Birsa Munda, Adivasi leader (Indigenous people) led a rebellion at the end of the 19th century against the dikus (outsiders) popularly known as Birsa Ulgulan (tumult, rebellion). The movement targeted British officials, zamindars, and missionaries. One of the immediate effects of the movement emerged in the form of protectionary legislation (Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act) and later played an influential role in the making of Jharkhand. In the contemporary social and political landscape, the presence of Birsa Munda in the form of the built environment such as statue is indelible and offers an exciting opportunity to understand the new aesthetic turn. In particular, the author investigates two statues in Jharkhand. These statues that function as “sites of memory” play a significant role in political mobilisation and vote-bank politics. It also offers a possibility to understand the relationship between the state, elites and subalterns. The paper builds upon ethnographic materials collected during the fieldwork and devices a conceptual tool of “material-memory” to offer the specific role of Birsa’s memory as medium of doing memory politics.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Anderson, Edward , and Christophe, Jaffrelot . 2018. ‘Hindu Nationalism and the “Saffronisation of the Public Sphere”: An Interview with Christophe Jaffrelot’. Contemporary South Asia 26 (4): 468–82.
Assmann, Aleida . 2006. ‘Memory, Individual and Collective’. In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by Robert E., Goodin and Charles, Tilly , 210–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Assmann, Jan. 1995 . ‘Collective Memory and Cultural Identity’. New German Critique, no. 65: 125–33.
Assmann, Jan. 2011. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance and Political Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baviskar, Amita . 1997. In the Belly of the River: Tribal Conflicts Over Development in the Narmada Valley. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Belli, Malia . 2014. ‘Monumental Pride Mayawati’s Memorials in Lucknow’. Ars Orientalis 44.
Bregmann, Sigurd . 2012. ‘Religion in the Built Environment: Aesth/Ethics, Rituals, and Memory In Lived Urban Space’. In The Sacred in The City, edited by Liliana, Gómez and Walter, Van Herck . London: Bloomsbury Press.
Cassirer, Ernst . 1944. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
Chandra, Uday . 2016. ‘Flaming Fields and Forest Fires : Agrarian Transformations and the Making of Birsa Munda’ s Rebellion’. The Indian Economic and Social History Review 53: 1–30.
Clifford, James , and George E, Marcus . 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
Conquergood, Dwight . 2002. ‘Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research’. TDR – The Drama Review – A Journal of Performance Studies.
Damodaran, Vinita . 2002. ‘History, Landscape, and Indigeneity in Chotanagpur, 1850–1980’. South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies.
Devi, Mahasweta . 2001. Aranyer Adhikar (Forest Rights). Calcutta: Karuna Prokashini.
Devi, Mahasweta . 2003. Chotti Munda and His Arrow. Blackwell Publication.
Editor, Linda Steiner , and Barbie, Zelizer . 1995. ‘Competing Memories’. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, no. 12: 293–302.
Erll, Astrid . 2011. ‘Travelling Memory’. Parallax 17, 4 (2011): 4–18.
Gamburd, Michele Ruth . 2014. ‘Akhil Gupta, Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India’. Asian Ethnology.
Gary Michael, Tartako . 2012. Dalit Art and Visual Imagery. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Geertz, Clifford . 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books Inc.
Ghosh, Kaushik . 2006a. ‘Between Global Flows and Local Dams: Indigenousness, Locality, and the Transnational Sphere in Jharkhand, India’. Cultural Anthropology 21 (4): 501–34.
Ghosh, Kaushik . 2006b. ‘Between Global Flows and Local Dams: Indigenousness, Locality, and the Transnational Sphere in Jharkhand, India’. Cultural Anthropology 21 (4): 501–34.
Government of India. 2011. ‘Census of India 2011: Jharkhand’. Jharkhand.
Guha, Ranajit . 1999. Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gupta, Sanjukta Das . 2010. ‘Accessing Nature: Agrarian Change, Forest Laws and Their Impact on an Adivasi Economy in Colonial India’. Conservation and Society 7 (4): 227–38.
Gupta, Sanjukta Das . 2011. ‘Rethinking Adivasi Identity: The Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act (1908) and Its Aftermath among the Hos of Singhbhum’. In Adivasi in Colonial India: Survival, Resistance and Negotiation, edited by Biswamoy, Pati , 88–111. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.
Gupta, Sanjukta Das . 2016. ‘A Homeland for “Tribal” Subjects Revisiting British Colonial Experimentations in the Kolhan Government Estate’, 102–21.
Hartog, François . 2005. ‘Time and Heritage’. Museum International 57 (3): 7–18.
Hodges, Matt . 2015. ‘Reinventing “History”?’ History and Anthropology 26 (4): 515–27.
Jaffrelot, Christophe . 1996. The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics (125–1990). London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers
Jazeel, Tariq . 2014. ‘Subaltern Geographies: Geographical Knowledge and Postcolonial Strategy’. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 34 (2014): 88–103.
Jewitt, Sarah . 2008. ‘Political Ecology of Jharkhand Conflicts’. In Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49: 68–82.
Jones, Andrew . 2007. Memory and Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koselleck, Reinhart , and Translated by Hayden, White . 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lee, Richard E. 2018. ‘Lessons of the Longue Durée: The Legacy of Fernand Braudel’. Historia Crítica, 69–77.
