Authors of their own lives? Children, Contracts, their Responsibilities, Rights and Citizenship

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article explores contract theory and suggests that a focus on contracts provides an understanding of what it is to be human and the concomitant rights that spring from this. Thus despite children being a ‘special case’ and requiring higher levels of protection and intervention than adults, this always remains a gift that does not have the clarity or effectiveness that contracts provide. While retaining a constant critical distance attention to children’s ‘ability’ to write contracts illustrates in a clear way the evolving capacities of the child and the graduated way in which children are expected to gain responsibilities. This more complex and contested formulation of rights tends to be embedded in specific case laws at a local level, in direct contrast to the more abstract forms of rights that may present all children as vulnerable and lacking. Though the prism of contracts, a perspective to wider economic inequalities is enabled in a manner that may give us a different approach to issues such as consumerism.

Authors of their own lives? Children, Contracts, their Responsibilities, Rights and Citizenship

in The International Journal of Children's Rights

Sections

References

ClaytonM.Consent in children: Legal and ethical issuesJournal of Child Health Care 4(2) (2000): 7881.

CockburnT. & CleaverF.How Children and Young People Win Friends and Influence Others: Children and Young People’s Association their Opportunities Strategies and Obstacles. A report to inform the inquiry into the Future of Civil Society in the UK and Ireland. Summer 2009. (London: Carnegie UK Trust2009).

CookD.The dichotomous child in and of commercial cultureChildhood 12(2) (2005): 155159.

CookD.Children as consumers’. In The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies. eds. QvortrupJ.CorsaroW. & HönigM. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan2009).

CunninghamH.Children and Childhood in Western Society Since 1500 (London: Longman1995).

DCSFThe Composition of Schools in England (London: Department of Children, Schools and Families2007).

EngleP.Comparative Policy Implications of Children’s Rights in United Nations Committee on the Rights of Child United Nations’ Children’s Fund and ‘Implementing Child Rights in Early Childhood’: A Guide to General Comment 7. Implementing Child Rights in Early Childhood (The Hague: Bernard van leer Foundation2006).

Esping-AndersenG.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity1990).

FundudisT.Consent issues in Medico-Legal proceduresChild and Adolescent Mental Health 8(1) (2003): 1822.

HoldsworthW.History of English Law (London: Sweet and Maxwell1938).

HollandS. et al. ‘Democratising the family and the state? The case of family group conferences in child welfareJournal of Social Policy 34(1) (2005): 5977.

JonesP. & WelchS.Rethinking Children’s Rights (London: Continuum2010).

LansdownG.The Evolving Capacities of the Child (Geneva: UNICEF, Innocenti Research Centre2005).

LockeJ.Two Treatises of Government (London: Everyman1690/1986).

MartensL.SouthertonD. & ScottS.Bringing children into the sociology of consumptionJournal of Consumer Culture 4(2) (2004): 155182.

MarshallT.H.Citizenship and Social Class (London: Pluto1950/1992).

MayallB.Generational relations at family level’. In The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies. eds. QvortrupJ.CorsaroW. & HönigM.(Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan2009) 175187.

McKendrickE.Contract Law (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan2011).

NairnA.Child Well-being in the UK Spain and Sweden: The Role of Inequality and Materialism (York: UNICEF/IPSOS MORI2011).

O’NeillJ.The Missing Child in Liberal Theory: Towards a Covenant Theory of Family Community Welfare and the Civic State (Toronto: University of Toronto Press1994).

PatemanC.The Sexual Contract (Cambridge: Polity1988).

PereraA.Can i decide please? The state of children’s consent in the UKEuropean Journal of Health Law 15 (2008): 411420.

PetersonM.The Jinn and the computer: Consumption and identity in Arabic Children’s MagazinesChildhood 12(2) (2005): 177200.

PilcherJ.No logo? Children’s consumption and fashionChildhood 18(1) (2011): 128141.

PostmanN.The Disappearance of Childhood (New York: Laurel1982).

RawlsJ.A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press1972).

RawlsJ.Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press1993).

RedmondG.Children as actors: How does the child perspectives literature treat agency in the context of poverty?Social Policy and Society 8(4) (2009): 541550.

SaundersP.Consumption sector cleavagesSociety and Space 4(2) (1986): 155163.

SuchE. & WalkerR.Journal of Social Policy 34(1) (2005): 3957.

WilkinsonR. & PickettK.The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better (London: Allen Lane2009).

VandenbrouckeF. & VleminckxK.Disappointing poverty trends: Is the social investment state to blame?Journal of European Social Policy 21(5) (2011): 450471.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 14 14 5
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0