The Draft cdc Circumcision Recommendations: Medical, Ethical, Legal, and Procedural Concerns

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“cdc”) is poised to recommend that physicians counsel the parents of every newborn boy and heterosexually active adolescent and man in the United States – approximately 36 million boys and men – that the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks, that parents should take non-medical factors into account in making the “circumcision decision”, and that Medicaid should pay for it.

The draft cdc recommendations are not medically correct, ethically sound, legally permissible or procedurally valid. Accordingly, they should not be implemented and would be legally invalid if they are. They provide erroneous and misleading advice to physicians that exposes them to the threat of lawsuits by men and parents. The cdc must revise its draft guidelines to comport with the correct and prevailing view in the Western world that circumcision is on balance deleterious to health; that men have the right to make the “circumcision decision” for themselves; that physicians are not permitted to circumcise healthy boys; and that it is unlawful to use Medicaid to pay for unnecessary surgery.

The Draft cdc Circumcision Recommendations: Medical, Ethical, Legal, and Procedural Concerns

in The International Journal of Children's Rights

Sections

References

cdc Background Materials. Background Methods and Synthesis of Scientific Information Used to Inform the “Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and Parents Regarding Male Circumcision and the Prevention of hiv infection stis and other Health Outcomes”: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=cdc-2014-0012-0002.

FrischM. et alCultural BiasCultural bias in the aap’s technical report and policy statement on male circumcision”Pediatrics131 (2013): 796800 (Criteria for Preventive Medicine).

Draft cdc Recommendations. Draft cdc Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and Parents Regarding Male Circumcision and the Prevention of hiv Infection stis and Other Health Outcomes: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=cdc-2014-0012.

KupferschmidC. et alEuropean cdc CritiqueCommentary on the cdc “Recommendations for providers counseling male patients and parents regarding male circumcision and the prevention of hiv infection stis and other health outcome (2015): http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=cdc-2014-0012-2455.

Peer Review Plan. Peer Review Plan For Draft cdc Recommendations and The Background Methods and Synthesis of Scientific Information Used to Inform the Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients And Parents regarding Male Circumcision in the Prevention of hiv Infection stis and Other Health Outcomes: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/policies/mcrecs_PeerReviewPlan.pdf.

Public Comments on Proposed cdc Circumcision Guidelines: http://cdc.intactivist.net/.

Van HoweR. S.Van Howe Peer ReviewA cdc-requested, Evidence-based Critique of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014 Draft on Male Circumcision: How Ideology and Selective Science Lead to Superficial, Culturally-biased Recommendations by the cdc ” (2015).

1999 ama Circumcision Report. Council on Scientific Affairs. Report 10: Neonatal circumcision. Chicago: American Medical Association1999.

1999 Hammond Poll. The National Organization to Halt the Abuse and Routine Mutilation of Males (noharmm) sent a survey to individuals who had previously contacted organisations opposed to circumcision. T. Hammond “Preliminary Poll of Men Circumcised in Infancy or Childhoodbju International 83 Supp. 18592 (1999): http://www.noharmm.org/bju.htm.

aap Policy 2012American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision Policy Statement Pediatrics 130 no. 3 (2012): 585586.

aap Technical Report 2012Technical Report Male Circumcision Task Force on Circumcision Pediatrics vol. 130 No. 3 1 September 2012 e756e785: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756.

aids.gov. aids.gov Lower Your Sexual Risk of hiv (“Anal sex is the highest-risk sexual activity for hiv transmission”).

Bossio et al. (2014) (Bossio Review) “A review of the current state of the male circumcision literatureThe Journal of Sexual Medicine11(12) 28472864 at 2853.

Boyle et al. (Boyle and Hill) “Sub-Saharan randomised clinic trials into male circumcision and hiv transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns” 19 J. Law. Med. 316334 (2011).

Boyle Psychosexual Sequelae (Boyle et al.) “Male circumcision: Pain, trauma and psychosexual sequelaeJ. Health Psychol. 2002; 7: 329343.

ColdC. J. and TaylorJ. R. (Cold and Taylor) “The prepucebju Int 1999; 83 Suppl. 1:3444.

BundickS. (Bundick Critique) “Promoting infant male circumcision to reduce transmission of hiv: A flawed policy for the us Health and Human Rights Journal (31 August 2009).

Canadian Paediatric SocietyCanadian Paediatric Society Circumcision: Information for Parents (November 2004).

Christakis et al. “A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcisionPediatrics2000; 105(1 Pt. 3): 246249.

Doctors Opposing Circumcision (doc Critique) Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics 2012 Circumcision Policy Statement: http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/pdf/2013-04-24_Commentary.pdf.

PositionDutch: Royal Dutch Medical Association Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors (2010).

FrischM. and SimonsenJ. (Frisch Autism) “Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in DenmarkJ. R. Soc. Med. (8 January 2015).

Garber.S. T.The Circular Cut: Problematizing the Longevity of Civilization’s Most Aggressively Defended AmputationWesleyan University Thesis (2013).

German Critique: http://www.intactamerica.org/german_pediatrics_statement (translated).

Johns Hopkins Medicine News and Publications As Circumcision Wounds Heal hiv-Positive Men May Spread Virus To Female PartnersStudy Shows (28 April 2015).

JoudiM. et al (Joudi Meatal Stenosis) “Incidence of asymptomatic meatal stenosis in children following neonatal circumcisionJ. Pediatr. Urol. 7(5): 526528 (2011).

