Age is Just a Number? Supporting Migrant Young People with Precarious Legal Status in the UK
In: The International Journal of Children's RightsSearch for other papers by Devyani Prabhat in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ann Singleton in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Robbie Eyles in
Current site
Google Scholar
This paper challenges the focus on age 18 as an exclusionary point in law for migrant young people, particularly unaccompanied migrants, with insecure legal status. Initially meant to provide a protective category of “childhood” in law, focus on age 18 creates a sharp transition point in law for young people. This chronological concept of age does not match up with the reality of lives of many young people who step into adulthood without being able to live in a self-supporting manner. Law recognises the constraints and provides some respite for British national children who are in care; however, non-UK migrant and/or asylum-seeking young people in this situation are immediately at risk of losing their liberty. We suggest that non-British migrant young people aged 18–21 should be treated as a youth category in a manner similar to that used for British young people in care.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Arendt H. (1973), The Origins of Totalitarianism, revised edn., New York: Harcourt.
-
Benhabib S. (2005), “The Right to Have Rights in Contemporary Europe”, New Haven CT: Yale University: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.538.1742&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
-
Bernstein R.J. (2005), “Hannah Arendt on the Stateless”, Parallax 11(1): 46–60.
-
Besson S. (2005), The International Journal of Children’s Rights 13: 433–461.
-
Bhabha J. (2004), “More Than their Share of Sorrows”, Kate Halvorsen, Asylum Decisions on Child Applicants: Report on 4-Country Pilot Project Oslo, Norwegian Government, 40.
-
Bhabha J. (2009), “Arendt’s Children: Do Today’s Migrant Children Have a Right to Have Rights?”, Human Rights Quarterly 31: 410–451.
-
Bicocchi Luca and LeVoy Michele (2008), Undocumented Children in Europe: Invisible Victims of Immigration Restrictions, Brussels: PICUM.
-
Bigo Didier (2014), “The (In)securitization Practices of the Three Universes of EU border control: Military/Navy – Border Guards/Police – Database Analysts”, Security Dialogue 45(3): 209–225.
-
Blitz. Brad K. and Otero-Iglesias Miguel (2011), “Stateless by Any Other Name: Refused Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37: 657–673.
-
Bloch Alice (2014), “Living in Fear: Rejected Asylum Seekers Living as Irregular Migrants in England”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40(10): 1507–1525.
-
Canning V. (2017), Gendered Harm and Structural Violence in the British Asylum System, Oxon: Routledge.
-
Chase E. , Knight A. and Statham J. (2008), The Emotional Wellbeing of Unaccompanied Young People Seeking Asylum in the UK, London: British Association of Adoption and Fostering.
-
Coram Children’s Legal Centre (2017), “Migrant Children’s Project FACT SHEET: The Age Assessment Process”, March, Colchester: Coram Children’s Legal Centre.
-
Coram Children’s Legal Centre (2017), “Legal Aid and Exceptional Case Funding”, May, Colchester: Coram Children’s Legal Centre.
-
Courtney M.E. and Hook J.L. (2017), “The Potential Educational Benefits of Extending Foster Care to Young Adults: Findings from a Natural Experiment”, Children and Youth Services Review 72: 124–132.
-
Crawley Heaven (2007), When is a Child not a Child? Asylum, Age Disputes and the Process of Age Assessment, May, London: ILPA Report.
-
Crawley Heaven (2011), “‘Asexual, Apolitical Beings’: The Interpretation of Children’s Identities and Experiences in the UK Asylum System”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37(8): 1171–1184 doi: .10.1080/1369183X.2011.590645
-
Department for Education (2017), Applying Corporate Parenting Principles to Care and Pathway Planning: Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities, London: Department for Education: http://reescentre.education.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ESRC-seminar-Migrant-Children-Foster-Care-report.pdf.
-
Department for Education and Department of Health (2015), Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0 to 25 Years, January: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/398815/SEND_Code_of_Practice_January_2015.pdf.
-
De Zwart F. (2005), “The Dilemma of Recognition: Administrative Categories and Ethnic Diversity”, Theory and Society 34(2): 137–169.
-
Eastmond Marita and Ascher Henry (2011), “In the Best Interest of the Child? The Politics of Vulnerability and Negotiations for Asylum in Sweden”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37(8): 1185–1200.
-
Federle Katherine Hunt (1993), “On the Road to Reconceiving Rights for Children: A Postfeminist Analysis of the Capacity Principle”, Depaul Law Review 42(3): 983–1028.
-
Finch Nadine (2011), “Return of Separated Children to Countries of Origin” in Safeguarding Children from Abroad: Refugee, Asylum Seeking and Trafficked Children in the UK, eds. Emma Kelly and Farhat Bokhari, London: Jessica Kingsley.
-
Freeman M. (1992), “Introduction: Rights, Ideology and Children”, in The Ideologies of Children’s Rights, eds. Freeman M. and Veerman P. , London: Martinus Nijhoff.
-
Frijhoff W. (2012), “Historian’s Discovery of Childhood”, Paedagogica Historica: International Journal of the History of Education 48(1): 11–29.
-
Full Fact (2018), “How many child asylum seekers are found to be adults?” 24 April: https://fullfact.org/immigration/how-many-child-asylum-seekers-are-found-be-adults/.
-
gdwg (Gatwick Detainees Welfare Group) (2017), Don’t Dump Me in a Foreign Land, Crawley: GDWT: https://gdwg.org.uk/app/uploads/2018/04/youngarrivers-online-1.pdf.
-
Giner C. (2007), “The politics of Asylum and Childhood in the UK”, Children and Society 21: 249–260.
-
Goldson G. (2002), “New Labour, Social Justice and Children: Political Calculation and the Deserving – Undeserving Schism”, British Journal of Social Work 32: 683–695.
-
Griffiths Melanie (2015), “‘Here, Man Is Nothing!’ Gender and Policy in an Asylum Context”, Men and Masculinities 18 (4):468–488.
-
Grossman Lewis A. (2008), “Food, Drugs, and Droods: A Historical Consideration of Definitions and Categories in American Food and Drug Law”, Cornell Law Review 93(5): 1091–1148.
-
Hann M. (2013), “Recognising Recognition: Hannah Arendt on the (Right to Have) Rights”, paper presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, Cardiff, 23–25 March.
-
Hart Jason (2006), “Saving Children: What Role for Anthropology?”, Anthropology Today 22 (1): https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2006.00410.x.
-
Home Office (2007), Planning Better Outcomes and Support for Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children, Consultation Paper, February, London: Immigration and Nationality Directorate:http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/229/1/1505-3790.pdf.
-
Home Office (2018), Assessing Age, London: Home Office: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/683907/assessing-age-v1.0ext.pdf.
-
House of Lords European Union Committee (2016), Children in Crisis: Unaccompanied migrant children in the EU, HL Paper 34, London: House of Lords.
-
Humphris R. and Sigona N. (2017), “Outsourcing the ‘Best Interests’ of Unaccompanied Asylum-seeking Children in the Era of Austerity”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studiesdoi: .10.1080/1369183X.2017.1404266
-
Judge Ruth (2010), Refugee Advocacy and the Biopolitics of Asylum in Britain: The Precarious Position of Young Male Asylum Seekers and Refugees, rsc Working Paper Series No. 60:17, Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre.
-
Kesby Alison (2012), The Right to Have Rights Citizenship, Humanity, and International Law, Oxford: OUP.
-
Kvittingen Anna Verley (2010), Negotiating Childhood: Age Assessment in the UK Asylum System, Working Paper. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre University: www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp67-negotiating-childhood-2010.pdf.
-
Krause M. (2008), “Undocumented Migrants: An Arendtian Perspective”, European Journal of Political Theory 7(3): 331–348.
-
Lansdown G. (2005), Innocenti Insight: The Evolving Capacities of the Child, Florence: Save the Children Sweden and UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
-
Lundberg Anna (2011), “The Best Interests of the Child Principle in Swedish Asylum Cases: The Marginalization of Children’s Rights”, Journal of Human Rights Practice 3(1): 49–70.
-
Mayall Berry (2000), “The Sociology of Childhood in Relation to Children’s Rights”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 8: 243–259.
-
McLaughlin Carly (2017), “‘They Don’t Look Like Children’: Child Asylum-seekers, the Dubs Amendment and the Politics of Childhood”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies .
-
Meloni F. and Chase E. (2017), “Transitions into institutional adulthood”, Becoming Adult Research Brief No. 4. London: ucl: www.becomingadult.net.
-
Osgood D. Wayne , Foster E. Michael and Courtney Mark E. (2002), “Vulnerable Populations and the Transition to Adulthood”, Future of Children 20(1): 209–229.
-
Pottage R.A. and Mundy M. , eds. (2004), Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things, Cambridge: CUP.
-
Prabhat Devyani and Hambly Jessica C. (2017), “Bettering the Best Interests of the Child Determination: Of Checklists and Balancing Exercises”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 25(3–4): 754–778.
-
Rajaram P. (2002), “Humanitarianism and Representations of the Refugee”, Journal of Refugee Studies 15(3): 247–264.
-
Council Refugee (2017), “Age assessment guidance and information sharing guidance for uasc”, 18 August: http://adcs.org.uk/safeguarding/article/age-assessment-information-sharing-for-unaccompanied-asylum-seeking-childre.
-
Sawyer Susan M. , Azzopardi Peter S. , Wickremarathne Dakshitha and Patton George C. (2018), “The Age of Adolescence”, The Lancet, January 17: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1.
-
Sigona N.E. Chase and Humphris R. (2017), “Protecting the ‘Best Interests’ of the Child in Transition to Adulthood”, Becoming Adult Research Brief No. 3. London: UCL: www.becomingadult.net.
-
Singleton A. (2018), “Data: creating the empirical base for development of child migration policy and protection”, Chapter 22 in Jacqueline Bhabha, Jyothi Kanics, Daniel Senovilla Hernández (eds.), Research Handbook on Child Migration: 334–344, Edward Elgar Publishing.
-
Taylor Diane (2012), “£2m paid out over child asylum seekers illegally detained as adults”, The Guardian, February 17: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/feb/17/home-office-payout-child-asylum-seekers.
-
Thatun Susu and Heissler Karin (2013), “Children’s Migration: Towards a Multidimensional Child Protection Perspective” in Children on the Move, 95–105, Geneva: IOM.
-
Wade J. , Mitchell F. and Baylis G. (2005), Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children: The Response of Social Work Services, London: British Association of Adoption and Fostering.
-
Wade J.A. , Kohli Sirriyeh R. and Simmonds J. , J. (2012), Fostering Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Young People: Creating a Family Life across “a world of difference” , London: British Association of Adoption and Fostering, summary “Safeguarding Strategy Unaccompanied asylum seeking and refugee children” at: www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/research/pdf/FosterUAS.pdf.
-
Way T. (2009), “Trauma Narratives and the Discursive Construction of Alterity”, paper delivered at “Refugees: Lives Pushed to the Margins”, Sixth Annual Forced Migration Student Conference, University of East London, 25 April.
-
Williams Lucy . n.d., “The Mental Wellbeing of Young Former Unaccompanied Asylum-seeking Children in East Kent”, Final Report. Bexley: Mind.
-
Woodhead M. (1997), “Psychology and the Cultural Construction of Children’s Needs” in Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, James A. and Prout A. (eds.), 2nd edn. London: Falmer.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1638 | 146 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 259 | 39 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 385 | 82 | 2 |
Age is Just a Number? Supporting Migrant Young People with Precarious Legal Status in the UK
In: The International Journal of Children's RightsSearch for other papers by Devyani Prabhat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ann Singleton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robbie Eyles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This paper challenges the focus on age 18 as an exclusionary point in law for migrant young people, particularly unaccompanied migrants, with insecure legal status. Initially meant to provide a protective category of “childhood” in law, focus on age 18 creates a sharp transition point in law for young people. This chronological concept of age does not match up with the reality of lives of many young people who step into adulthood without being able to live in a self-supporting manner. Law recognises the constraints and provides some respite for British national children who are in care; however, non-UK migrant and/or asylum-seeking young people in this situation are immediately at risk of losing their liberty. We suggest that non-British migrant young people aged 18–21 should be treated as a youth category in a manner similar to that used for British young people in care.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1638 | 146 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 259 | 39 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 385 | 82 | 2 |