Leadership Succession, Great Power Ambitions, and the Future of Central Asia

in Central Asian Affairs
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Two uncertainties will reshape inter- and intra-state governance in Eurasia over the next five to twenty years. First, the stabilizing anchors of Central Asia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, will see their first leadership change since independence. Second, it is unclear if and how the region’s two great powers, Russia and China, will accommodate one another’s expanding interests. This paper explores these two uncertainties, their potential to reshape Central Asian politics, and scenarios that may emerge should the current, now quarter century status quo be disrupted.

Sections

References

2

Edward Schatz, “The Soft Authoritarian Tool Kit: Agenda-Setting Power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan,” Comparative Politics, 41, no. 2 (January 2009): 203–222.

4

Rico Isaacs, “Charismatic Routinization and Problems of Post-Charisma Succession in ­Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan,” Studies of Transition States and Societies, 7, no. 1 (2015): 70.

7

Joel S. Migdal, Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), 235; Adam Przeworski, “Democracy and Economic Development,” in Edward D. Mansfield and Richard Sisson (eds), The Evolution of Political Knowledge (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2004), 300–324.

8

Lawrence P. Markowitz, State Erosion: Unlootable Resources and Unruly Elites in Central Asia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013), 68.

13

Elena Kostyuchenko, “Zhanaozen,” Novaya gazeta, December 20, 2011.

17

Eric McGlinchey, “Islamic Leaders in Uzbekistan,” Asia Policy, 1 (January 2006): 123–144.

18

S. Frederick Starr, “Making Eurasia Stable,” Foreign Affairs, 74, no. 1 (January/February 1996): 80–92, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/1996-01-01/making-eurasia-stable.

19

Eric McGlinchey, “The Making of Militants: The State and Political Islam in Central Asia,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, 25, no. 3 (2005): 554–566.

20

Daniel N. Posner, “Regime Change and Ethnic Cleavages in Africa,” Comparative Political Studies, 40, no. 11 (November 2007): 1308.

30

Daniel C. O’Neill, “Risky Business: The Political Economy of Chinese Investment in ­Kazakhstan,” Journal of Eurasian Studies, 5, no. 2 (July 2014): 146, doi:10.1016/j.euras.2014.05.007.

31

Umida Hashimova, “Political and Economic Developments in Uzbekistan: 2013 Year in Review,” Eurasia Daily Monitor, January 24, 2014, http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=41874&no_cache=1 (accessed May 13, 2015).

33

Jack Farchy, “China’s Great Game: In Russia’s Backyard,” Financial Times, October 14, 2015, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d35d34ca-6e70-11e5-aca9-d87542bf8673.html#axzz46zWCQg3J.

38

Ian Traynor, “Kazakhstan Is Latest Russian Neighbour to Feel Putin’s Chilly Nationalist Rhetoric,” The Guardian, September 1, 2014, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/01/kazakhstan-russian-neighbour-putin-chilly-nationalist-rhetoric (accessed May 14, 2015).

40

Ahmed Rashid, “Jihad’s New Frontier: Tajikistan,” New York Times, June 11, 2015, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/10/opinion/jihads-new-frontier-tajikistan.html.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 32 32 15
Full Text Views 6 6 4
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0