This article analyzes the role of mosques dedicated to the “father of the nation” under two personalistic authoritarian systems: Saparmurat Niyazov in Turkmenistan and Sheikh Zayed in the United Arab Emirates (uae). Critiquing “cult of personality” narratives as Orientalist and analytically weak, I emphasize the constructed nature of charisma, asking how such personalistic regimes produce the image of a coherent figurehead—and to what end. As a discursive device, the personalistic leader-as-icon appears in a range of authoritarian regimes, and it is materially inscribed in the symbolic landscapes to create the impression of unity among elites and the masses. To illustrate how this works, I draw on research in Turkmenistan and the uae from 2012 through 2014, including landscape analysis of two mosques memorializing the countries’ founding fathers: the Turkmenbashi Ruhy Mosque in the outskirts of Ashgabat, and the Sheikh Zayed Mosque, in the outskirts of Abu Dhabi.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Anssi Paasi, Territories, Boundaries, and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Boundary (New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1996).
Garth Myers, “From Expected to Unexpected Comparisons: Changing the Flows of Ideas about Cities in a Postcolonial Urban World,” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 35, no. 1 (2014): 104–118.
Jeroen Van den Bosch, “Personalism: A Type or Characteristic of Authoritarian Regimes?” Politologická Revue, 21, no. 1 (2015): 11–30.
Max Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (New York: Bedminster Press, 1968). See, for example, Steven Eke and Taras Kuzio, “Sultanism in Eastern Europe: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus,” Europe-Asia Studies, 52, no. 3 (May 2000): 523; Shmuel Eisenstadt, Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neopatrimonialism (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1973); Anja Franke, Andrea Gawrich, and Gurban Alakbarov, “Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as Post-Soviet Rentier States: Resource Incomes and Autocracy as a Double ‘Curse’ in Post-Soviet Regimes,” Europe-Asia Studies, 61, no. 1 (2009): 109–140; Alisher Ilkhamov, “Neopatrimonialism, Interest Groups and Patronage Networks: The Impasses of the Governance System in Uzbekistan,” Central Asian Survey, 26, no. 1 (2007): 65–84; Rico Isaacs, “Informal Politics and the Uncertain Context of Transition: Revisiting Early Stage Non-Democratic Development in Kazakhstan,” Democratization, 17, no. 1 (2010): 1–25; Rico Isaacs, Party System Formation in Kazakhstan: Between Formal and Informal Politics (New York: Routledge, 2011); Nicholas Kunysz, “From Sultanism to Neopatrimonialism? Regionalism within Turkmenistan,” Central Asian Survey, 31, no. 1 (March 2012): 1–16; Marlene Laruelle, “Discussing Neopatrimonialism and Patronal Presidentialism in the Central Asian Context,” Demokratizatsiya, 20, no. 4 (Fall 2012): 301–324; Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996); Lawrence Markowitz, “The Sub-National Roots of Authoritarianism: Neopatrimonialism and Territorial Administration in Uzbekistan,” Demokratizatsiya, 20, no. 4 (Fall 2012): 387–408; Sébastien Peyrouse, Turkmenistan: Strategies of Power, Dilemmas of Development (Armonk, ny: M.E. Sharpe, 2012).
Henry Hale, “Democracy or Autocracy on the March? The Colored Revolutions as Normal Dynamics of Patronal Presidentialism,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39, no. 3 (2006): 307. See for example, Laruelle, “Discussing Neopatrimonialism,” 301–324.
Barbara Geddes, Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003), 51. See, for example, Rico Isaacs and Sarah Whitmore, “The Limited Agency and Life-Cycles of Personalized Dominant Parties in the Post-Soviet Space: The Cases of United Russia and Nur Otan,” Democratization, 21, no. 4 (2014): 699–721.
