W. Barclay, The Gospel of Mark (Philadelphia: Westminster, rev. edn, 1975), pp. 247-48; S. Johnson, “The Identity and Significance of the Neaniskos in Mark,” Forum 8 (1992), pp. 123-39. See also the suggestions in H. Swete, The Gospel According to St Mark (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1952), p. 354.

 W. Barclay, The Gospel of Mark (Philadelphia: Westminster, rev. edn, 1975), pp. 247-48; S. Johnson, “The Identity and Significance of the Neaniskos in Mark,” Forum 8 (1992), pp. 123-39. See also the suggestions in H. Swete, The Gospel According to St Mark (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1952), p. 354.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 M. Haren, “The Naked Young Man: A Historian’s Hypothesis on Mark 14, 51-52,” Bib 79 (1998), pp. 525-31.

 M. Haren, “The Naked Young Man: A Historian’s Hypothesis on Mark 14, 51-52,” Bib 79 (1998), pp. 525-31.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 M. Smith, Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973), pp. 176-77; M. Meyer, “The Youth in the Secret Gospel of Mark,” Semeia 49 (1990), pp. 129-53.

 M. Smith, Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973), pp. 176-77; M. Meyer, “The Youth in the Secret Gospel of Mark,” Semeia 49 (1990), pp. 129-53.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 A. Vanhoye, “La fuite du jeune homme nu (Mc 14, 51-52),” Bib 52 (1971), pp. 401-406 (404); Johnson, “The Identity and Significance of the Neaniskos in Mark,” pp. 125-26; A. Kuruvilla, “The Naked Runaway and the Enrobed Reporter of Mark 14 and 16: What Is the Author Doing with What He Is Saying?,” JETS 54 (2011), pp. 527-45 (541-42).

 A. Vanhoye, “La fuite du jeune homme nu (Mc 14, 51-52),” Bib 52 (1971), pp. 401-406 (404); Johnson, “The Identity and Significance of the Neaniskos in Mark,” pp. 125-26; A. Kuruvilla, “The Naked Runaway and the Enrobed Reporter of Mark 14 and 16: What Is the Author Doing with What He Is Saying?,” JETS 54 (2011), pp. 527-45 (541-42).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 J. Theriault, “Le ‘jeune homme’ dans le récit de la passion chez Marc,” Sémiotique et Bible 104 (2001), pp.24-41 (36). R. Scroggs and K. Groff (“Baptism in Mark: Dying and Rising with Christ,” JBL 92 [1973], pp. 531-48) view the young man as a symbolic pointer to the Christian baptismal initiate, and representative of Jesus Christ.

 J. Theriault, “Le ‘jeune homme’ dans le récit de la passion chez Marc,” Sémiotique et Bible 104 (2001), pp.24-41 (36). R. Scroggs and K. Groff (“Baptism in Mark: Dying and Rising with Christ,” JBL 92 [1973], pp. 531-48) view the young man as a symbolic pointer to the Christian baptismal initiate, and representative of Jesus Christ.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 H. Fleddermann, “The Flight of a Naked Young Man (Mark 14:51-52),” CBQ 41 (1979), pp. 412-18 (418); H. Jackson, “Why the Youth Shed His Cloak and Fled Naked: The Meaning and Purpose of Mark 14:51-52,” JBL 116 (1997), pp. 273-89 (279-80); J. Edwards, The Gospel According to Mark (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2002), pp. 440-41. For a summary of views about 14:51-52, see A. Collins, Mark: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007), pp. 688-95.

 H. Fleddermann, “The Flight of a Naked Young Man (Mark 14:51-52),” CBQ 41 (1979), pp. 412-18 (418); H. Jackson, “Why the Youth Shed His Cloak and Fled Naked: The Meaning and Purpose of Mark 14:51-52,” JBL 116 (1997), pp. 273-89 (279-80); J. Edwards, The Gospel According to Mark (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2002), pp. 440-41. For a summary of views about 14:51-52, see A. Collins, Mark: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007), pp. 688-95.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Hegel, Phenomenology, p. 36.

 Hegel, Phenomenology, p. 36.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Hegel, Phenomenology, p. 51. Thought is a development in which a form is shown to be incomplete by its own standards, and postulates an alternative form (a determinate negation) that meets the same standards. It is, as Hegel wrote (Phenomenology, p. 2) “the progressive unfolding of truth.”

 Hegel, Phenomenology, p. 51. Thought is a development in which a form is shown to be incomplete by its own standards, and postulates an alternative form (a determinate negation) that meets the same standards. It is, as Hegel wrote (Phenomenology, p. 2) “the progressive unfolding of truth.”)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 S. Žižek, The Parallax View (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009), pp. 45-46.

 S. Žižek, The Parallax View (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009), pp. 45-46.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 G. Hegel, Hegel’s Science of Logic (trans. A. Miller; Atlantic Highlands: Humanities International, 1969), p. 402.

 G. Hegel, Hegel’s Science of Logic (trans. A. Miller; Atlantic Highlands: Humanities International, 1969), p. 402.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 S. Moore, Mark and Luke in Poststructuralist Perspectives: Jesus Begins to Write (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), p. 31. See also S. Moore, “Deconstructive Criticism: The Gospel of Mark,” in J. Anderson and S. Moore (eds.), Mark & Method: New Approaches in Biblical Studies (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992), pp. 84-102 (93-94).

 S. Moore, Mark and Luke in Poststructuralist Perspectives: Jesus Begins to Write (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), p. 31. See also S. Moore, “Deconstructive Criticism: The Gospel of Mark,” in J. Anderson and S. Moore (eds.), Mark & Method: New Approaches in Biblical Studies (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992), pp. 84-102 (93-94).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Moore, Mark and Luke, p. 33.

 Moore, Mark and Luke, p. 33.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Moore, Mark and Luke, p. 37.

 Moore, Mark and Luke, p. 37.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 K. Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (trans. B. Fowkes; London: Penguin, 1976), vol. 1, pp. 164-65.

 K. Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (trans. B. Fowkes; London: Penguin, 1976), vol. 1, pp. 164-65.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Lukács, History and Class Consciousness, p. 86.

 Lukács, History and Class Consciousness, p. 86.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Aristophanes, The Lysistrata; The Thesmophoriazusae; The Ecclesiazusae; The Plutus (trans. B. Rogers; LCL; Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1924), esp. lines 213-67 and 635-752; see E. Bobrick, “The Tyranny of Roles: Playacting and Privilege in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae,” in G. Dobrov (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1997), p. 178.

 Aristophanes, The Lysistrata; The Thesmophoriazusae; The Ecclesiazusae; The Plutus (trans. B. Rogers; LCL; Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1924), esp. lines 213-67 and 635-752; see E. Bobrick, “The Tyranny of Roles: Playacting and Privilege in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae,” in G. Dobrov (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1997), p. 178.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See Moore, Mark and Luke, p. 31.

 See Moore, Mark and Luke, p. 31.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 M. Blanchot, The Space of Literature (trans. A. Smock; Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982), pp. 33, 91, 142, 148-49, 223; J. Derrida, Dissemination (trans. B. Johnson; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), pp. 15, 26-29, 56-57, 63.

 M. Blanchot, The Space of Literature (trans. A. Smock; Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982), pp. 33, 91, 142, 148-49, 223; J. Derrida, Dissemination (trans. B. Johnson; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), pp. 15, 26-29, 56-57, 63.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation