Challenging Competency and Capacity?

Due Weight to Children’s Views in Family Law Proceedings

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Galvanised by the un Convention on the Rights of the Child, many jurisdictions have introduced or strengthened children’s rights to participate in family law proceedings. Yet, the research and legal literature continues to show difficulties in implementation. According to the literature, decisions makers frequently view children as insufficiently competent or lacking in capacity to participate in proceedings or for much weight to be given to the children’s views. This article unpicks the concepts of competence and capacity, both in relevant literature and reported case law from Scotland. The article asks three questions: What are meant by competence and capacity? How are they used? Do the concepts enhance or detract from children’s participation rights? The article finds that competence is often casually used in the literature, alternative terms are used in reported case law (such as maturity), and judging capacity remains problematic in both law and practice. The article concludes that both concepts detract from children’s participation rights, as the concepts suggest competence and capacity are inherent to the child rather than contextual and relational. If the concepts were to be used, they should be subject to more critique and precise definition. However, children’s participation rights are more likely to be furthered by alternatives, such as fresh ideas about recognising and supporting people’s legal capacity within the un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Challenging Competency and Capacity?

Due Weight to Children’s Views in Family Law Proceedings

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Sections
References
  • Alderson P. Children’s Consent to Surgery (Buckingham: Open University Press1993).

  • Alston P. The Best Interests Principle: Towards a reconciliation of culture and human rights” in Alston P. (ed.) The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling culture and human rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arstein-Kerslake A. An empowering dependency: exploring support for the exercise of legal capacity”Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 2016 (18(1)) 7792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bala N. Birnbaum R. and Cyr F. Judicial Interviews in Canada’s Family Courts: Growing acceptance but still controversial” in Gal T. and Faedi Duramy B. (eds.) International Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Child Participation (Oxford: Oxford University Press2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes L. ‘Moral actors in their own right’: consideration of the views of children in family proceedingsScots Law Times 2008 (21) 139142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ben-Arieh A. Casas F. Frønes I. and Korbin J.E. (eds.) Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories Methods and Policies in Global Perspective (London: Springer2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Birnbaum R. and Saini M. A scoping review of qualitative studies on the voice of the child in child custody disputes”Childhood 2012 (20(2)) 260282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bjarnadóttir R. Modern adolescents’ leisure activities: A new field for education?”Young Nordic Journal of Youth Research 2004 (12(4)) 42994315. doi: 10.1177/1103308804046715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development (Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press1979).

  • Chawla L. and Heft H. Children’s Competence and the Ecology of Communities”Journal of Environmental Psychology 2002 (22) 201216. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2002.0244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cobb J. Seen but not heard?”Family Law 2015 (45(Feb)) 144157.

  • Donaldson M. Children’s Minds (London: Fontana1978).

  • Douglas G. New families, new governance: international perspectives on hearing and listening in family regulation”Family Law 2013 (43(5)) 559563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eaton D. and Jarmain S. Parental alienation: surely the time has come to effect change?Family Law 2016 (May) 581585.

  • Eekelaar J. The interests of the child and the child’s wishes: The role of dynamic self-determinismInternational Journal of Law and the Family 1994 (8(1)) 4261.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farrell A. Kagan S.L. and Tisdall E.K.M. Early Childhood Research: an expanding field” in Farrell A. Kagan S.L. and Tisdall E.K.M. (eds.) The sage Handbook of Early Childhood Research (London: Sage2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fortin J. Adolescent autonomy and parents” in Children’s Rights and the Developing Law 3rd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freeman M.D.A. (ed.) Law and Childhood Studies Current Legal issues Vol. 14. (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

  • Freeman M.D.A. The Rights and Wrongs of Children (London: Pinter1983).

  • Griffiths A.M.O. Fotheringham J.M. and McCarthy F. Family Law (Edinburgh: W. Green2013).

  • Hale M. Listening to children: are we nearly there yet?Family Law 2016 (March) 320329.

  • Henaghan M. Why Judges Need to Know and Understand Childhood Studies” in Freeman M.D.A. (ed.) Law and Childhood Studies Current Legal issues Vol. 14. (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hendrick H. Constructions and Reconstructions of British Childhood” in James A. and Prout A. (eds.) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood (London: Routledge1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hinton R. Children’s Participation and Good Governance: limitations of the theoretical literature”International Journal of Children’s Rights 2008 (16(3)) 285300. doi: 10.1163/157181808X311141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holzscheiter A. Children’s Rights in International Politics: The Transformative Power of Discourse (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • James A. and James A. Key Concepts in Childhood Studies (London: Sage2008).

  • James A. Jenks C. and Prout A. Theorizing Childhood (Cambridge: Polity Press1998).

  • Kohlberg L. The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages Essays on Moral Development Volume 2 (New York City: Harper & Row1984).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lansdown G. The Evolving Capacities of the Child (Florence: unicef Innocenti Research Centre 2005).

