Theorising Children’s Rights and Child Welfare Paradigms

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

By employing the principles and standards of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (crc), this paper explores the significance and implications of children’s rights for child welfare, with a specific focus on theoretical paradigms of practice. Reform discussions in child welfare scholarship often have centred on deficiencies in the Anglo-American child protection paradigm associated with liberal welfare states. Alternative paradigms are contrasted, most notably the family service approach to child welfare generally found in Nordic, social democratic welfare states. Whilst the crc supports a family service paradigm, the paper highlights disturbing tendencies in reform discussions that are traceable to theoretical roots in the widely adopted and referenced Esping-Andersen/Gilbert classifications of cultures and child welfare paradigms. Whilst the classifications have proven to be useful, the paper explores the need for a more nuanced and complex characterisation of cultures and paradigms, to avoid misunderstandings and conceptual confusion. In particular, children’s rights often are associated only with liberal welfare states and child protection paradigms, and therefore adopting a family service paradigm is conceptualised as moving away from a children’s rights or child protection focus. In fact, a children’s rights framework for child welfare would establish provision, protection and participation as equal and interrelated priorities, whilst still emphasising the importance of a child-centred analysis.

Theorising Children’s Rights and Child Welfare Paradigms

in The International Journal of Children's Rights

Sections

References

An-Na’imA. A. (ed.) Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press2011).

An-Na’imA.Cultural Transformation and Normative Consensus on the Best Interests of the ChildInternational Journal of Law and the Family 8 (1994): 6281.

AlcockP. and CraigG. (2nd Executive Director.) International Social Policy: Welfare Regimes in the Developing World (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan2009).

AlstonP. and GoodmanR. International Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press2013).

AndersenJ. G.GuillemardA.JensenPer H. and Pfau-EffingerB.The Changing Face of Welfare. Consequences and outcomes from a citizenship perspective (Bristol: The Policy Press2005).

AnderssonG. Child and Family Welfare in Sweden in Freymond N. and Cameron G. Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Toronto: University of Toronto Press2006): 171190.

BronfenbrennerU.Ecological Systems Theory. Annals of Child Development6 (1989):187249.

CameronG.CoadyN. and AdamsG.Moving Toward Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press2007).

ClapmanA.Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press2007).

ConwayJ.The Canadian Family in Crisis (Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Ltd.2003).

CovellK. and HoweR. B.The Challenge of Children’s Rights for Canada (Waterloo, on: Wilfrid Laurier University Press2001).

CovellK. and HoweR. B.Children Families and Violence: Challenges for Children’s Rights (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers2009).

DanielP. and IvattsJ.Children and Social Policy (London: Macmillan1998).

DonnellyJ.Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice3 rd edn. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press2013).

EichlerM.Family Shifts: Families Policies and Gender Equality (Toronto: Oxford University Press1997).

Esping-AndersenG.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (London: Polity Press1990).

EydalG. B. and SatkaM.Social Work and Nordic Welfare Policies for Children – Present Challenges in the Light of the PastEuropean Journal of Social Work9 (3) (2006): 305322.

GilbertN. (ed.) Combatting Child Abuse: International Perspectives and Trends (Oxford: Oxford University Press1997).

GilbertN.PartonN. and SkivenesM. (eds.) Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations (Oxford: Oxford University Press2011).

GoodyerA.Child-Centred Foster Care: A Rights-Based Model for Practice (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers2011).

GornickJ. and MeyersM.Creating Gender Egalitarian Societies: An Agenda for Reform”Politics and Society36 (3) (2008): 313349.

HammarbergT.The un Convention on the Rights of the Child – and How to Make It WorkHuman Rights Quarterly12 (1990): 97105.

HetheringtonR.CooperA.SmithP. and WilfordG.Protecting Children: Messages from Europe (Dorset: Russell House Publishing Limited1997).

HetheringtonR.Learning from Difference: Comparing Child Welfare Systems” in FreymondN. and CameronG.Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Toronto: University of Toronto Press2006): 2750.

