The Challenges to Prohibition: Opium Law, Opium Smuggling, and Chinese in the Philippines, 1910–1935
In: China and AsiaSearch for other papers by Dondy Pepito G. Ramos in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Opium was one of the issues that had to be resolved by the Americans upon their colonization of the Philippines. The debate on the potentialities of opium dates back to the Spanish colonial period, when the colonial government framed the opium issue as both economic and moral in nature. In the end, the economic potentialities of opium outweighed its moral repercussions because the Spanish colonial government allowed its regulated use among the Chinese. In contrast, the American officials in Manila crafted a progressive prohibitionist policy based on the recommendation of the investigative Opium Committee in 1905. In terms of opium in the Philippines, the majority of research has focused on the American policies on opium and their international consequences. This study focuses on the aftermath and challenges of the American prohibitionist policy from 1910 to 1935, particularly as they related to smuggling. Using archival documents such as annual reports from the governor-general of the Philippines and other government records, the paper aims to demonstrate how and in what ways opium was smuggled in the Philippines and to analyze the various motivations, reasons, and methods used by smugglers. Furthermore, the paper explores the involvement of the Chinese in various notable opium-related cases in the Philippines. I also argue that an increase in the smuggling of opium was an unwanted aftermath of the American prohibitionist policy. The present study hopes to contribute to the growing body of literature on narcotics, drug policies, and empire building.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Chu, Richard. “The ‘Chinaman’ Question: A Conundrum in U.S. Imperial Policy in the Pacific.” Kritika Kultura 7, no. 5 (2006): 5–23.
-
Chu, Richard. Chinese and Chinese Mestizos of Manila: Family, Identity, and Culture, 1860s–1930s. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
-
Comenge, Rafael. Los Chinos: Estudio Social y Politico. Manila: Tipo-Lit. de Chofre y Comp, 1894.
-
Corpuz, O. D. The Roots of the Filipino Nation. Vol. 2. Diliman, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 2006.
-
Federal Narcotic Control Board. Traffic in Opium and Other Dangerous Drugs with Respect to the Philippine Islands for the Six Months’ Period from July 1 to December 31, 1928 and for the Calendar Year 1929. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1930.
-
Federal Narcotic Control Board. Traffic in Opium and Other Dangerous Drugs for the Year Ended December 31 1937. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1938.
-
Foster, Anne. “Models for Governing Opium and Colonial Policies in Southeast Asia, 1898–1910.” In The America Colonial State in the Philippines: Global Perspectives, edited by Julian Go and Anne Foster, 92–117. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
-
Foster, Anne. “The Philippines, The United States, and the Origins of Global Narcotics Prohibition.” The Social History of Alcohol and Drugs 33, no. 1 (2019): 13–36.
-
Hurley, Vic. Jungle Patrol, the Story of the Philippine Constabulary (1901–1936). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.
-
McCoy, Alfred, and Alfredo, Roces. Philippine Cartoons: Political Caricature of the American Era, 1900–1941. Manila: Vera-Reyes, 1985.
-
McCoy, Alfred. Policing America’s Empire: The United States, the Philippines, and the Rise of Surveillance State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2009.
-
Opium Committee of 1903. Report of the Committee Appointed by Philippine Commission to Investigate the Opium and the Traffic Therein and the Rules, Ordinances, and Laws Regulating such use and Traffic in Japan, Formosa, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Saigon, Singapore, Burmah, Java, and the Philippine Islands. Washington, DC: War Department, 1905.
-
Otis, Elwell. Report of Major General Elwell S. Otis. Washington, DC: Bureau of Printing, 1902.
-
Philippine Commission. Annual Report of the Philippine Commission to the Secretary of War 1905. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1906.
-
Philippine Commission. Annual Report of the Philippine Commission to the Secretary of War 1914. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1914.
-
Philippine Commission. Annual Report of the Philippine Commission to the Secretary of War 1915. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1916.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1918. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1919.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1919. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1920.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1920. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1923.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1923. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1925.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1923. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1926.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1925. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1927.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1926. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1928.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1927. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1929.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1928. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1930.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1929. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1931.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1930. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1932a.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1931. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1932b.
-
Philippines Governor-General. Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands 1932. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1934.
-
Ramos, Dondy Pepito G., ii. “‘China’s Curse’: Racialization of Opium Use in Colonial Philippines, 1903–1908.” Philippine Sociological Review 68 (2020): 75–97.
-
Tagliacozzo, Eric. Secret Trades, Porous Borders: Smuggling and States along a Southeast Asian Frontier, 1865–1915. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press, 2008.
-
Taylor, Arnold H. “American Confrontation with Opium Traffic in the Philippines.” Pacific Historical Review 36, no. 3 (1967): 307–24.
-
United States Philippine Commission. Minutes of the Public Session of the U.S.—Philippine Commission 1902/1903. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1903.
-
Victoria, Ferdinand. “‘The Most Humane of Any That Could Be Adopted’: The Philippine Opium Committee Report and the Imagining of the Opium Consumer’s World in the Colonial Philippines, 1903–1905.” In Towards a Filipino History: A Festschrift for Zeus A. Salazar, edited by Portia L. Reyes, 88–156. Quezon City: Bagong Kasaysayan, 2015.
-
Wertz, Daniel J. P. “Idealism, Imperialism, and Internationalism: Opium Politics in the Colonial Philippines, 1898–1925.” Modern Asian Studies 47, no. 2: 467–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
-
Wickberg, Edgar. The Chinese in Philippine Life, 1850–1898. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2000.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 695 | 395 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 174 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 335 | 20 | 0 |
The Challenges to Prohibition: Opium Law, Opium Smuggling, and Chinese in the Philippines, 1910–1935
In: China and AsiaSearch for other papers by Dondy Pepito G. Ramos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Opium was one of the issues that had to be resolved by the Americans upon their colonization of the Philippines. The debate on the potentialities of opium dates back to the Spanish colonial period, when the colonial government framed the opium issue as both economic and moral in nature. In the end, the economic potentialities of opium outweighed its moral repercussions because the Spanish colonial government allowed its regulated use among the Chinese. In contrast, the American officials in Manila crafted a progressive prohibitionist policy based on the recommendation of the investigative Opium Committee in 1905. In terms of opium in the Philippines, the majority of research has focused on the American policies on opium and their international consequences. This study focuses on the aftermath and challenges of the American prohibitionist policy from 1910 to 1935, particularly as they related to smuggling. Using archival documents such as annual reports from the governor-general of the Philippines and other government records, the paper aims to demonstrate how and in what ways opium was smuggled in the Philippines and to analyze the various motivations, reasons, and methods used by smugglers. Furthermore, the paper explores the involvement of the Chinese in various notable opium-related cases in the Philippines. I also argue that an increase in the smuggling of opium was an unwanted aftermath of the American prohibitionist policy. The present study hopes to contribute to the growing body of literature on narcotics, drug policies, and empire building.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 695 | 395 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 174 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 335 | 20 | 0 |
