Gender in Biblical Studies after the Forgery of The Gospel of Jesus’s Wife
In: Biblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Christopher B. Zeichmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The Gospel of Jesus’s Wife (GJW) was announced in 2012, but was effectively declared “dead” in June 2016 when it was shown beyond doubt to be a modern forgery. This article, rather than discussing the content or authenticity of GJW, considers the role of gender in scholarly discourse on GJW. While conversation about GJW began as one would expect for a newly announced Gospel fragment, its subtext soon evinced preoccupations with gender in the field of biblical studies. Particularly troubling was the sexist intonation of scholarly discourse, which came to associate GJW and its advocates with “hyperfeminism” and deemed the fragment’s owner’s spouse an “eccentric wife.” This article is an effort to both describe the texture of scholarly discourse as well as identify factors contributing to the sexist discussion that ensued. These problems are representative of pervasive issues that are often ignored in the field of biblical studies.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
1
Ahmed S. 2004 Declarations of Whiteness: The Non-performativity of Anti-Racism borderlands 3.2
-
2
Arnal W.E. 2005 The Symbolic Jesus: Historical Scholarship, Judaism and the Construction of Contemporary Identity London Equinox
-
3
Askeland C. 2014a Jesus Had an Ugly Sister-in-Law Evangelical Textual Criticism http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.ca/2014/04/jesus-had-ugly-sister-in-law.html
-
4
Askeland C. 2014b A Fake Coptic John and Its Implications for the ‘Gospel of Jesus's Wife,’ TynBul 65 1 10
-
5
Askeland C. 2015 A Lycopolitan Forgery of John's Gospel NTS 61 314 34
-
6
Baden J. C. Moss 2014 The Curious Case of Jesus's Wife The Atlantic 315.5 74 81
-
7
Baigent Michael Richard Leigh Henry Lincoln 1982 The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail London Jonathan Cape
-
8
Bąk T. 2016 „Jezus rzekł do nich: Moja żona”: Znaczenie kontrowersyjnego manuskryptu koptyjskiego w świetle współczesnej wiedzy i polemiki Collectanea Theologica 86 61 83
-
9
Bernhard A. 2015 The Gospel of Jesus' Wife: Textual Evidence of Modern Forgery NTS 61 335 55
-
10
Blanton W. J.G. Crossley H. Moxnes 2009 Jesus beyond Nationalism: Constructing the Historical Jesus in a Period of Cultural Complexity BibleWorld; London Equinox
-
12
Burke T. 2010 Heresy Hunting in the New Millenium SR 39 405 420
-
13
Burke T. 2017 Fakes, Forgeries, and Fictions: Writing Ancient and Modern Christian Apocrypha: Proceedings from the 2015 York University Christian Apocrypha Symposium Eugene Cascade
-
14
Cameron R. M.P. Miller 2004 Introduction: Ancient Myth and Modern Theories of Christian Origins R. Cameron M.P. Miller Redescribing Christian Origins SBLSS, 28 Atlanta SBL 1 30
-
15
Chakrabarty D. 1992 Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian’ Pasts? Representations 37 1 26
-
16
Chomsky N. 1973 Scholarship and Ideology: American Historians as ‘Experts in Legitimation,’ Social Scientist 1 20 37
-
17
Crawford T. 2011 Curating Gnosis: Discovery, Power and the Creation of (a) Discipline Ph.D. dissertation Department of Religion, Claremont Graduate University
-
18
Crossley J.G. 2008 Jesus in an Age of Terror: Scholarly Projects for a New American Century BibleWorld; London Equinox
-
19
Crossley J.G. 2012 Jesus in an Age of Neoliberalism: Quests, Scholarship and Ideology BibleWorld; London Equinox
-
21
DeConick A. D. 2014 Sexism and the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife Forbidden Gospels Blog http://aprildeconick.com/forbiddengospels/2014/5/9/sexism-and-gospel-of-jesus-wife
-
22
Denzy Lewis N. J.A. Blount 2014 Rethinking the Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices JBL 133 399 419
-
23
Dupuydt L. 2014a The Alleged Gospel of Jesus's Wife: Assessment and Evaluation of Authenticity HTR 107 172 89
-
24
Dupuydt L. 2014b The Papyrus Fragment and the Crocodile: When Discerning a Blunder Is Itself a … NT Blog http://markgoodacre.org/Depuydt.pdf
-
25
Foucault M. 2000 Truth and Power J.B. Faubion Power Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 3 New York New 111 33
-
26
Gibson David Michael McKinley 2015 Finding Jesus: Faith, Fact, Forgery New York St. Martin's
-
27
Goodacre M.S. 2017 Jesus' Wife, the Media and The Da Vinci Code Burke 2017 341 48
-
28
Gurry P. 2016 The Owner of the Gospel of Jesus' Wife Unveiled Evangelical Textual Criticism http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.ca/2016/06/the-owner-of-gospel-of-jesus-wife.html
-
29
Hacking I. 1999 The Social Construction of What? Cambridge Harvard University Press
-
30
Jones C. 2015 The Jesus' Wife Payrus in the History of Forgery NTS 61 368 78
-
31
Kazantzakis Nikos 1960 The Last Temptation of Christ P.A. Bien New York Simon & Schuster
-
32
Kim D.W. 2015 Reconsidering the Gospel of Jesus' Wife: An Imperfect Forgery or Another Polemical Gnostic Fragment RST 34 19 40
-
33
King K.L. 2003 What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge Harvard University Press
-
34
King K.L. 2014 Jesus Said to Them, ‘My Wife … ’”: A New Coptic Papyrus Fragment HTR 107 131 59
-
35
