Reducing students’ homework burden is to improve the quality and efficiency of school education. The proposal of “double reduction” aims to call for education to return to the essence of educating people, respect the law of education and the law of talent growth, so that students can achieve personalized development while developing in an all-round way. The “double reduction” policy combines the dual value orientation of equitable pursuit and high-quality development. Reducing students’ homework burden and off-campus training burden is the path and basic goal of the “double reduction” policy. It will be a long and challenging process to promote the quality and efficiency of school education, standardize the ecology of off-campus education, and form an effective interaction between them, so that off-campus education can become a good supplement to on-campus education rather than a necessity.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Han T., Su D. (2022). Connotation, Value and Direction of Quality Improvement of School Education under the Background of “Double Reduction”. China Audio-Visual Education,20(05):42–48.
Li, J. (2021). Examining macro-policy development stages of vocational education in China: A retrospective policy analysis. Beijing International Review of Education. 3(1). 487–492.
Liu G., Ma X. (2022) The target orientation and Practice Path of “Double Reduction” Policy in Basic Education. Journal of Chengdu Normal University,38(02):1–6.
Ma L. Zheng X. (2022) “Double Reduction”: Education Ecology aimed at reshaping students’ Healthy growth. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),43(01):79–90.
Shen G., He P. (2022). Implementation of “Double Reduction” Policy in Education Governance System: Value connotation, action logic and operation mechanism. Modern Education Management,20(08):21–28.
Tao L., Yang X. (2022) The Value Proof of “Double Reduction” and the direction of The Times. China Audio-Visual Education,20(03):7–15.
Xue, E., & Li, J. (2022) Exploring the education power in China: The basic connotation, key index, and strategic pathway. Educational Philosophy and Theory. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2022.2088352.
Yu H. (2021). The public return of Basic education and the hidden concern of fairness in the era of “Double Reduction”. Nanjing Social Sciences,20(12):145–153.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 857 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 1666 | 917 | 239 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 2278 | 916 | 32 |
Reducing students’ homework burden is to improve the quality and efficiency of school education. The proposal of “double reduction” aims to call for education to return to the essence of educating people, respect the law of education and the law of talent growth, so that students can achieve personalized development while developing in an all-round way. The “double reduction” policy combines the dual value orientation of equitable pursuit and high-quality development. Reducing students’ homework burden and off-campus training burden is the path and basic goal of the “double reduction” policy. It will be a long and challenging process to promote the quality and efficiency of school education, standardize the ecology of off-campus education, and form an effective interaction between them, so that off-campus education can become a good supplement to on-campus education rather than a necessity.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 857 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 1666 | 917 | 239 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 2278 | 916 | 32 |