This essay proceeds from a modern sensitivity with regard to suffering and violence in canonical texts and draws on a modern phenomenon, sadomasochism (in particular masochism and appertaining theory, enhanced with theory concerning torture and pain), in order to understand the dynamics of suffering and its interpretation in the Apocalypse of John. The result of the paper is a contribution to the question what role pain and suffering play in the Apocalypse of John, as well as to the question to what extent comparing contemporary cultural phenomena and their analysis can contribute to the understanding of ancient texts. The paper also seeks to move beyond the rather pejorative and unnuanced use of the term ‘sadomasochistic’ in relation to the Apocalypse of John that has been used here and there in order to condemn the violence contained in the work (and, in the process, shedding rather shady light on BDSM practicioners).
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
See Staci Newmahr, Playing on the Edge: Sadomasochism, Risk, and Intimacy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011), p. 2.
See Boer, ‘Yhwh as Top’, p. 101; Boer takes his cue from Deleuze: ‘Waiting and suspense are the essential characteristics of the masochistic experience’ (‘Coldness and Cruelty’, pp. 70-71). See also Linda Hart, Between the Body and the Flesh: Performing Sadomasochism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 103.
Deleuze, ‘Coldness and Cruelty’, p. 65; Boer, ‘Yhwh as Top’, p. 100.
See Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, Venus in Fur (trans. Fernanda Savage; Mineola: Dover, 2012), p. 80 (his demand follows on Wanda’s remark that she hates ‘play-acting’).
See Boer, ‘Yhwh as Top’, p. 89; see also p. 97 for reference to divine-human relationships (97).
See Elizabeth Freeman, Time Bind: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010), esp. pp. 137-69.
See Allan T. Georgia, ‘Translating the Triumph: Reading Mark’s Crucifixion Narrative against a Roman Ritual of Power’, JSNT 36 (2013), pp. 17-38 (23); Mary Beard, The Roman Triumph (Boston: Belknap/Harvard University Press, 2007), p. 25.
Judith Butler, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (New York: Routledge, 1997), p. 25.
Beard, Roman Triumph, p. 136. On the instability of ‘seeing and being seen’, see also Frilingos, Spectacles of Empire, pp. 35-38.
Wayne Meeks, Christ is the Question (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2006), pp. 76-77; see also Georgia, ‘Translating the Triumph’, pp. 17-18.
See, e.g., Richard Bauckham, The Theology of the Book of Revelation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), passim.
Stephen D. Moore, God’s Gym. Divine Male Bodies of the Bible (New York: Routledge, 1996), pp. 22-30, Moore refers in particular to Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (trans. Alan Sheridan; New York: Vintage, 1977).
Sarah Coakley, ‘Prologue: Powers and Submissions’, Powers and Submissions (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), p. xx.
As it appears in Boer, ‘Yhwh as Top’, p. 93, where the suggestion that the passion narrative has sadomasochistic overtones is answered by Deleuze (as presented by Boer) with ‘Indeed it is … for not only is suffering valorized as never before, but it is willed submission, in total submission. Further, it is a suffering and submission that becomes the model for all believers who follow. They must imitate Christ … who is the basis of a new covenant’.
See Weil, The Iliad or the Poem of Force, pp. 42-43. See in general also Stuart Jesson, ‘Simone Weil: Suffering, Attention, and Compassionate Thought’, Christian Ethics 27 (2014), pp. 185-201.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 678 | 47 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 82 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 109 | 6 | 1 |
This essay proceeds from a modern sensitivity with regard to suffering and violence in canonical texts and draws on a modern phenomenon, sadomasochism (in particular masochism and appertaining theory, enhanced with theory concerning torture and pain), in order to understand the dynamics of suffering and its interpretation in the Apocalypse of John. The result of the paper is a contribution to the question what role pain and suffering play in the Apocalypse of John, as well as to the question to what extent comparing contemporary cultural phenomena and their analysis can contribute to the understanding of ancient texts. The paper also seeks to move beyond the rather pejorative and unnuanced use of the term ‘sadomasochistic’ in relation to the Apocalypse of John that has been used here and there in order to condemn the violence contained in the work (and, in the process, shedding rather shady light on BDSM practicioners).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 678 | 47 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 82 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 109 | 6 | 1 |