Save

Control, Protection and Rights

A Critical Review of Peru’s Begging Bill

In: The International Journal of Children's Rights
Author: Dena Aufseeser1
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Geography and Environmental Systems University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA, daufsee@umbc.edu
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

In this article, I critically examine Peru’s Law to Protect Minors from situations of Begging. I consider the way in which a language of children’s rights is ironically invoked to justify the physical removal and criminalization of children working in public spaces by appeals to very specific understandings of childhood, parenting, and space. Despite the law’s formal emphasis on protection, I suggest it is more concerned with social control and containment than children’s actual well-being. As such, it fails to reflect the basic principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child to which Peru has committed. However, because the crc is subject to multiple interpretations, it also serves as a potential resource to counter repressive legislation such as the Begging Bill. The article is based on 14 months of field work in Peru and over 100 interviews with policy makers, government officials, educators, and street children themselves, among others.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 307 87 0
Full Text Views 178 7 0
PDF Views & Downloads 51 24 1