  • Le Borgne C. Implementing Children’s Participation at the Community Level: The Practices of Non-Governmental Organisations (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ljungdalh A.K. A Review of Practical reasoning in Child and Youth Research”Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2016 (60(5)) 554575. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2015.1062415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lundy L. and McEvoy L. Childhood, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and Research: What Constitutes a ‘Rights-Based’ Approach?” in Freeman M.D.A. (ed.) Law and Childhood Studies Current Legal issues Vol. 14. (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mackay K. Hearing children in contact disputescrfr Briefing2013a: https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/6557/briefing%2065.pdf;jsessionid=34DC22EC1503E28F8E5ACAC8F0DEF332?sequence=1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mackay K. The treatment of the views of children in private law child contact disputes where there is a history of domestic abuse2013b: http://www.sccyp.org.uk/ufiles/views-of-children-and-domestic-abuse.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mair J. Wasoff F. and Mackay K. All Settled? Legally binding separation agreements and private ordering in family law in Scotlandcrfr briefing2013: http://www.crfr.ac.uk/assets/MinutesofAgreement20131.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall K. Tisdall E.K.M. Cleland A. with Plumtree A. ‘Voice of the Child’ under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995: giving due regard to children’s views in all matters that affect them Volume 1 – Mapping Paper (Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morrison F. Children Contact and Domestic Abuse (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh2014).

  • Morrison F. Tisdall E.K.M. Jones F. and Reid A. Child contact proceedings for children affected by domestic abuse2013: http://www.cypcs.org.uk/publications/domestic-abuse.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Munby J. Unheard voices: the involvement of children and vulnerable people in the family justice systemFamily Law 2015 (August) 895902.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parkes A. Implementation of Article 12 in Family Law Proceedings in Ireland and New Zealand” in Gal T. and Duramy B.F. (eds.) International Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Child Participation (Oxford: Oxford University Press2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peroni L. and Timmer A. Vulnerable Groups: the promise of an emergent concept in European Human Rights Convention Law”International Journal of Constitutional Law 2013 (11) 10561085.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piaget J. Origins of intelligence in the child ( London: Routledge & Kegan Paul1936).

  • Reid R. Children’s Rights: Radical Remedies for Critical Needs” in Asquith S. and Hill M. (eds.) Justice for Children (London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robinson A. and Henaghan M. Children: Heard but not listened to? An analysis of children’s views under s 6 of the Care of Children’s Act 2004”New Zealand Family Law Journal 2011 (7(2)) 3952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rogoff B. Cognition as a Collaborative Process” in Kuhn D. and Siefler R.S. (eds.) Handbook of Child Psychology Volume 2: Cognition perception and language (New York: Wiley1998).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rogoff B. Moore L. Najafi B. Dexter A. Correa-Chavez M. and J. Solis Children’s development of cultural repertoires through participation in everyday routines and practices” in Grusec J.E. and Hastings P.D. (eds.) Handbook of Socialization (New York: Guilford2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saini M. Johnston J.R. Fidler B.J. and Bala N. Empirical Studies of Alienation” in Kuehnle K. and Drozd L. (eds.) Parenting Plan Evaluations: Applied Research for the Family Court (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012) doi: 10.1093/med:psych/9780199754021.003.0013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schroeter K. Competence Literature Review2008: http://www.innovationlabs.com/research/pre/reading_materials/competence_lit_review.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scottish Courts and TribunalsReport of the Scottish Civil Courts Review – Volume 2 – Chapters 10 to 152009: https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/civil-courts-reform/report-of-the-scottish-civil-courts-review-vol-2-chapt-10---15.pdf?sfvrsn=4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scottish Law CommissionReport on the Legal Capacity and Responsibility of Minors and Pupils Scot Law Com No 110 (Edinburgh: hmso1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scottish Law CommissionReport on Family Law Scottish Law Com No 135 (Edinburgh: hmso1992).

  • Series L. Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms”International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2015 (40) 8091.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherwood-Johnson F. Constructions of ‘vulnerability’ in comparative perspective”Disability & Society 2013 (28(7)) 908921.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith A.B. Children’s Rights and Early Education: Links to theory and advocacy”Australian Journal of Early Childhood 2007 (32(3)) 18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sutcliffe K. Sutcliffe R. and Alderson P. Can very young children share in their diabetes care? Ruby’s story”Paediatric Nursing 2004 (16(10)) 2426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomson J. Family Law in Scotland 7th edn. (Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury2014).

  • Tisdall E.K.M. Children (Scotland) Act 1995 (Edinburgh: hmso1997).

  • Tisdall E.K.M. Subjects with Agency: Children’s participation in family law proceedings”Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2016a (38(4)) 362379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tisdall E.K.M. Conceptualising children and young people’s participation: examining vulnerability, social accountability and co-production”International Journal of Human Rights 2016b (21(1)) 5975: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1248125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tisdall E.K.M. and Morrison F. Children’s Participation in Court Proceedings when Parents Divorce or Separate” in Freeman M.D.A. (ed.) Law and Childhood Studies Current Legal issues Vol. 14. (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the ChildGeneral Comment No. 12 The right of the child to be heard2009: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/CRC-C-GC-12.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the ChildGeneral Comment No. 14 on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration2013: http://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/crc/docs/GC/CRC_C_GC_14_ENG.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with DisabilitiesGeneral Comment No. 1 Article 12: Equal recognition before the law2014: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/031/20/PDF/G1403120.pdf?OpenElement.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Statistics DivisionUnited Nations Demographic Yearbook 2014Sixty-fifth issue2016: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whitecross R.W. Research findings for scoping study of the commissioning preparation and use of court reports in the Child Welfare Hearing system in the Sheriff Courts2011: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/01/18132523/1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilkinson A.B. and Norrie K. The Law Relating to Parent and Child in Scotland (3rd edn.) (Edinburgh: Scottish Universities Law Institute2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 282 258 20
Full Text Views 235 235 5
PDF Downloads 94 94 4
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0