A Children’s Rights Perspective on the Participation of Juvenile Defendants in the Youth Court
In: The International Journal of Children's RightsAccording to international children’s rights law and standards, juvenile defendants should be given the opportunity to be heard in juvenile justice proceedings. Moreover, from developmental psychological research it can be concluded that young people who appear in court usually have a limited understanding of judicial procedures. Therefore, it is argued that juveniles need to be assisted in giving their views and in understanding juvenile justice proceedings. Insights from the children’s rights and the developmental psychological perspective are taken as starting points in this study to formulate requirements for the effective participation of juvenile defendants. Moreover, this article presents an overview of youth court practices in 11 European countries in order to analyse the extent to which the requirements are fulfilled in practice.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abramson B., , “ Juvenile justice: The ‘unwanted child’. Why the potential of the Convention on the Rights of the Child is not being realised, and what we can do about it” in Juvenile Law Violators, Human Rights, and the Development of New Juvenile Justice Systems, eds. Jensen E.L., and Jepsen J. (Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing, 2006) 15–38.
-
Aebersold P., Schweizerisches Jugendstrafrecht (Bern: Stämpfli Publishing Ltd, 2011).
-
Archard D., and Skivenes M., “ Hearing the child”, Child and Family Social Work 14(4) (2009): 391–399.
-
Bueren van G., The International Law on the Rights of the Child (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Brill | Nijhoff, 1995).
-
Burman M., et al., “ Scotland” in Juvenile Justice Systems in Europe, eds. Dünke F.l et al. (Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg, 2010) 1149–1194.
-
Buss E., , “ The role of lawyers in promoting juveniles’ competence as defendants” in Youth on Trial. Developmental Perspectives on Juvenile Justice, eds. Grisso T., and Schwartz R.G. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000) 243–265.
-
Cantwell N., , “ The origins, development and significance of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child” in The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. A guide to the “Travaux préparatoires”, ed. Detrick S. (Dordrecht: Brill | Nijhoff, 1992) 19–30.
-
Cashmore J., and Parkinson P., “ What responsibilities do courts have to hear children’s voices?”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 15(1) (2007): 43– 60.
-
Cipriani D., Children’s rights and the minimum age of criminal responsibility – a global perspective (Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate, 2009).
-
Cooper D.K., “ Juveniles’ understanding of trial-related information: Are they competent defendants?”, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 15(2) (1997): 167–180.
-
Council of Europe, Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Child-Friendly Justice, (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 November 2010 at the 1098th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies), (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2010).
-
Delfos M.F., Ik heb ook wat te vertellen! Communiceren met pubers en Adolescenten (Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SWP, 2005).
-
Dohrn B., , “ Last resort, dignity and re-integration. Infusing ‘best interests of the child’ with substantive and procedural rights in juvenile justice” in Rechten van het kind in (inter)nationaal perspectief, eds. Bruning M., and Ruitenberg G. (Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SWP, 2005) 90– 102.
-
Driver C., and Brank E.M., “ Juveniles’ knowledge of the court process: results from instruction from an electronic source”, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 27(4) (2009): 627–642.
-
Fitzgerald R.et al., “Children’s participation as a struggle over recognition” in A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation. Perspectives from Theory and Practice, eds. B. Percy-Smith and N. Thomas (Hoboken: Routledge, 2009) 293–305.
-
Freeman M., “ Why it remains important to take children’s rights seriously”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 15(1) (2007): 5–23.
-
Freeman M., “ The best interests of the child? Is the best interests of the child in the best interests of children?”, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 11(3) (1997): 360–388.
-
Goldson B., and Muncie J., “ Towards a global ‘child friendly’ juvenile justice?”, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 40(1) (2012): 47–64.
-
Griffiths A., and Kandel R.F., “ Hearing children in children’s hearings”, Child and Family Law Quarterly 12(3) (2000): 283–99.
-
Grisso T., , “ What we know about youths’ capacities as trial defendants” in Youth on Trial. Developmental Perspectives on Juvenile Justice, eEds. Grisso T., and Schwartz R.G. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000) 139–171.
-
Grisso T. et al., “ Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants”, Law and Human Behavior 27(4) (2003): 333–363.
-
Hepping K., and Weijers I., Effectieve ouderparticipatie in het jeugdstrafproces. De Utrechtse pilot Versterken Betrokkenheid Ouders (Amsterdam: swp, 2011).
