Which is the Best Model of the Universe?

in Culture and Dialogue
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Modern scientific cosmology pushes the boundaries of knowledge and the knowable. This is prompting questions on the nature of scientific knowledge, and the emergence of the new field “Philosophy of Cosmology.” One central issue is what defines a “good” model. I discuss how “good” models are conventionally chosen, and how those methods operate in data-sparse situations: enabling the implicit introduction of value judgments, which can determine inference and lead to inferential polarization, e.g., on the question of ultimate explanation. Additional dimensions for comparing models are needed. A three-legged comparison is proposed: evidence, elegance and beneficence. This explicitly considers the categories of criteria that are always at least implicitly used. A tentative path to an implementation of the proposed model comparison framework is presented. This extends the Bayesian statistical framework. Model comparison methodology is fertile ground for dialogue between the sciences and the humanities. The proposed framework might facilitate such a dialogue.

Which is the Best Model of the Universe?

in Culture and Dialogue

Sections

References

5

Norwood Russell Hanson“Is there a logic of scientific discovery?,” in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 2 (1960): 91-106.

6

George F. R Ellis“On the philosophy of cosmology,” in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2014): 5-23.

7

See Martin ReesJust Six Numbers (New York: Basic Books2001).

10

See Tom McLeishFaith & Wisdom in Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press2014).

11

See C.F. von WeizsäckerThe Relevance of Science Gifford Lectures (New York: Collins1964).

12

Amir D. AczelWhy Science Does Not Disprove God (New York: William Morrow2014).

14

Alister McGrathA Fine-Tuned Universe: The Quest for God in Science and Theology (Louisville, K: Westminster John Knox Press2009).

17

See Richard SwinburneThe Existence of God (Oxford: Clarendon Press2004).

18

See Herman PhilipseGod in the Age of Science? A Critique of Religious Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

20

See e.g. McGrathScience & Religion132.

21

John PolkinghorneBelief in God in the Age of Science (Yale: Yale University Press1998).

25

See Nicholas MaxwellFrom Knowledge to Wisdom: A Revolution for Science and the Humanities (London: Pentire Press2007); Nicholas Maxwell How Universities Can Help Create a Wiser World: The Urgent Need for an Academic Revolution (Exeter: Imprint Academic 2014).

26

John Skilling“Foundations and Algorithms,” in Bayesian Methods in Cosmologyed. Michael P. Hobson et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009).

31

Ian McGilchristThe Master and his Emissary (Yale: Yale University Press2012).

Figures

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 33 16
Full Text Views 92 92 73
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0