Save

What Inequality means for Children

Evidence from Young Lives

In: The International Journal of Children's Rights
Authors:
Martin Woodhead Associate Research Director of Young Lives at University of Oxford Emeritus Professor of Childhood Studies at the Open University, UK, martin.woodhead@qeh.ox.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Martin Woodhead in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul Dornan Senior Policy Officer for Young Lives; Department of International Development, University of Oxford, paul.dornan@qeh.ox.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Paul Dornan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Helen Murray Programme Manager, Open Society Foundations, UK previously Young Lives Policy Officer, UK, helen.murray@opensocietyfoundations.org

Search for other papers by Helen Murray in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Understanding how poverty and inequalities impact on children is the major goal of Young Lives, a unique longitudinal, mixed-methods study. Two cohorts totaling 12,000 children are being tracked since 2001, growing-up in Ethiopia, the state of Andhra Pradesh (ap) India, Peru and Vietnam. Earlier versions of this paper were prepared as Young Lives contribution to a unicef/un Women consultation on the post-2015 Development agenda (www.worldwewant2015.org/inequalities) and published as Woodhead, Dornan and Murray (2013).

We summarise Young Lives evidence to date on eight research issues that are central to any child rights agenda:

  1. 1. How inequalities interact in their impact on children’s development and the vulnerability of the most disadvantaged households.
  2. 2. The ways inequalities rapidly undermine the development of human potential.
  3. 3. How gender differences interconnect with other inequalities, but do not always advantage boys in Young Lives countries.
  4. 4. The links between poverty, early ‘stunting’, and later outcomes, including psycho-social functioning, as well as emerging evidence that some children recover.
  5. 5. Inequalities that open up during the later years of childhood, linked to transitions around leaving school, working, and anticipating marriage etc.
  6. 6. Children’s own perceptions of poverty and inequality, as these shape their well-being and long-term prospects.
  7. 7. Evidence of the growing significance of education, including the ways school systems can increase as well as reduce inequalities.
  8. 8. The potential of social protection programmes in poverty alleviation.

We conclude that since inequalities are multidimensional, so too must be the response. Equitable growth policies, education and health services, underpinned by effective social protection, all have a role to play.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1341 258 34
Full Text Views 409 33 1
PDF Views & Downloads 332 52 3