National Face and Facework in China’s Foreign Policy

A Corpus-Assisted Case Study of Chinese Foreign Affairs Press Conferences

Bandung

The Goffman (1967) and Brown and Levinson (1987) socio-pragmatic theory of face was first devised through speculating on and observing the interaction of individuals. Later research has looked at the phenomenon of group-face (e.g. Spencer-Oatey 2007). In this research we examine how face and facework theory can also be applied to communications made by state actors to the outside world, in other words, whether facework theories could also be applied to national face. To this end we compiled a corpus of all press conferences held by the Ministry of Chinese Foreign Affairs in 2016 and subjected it to quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as comparative analysis with US White House press briefings. Chinese government statements were felt to be a promising genre partly because of the particularly intricate relations China has with its geographically close partners and neighbours and partly because of the supposed special importance accorded to face in Chinese culture (Kádár et al 2013; Chen and Hwang 2016). The techniques we employ in the analyses derive from the field of corpus-assisted discourse studies (Partington, Duguid and Taylor 2013).

  • Aristotle. 2012. The Art of Rhetoric. London: Collins.

  • Biber D. Johansson S. Leech G. Conrad S. and Finegan E. . 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Bousfield D. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Bousfield D. and Locher M. (eds.). 2008. Impoliteness in language. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Brown P. and Levinson S. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Brown G. and Yule G. . 1983. Discourse Analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chen R. and Hwang K. . 2016. Nation face and identity: An initial investigation of National face in East Asia. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 111.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Culpeper J. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349367.

  • Culpeper J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Du X. and Rendle-Short J. . 2016. Journalist questions: comparing adversarialness in Chinese political press conferences. Discourse Context and Media 125158.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Duguid A. 2009. Insistent voices: government messages. In Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict ed. Bayley P. and Morley J. 234260. London: Routledge.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Duguid A. and Partington A. . 2017. Forced lexical primings in transdiscoursive political messaging. In Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances ed. Pace-Sigge M. and Patterson K. 6792. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Goffman E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Gray B. 2016. Lexical bundles. In Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus-Linguistic Research ed. Baker P. and Egbert J. 3354. London: Routledge.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Jiang X. 2006. Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: the case of the North Korea nuclear crisis. Discourse and Society 17(2): 237257.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Kádár D. Haugh M. and Chang M. . 2013. Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese cmc discussion boards. Multilingua 32(3): 343372.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Kampf Z. 2009. Public (non-)apologies: The discourse of minimizing responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics. 41(11): 257270.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Kasper G. 1990. Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 193218.

  • Magistro E. 2007. Promoting the European Identity: Politeness Strategies in the Discourse of the European Union. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines. 1(1): 5173.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Magistro E. 2011. National Face and National Face Threatening Acts: Politeness and the European Constitution . In Situated Politeness ed. Haugh M. Davies B. and Merrison A.J. 232252. London: Continuum.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Nye J. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Cambridge, MA: Public Affairs.

  • Partington A. 2003. The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-doctor and the Wolf-pack at the White House. London: Routledge.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Partington A. 2006. The Linguistics of Laughter. Laughter-talk at the White House. London: Routledge.

  • Partington A. 2018. Intimations of ‘Spring’? What got said and what didn’t get said about the start of the Middle Eastern / North African uprisings. A corpus-assisted discourse study of a historical event. In Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse ed. Shröter M. and Taylor C. 95123. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Partington A. and Marchi A. . 2015. Using corpora in discourse analysis. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics ed. Biber D. and Reppen R. 216234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Partington A. Duguid A. and Taylor C. . 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Partington A. and Taylor C. . 2018. The Language of Persuasion in Politics . London: Routledge.

  • Riccio G. 2009. White House press briefings as a message to the world. Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict ed. P. Bayley and J. Morley 108–140. London: Routledge.

  • Scott M. 2008. WordSmith Tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

  • Spencer-Oatey H. 2007. Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4): 639656.

  • Taylor C. 2009. Interacting with conflicting goals: facework and impoliteness in hostile cross-examination. Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict, ed. P. Bayley and J. Morley, 208–233. London: Routledge.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • Taylor C. 2010. Science in the news: a diachronic perspective. Corpora 5(2): 221250.

  • Watts R. Ide S. and Ehrlich K. . 1992. Introduction. In Politeness in language: study in its history theory and practice ed. Watts R. 117. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用

内容统计数据

全部期间 过去一年 过去30天
摘要浏览次数 88 88 11
全文浏览次数 3 3 1
PDF下载次数 2 2 1