The “Stolen Revolution” and Hope: ‘Progressive’ and ‘Conservative’ Forces of the Contemporary Political Context of Kyrgyzstan
In: Central Asian AffairsSearch for other papers by Aksana Ismailbekova in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article examines the role of the progressive forces in recent revolutions in Kyrgyzstan, and asks why their movements have not led to real political change in this Central Asian country. In Kyrgyzstan, the progressive forces are identified with such groups as young people, the educated middle class, lawyers, and journalists. Their discourses, such as demands for fair elections and the rule of law, have been central to the three revolutions that have taken place in Kyrgyzstan since 2005, as has their concept of Umut, or hope. The central thesis of this article is that, although these forces may have led recent revolutionary movements, they have proved unable to establish political dominance after the completion of revolutionary processes. Instead, after each revolutionary attempt, the rules of “local politics” have been consistently reasserted in Kyrgyzstan. These are rules based on the power of informal social and political networks governed by rules of reciprocity and the pursuit of self-interest. In spite of this recurring outcome, the progressive forces retain their commitment to hope, and it is the prism of hope which this paper uses to make sense of revolution’s failure. In this paper, a contribution to the anthropology of revolution, that idea of hope is deconstructed: this permits a greater focus on how and why the promises of revolution have, so far, been betrayed and unfulfilled in contemporary Kyrgyzstan, where the idea of hope plays a fundamental representational and political role.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ata Meken Party. 2020. “My reshili podderzhat’ Sadyra Zhaparova na dolzhnost’ prem’yera radi stabil’nosti”. 14 October. Gezitter.org. Available at: https://www.gezitter.org/politic/92160_ata_meken_myi_reshili_podderjat_sadyira_japarova_na_doljnost_premera_radi_stabilnosti/ Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Baez-Camargo, C. and A. Ledeneva. 2017. “Where Does Informality Stop and Corruption Begin? Informal Governance and the Public/Private Crossover in Mexico, Russia and Tanzania”. Slavonic and East European Review, 95 No. 1: 49–75.
-
Baialieva, Gulzat and Joldon Kutmanaliev. 2020. “How Kyrgyz social media backed an imprisoned politician’s meteoric rise to power.” Open Democracy. 15 October. Available at https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/how-kyrgyz-social-media-backed-an-imprisoned-politicians-meteoric-rise-to-power/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Beyer, Judith. 2015. “Constitutional Faith Law and Hope in Revolutionary Kyrgyzstan”. Ethnos, 80:3, 320–345
-
Bayat, Asef. 2017. Revolution without Revolutionaries: Making Sense of the Arab Spring. Stanford Studies in Middle Eastern and Islamic Societies and Cultures. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Chekirova, A. 2023. “How are populist attitudes activated? Understanding revolutionary mobilization in Kyrgyzstan.” Central Asian Affairs, 10: 123–156.
-
Community of Lawyers in Kyrgyzstan. 2020. Lawyers.kg Available at http://lawyers.kg/?fbclid=IwAR35LYHHxiejzUT9kNPUf_DYGrNxVNFAl7GFMWRdD_00P35V5EprvFfiwo”. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Coleman, James. 1986. Individual interest and collective action. Selected essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Doolotkeldieva, Asel. 2021. “Populism à la Kyrgyz: Sadyr Japarov, Nationalism, and Anti-Elite Sentiment in Kyrgyzstan”. Illiberalism Studies Program Working Papers No. 4 (February): 3–13 Available at https://www.illiberalism.org/populism-la-kyrgyz-sadyr-japarov-nationalism-anti-elite-sentiment-kyrgyzstan/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Doolotkeldieva, Asel. 2010 Kyrgyzstani civil youth movements after the Tulip revolution: self realization, nationalism and the state. Available at https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/145018/Doolotkeldieva_Tulip.pdf. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Doolotkeldieva, Asel, and Wolters, Alexander. 2017. “Uncertainty Perpetuated? The Pitfalls of a Weakly Institutionalized Party System in Kyrgyzstan”. Central Asian Affairs 4 No 1: 26–50.
-
Dzhuraev, Shairbek. 2010. “Back on Track? Kyrgyz Authoritarianism after the Tulip Revolution.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, No. 95: 1–6.
-
Dzhuraev, Shairbek. 2021. “New president, old presidentialism? Kyrgyzstan at the crossroads between reform options and further instability.” Zentralasien-Analysen, no. 145; 6–10. https://doi.org/10.31205/ZA.145.02.