McLean, Stuart . 2015. ‘Materiality and Culture’. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition.
Munda, R.D. 2013. Adi-Dharam. 3rd ed. Calcutta: Advaani.
Nora, Pier . 1989. ‘Between Memory and History: Lieux de Memoire’. Representation, no. 26: 7–24.
O’Brien, Daniel B. Cruise . 2003. Symbolic Confrontations: Muslims Imagining the State in Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
O’keeffe, Tadhg . 2007. ‘Landscape and Memory: Historiography, Theory, Methodology’. In Heritage, Memory and the Politics of Identity: New Perspectives on the Cultural Landscape, edited by Moore, N and Whelan, Y. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Parmar, Pooja . 2012. ‘Undoing Historical Wrongs: Law and Indigeneity in India’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 493 (49): 491–525.
Portelli, Alessandro . 1981. ‘The Peculiarities of Oral History’. History Workshop Journal 12 (1): 96–107.
Prakash, Amit . 2001. Jharkhand: Politics of Development and Identity. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
Rana, L.N. 1992. ‘The Adivasi Mahasabha (1938–1949) : Launching Pad of the Jharkhand Movement’. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 53 (3): 397–405.
Ranjan, Rahul . 2017. ‘Unravelling the Narratives of Adivasi Dispossession: A Case Study of Land Acquisition in Nagri Village, Jharkhand’. Development 60 (3–4): 227–34.
Roy, S.C. 1912. The Mundas and Their Country. 1st ed. Calcutta: Kuntaline Press.
Rycroft, Daniel J. 2004. ‘Capturing Birsa Munda: The Virtuality of a Colonial-Era Photograph List of Plates’. Indian Folklore Research Journal 1 (4): 53–67.
Rycroft, Daniel J. 2011. ‘After-Images: Visual Cultures and Subaltern Pasts’. Visual Culture in Britain, no. 12:3: 367–86.
Saito, Hiro . 2010. ‘From Collective Memory to Commemoration’. In Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by John R., Hall , Laura., Grindstaff , and Ming-cheng, Miriam. Lo 629–38. London: Routledge.
Sarkar, Sumit . 1989. Modern India 1885–1947. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Shah, Alpa . 2011. In the Shadows of the State: Indigenous Politics, Environmentalism and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Shah, Alpa . 2017. ‘Ethnography? Participant Observation, a Potentially Revolutionary Praxis’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1).
Singh, Anjana . 2019. ‘Many Faces of the Pathalgadi Movement in Jharkhand’. Economic Political Weekly, 28–33.
Singh, Jai Pal . 2003. ‘“Jai Jharkhand! Jai Adivasi! Jai Hind!”’ In Jharkhand Movement: Indigenous Peoples’ Struggle for Autonomy in India, edited by S Bosu Munda, R.D and Mullick , 2–14. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
Singh, K.S. 2002. Birsa Munda and His Movement [1854–1901]. Centennial. Calcutta: Seagull Books.
Sinha, S.P. 1997. Life and Times of Birsa Bhagwan. 2nd ed. Ranchi: Bihar Tribal Research Institute.
Sivaramakrishnan, K. 1999. Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Changes in Colonial Eastern India. California: Standford University Press.
Spiegel, Gabrielle M . 2018. ‘Memory and History: Liturgical Time and Historical Time’. History and Theory 41 (2): 149–62.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty . 1988. ‘Can Subaltern Speak?’ In In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary, Nelson and Lawrence, Grossberg , 271–313. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Stuart, Corbridge . 1988. ‘The Ideology of Tribal Economy and Society: Politics in the Jharkhand, 1995–1980’. Modern Asian Studies 22 (1): 1–42.
Thrift, Nigel . 2004. ‘Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect’. Geografiska Annaler, no. 86: 57–78.
Tillin, Louise . 2012. Remapping India: New State and Their Political Origins. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Vitebsky, Piers . 2016. ‘Loving and Forgetting: Movements of Inarticulacy in Tribal India’. In The Scheduled Tribes and Their India: Politics, Identities, Policies, and Work, 168–95. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Howard . 2013. ‘Death, Memory, and Material Culture: Catalytic Commemoration and the Cremated Dead’. In The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, edited by S., Tarlow and L., Nilsson Stutz , 195–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3587 | 337 | 59 |
Full Text Views | 122 | 7 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 267 | 24 | 8 |
Birsa Munda, Adivasi leader (Indigenous people) led a rebellion at the end of the 19th century against the dikus (outsiders) popularly known as Birsa Ulgulan (tumult, rebellion). The movement targeted British officials, zamindars, and missionaries. One of the immediate effects of the movement emerged in the form of protectionary legislation (Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act) and later played an influential role in the making of Jharkhand. In the contemporary social and political landscape, the presence of Birsa Munda in the form of the built environment such as statue is indelible and offers an exciting opportunity to understand the new aesthetic turn. In particular, the author investigates two statues in Jharkhand. These statues that function as “sites of memory” play a significant role in political mobilisation and vote-bank politics. It also offers a possibility to understand the relationship between the state, elites and subalterns. The paper builds upon ethnographic materials collected during the fieldwork and devices a conceptual tool of “material-memory” to offer the specific role of Birsa’s memory as medium of doing memory politics.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3587 | 337 | 59 |
Full Text Views | 122 | 7 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 267 | 24 | 8 |