HetheringtonR. and NurseT.Promoting Change from ‘Child Protection’ to ‘Child and Family Welfare’: The Problems of the English System” in Freymond N. and Cameron G. Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Toronto: University of Toronto Press2006): 5383.

HoweR. B.Implementing Children’s Rights in a Federal State: The Case of Canada’s Child Protection System”International Journal of Children’s Rights9 (2001): 361382.

HoweR. B. and CovellK. (eds.) Children’s Rights in Canada: A Question of Commitment (Waterloo, on: Wilfrid Laurier University Press2007).

KufeldtK.Inclusive Foster Care: Implementation of The Model” in McKenzieB.Current Perspectives on Foster Family Care for Children and Youth (Toronto: Wall and Emerson1994): 84100.

LeiraA.Updating the ‘Gender Contract’? Childcare Reforms in the Nordic Countries in the 1990snora2 (10) (2002): 8189.

MacphersonC. B.The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press1977).

McDougallD.Children’s Rights: An Evaluation of the Controversy” in Levitt K. and Wharf B. The Challenge of Child Welfare (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press1985): 266275.

MorganK.The Political Path to a Dual Earner/Dual Carer Society: Pitfalls and PossibilitiesPolitics and Society36 (3) (2008): 403420.

oecdSociety at a Glance 2011: oecd Social Indicators (Paris: oecd Publishing2011).

PatemanC.The Disorder of Women (Cambridge: Polity Press1989).

PlougN. “The Nordic Child Care Regime – History, Development and ChallengesChildren and Youth Services Review34 (2012): 517522.

RawlsJ.A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press1971).

ShestackJ. J.The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights”Human Rights Quarterly 20 (1998): 201234.

SkevikA.The State – Parent – Child Relationship After Family Break-Ups: Child Maintenance in Norway and Britain” in FloraP. et al. (eds.) The State of Social Welfare (Aldershot: Ashgate1998).

SkevikA.Children of the Welfare State: Individuals with Entitlements, or Hidden in the Family?Journal of Social Policy32 (3) (2003): 423440.

SpitzD. (ed.) On Liberty: John Stuart Mill. A Norton Critical Edition (New York: W. W. Norton & Company1975).

Strong-BoagV.Getting to Now: Children in Distress in Canada’s Past” in Wharf B. Community Work Approaches to Child Welfare (Peterborough, Broadview Press2002): 2946.

TwiningW. (ed.) Human Rights Southern Voices: Francis Deng Abdullahi An-Na’im Yash Ghai and Upendra Baxi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009).

unicefConvention on the Rights of the Child – Frequently Asked Questions (2005): http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30229.html.

unicef Office of Research “Child Well-being in Rich Countries: A Comparative OverviewInnocenti Report Card 11 (Florence: unicef Office of Research2013).

United Nations General Assembly u.n. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) Document: a/res/44/25.

United Nations General Assembly Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children (2010) Document: a/res/64/142.

United Nations Treaty CollectionConvention on the Rights of the Child (1989): https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&lang=en.

WaldockT.The Rights of Children in Care: Consistency With the Convention?” in HoweR. B. and CovellK. (eds.) Children’s Rights in Canada: A Question of Commitment (Waterlooon: Wilfrid Laurier University Press2007): 287319.

WaldockT.Enhancing the Quality of Care in Child Welfare: Our Obligation under the un Convention on the Rights of the Child”Relational Child and Youth Care Practice24 (3) (2011): 5061.

WaldockT.Apologize … For Goodness Sake: Canada’s ‘Home Children’ and Our History of Discrimination Against Marginalised ChildrenRelational Child and Youth Care Practice25 (2) (2012): 6975.

YoungS.McKenzieM.SchjelderupL.MoreC. and WalkerS.What Can We Do to Bring the Sparkle Back into this Child’s Eyes? Child Rights/Community Development Principles: Key Elements for a Strengths-based Child Protection Practice”. Child Care in Practice20 (1) (2014): 135152.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 22 22 11
Full Text Views 10 10 9
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0