Children’s engagement with online technologies may seem second nature, yet the impact that the Internet has on their lives is shaped by a powerful public policy agenda that largely overlooks children’s interests. Australia’s digital policy framework is dominated by discourses of safety and risk on the one hand and, on the other, neoliberal arguments about the possibilities for economic growth offered by e-commerce. In the midst of such powerful discourses it is difficult for children’s voices to be heard. This paper offers a close textual analysis of the Australian public policy context for regulating cyberspace. Finding a discursive duopoly that overlooks children’s interests, the author identifies two key features of a rights-based approach to challenge the dominant narratives currently serving the interests of the private sector and the State.
Australian Communications and Media AuthorityCyber[Smart] (undated) at http://www.cybersmart.gov.au/.
Australian Crime Commission Submission to the Joint Select Committee On Cyber-Safety (2012) at http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=jscc/senior_australians/subs.htm.
Australian Federal Police ‘Response to the Public Discussion Paper: Connecting with confidence: optimising Australia’s Digital future’ (2011).
Australian Human Rights Commission Media Release ‘BackMeUp anti-cyberbullying campaign exceeds expectations’ (2012) at http://www.hreoc.gov.au/about/media/media_releases/2012/63_12.html.
Australian Human Rights Commission Media Release ‘Something in Common’ (2013) at http://somethingincommon.gov.au/backmeup.
Australian Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Cyber-Safety ‘Terms of Reference: Inquiry into Cyber-Safety for Senior Australians’ (2010) at http://aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=/jscc/senior_australians/tor.htm.
Australian Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Cyber-SafetyHigh-Wire Act: Cyber-safety and the Young (CanberraCommonwealth of Australia2011).
Bluett-BoydN.FilebornB.QuadaraA. & MooreS.The role of emerging communication technologies in experiences of sexual violence: A new legal frontier? (MelbourneAustralian Institute of Family Studies2013).
GearyB.Office of the Child Safety Commissioner Submission to the Australian Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Cyber-Safety (2011b) at http://ccyp.vic.gov.au/childsafetycommissioner/downloads/submission-cyber-safety-senate-inquiry.pdf.
KaneD. Director Corporate Security and Investigations/Officer of Internet Trust and Safety Telstra Corporation Transcript of Evidence for the Joint Select Committee on Cyber-Safety (8 July 2011) at http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=jscc/hearings.htm.
KehilyM. J.An Introduction to Childhood Studies (New York: Open University Press2008).
LivingstoneS. ‘Regulating the Internet in the interests of children: Emerging British, European and international approaches’. In The handbook on global media and communication policy. eds. R. Mansell & M. Raboy (Chichester: Wiley 2011a): 505–524.
LivingstoneS. et al. Risks and safety on the Internet: the perspectives of European children: full findings and policy implications from the eu Kids Online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. (London: London School of Economics and Political Science2011b).
PhairN. quoted in ‘Facebook accused of being lax on child porn’. The Age (21 August 2012) at http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/facebook-accused-of-being-lax-on-child-porn-20120820-24i5v.html#ixzz247y3WFhD.
United NationsUnited Nations Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography. un gaor 54th sess Agenda Item 116 a un Doc A/res/54/263 (25 May 2000).
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the ChildGeneral Comment No. 5: General measures of implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child 34th sess un Doc crc/gc/2003/5 (19 September – 3 October 2003).
United Nations Human Rights CouncilThe Promotion protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internetun hrc 20th sess Agenda Item 3 un Doc A/hrc/ 20/L.13 of (5 July 2012).
Issued in November1999at a meeting organised by the Norwegian government and the United Nations Children’s Fund (unicef) the Oslo challenge charges that children’s rights be respected by all involved in children’s relationship to the media (unicef 1999).