Bettering the Best Interests of the Child Determination: Of Checklists and Balancing Exercises

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The paper compares European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and uk court judgments on cross-border nationality cases concerning children and wholly domestic family law cases regarding children (without the cross-border element). It identifies different legal standards that apply to the well-being of children such as the best interests principle and the welfare principle and maps how successful these standards are in bringing in the views of children. It appears that cross-border nationality cases are unable to consider the interests of children as seriously as the wholly domestic family law cases. The domestic court approach of welfare brings in children’s views more effectively than nationality cases in domestic courts or at the ECtHR. It would benefit children if a rigorous best interests determination is carried out in nationality proceedings and a welfare approach is adopted consistent with family law cases.

Bettering the Best Interests of the Child Determination: Of Checklists and Balancing Exercises

in The International Journal of Children's Rights

Sections

References

Abrams K. (2006) “Immigration status and the best interests of the child standard”Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law14(1) 87.

Arthur R. (2010) “Protecting the best interests of the child: A comparative analysis of the youth justice systems in Ireland, England and Scotland”The International Journal of Children’s Rights18(2) 217231.

Carr B.A. (2009) “Incorporating a ‘best interests of the child’ approach into immigration law and procedureYale Human Rights and Development Law Journal Spring.

Dalrymple J.K. (2006) “Seeking asylum alone: Using the best interests of the child principle to protect unaccompanied minors”Boston College Third World Law Journal26131.

Eekelaar J. (1986) “The emergence of children’s rights”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies6(2) 161182.

Eekelaar J. (2015) “The role of the best interests principle in decisions affecting children and decisions about children”The International Journal of Children’s Rights23(1) 326.

Fernando M. (2014) “Family law proceedings and the child’s right to be heard in Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Canada”Family Court Review52(1) 4659.

Freeman M. (1997) “The best interests of the child? Is the best interests of the child in the best interests of children?”, International Journal of Law Policy and the Family11(3) 360388.

Giner C. (2007) “The politics of childhood and asylum in the ukChildren & Society21(4) 249260.

Glen P. (2012) “The removability of non-citizen parents and the best interests of citizen children: How to balance competing imperatives in the context of removal proceedings”Berkeley Journal of International Law30134.

Green B.A. and Dohrn B. (1995) “Foreword: Children and the ethical practice of law”Fordham Law Review641281.

Haugli T. and Shinkareva E. (2012) “The best interests of the child versus public safety interests: State interference into family life and separation of parents and children in connection with expulsion/deportation in Norwegian and Russian law”International Journal of Law Policy and the Family26(3) 351377.

James A. (2007) “Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials”American Anthropologist109(2) 261272.

Kelly J.B. (1997) “The best interests of the child”Family Court Review35(4) 377387.

Kjørholt A.T. (2008) “Children as new citizens: In the best interests of the child?” in European Childhoods (pp. 1437) London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kohm L.M. (2007) “Tracing the foundations of the best interests of the child standard in American jurisprudence”Journal of Law & Family Studies10337.

Littlechild B. (2000) “Children’s rights to be heard in child protection processes – law, policy and practice in England and WalesChild Abuse Review9(6) 403415.

Lundy L. (2007) “‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”British Educational Research Journal33(6) 927942.

Masson J. (2000) “Representation of children in England: Protecting children in child protection proceedings”Family Law Quarterly34(3) 467495.

McNamee S. James A. and James A. (2005) “Family law and the construction of childhood in England and Wales” in Goddard J. McNamee S. James A. and James A. (eds.) The Politics of Childhood (pp. 226244). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 11
Full Text Views 9 9 7
PDF Downloads 4 4 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0