-
Dzhuraev, Shairbek. 2020. “Turbulence in Kyrgyzstan: A Hijacked Revolution or Business as Usual?” Crossroads Central Asia (blog). October 12. Available at https://www.crossroads-ca.org/turbulence-in-kyrgyzstan-a-hijacked-revolution-or-business-as-usual/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Gezitter. 2020. “Sadyr Zhaparov: Kriminal budet iskorenen, politicheskikh goneniy ne budet” 15. October. Gezitter.org. Available at https://www.gezitter.org/politic/92165_sadyir_japarov_kriminal_budet_iskorenen_politicheskih_goneniy_ne_budet/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Eraliev, S. V. 2021. “Kyrgyzstane zavershilis’ aktsii, prokhodivshiye pod lozungom « Za zakonnost’! »”. Available at https://rus.azattyk.org/a/31187061.html” https://rus.azattyk.org/a/31187061.html. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Engvall, Johan. 2021. “The Fall of Kyrgyzstan’s Parliamentary Experiment and the Rise of Sadyr Japarov”. CACI, 21 January. Available at https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13657-the-fall-of-kyrgyzs. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Ismailbekova, Aksana. 2021a. “Native son Japarov: The embodiment of injustice?” Anthropology Today 37 No 5: 14–17.
-
Ismailbekova, Aksana. 2021b. “Informal Governance, ‘Clan’ politics and Corruption”. In Isaacs, R. and E. Marat, Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Central Asia. London: Routledge: 87–100.
-
Ismailbekova, Aksana. 2014. “Securing future lives of children through ritualised parenthood in the village of Bulak, Kyrgyzstan”. Special Issue on Futures and Belongings in Kyrgyzstan. Ed. Jeanne Féaux de la Croix and Aksana Ismailbekova. The Anthropology of East Europe Review (AEER) 32 No 2: 17–32 [OA].
-
Ismailbekova, Aksana. 2022. “Eine weitere »gestohlene« Revolution?—Macht und Informalität in Kirgistan”. Zentralasien-Analysen Nr. 153 (29.07.2022). Available at https://www.laender-analysen.de/zentralasien-analysen/153/eine-weitere-gestohlene-revolution-macht-und-informalitaet-in-kirgistan/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Ismailbekova, Aksana. 2023. Voices of Doubt. The Diplomat. Available at https://thediplomat.com/2023/10/voices-of-doubt-unraveling-the-ambiguities-surrounding-kolbaevs-killing/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Jansen, Stef. 2016. “Ethnography and the Choices Posed by the ‘Affective Turn’”. In Sensitive Objects: Affect and Material Culture, edited by Jonas Frykman, and Maja Provrzanovic Frykman, 55–77. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
-
Jansen, Stef. 2021. “The Anthropology of Hope”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Oxford University Press: 1–22.
-
Miyazaki, H. 2004. The method of hope: Anthropology, philosophy, and Fijian knowledge. Stanford University Press.
-
Kaktus. 2015. “Okul bala: Institut iskusstvennogo rodstva.” Kaktus media Available at https://kaktus.media/doc/324910_okyl_bala:_instityt_iskysstvennogo_rodstva.html. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Kaktus. 2020. “Pervyy politicheskiy kraudfanding. ‘Reforma’ sobrala den’gi dlya izbiratel’nogo zaloga”. Kaktus media 24.08.2020. Available at https://kaktus.media/doc/419440_pervyy_politicheskiy_kraydfanding._reforma_sobrala_dengi_dlia_izbiratelnogo_zaloga.html. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Kloop. 20202. “12 druzey Sadyra: kto finansiruyet izbiratel’nuyu kampaniyu Zhaparova?” 23 December. Kloop Available at https://kloop.kg/blog/2020/12/23/12-druzej-sadyra-kto-finansiruet-izbiratelnuyu-kampaniyu-zhaparova/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Khamidov, Alisher. 2010. “Not the Tulip Revolution All Over Again”. Available at Eurasianet. Apr 8. Available at https://eurasianet.org/not-the-tulip-revolution-all-over-again. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Korotkova, Yelena. 2020. “Zhogorku Kenesh narushayet Konstitutsiyu, kogda prinimayet zakony i ne opoveshchayet obshchestvennost”—pravovaya klinika « Adilet » 16.11. 2020. Kloop. Available at https://kloop.kg/blog/2020/11/16/zhogorku-kenesh-narushaet-konstitutsiyu-kogda-prinimaet-zakony-i-ne-opoveshhaet-obshhestvennost-pravovaya-klinika-adilet/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Holbraad, M. 2014. “Revolución o muerte: self-sacrifice and the ontology of Cuban Revolution”. Ethnos 79 No 3, 365–387. Available on-line: https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2013.794149.
-
Ledeneva, A. (ed.). 2018. The Global Encyclopaedia of Informality: Understanding Social and Cultural Complexity, Volume 1. London: UCL Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911307907.
-
Limon.kg 2020. “Vpervyye v istorii strany grazhdane sobrali izbiratel’nyy zalog 5 mln somov dlya partii”. 24.08.20. Available at https://limon.kg/news:72965. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Tiulegenov, Medet. 2020. “Protests Over Stolen Elections in Kyrgyzstan Where is the country headed this time?” Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. October. Available at https://www.rosalux.de/en/news/id/43129/protests-over-stolen-elections-in-kyrgyzstan?cHash=b34d35f840d29de925c1a9b16277bb47 Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Toktakunov, Ali. AliHub. 2021. https://www.youtube.com/user/alitoktakunov. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Toregel′di uulu, Bakyt. 2021. “Referendum po prinyatiyu novoy Konstitutsii: aktivisty namereny sudit′sya s vlast′yu”. 9 March. Available at https://rus.azattyk.org/a/31141713.html. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Ryskulova, Nargiza. 2021. “BBC, 5 mln dollarov za kirgizskogo “avtoriteta”. Pochemu SSHA vstrevozheny korruptsiyey v Bishkek“, March 7. Available at https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-56309688 Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Reeves, M. 2011. “Fixing the Border: On the Affective Life of the State in Southern Kyrgyzstan”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(5) 905–923.
