International Models of Child Participation in Family Law Proceedings following Parental Separation / Divorce

In: The International Journal of Children's Rights
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Otago, New Zealand
  • 2 Southern Cross University, Australia
  • 3 Stricks Law School
  • 4 TATA Institute of Social Science, India
  • 5 Southern Cross University, Australia

This article reports on the findings of a 2009 survey conducted under the auspices of the Childwatch International Research Network about how children’s participation rights, as set out in Articles 12 and 13 of the UNCRC, are respected in private family law proceedings internationally. Court-based and alternative dispute resolution processes and the roles of relevant professionals engaged in child-inclusive practices are considered, as well as religious, indigenous and customary law methods of engaging with children. The findings from the 13 participating countries confirm an increasing international commitment to enhancing children’s participation in family law decision-making, but depict a wide variety of approaches being used to achieve this. Case studies from Australia, India, Israel and New Zealand are included to illustrate differing models of children’s participation currently in use in decision-making processes following parental separation.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, Family Characteristics and Transitions (Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006–2007).

  • Bajpai A., Child Rights in India: Law, Policy and Practice (India: OUP, 2006).

  • Bandhopadhyay P.K., ‘Family courts in Rajasthan’, Central India Law Quarterly 5(2) (1992): 254.

  • Baroness Hale of Richmond, ‘Children’s participation in family law decision-making: Lessons from abroad’, Australian Journal of Family Law 20(2) (2006): 119126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boshier P., The Child’s Voice in Process: Which Way is Forward? Speech by the Principal Family Court Judge to the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Annual Conference, New Orleans, USA, 29 May 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boshier P., , Taylor N.J., & Seymour F., ‘Early intervention in New Zealand Family court cases’, Family Court Review 49(4) (2011): 818830.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cairns L., , ‘Participation with purpose’. In Children, Young People and Social Inclusion: Participation for What?. eds. Tisdall E.K.M., , Davis J.M., , Hill M. (Bristol: The Policy Press, 2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Vaus D., Diversity and Change in Australian Families: Statistical Profiles (2004). Retrieved 1 June 2010, from http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/diversity/DiversityAndChange.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldson J., ‘Hello, I’m a Voice, Let Me Talk’ - Child-inclusive Mediation in Family Separation (Wellington: Families Commission Innovative Practice Report No. 1/06, 2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldson J., & Taylor N.J., ‘Child-inclusion in dispute resolution in the New Zealand Family Court’, New Zealand Family Law Journal 6(7) (2009): 201209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gollop M., , Smith A.B., & Taylor N.J., ‘Children’s involvement in custody and access arrangements after parental separation’, Child and Family Law Quarterly 12(4) (2000): 383399.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graham A., ‘Life is like the seasons: Responding to change, loss and grief through a peer based education program’, Childhood Education 80(6) (2004): 317322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graham A., & Fitzgerald R., ‘Exploring the promises and possibilities for children’s participation in family relationship centres’, Family Matters 84 (2010): 5360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henaghan, R.M., ‘Why judges need to know and understand childhood studies’. In Law and Childhood Studies. ed. M. Freeman (Current Legal Issues, volume 14, London: Oxford University Press, in press).

  • Honig M., , ‘How is the child constituted in childhood studies?’. In The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies. eds. Qvortrup J., , Corsaro W., & Honig M. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Humphreys C., , Houghton C., & Ellis J., Literature Review: Better Outcomes for Children and Young People Experiencing Domestic Abuse (Scottish Government, June 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • James A.L., ‘Competition or Integration? The next step in childhood studies?Childhood 17(4) (2010): 485499.

  • Kiernan K., Cohabitation and Divorce across Nations and Generations (London: London School of Economics and Political Science, 2003).

  • Lansdown G., The Evolving Capacities of the Child (Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Centre, 2005).