See for example, Michael Denison, “The Art of the Impossible: Political Symbolism, and the Creation of National Identity and Collective Memory in Post-Soviet Turkmenistan,” Europe-Asia Studies, 61, no. 7 (2009): 1167–87; Helena Goscilo, Putin as Celebrity and Cultural Icon (New York: Routledge, 2013); Slavomír Horák, “The Elite in Post-Soviet and Post-Niyazow Turkmenistan: Does Political Culture Form a Leader,” Demokratizatsiya, 20, no. 4 (Fall 2012): 371–385; Slavomír Horák, “The Battle of Gökdepe in the Turkmen Post-Soviet Historical Discourse,” Central Asian Survey, 34, no. 2 (April 2015): 149–161; Abel Polese and Slavomir Horák, “A Tale of Two Presidents: Personality Cult and Symbolic Nation-Building in Turkmenistan,” Nationalities Papers, 43, no. 3 (May 2015): 457–478; Jan Šír, “Cult of Personality in Monumental Art and Architecture: The Case of Post-Soviet Turkmenistan,” Acta Slavica Japonica, 25 (2008): 203–220.
Natalie Koch, “The Monumental and the Miniature: Imagining ‘Modernity’ in Astana,” Social & Cultural Geography, 11, no. 8 (2010): 769–787; after Laura Adams and Assel Rustemova, “Mass Spectacle and Styles of Governmentality in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan,” Europe-Asia Studies, 61, no. 7 (2009): 1249–76.
Simonetta Falasca-Zamponi, Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini’s Italy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997). See also a special issue of the journal Modern Italy (1999 vol. 3, no. 2).
Ian Kershaw, The “Hitler Myth”: Image and Reality in the Third Reich (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).
J. Arch Getty, Origins of the Great Purges: The Soviet Communist Party Reconsidered, 1933–1938 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
Edward Shils, “Charisma, Order, and Status,” American Sociological Review, 30, no. 2 (1965): 199–213; Edward Shils, The Constitution of Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).
Tamar Mayer, Gender Ironies of Nationalism: Sexing the Nation (New York: Routledge, 2000), 6.
Lorraine Dowler, “Gender, Militarization, and Sovereignty,” Geography Compass I, 6, no. 8 (2012): 490–499; Cynthia Enloe, Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000); Natalie Koch, “Security and Gendered National Identity in Uzbekistan,” Gender, Place & Culture, 18, no. 4 (August 2011): 499–518; Iris Young, “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State,” Signs, 29, no. 1 (2003): 1–25; Nira Yuval-Davis, Gender & Nation (London: Sage Publications, 1997).
Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France 1977–1978 (New York: Picador, 2007).
Peter Mandaville, Global Political Islam: International Relations of the Muslim World (New York: Routledge, 2007), 7.
See for example, Robert Bellah, “Civil Religion in America,” Daedalus, 96, no. 1 (1967): 1–21; Carlton Hayes, Nationalism: A Religion (New York: Macmillan, 1960); Mark Juergensmeyer, The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993); Mark Juergensmeyer, “Nationalism and Religion,” in Gerard Delanty and Krishan Kumar (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2006), 295–306; Conor Cruise O’Brien, God Land: Reflections on Religion and Nationalism (Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1988); Anthony D. Smith, “The ‘Sacred’ Dimension of Nationalism,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29, no. 3 (2000): 791–814.
Koch, “Security and Gendered National Identity in Uzbekistan,” 499–518; Natalie Koch, “Is Nationalism Just for Nationals? Civic Nationalism for Noncitizens and Celebrating National Day in Qatar and the uae,” Political Geography, 54 (2016).
Juan Cole and Deniz Kandiyoti, “Nationalism and the Colonial Legacy in the Middle East and Central Asia: Introduction,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34, no. 2 (2002): 197.
