Judges 19-21 has been a source of conflict in scholarly debate in regards to genre identification. This study explores possible genre identification with the Hebrew term, משל. With the assistance of Mikhail Bakhtin’s work with dialogism, this study uncovers theological and political nuances in close readings of the text, especially with the Hebrew terms סף (“threshold”) and המאכלת (“the knife”). The book of Judges is a book in which Israel struggles for identity, for becoming, for futures. But this story provokes notions of a future founded on rape and dismemberment. What kind of future can be propped up by this past?
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Mikhail M. Bakhtin, Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (ed. Michael Holquist; trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist; Austin: University of Texas, 1981), p. 257.
Phyllis Trible, Texts of Terror: Literary-Feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984), p. 65.
Martin Buber, Kingship of God (New York: Humanity, 1967), pp. 77-78. Buber also highlights a misinterpretation (which originated with Julius Wellhausen) that in “the act of unity at the beginning of the twentieth chapter in no way justifies the conception that what is involved here is a ‘churchly’ unity which was projected back from the post-exilic situation in the early period” (p. 82).
Lawson G. Stone, “Book of Judges,” in Dictionary of the Old Testament Historical Books (Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity, 2005), pp. 595, 602.
Karel Van Der Toorn, Scribal Culture and the Making of the Hebrew Bible (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009), p. 5. Van Der Toorn employs the designation “text artisans.” Van Der Toorn points out that the work of the scribes is likened to the work of “artisans” rather than “artists.” Creating original documents was not the aim of these scribes. These “co-productions” focused on “skill” and “technical mastery,” and the focus of the message of the texts is the communal disposition. Modern quests for the author prove dissatisfying until we realize that there was a scribal community behind these documents.
Daniel Block, Judges, Ruth (Nashville: B & H Publishing Group, 1999), p. 53. For a thorough survey of the composition of the book of Judges, see Martin Noth, The Deuteronomic History (trans. David Orton; JSOTSup; Sheffield: JSOT, 1981).
Terje Stordalen, “Dialogism, Monologism, and Cultural Literacy: Classical Hebrew Literature and Readers’ Epistemic Paradigms,” The Bible and Critical Theory 10 (2014), pp. 2-20 (6-7). Other examples noted by Stordalen include “the Egyptian text, A Dispute over Suicide (Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Bible 405-407); The Protest of the Eloquent Peasant (ANET 407-410; Context of Scripture 1: 90-104); The Report of Wenamun (CoS 1: 89-93); the Sumerian Man and his God (ANET 598-592); the Akkadian Fable between the Date Palm and the Tamarisk (ANET 410f, 592f); Dialogue of Pessimism (ANET 600f; CoS 1: 495f), The Babylonian Theodicy (ANET 601-604; CoS 1: 492-495); Dialogue between a Man and His God (CoS 1: 385)” (p. 7 n. 4).
Stordalen, “Dialogism, Monologism, and Cultural Literacy,” p. 7.
Barbara Green, Like a Tree Planted: An Exploration of Psalms and Proverbs through Metaphor (Minnesota: Liturgical, 1997), p. 1.
Adele Reinhartz, Why Ask My Name? Anonymity and Identity in Biblical Narrative (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), p.125.
Green, How Are the Mighty Fallen, p. 58. Green continues, “Morson maintains that genres are Bakhtin’s response to simplistic, reductive, pre-packaged formalist thinking” (How Are the Mighty Fallen, p. 58). Green actually argues for 1 Samuel 1-3 to be considered a משל, a “hugged.” The “hugged” she takes from the Hebrew root נגד with the “verbal possibilities of telling, making known” coupled with the Hebrew noun נגד, which she notes is usually translated “one designated for leadership” (How Are the Mighty Fallen, p. 54).
Joyce Baldwin, 1 & 2 Samuel (Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity, 1998), pp. 103-105.
Cited in Block, Judges, Ruth, p. 546. See also Archives royales de Mari (ARM), 2.48. G. Wallis advances this connection to Judg. 19:29-30 and 1 Sam. 11:7 in “Eine Parallele zu Richter 19.29ff und 1 Sam. 11.5ff aus den Briefarchiv von Mari,” ZAW 64 (1952), pp. 57-61.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 417 | 53 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 180 | 15 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 242 | 39 | 0 |
Judges 19-21 has been a source of conflict in scholarly debate in regards to genre identification. This study explores possible genre identification with the Hebrew term, משל. With the assistance of Mikhail Bakhtin’s work with dialogism, this study uncovers theological and political nuances in close readings of the text, especially with the Hebrew terms סף (“threshold”) and המאכלת (“the knife”). The book of Judges is a book in which Israel struggles for identity, for becoming, for futures. But this story provokes notions of a future founded on rape and dismemberment. What kind of future can be propped up by this past?
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 417 | 53 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 180 | 15 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 242 | 39 | 0 |