000 Edinburgh T & T Clark John, the Son of Zebedee: The Life of a Legend
Currie Gregory Unreliability Refigured: Narrative in Literature and Film 1995 53 19 29 The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Dauer Anton 1972 Munich Kösel Die Passionsgeschichte im Johannesevangelium. Eine traditionsgeschichtliche und thelogische Untersuchung zu Joh 18,1–19,30
Derrida Jacques 1981 Chicago University of Chicago Press Positions (trans. Alan Bass
Ehrman Bart D. 2006 Oxford Oxford University Press The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed
Esler Philip & Piper Ronald 2006 London SCM Lazarus, Mary and Martha: A Social-Scientific and Theological Reading of John
Farelly Nicolas 2010 Tübingen Mohr Siebeck The Disciples in the Fourth Gospel: A Narrative Analysis of Their Faith and Understanding
Gagné Andé Caractérisation des Figures de Satan et de Judas dans le IVe Évangile: Stratégie Narrative et Deployment des Intrigues de Conflit 2003 55 263 284 Science et Esprit
Hylen Susan E. 2009 Louisville Westminster John Knox Imperfect Believers: Ambiguous Characters in the Gospel of John
Iser Wolfgang 1980 Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett
Johansen Ruthann Knechel 1994 Tuscaloosa University of Alabama Press The Narrative Secret of Flannery O’Connor: The Trickster as Interpreter
Klassen William 1996 Minneapolis Augsburg Judas: Betrayer or Friend of Jesus?
Lang Manfred 1999 Göttingen Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Johannes und die Synoptiker: eine redaktionsgeschichtliche Analyse von Joh 18–20 vor dem markinishen und lukanischen Hintergrund
Liddell Henry George & Scott Robert 1889 Oxford Clarendon An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon
Liddell Henry George, Scott Robert & Jones Henry Stuart 1940 Oxford Clarendon A Greek-English Lexicon
Moloney Francis J. 1998 Collegeville Liturgical The Gospel of John
Moore Stephen D. Are There Impurities in the Living Water that the Johannine Jesus Dispenses? Deconstruction, Feminism, and the Samaritan Woman 1993 1 207 227 BibInt
Neirynck Frans The ‘Other Disciple’ in Jn 18:15–16 1975 51 113 141 Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses
Nünning Ansgar F. Phelan James & Rabinowitz Peter J. Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration: Synthesizing Cognitive and Rhetorical Approaches 2005 89 107 Malden Blackwell A Companion to Narrative Theory
Nünning Ansgar 1998 Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Unreliable Narration: Studien zur Theorie und Praxis unglaubwürdigen Erzählens in englishsprachigen Erzählliteratur
Paffenroth Kim 2001 Louisville Westminster John Knox Judas: Images of the Lost Disciple
Pagels Elaine & King Karen 2008 New York Penguin Reading Judas: The Controversial Message of the Ancient Gospel of Judas
Phelan James 2004 Ithaca Cornell University Press Living to Tell about It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration
Phelan James & Martin M.P. Herman D. ‘The Lessons of Weymouth’: Homodiegesis, Unreliability, Ethics and the Remains of the Day 1999 88 109 Columbus Ohio State University Press Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis
Polzin Robert Divine and Anonymous Characterization in Biblical Narrative 1993 63 205 213 Semeia
Rabatel Alain L’arrestation de Jesus et la representation de Judas en Jean 18,1–12 mise en perspective avec l’univers de la gnose dans L’Evangile de Judas 2009 84 49 79 Etudes Theologiques et Religieuses
Reinhartz Adele 1998 Oxford Oxford University Press Why Ask My Name?”: Anonymity and Identity in Biblical Narrative
Ridderbos Herman 1997 Grand Rapids Eerdmans The Gospel of John: A Theological Commentary (trans. John Vriend
Staley Jeffrey L. 1986 Macon Mercer University Press The Print’s First Kiss: A Rhetorical Investigation of the Implied Reader in the Fourth Gospel
Staley Jeffrey L. Subversive Narrator/Victimized Reader: A Reader Response Assessment of a Text-critical Problem, John 18:12–24 1993 51 79 98 JSNT
Thatcher Tom The Sabbath Trick: Unstable Irony in the Fourth Gospel 1999 76 53 77 JSNT
Thibeaux Evelyn R. Reading Readers Reading Characters 1993 63 215 227 Semeia
Van Tilborg Sjef 1993 Leiden Brill Imaginative Love in John
Volf Miroslav Johannine Dualism and Contemporary Pluralism 2005 21 189 217 Modern Theology
Wall K. The Remains of the Day and Its Challenges to Theories of Unreliable Narration 1994 24 18 42 Journal of Narrative Technique
Wright William M. IV Greco-Roman Character Typing and the Presentation of Judas in the Fourth Gospel 2009 71 544 559 CBQ
Zerweck Bruno Historicizing Unreliable Narration: Unreliability and Cultural Discourse in Narrative Fiction 2001 35 151 178 Style
Johansen (1994) has used the trickster model to interpret narration.
Liddell et al. 1940: 958. As in Sophocles when Teucer uses the word to accuse Menelaus of cheating (Ajax 1135). Similarly, Aristotle refers to a logical fallacy as being “like the word of the κλέπτου” (Sophistici Elenchi 180.18).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 477 | 51 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 295 | 10 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 147 | 22 | 4 |
One of the most troubling aspects of the Gospel of John is its tendency to create rigid dualisms between insiders and outsiders. This article uses the technique of deconstruction to undermine John’s characterization of the ultimate outsider: Judas. John inadvertently gives the reader the freedom to identify the anonymous figure of the other disciple who lets Peter into the high priest’s courtyard as Judas. Such identification leads to a deconstructive reading of the Gospel of John in which dualism collapses. With its ambiguities and aporias, the Gospel of John allows for the redemption of Judas when read deconstructively. The instability John’s dualism calls into question the validity of any strict binary that labels people as insiders or outsiders.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 477 | 51 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 295 | 10 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 147 | 22 | 4 |