James Bell, “Redefining National Identity in Uzbekistan: Symbolic Tensions in Tashkent’s Official Public Landscape,” Ecumene, 6, no. 2 (1999): 183–213; Pierre Bourdieu, “Social Space and Symbolic Power,” Sociological Theory, 7, no. 1 (1989): 14–25; Denis Cosgrove, Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape (London: Croom Helm, 1984); Denis Cosgrove and Stephen Daniels, The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design, and Use of Past Environments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988); Sally Cummings, Symbolism and Power in Central Asia: Politics of the Spectacular (London: Routledge, 2010); James Duncan, The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990); Benjamin Forest, Juliet Johnson, and Karen Till, “Post-Totalitarian National Identity: Public Memory in Germany and Russia,” Social & Cultural Geography, 5, no. 3 (2004): 357–380; Geertz, Negara; Geertz, “Centers, Kings, and Charisma”; Joshua Hagen, “Architecture, Urban Planning, and Political Authority in Ludwig I’s Munich,” Journal of Urban History, 35, no. 4 (May 2009): 459–485; Joshua Hagen, “Architecture, Symbolism, and Function: The Nazi Party’s ‘Forum of the Movement’,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, no. 3 (2010): 397–424; Natalie Koch, “The Monumental and the Miniature: Imagining ‘Modernity’ in Astana,” Social & Cultural Geography, 11, no. 8 (2010): 769–787; Natalie Koch, “The Violence of Spectacle: Statist Schemes to Green the Desert and Constructing Astana and Ashgabat as Urban Oases,” Social & Cultural Geography, 16, no. 6 (2015): 675–697; Pierre Nora, Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996); Dmitri Sidorov, “National Monumentalization and the Politics of Scale: The Resurrections of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, no. 3 (2000): 548–572; Lawrence Vale, Architecture, Power, and National Identity (New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1992); Veyne, Bread and Circuses.
Herman van der Wusten, “Dictators and Their Capital Cities: Moscow and Berlin in the 1930s,” GeoJournal, 52, no. 4 (2001): 339–344.
Bülent Batuman, “Minarets without Mosques: Limits to the Urban Politics of Neo-Liberal Islamism,” Urban Studies, 50, no. 6 (May 2013): 1097–1113; Alev Çınar, “Imagined Community as Urban Reality: The Making of Ankara,” in Alev Çınar and Thomas Bender (eds.), Urban Imaginaries: Locating the Modern City (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007), 151–181; Kyle Evered, “Symbolizing a Modern Anatolia: Ankara as Capital in Turkey’s Early Republican Landscape,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, 28, no. 2 (January 2008): 326–341; Duygu Kacar, “Ankara, a Small Town, Transformed to a Nation’s Capital,” Journal of Planning History, 9, no. 1 (2010): 43–65.
Natalie Koch, “The Violence of Spectacle”; Pernilla Ouis, “‘Greening the Emirates’: The Modern Construction of Nature in the United Arab Emirates,” cultural geographies, 9, no. 3 (2002): 334–347.
Sangeetha Swaroop, “The World’s Largest Carpet: An Ode to Creativity and Exemplary Workmanship,” Al Shindagah (2008), available at: http://alshindagah.com/shindagah83/culture_2.htm (accessed January 24, 2016).
Katherine Verdery, The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 6.
Lily Kong, “Cemeteries and Columbaria, Memorials and Mausoleums: Narrative and Interpretation in the Study of Deathscapes in Geography,” Australian Geographical Studies, 37, no. 1 (1999): 1–10.
Stephen Kotkin, Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), 154.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1474 | 250 | 26 |
Full Text Views | 316 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 225 | 10 | 0 |
This article analyzes the role of mosques dedicated to the “father of the nation” under two personalistic authoritarian systems: Saparmurat Niyazov in Turkmenistan and Sheikh Zayed in the United Arab Emirates (uae). Critiquing “cult of personality” narratives as Orientalist and analytically weak, I emphasize the constructed nature of charisma, asking how such personalistic regimes produce the image of a coherent figurehead—and to what end. As a discursive device, the personalistic leader-as-icon appears in a range of authoritarian regimes, and it is materially inscribed in the symbolic landscapes to create the impression of unity among elites and the masses. To illustrate how this works, I draw on research in Turkmenistan and the uae from 2012 through 2014, including landscape analysis of two mosques memorializing the countries’ founding fathers: the Turkmenbashi Ruhy Mosque in the outskirts of Ashgabat, and the Sheikh Zayed Mosque, in the outskirts of Abu Dhabi.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1474 | 250 | 26 |
Full Text Views | 316 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 225 | 10 | 0 |