  • Lansdown G., , ‘The realisation of children’s participation rights’. In A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation: Perspectives from Theory and Practice. eds. Percy-Smith B., & Thomas N. (London: Routledge, 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McIntosh J., , Wells Y., & Long C., ‘Child-focused and child-inclusive family dispute resolution: One year findings from a prospective study of outcomes’, Journal of Family Studies 13(1) (2007): 825.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Melton G., Background for a General Comment on the Right to Participate: Article 12 and Related Provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Prepared for use by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, September 2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monk D., , ‘Children and the law’. In An Introduction to Childhood Studies (2nd ed.). ed. Kehily M.J. (Berkshire: Open University Press, 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morag T., , Rivkin D., & Sorek Y., ‘Child participation in the family courts – lessons from the Israeli Pilot project’, The International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family (2012) 26(1): 130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mill I., ‘Conversations with children: A judge’s perspective on meeting the patient before operating on the family’, New Zealand Family Law Journal 6(3) (2008): 7279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newell S., , Graham A., & Fitzgerald R., ‘Results of an International Survey Regarding Children’s Participation in Decision-Making Following Parental Separation’, Report to the Childwatch International Research Network’s Children and the Law Thematic Study Group, (Australia: Centre for Children and Young People, Southern Cross University, November 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parkinson P., & Cashmore J., The Voice of a Child in Family Law Disputes (London: Oxford University Press, 2008).

  • Percy-Smith B., & Thomas N., eds., A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation (London: Routledge, 2010).

  • Practice Note: Lawyer for the Child: Code of Conduct (issued by the New Zealand Principal Family Court Judge, 24 March 2011).

  • Prout A., & James A., , ‘A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems’. In Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. ed. James A., & Prout A. (London: Falmer Press, 1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pryor J., & Rodgers B., Children in Changing Families: Life after Parental Separation (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001).

  • Schuz R., ‘The right of the child to participate: Theory v Practice in the family courts’ (in Hebrew), The Family in Law (2) (2008): 207271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shochetman E., ‘Consideration of the wishes of a minor in child custody cases’ (in Hebrew), Netanya Law Review 4 (2005): 545.

  • Smart C., , Neale B., & Wade A., The Changing Experience of Childhood (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).

  • Smith A.B., ‘Interpreting and supporting participation rights: Contributions from sociocultural theory’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 10(1) (2002): 7388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith A.B., , Taylor N.J., & Gollop M.M., eds., Children’s Voices: Research, Policy and Practice (Auckland: Pearson Education, 2000).

  • Smith A.B., , Taylor N.J., & Tapp P., ‘Rethinking children’s involvement in decision-making after parental separation’, Childhood 10(2) (2003): 201216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor N.J., ‘The voice of children in family law’, Children’s Legal Rights Journal 18(1) (1998): 214.

  • Taylor N.J., Care of Children: Families, Dispute Resolution and the Family Court (Dunedin: University of Otago PhD thesis, 2005).

  • Taylor N.J., ‘What do we know about involving children and young people in family law decision-making? A research update’, Australian Journal of Family Law 20(2) (2006a): 154178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor N.J., ‘Establishment of the New Zealand Family Court’, New Zealand Family Law Journal 5(7) (2006b): 169180.

  • Taylor N.J., & Gollop M., Children’s Participation in Family Law Proceedings, Research Report for the Childwatch International Children and the Law Study Group (Dunedin: University of Otago Children’s Issues Centre, May 2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor N.J., , Tapp P., & Henaghan R.M., ‘Respecting children’s participation in family law proceedings’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 15(1) (2007): 6182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Théry I., ‘The “Interest of the Child” and the regulation of the post divorce family’, International Journal of Sociology of Law 14 (1985): 341358.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tisdall E.K.M., , Bray R., , Marshall K., ‘Children’s participation in family law proceedings: A step too far or a step too small?’, Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 26(1) (2004): 1733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNICEF, Fact sheet: The right to participation. (2008a). Retrieved 26 June 2011, from http://www.unicef.org/crc/files/Right-to-Participation.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNICEF Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retreived 26 June 2011, from http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30177.html.

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. General Comment No. 12: The Right of the Child to be Heard (Geneva: CRC/C/GC/12, 1 July 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodhead M., , ‘Childhood studies: Past, present and future’. In An Introduction to Childhood Studies (2nd ed). ed. Kehily M. (London: Open University Press, 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Young L., , ‘Children and ‘Family Law”. In Children and the Law in Australia. eds. Monahan G., & Young L. (Sydney: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24)

    Section 26, Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 352 210 11
Full Text Views 288 53 3
PDF Downloads 92 56 7