Genital Autonomy, Children’s Rights, and Competing Rights Claims in International Human Rights Law

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Claims that genital autonomy should be considered a human right call into question medically unnecessary genital alterations, including genital cutting of both boy and girl children, the forced or coerced circumcision of adults, and surgical alterations performed on the genitals of intersex children prior to the age of consent. To date, global norms suggest only a narrow applicability of any right to genital autonomy. International organizations, states, and non-governmental organizations increasingly condemn genital cutting of girls and women but generally tolerate both the genital cutting of boys and men and the surgical alteration of the genitals of intersex children. In examining assertions that genital autonomy should be considered a human right, the article considers competing rights claims, including religious and cultural rights, parental rights, and contending perspectives on health rights. Ultimately, this article highlights the limitations of international human rights law as a tool for promoting a right to genital autonomy.

Genital Autonomy, Children’s Rights, and Competing Rights Claims in International Human Rights Law

in The International Journal of Children's Rights

Sections

References

Abu-SahliehS.A.Male and Female Circumcision among Jews Christians and Muslims:Religious Medical Social and Legal Debate (Warren Center, PA: Shangri La Publications2001).

BaetenJ.M.ClumC. & CoatesT.J.Male circumcision and HIV benefits and risk for womenLancet 374 (2007): 182184.

ChaoA. . ‘Risk factors associated with prevalent HIV-1 infection among pregnant women in RwandaInternational Journal of Epidemiology 23 (1994): 371380.

Circumcision Reference LibraryComplications from Circumcision. Available online at: http://www.cirp.org/library/complications. [Accessed September 2 2011]

Committee on the Rights of the ChildComments and Recommendations regarding Corporal Punishment (June 2011). Available online at: http://www.endcorporalpunishment.org/pages/hrlaw/crc_session.html

DarbyR.A Surgical Temptation: The Demonization of the Foreskin and the Rise of Circumcision in Britain (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press2005).

DavisD.Male and female genital alteration: A collision course with the lawHealth Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine 11 (2011): 487570.

DeLaetD.L.The Global Struggle for Human Rights (Wadsworth Publishers2006).

DeLaetD.L.Framing male circumcision as a human rights issue? Contributions to the debate over the universality of human rightsJournal of Human Rights 8(4) (2009): 405426.

DowsettG.W. & CouchM.Male circumcision and HIV prevention: Is there really enough of the right kind of evidence?Reproductive Health Matters 15(29) (2007): 3344.

FoxM. & ThomsonM.Older minors and circumcision: Questioning the limits of religious actionsMedical Law International 9 (2008): 283310.

FoxM. & ThomsonM.HIV/AIDS and circumcision: Lost in translationJournal of Medical Ethics 36 (2010): 798801.

GershoffE.T. & BitenskyS.H.The case against corporal punishment of children: Converging evidence from social science research and international human rights law and implications for U.S. public policyPsychology Public Policy and Law 13(4) (2007): 231272.

HellstenS.K.Rationalising circumcision: From tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—Critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilationJournal of Medical Ethics 30 (2004): 248253.

HernlundY. & Shell-DuncanB.Contingency, context, and change: Negotiating female genital cutting in The Gambia and SenegalAfrica Today (2007): 4357.

KatzI.T. & WrightA.A.Circumcision—A surgical strategy for HIV prevention in AfricaNew England Journal of Medicine 359(23) (2008): 24122415.

KilkellyU.The child’s right to religious freedom in international law: The search for meaning’. In What is Right for Children?: The Competing Paradigm of Religion and Human Rights. eds. FinemanM. & WorthingtonK. (Surrey, England and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishers2009) 243268.

MackieG.Ending footbinding and infibulation: A convention accountAmerican Sociological Review 61(6) (1996): 9991017.

MgbakoC. . ‘Penetrating the silence in Sierra Leone: A blueprint for the eradication of female genital mutilationHarvard Journal of Human Rights 23 (2010): 111140.

MillettG.A. . ‘Circumcision status and risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among Men who have Sex with Men: A Meta-analysisJournal of the American Medical Association 300 (2008): 16741684.

MillsE. & SiegriedN.Cautious optimism for new HIV/AIDS prevention strategiesLancet 368(9543) (2006): 1236.