LearmanL.A.Neonatal circumcision: a dispassionate analysis”Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.1999; 42(4):849859.

Richters et al. “Are Condoms the Right Size(s)? A Method for Self-Measurement of the Erect PenisVenereology Vol. 8 no. 2 (1995).

SorrellsM. L.SnyderJ. L.ReissM. D. et al. (Sorrells Fine-Touch) “Fine-Touch Pressure Thresholds in the Adult Penis”bju International99 (2007): 864869 864.

Taddio et al. (Taddio Vaccination) “Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccinationThe Lancet 1997; 349(9052):599–603 (“Circumcised infants showed a stronger pain response to subsequent routine vaccination than uncircumcised infants”).

PollHammond2012unpublished. Available from the author.

Van HoweR. S. (Van Howe, Meatal Stenosis), “Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting”, Clin . Pediatr. 2006; 45(1): 4954.

18 U.S.C. Ch. 7 Sec. 116.

42 usc 42 usc § 1396a(a)(10)(C).

44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A) (“provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register”).

AdlerPeter W. (Adler Legal) “Is Circumcision Legal?” 16 Rich. J.L. & Pub. Int. 43983 (2013).

AdlerPeter W. (Adler Medicaid) “Is it lawful to use Medicaid to pay for circumcision?19 J. Law. Med. 33553 (2011).

ama Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 8.03 Conflicts of Interest: Guidelines.

American Academy of Ophthalmology Advisory Opinion of the Code of Ethics Unnecessary Surgery and Related Procedures (2008): http://www.aao.org/about/ethics/upload/Unnecessary-Surgery-2008.pdf.

American Academy of Pediatrics Informed Consent Parental Permission and Assent in Pediatric Practice (aap Informed Consent) 95 Pediatrics 314 315 (1995).

arc Judgments and Settlements. See <http://arclaw.org/resources/settlements>.

Armstrong v. State 989 P.2d 364 (Mont. 1999).

DoeBeal v. 432 us 438 (1977).

BrigmanWilliam E.Circumcision as Child Abuse: The Legal and Constitutional Issues” 23 J. Fam. Law. 337 (1985).

Burden of Proof. See generally: http://www.trans-lex.org/966000.

cdc Mission Role and Pledge: http://www.cdc.gov/about/organization/mission.htm.

AffidavitDiekema Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum of Law Superior Court of Washington in and for Jefferson County (Diekema Affidavit) (18 January 2006) (available from the author).

Diekema et al. Clinical Ethics in Pediatrics A Case-Based Textbook (2011) (Diekema Clinical Ethics).

EarpB. (Earp Critique of the cdc) “Do the Benefits of Male Circumcision Outweigh the Risks? A Critique of the Proposed cdc Guidelines” Front in Pediatr 2015; 3: 18 (2015). doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00018: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc4364150/.

First Amendment and Religion. See generally: http://www.uscourts.gov/educational -resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-and-religion.

Executive Order 13563. Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review (18 January 2011).

German Case. Landgericht Köln; 7 May 2012; Urteil Ns 169/11.

HeymanS.The First Duty of Government: Protection, Liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment” 41 Duke L.J. 507 (1991); Equal protectionLegal Information InstituteCornell University Law School.

hhs Guidelines for cdc. hhs Information Quality Web Site Guidelines for Ensuring the Quality of Information Disseminated to the Public D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.aspe.hhs.gov/infoquality/guidelines/cdcinfo2.shtml.

MerkelR.PutzkeJ. (Merkel Criminal Assault) J. Med. Ethics, “After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?British Medical Journal (4 June 2013).

New Hampshire Criminal Statute. New Hampshire rsa 167:61-a (‘1. It is a felony crime when a Medicaid provider—with intent to defraud—2. Submits a false claim for payment; submits a claim for a good or service that was not medically necessary according to professionally recognized standards.’).

omb Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (omb Quality Bulletin): http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf.

MassachusettsPrince v. 321 U.S. 158 (1944).

Royal Dutch Medical Association Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors (2010): http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Publicaties/knmgpublicatie/Nontherapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-2010.htm.

Schweiker v. Hogan 457 us 569 at 573 (1982) citing 42 usc 42 usc § 1396a(a)(10)(C).

Svoboda et al. (Svoboda Fatal Flaws) “Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest aap policy report on neonatal circumcisionJ. Med Ethics (2013) (a critique of the similar 2012 aap circumcision policy statement).

SvobodaJ. (Svoboda Human Rights) “Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violationJ. Med. Ethics 2013;39:469474 doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101229.

Svoboda et al. (Svoboda Unethical and Unlawful) “Circumcision is Unethical and Unlawful, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (accepted for publication in 2016 after peer review).

Tortorella v. Castro 140 Cal.App.4th 1 43 Cal.Rptr.3d 853 Cal.App. 2 Dist. (2006).

Union Pacific Railway Company v. Botsford 141 U.S. 250 (1891).

bbc News. German court rules circumcision is ʻbodily harm’ bbc News 26 June 2012: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-18604664.

Papal Bull. Pope Eugene iv The Council of Florence (A.D. 1438–1445) From Cantate Domino – Papal Bull of Pope Eugene iv (16 March 2005).

unaidsMale circumcision Global trends and determinants of prevalence safety and acceptabilityunaids.

Washington Times:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/15/circumcision -proposal-by-cdc-drawing-detractors/.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5 5 2
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0