-
Sahlins, Marshall D. 2009 (1972). Stone Age Economics. London: Routledge.
-
Shayne, J. D. 2004. The revolution question: feminisms in El Salvador, Chile, and Cuba. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
-
Schmitz, A. 2021. “Revolution again in Kyrgyzstan: forward to the past?” (SWP Comment, 8/2021). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit. Available at https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/dsocument/71981/ssoar-2021-schmitz-Revolution_again_in_Kyrgyzstan_forward.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-2021-schmitz-Revolution_again_in_Kyrgyzstan_forward.pdf. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Schielke. Samuli. 2015. Egypt in the Future Tense: Hope, Frustration and Ambivalence, Before and After 2011. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
-
Sheranova, A. and Uraimov, M. 2023. “The declining role of political elites in revolutions in post-communist Eurasia: The October revolution in Kyrgyzstan”. Central Asian Affairs: 10, 183–208.
-
Pelkmans, Mathijs. 2013. “Ruins of hope in a Kyrgyz post-industrial wasteland”. Anthropology Today. 29 No 5: 17–21.
-
Pannier, Bruce. 2020. “Kyrgyzstan posle smeny vlasti: eyforii net, no yest’ razocha rovaniye.” Azartky.kg. Available at https://rus.azattyq.org/a/analysis-no-euphoria-but-lots-of-disappointment-in-kyrgyzstan/30920504.html. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
OSCE/ODIHR. 2010. “Election Observation Mission Report. 2010”. Kyrgyz Republic, Parliamentary Elections. Available at https://www.osce.org/odihr/74649. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
OSCE/ODIHR. 2015. “Election Observation Mission Report. 2015”. Kyrgyz Republic, Parliamentary Elections. Available at https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/kyrgyzstan/219186. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Newton, Scott. 2021. “Contemporary Central Asian Legal Systems in Developmental Context: Genealogy, Political Economy, State Architecture”. Jeroen Van Den Bosch, Adrien Fauve, B. J. De Cordier. The European Handbook of Central Asian Studies. Ibidem Verlag: 537–566.
-
Wilson, Alice. 2016. Sovereignty in exile: a Saharan liberation movement governs. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
-
Wilson, Alice. (2019) 2023. “Revolution”. In The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by Felix Stein. Facsimile of the first edition in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. http://doi.org/10.29164/19rev. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Vince, N. 2016. Our fighting sisters: nation, memory and gender in Algeria, 1954–2012. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
-
Zhapykeyev, Syimyk. 2021. “Narod teper’ ne poverit, pust’ dazhe Zhapykeyev sdelayet videoobrashcheniye ne iz « kukhni », a iz « spal’ni” Gezitter.org 12 March. Available at https://www.gezitter.org/society/95780_narod_teper_ne_poverit_pust_daje_japyikeev_sdelaet_videoobraschenie_ne_iz_kuhni_a_iz_spalni/. Accessed 22.12.2023.
-
Zigon, Jarrett. 2009. “Hope dies last. Two aspects of hope in contemporary Moscow”. Anthropological Theory. Vol 9(3): 253–271
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 301 | 301 | 53 |
| Full Text Views | 14 | 14 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 36 | 36 | 4 |
The “Stolen Revolution” and Hope: ‘Progressive’ and ‘Conservative’ Forces of the Contemporary Political Context of Kyrgyzstan
In: Central Asian AffairsSearch for other papers by Aksana Ismailbekova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article examines the role of the progressive forces in recent revolutions in Kyrgyzstan, and asks why their movements have not led to real political change in this Central Asian country. In Kyrgyzstan, the progressive forces are identified with such groups as young people, the educated middle class, lawyers, and journalists. Their discourses, such as demands for fair elections and the rule of law, have been central to the three revolutions that have taken place in Kyrgyzstan since 2005, as has their concept of Umut, or hope. The central thesis of this article is that, although these forces may have led recent revolutionary movements, they have proved unable to establish political dominance after the completion of revolutionary processes. Instead, after each revolutionary attempt, the rules of “local politics” have been consistently reasserted in Kyrgyzstan. These are rules based on the power of informal social and political networks governed by rules of reciprocity and the pursuit of self-interest. In spite of this recurring outcome, the progressive forces retain their commitment to hope, and it is the prism of hope which this paper uses to make sense of revolution’s failure. In this paper, a contribution to the anthropology of revolution, that idea of hope is deconstructed: this permits a greater focus on how and why the promises of revolution have, so far, been betrayed and unfulfilled in contemporary Kyrgyzstan, where the idea of hope plays a fundamental representational and political role.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 301 | 301 | 53 |
| Full Text Views | 14 | 14 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 36 | 36 | 4 |