Informal reciprocal exchanges continue to shape people’s interactions in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. State retrenchment from the social sphere and growing inequality has markedly limited citizens’, access to scarce resources including housing. This has stimulated people’s involvement in informal exchanges. The article analyzes housing policy during the Soviet and post-Soviet periods taking a closer look at the process of housing allocation. It claims that despite formalization of housing distribution, citizens continue using informal networks to gain access to that scarce commodity in the post-Soviet period. The article draws on data collected from interviews, textual analysis, and original surveys conducted in Kazakhstan in 2011 and 2013.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Javier Auyero, “The Logic of Clientelism in Argentina: An Ethnographic Account,” Latin American Research Review, 35, no. 3 (2003): 59.
The term used by Edward Schatz (2006).
Henry Morton, “Who Gets What, When, and How? Housing in the Soviet Union,” Soviet Studies, 32, no. 2 (1980): 235–259.
Lynn Attwood, “Privatization of Housing in Post-Soviet Russia: A New Understanding of Home Edward?” Europe -Asia Studies 64, no. 5 (2012): 906.
Arif Hasan, Housing Crisis in Central Asia (Karachi: City Press, 1997).
Boleslaw Domanski, “Gatekeepers and Administrative Allocation of Goods Under Socialism: An Alternative Perspective,” Environment and Planning, 9, no. 3 (1991): 281–293.
Barbara Junisbai, “A Tale of Two Kazakhstans: Sources of Political Cleavage and Conflict in the Post-Soviet Period,” Europe -Asia Studies, 62, no. 2 (2010): 235–269.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 527 | 97 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 275 | 10 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 101 | 27 | 3 |
Informal reciprocal exchanges continue to shape people’s interactions in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. State retrenchment from the social sphere and growing inequality has markedly limited citizens’, access to scarce resources including housing. This has stimulated people’s involvement in informal exchanges. The article analyzes housing policy during the Soviet and post-Soviet periods taking a closer look at the process of housing allocation. It claims that despite formalization of housing distribution, citizens continue using informal networks to gain access to that scarce commodity in the post-Soviet period. The article draws on data collected from interviews, textual analysis, and original surveys conducted in Kazakhstan in 2011 and 2013.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 527 | 97 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 275 | 10 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 101 | 27 | 3 |