NjeuhmeliE. . ‘Voluntary medical male circumcision: Modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in Eastern and Southern AfricaPLoS Medicine 8(11) (2011): e1001132.

NussbaumM.C.Sex and Social Justice (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press1999).

ObioraL.A.Bridges and barricades: Rethinking polemics and intransigence in the campaign against female circumcisionCase Western Reserve Law Review 47(2) (1997): 275378.

RevazC.R.An introduction to the U.N. convention on the rights of the child’. In The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: An Analysis of Treaty Provisions and Implications of U.S. Ratification. eds. TodresJ.W.WojcikM.E. & RevazC.R. (Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoof Publishers2006) 917.

Royal Dutch Medical AssociationNon-therapeutic Circumcision of Male Minors Position Paper (2010).

SaratA.The unsettled states of human rights: An introduction’. In Human Rights: Concepts Contests Contingencies. eds. SaratA. & KearneyT.R. (Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press2002) 1033.

Shell-DuncanB.ObieroW.O. & MuruliL.A.Women without choices: The debate over medicalization of female genital cutting and its impact on a Northern Kenyan Community’. In Female ‘Circumcision’ in Africa: Culture Controversy and Change. eds. Shell-DuncanB. & HernlundY. (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers2000) 109128.

SlackA.T.Female circumcision: A critical appraisalHuman Rights Quarterly 10(4) (1988): 437486.

SullivanN.“The price to pay for our common good’: Genital modification and the somatechnologies of Cultural (In)DifferenceSocial Semiotics 17(3) (2007): 395409.

SvobodaJ.S. & DarbyR.A rose by any other name: Symmetry and asymmetry in male and female genital cutting’. In Fearful Symmetries: Essays and Testimonies Around Excision and Circumcision. ed. ZabusC. (Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi2008).

The United Nations Children’s FundProgress for Children: A Report Card on Child Protection No. 8 (2009). Available online at: http://www.unicefusa.org/news/publications/progress-for-children/Progress_for_Children-No-8_EN_081309.pdf

TodresJ.W.Analyzing the opposition to U.S. ratification of the U.N. convention on the rights of the child’. In The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: An Analysis of Treaty Provisions and Implications of U.S. Ratification. eds. TodresJ.W.WojcikM.E. & RevazC.R. (Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoof Publishers2006) 1932.

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human RightsHarmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children (2005) Fact Sheet. Available online at: http://www.unhchr.cn/html/menn6/2/fs23.htm

United Nations Population FundPromoting Gender Equality: Frequently Asked Questions on Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting (2012). Available online at: http://www.unfpa.org/gender/practices2.htm#21. (Accessed 27 May 2012.)

VeermanP. & SandC.Religion and children’s rightsThe International Journal of Children’s Rights 7(4) (1999): 385393.

WawerM.J. . ‘Circumcision in HIV-infected men and its effect in HIV transmission to female partners in Rakai, Uganda: A randomised controlled trialLancet 374 (2009): 229237.

WoodhouseB.B.The family-supportive nature of the U.N. convention on the rights of the child’. In The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: An Analysis of Treaty Provisions and Implications of U.S. Ratification. eds. TodresJ.W.WojcikM.E. & RevazC.R. (Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2006) 3750.

WoodhouseB.B. & JohnsonK.A.The United Nations convention on the rights of the child: Empowering parents to protect their children’s rights’. In What is Right for Children?: The Competing Paradigm of Religion and Human Rights. eds. FinemanM. & WorthingtonK. (Surrey, England and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishers2009) 718.

World Health OrganizationFemale Genital Mutilation (2010) Fact Sheet No. 241. Available online at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en

3)

The Associated Press‘California Bill Seeks Statewide Rules on Male Circumcision after Effort to Ban it in San Francisco,’ The Washington Post 23 August 2011.

4)

Monica Almeida‘Efforts to ban Circumcision Gain Traction in California,’ The New York Times 4 June 2011.

7)

Tracy McVeigh and Tara Sutton‘British Girls undergo Horror of Genital Mutilation Despite Tough Laws,’ The Observer 25 July 2010.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 12
Full Text Views 33 33 23
PDF Downloads 6 6 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0