-
Kilbrandon Committee, Children and young persons Scotland. Report by the Committee by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty (Edinburgh: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1964).
-
Kilkelly U., Listening to children about justice: Report of the Council of Europe consultation with children on child-friendly justice (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2010).
-
Kilkelly U., “ Youth justice and children’s rights: Measuring compliance with international standards” Youth Justice 8(3) (2008): 187–192.
-
Kilkelly U., and Donnelly M., “ Participation in healthcare: the views and experiences of children and young people”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 19(1) (2011): 107–125.
-
Krappmann L., “ The weight of the child’s view (Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 18(4) (2010): 501–513.
-
Lansdown G., The evolving capacities of the child (Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2005).
-
Liefaard T., Deprivation of liberty of children in light of international human rights law and standards (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008).
-
Lundy L., “ ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, British Educational Research Journal 33(6) (2007): 927–942.
-
Plotnikoff J., and Woolfson R., Young defendants’ pack: scoping study for the Youth Justice Board (London: Youth Justice Board, 2002).
-
Rap, S.E. , The participation of juvenile defendants in the youth court. A comparative study of juvenile justice procedures in Europe (Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 2013).
-
Saywitz K., , Camparo L. B., and Romanoff A., “ Interviewing children in custody cases: Implications of research and policy for practice”, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 28(4) (2010): 542–562.
-
Scott E.S., and Steinberg L., Rethinking Juvenile Justice (Boston: Harvard University Press, 2008).
-
Sloth-Nielsen J., The role of international law in juvenile justice reform in South Africa, (Bellville: University of the Western Cape, 2001) .
-
Sinclair R., “ Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and Sustainable”, Children & Society 18(2) (2004): 106–118.
-
Thomas N. ‘“ Towards a theory of children’s participation”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 15(2) (2007): 199–218.
-
un Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 12 (2009), The right of the child to be heard, crc/c/gc/12.
-
un Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 10 (2007), Children’s rights in juvenile justice, crc/c/gc/10.
-
un Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 5 (2003), General Measures of Implementation for the Convention on the Rights of the Child (arts. 4, 42 and 44, para. 6), crc/gc/2003/5.
-
un Committee on the Rights of the Child (1996), General guidelines for periodic reports, crc/C/58.
-
Weidkuhn U., Jugendstrafrecht und Kinderrechte. Betrachtung des Schweizerischen Jugendstrafrechts im Lichte der Internationalen Rechte des Kindes und im Vergleich zu Südafrika (Zürich: Schulthess Juristische Medien, ag, 2009).
-
Weijers I., and Grisso T., , “ Criminal Responsibility of Adolescents: Youth as Junior Citizenship” in Reforming Juvenile Justice, eds. Junger-Tas J., and Dünkel F. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009) 45–67.
-
Winter, M. de, Kroneman M., and Baerveldt C. “ The social education gap. Report of a Dutch peer-consultation project on family policy”, British Journal of Social Work 29(6) (1999): 903–914.
-
Winter, M. de and Noom M. J., “ Iemand die je gewoon als mens behandelt. Thuisloze jongeren over het verbeteren van de hulpverlening”, Pedagogiek 21(4) (2001): 296–309.
-
5
ECtHR, 16 December 1999, Appl. no. 24724/94 (Case of T. v. the United Kingdom).
-
6
ECtHR, 15 June 2004, Appl. no. 60958/00 (Case of s.c. v. the United Kingdom).
-
7
ECtHR, 20 April 2009, Appl. no. 70337/01 (Case of Güveç v. Turkey).
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 568 | 129 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 441 | 41 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 405 | 107 | 9 |
A Children’s Rights Perspective on the Participation of Juvenile Defendants in the Youth Court
In: The International Journal of Children's RightsAccording to international children’s rights law and standards, juvenile defendants should be given the opportunity to be heard in juvenile justice proceedings. Moreover, from developmental psychological research it can be concluded that young people who appear in court usually have a limited understanding of judicial procedures. Therefore, it is argued that juveniles need to be assisted in giving their views and in understanding juvenile justice proceedings. Insights from the children’s rights and the developmental psychological perspective are taken as starting points in this study to formulate requirements for the effective participation of juvenile defendants. Moreover, this article presents an overview of youth court practices in 11 European countries in order to analyse the extent to which the requirements are fulfilled in practice.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 568 | 129 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 441 | 41 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 405 | 107 | 9 |