Komoszewski J.E. M.J. Sawyer D.B. Wallace 2006 Reinventing Jesus: How Contemporary Skeptics Miss the Real Jesus and Mislead Popular Culture Grand Rapids Kregel
-
36
Le Donne A. 2013 The Wife of Jesus: Ancient Texts and Modern Scandals London OneWorld
-
37
Le Donne A. 2016 Jesus’ Wife: What Did We Learn? The Jesus Blog http://historicaljesusresearch.blogspot.ca/2016/06/jesus-wife-what-did-we-learn.html
-
39
Lincoln B. 1999 Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship Chicago University of Chicago Press
-
40
Martin D.B. 2006 Sex and the Single Savior: Gender and Sexuality in Biblical Interpretation Louisville Westminster John Knox
-
41
Martínez J. 2016 Cheap Fictions and Gospel Truths E.P. Cueva J. Martínez Splendide Mendax: Rethinking Fakes and Forgeries in Classical, Late Antique, and Early Christian Literature Groningen Barkuis 3 20
-
42
Mazza R. 2016 The Jesus' Wife Fragment: End of Story? Faces and Voices http://facesandvoices.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/the-jesus-wife-fragment-end-of-story/
-
43
Mroczek E. 2014 ‘Gospel of Jesus’ Wife’ Less Durable Than Sexism Surrounding It Religion Dispatches http://religiondispatches.org/gospel-of-jesus-wife-less-durable-than-sexism-surrounding-it/
-
44
Roberts M.D. 2014 Was Jesus Married? Does the Gospel of Jesus' Wife Help Answer This Question? Reflections on Christ, Church, and Culture http://www.patheos.com/blogs/markdroberts/2014/05/05/was-jesus-married-does-the-gospel-of-jesus-wife-help-answer-this-question/
-
45
Robinson G.S. 2015 How a Papyrus Fragment Became a Sensation NTS 61 379 94
-
46
Sabar A. 2016a The Unbelievable Tale of Jesus's Wife The Atlantic 318.1 64 78
-
47
Sabar A. 2016b Karen King Responds to ‘The Unbelievable Tale of Jesus's Wife’ The Atlantic http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/karen-king-responds-to-the-unbelievable-tale-of-jesus-wife/487484/
-
49
Schroeder C.T. 2017 Gender and the Academy Online: The Authentic Revelations of the Gospel of Jesus' Wife Burke 2017 304 325
-
50
Spittler J.E. 2017 Responses to Mark Goodacre, James McGrath, and Caroline Schroeder on the Gospel of Jesus' Wife Burke 2017 349 73
-
51
Thompson A. 2012 Reality Check on Jesus and His ‘Wife’ Cosmic Log http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/18/13945001-reality-check-on-jesus-and-his-wife
-
52
Weir L. 2008 The Concept of Truth Regime Canadian Journal of Sociology 33 367 89
-
53
West J. 2012 No, People, A 4th Century Scrap Doesn't Prove Jesus Had a Wife Zwinglius Redivivus http://zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com/2012/09/18/no-people-a-4th-century-scrap-doesnt-prove-jesus-had-a-wife/
-
54
West J. 2014 What a Very Odd and Curious Response: Or, How Some Feminists Need to Learn about Adiaphora Zwinglius Redivivus http://zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/what-a-very-odd-and-curious-response-or-how-some-feminists-need-to-learn-about-adiaphora/
-
55
West J. 2016 The State of Biblical Scholarship in America: An Observation Zwinglius Redivivus http://zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com/2016/06/18/the-state-of-biblical-scholarship-in-america-an-observation/
-
56
Williams M.A. 1996 Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category Princeton Princeton University Press
-
57
Wimbush V.L. 2008 TEXTureS, Gestures, Power: Orientation to Radical Excavation V.L. Wimbush Theorizing Scriptures: New Critical Orientations to a Cultural Phenomenon (Signifying (on) Scriptures New Brunswick Rutgers University Press 1 20
-
58
Witherington B. III 2006 What Have They Done with Jesus? Beyond Strange Theories and Bad History: Why We Can Trust the Bible San Francisco HarperSanFrancisco
-
59
Young R.J.C. 1990 White Mythologies: Writing History and the West London Routledge
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 777 | 94 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 109 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 147 | 27 | 0 |
Gender in Biblical Studies after the Forgery of The Gospel of Jesus’s Wife
In: Biblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Christopher B. Zeichmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The Gospel of Jesus’s Wife (GJW) was announced in 2012, but was effectively declared “dead” in June 2016 when it was shown beyond doubt to be a modern forgery. This article, rather than discussing the content or authenticity of GJW, considers the role of gender in scholarly discourse on GJW. While conversation about GJW began as one would expect for a newly announced Gospel fragment, its subtext soon evinced preoccupations with gender in the field of biblical studies. Particularly troubling was the sexist intonation of scholarly discourse, which came to associate GJW and its advocates with “hyperfeminism” and deemed the fragment’s owner’s spouse an “eccentric wife.” This article is an effort to both describe the texture of scholarly discourse as well as identify factors contributing to the sexist discussion that ensued. These problems are representative of pervasive issues that are often ignored in the field of biblical studies.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 777 | 94 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 109 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 147 | 27 | 0 |
